Recent Posts
18,590 posts(s) found
Considering I won every match with England since being hired and my goal in the WC was to reach the Semi Finals (at least that’s what I recall…), why was I fired from England?
I don’t mind, would probably leave the team any way, I am asking more out of curiosity…
PS: Once I was fired from Belgium for losing in the first match, although my goal was only to “improve the squad”, which I read as “we won’t fire you no matter what!”…
I use my PC and like it in general. I’d like to see full names as well (if possible) and also to rank players by age
Also, when we go to the TL, we could be directed straight to the TL instead of having to select TL/Loans/FT – one less click!
Hi, I’ve been looking at buying players and noticed the transfer list is hard to look at. I think this should be one of key parts of the game.
It used to be better but since we have the new layout style it’s completely changed.
Some ideas:
Bring back both player names
Shrink the text so more fits in?
Or remove some skills, like some of the secondary ones.
I use my iPhone to play this game so I’m not sure if others have this issue.
Cheers
Selling some good veterans @ Sportivo Luqueno to open space for youngsters. Take a look!
Ivan Amiama: D L, Tac 93, Pas 85
Bruno Mota: D C, Tac 94, Pas 84
Álvaro Ribeiro: MD R, Tac 79 Pas 94
Osório Leite: M RC, Pas 87 Sho 87
http://rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/617313
http://rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/594768
http://rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/598848
http://rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/587618
It’s been a while but happened again. Not sure if it’s the same thing, I’ll have a look soon.
Well, it was you’re turn to win CL this season so I knew you would kick me out. :-D lol
Got it – I had some other offers outstanding. Not a bug then!
You get this message when the sum of the new offer you’re trying to make with all the existing transfer offers you have is greater than your transfer budget. Let me know if that’s not the case and we’ll investigate.
New potential bug (not sure if it is one):
I keep getting messages from my board that “your offer is too high” when making unsolicited offers for human team’s players
This is happening in both worlds. Most recently, on Fast, I got this when bidding $6m for a player with estimated value of $3m. The player is 20ys old so I think the offer is totally justifiable. I have +$50m in cash and +$15m in transfer budget. I also offered $35k in salary, the player currently makes $20k. Why is this happening?
It’s a known issue, that’s for sure! We randomly distribute first placed teams against second placed teams, without considering whether they were in the same group. In terms of international competitions we need to fix that and improve the country distribution in the group phase.
You guys should meet in the final as usual! :-(
Hi, I’ve just played Malaga in my group and now we play each other in the knock out straight after?? I’m scared I’m going to be knocked out! Must be a bug! Lol
Seems to be working fine now, thanks!
Btw, great initiative to allow mangers to make unsolicited offers – I can point to at least 3 big transactions that would not have happened otherwise. The market is much more active now!
I’ve sent you an in-game message on FastTicker to get more details.
Cheers
Yeah, didn’t make the players very smart on such decisions :-)
The weakest team tie breaker served two purposes: increase the chance of a player being played in official matches AND helping weaker teams.
Thanks for the explanation! My expectation of how the new training system would work and would impact players choices was different.
Especially for the players that can only improve this season by playing matches in the top 3 countries or in a country that’s at least ranked 3 positions higher then the players home country. I expected the player to be smart and to choose automatically for a club in one of these high ranked countries. Especially if the players home country is ranked already in top 10 for example.
Good to know you can’t leave this decision up to the players. That’s probably also the reason why you created the option to reduce the number of clubs. So at least as a manager you can influence the players choice by raising the bar for the variable that selects automatically the weakest team.
(Just for my understanding: you’ve probably created this ‘weakest team’ rule, to give weak clubs an option to improve as well)
I am getting the same error page basically every time I try to make an offer. More recently it happened when trying to make an offer for players of my former team, and a player currently loaned to me
The logic is highest wage percentage, then longest loan period, then weakest team bidding. In terms of improvement if he only needs to play matches he’ll improve equally fast in any team, otherwise it depends on what is the player requirement. Did you set up anything specific in your loan clauses such as team playing international competitions or from higher ranked countries?
Percebemos sim Pedro e vamos corrigir em breve. Como esse é um problema que afeta apenas uma tela pra quem usa o jogo em Português não demos prioridade alta para esse problema. O motivo por trás disso é que a mesma letra de abreviação é usada pra mais de uma coisa (D para draw e defender e L para loss e left) e essa tela acabou usando a tradução incorreta (D como defensor e E como esquerda ao invés de E para empate e D para derrota).
Abraço
What’s the logic behind the choice players make to join a club on loan? Now one of my players got the chance to join a club in the premier league of Spain/ Portugal and England. Much higher ranked leagues then the German league I’m in. Compared to the current players in their squads my player would definitely be part of the team and play matches. The experience of playing matches in one of the high ranked countries might even lead to some skill development. So why would this player choose for a club in Peru? A country that’s just a bit higher in rank than Germany.
Vocês ainda não perceberam que nas tabelas as siglas estão invertidas em português???
D = Empate
E = Derrota
Dá prá corrigir por favor
All you said is correct (the 35 minutes thing can be less, but that’s a safe number). Interesting suggestion, funny nobody thought about it for player development before morale was implemented. Well, I guess that’s because everybody played friendlies like crazy to develop their players before “training” came into the picture.
Anyway, added to our list! Let’s see if others have more improvement suggestions for the formation rules.
Doubling is fine, the restriction will remain there just to prevent some ludicrous values that would render a team useless too quickly.
If you say ‘replace x by y after minute 45 when ahead’ and the team scores 1-0 in minute 60, at that moment the substitution will take place, right? And for development or morale, a player needs to play at least 35 minutes in a match, correct?
If this is both correct, ‘after minute 45 before minute 55 when ahead’ would be nice.
I probably have too much money now to offer them? Lol I have little money but can double some players wages.
An MA or AM player can play without any penalties on any M or A position, so nothing to worry on that front. We leave it to the owner of the player to decide how he wants the player position to be presented and it mainly impacts in which list the player is displayed when building your formation. If we allowed the international squad manager to change it, then the player owner would see the position swapped, most likely against his/her will :-)
Not sure this is necessarily a bug, however, when managing an international side, you are unable to reallocate a player’s position. For example if they are a MAC for their club side that is how they are for the international side. When you click on the player, as an international manager you are not able to make them a AMC e.g. reverse their position.
I don’t know whether players get punished for playing out of position, despite the fact that technically it is a potential position that they can play at international level. Maybe something to have a think about?
Logic changed a bit, please let me know if things are still unmanageable.
I’ve realised players were now asking for exaggerated salary increases by considering teammates salaries. Even though they will continue to look for his teammates when asking for a new salary they will be less aggressive on their demands now. Also, the maximum wage allowed by the board now takes into account this smarter way players are asking for wages so you don’t end up losing players unnecessarily.
@Joseppi I was suspecting that was the case. I will have a look at your situation but I’m pretty sure I will have to review the board wage restriction, unless your finances are really bad. Maybe link the restriction to the suggested wage…
@Dirk players will not look at the wages of players who have more stars or are “better” than they are. I say “better” because I know the way the game calculates how good a player is does not always reflect the reality. But if you have a similar or worse player earning too much you can expect that to affect the wage asked by a player.
It’s a long weekend here in Australia, so I won’t promise to review the board logic in the next couple days as I’ll be out and about and about with my family.
Gabriel, how smart are the players? Do they look at players with similar skills or at wages in absolute numbers without taking skills into account.
I have a top earner with Mella but he’s one of the best players of fastticker and has a golden star season after season. A normal player can’t refer his wage to such a player.