Recent Posts
18,535 posts(s) found
Hy Danilo, I’m working with IE 6 and 10214 × 768 resolution and still don’t works. I’m trying in Firefox too but the same problems.
Sorry, this really cause me more time to arrange my team and I know your and Cesário is really busy. I’ll download IE 7 and let you know if it works.
Thanks
Regards
There is nothing to do with altruism ;-). When I find a player today, being “hard” as it is now, I have to fight for that player against 5 to eight other managers. If this file idea goes ahead, there will be even more managers trying to get the player.
If something should be done is to make it even harder to find a player… like dividing the search page of every country in pages of 10 players most. Adding more countries, increasing the delay of server response.
I`d like the day when it will be possible to find a player and don`t have to fight for him against a whole bunch of other managers.
It’s almost pure lucky. Almost because in the first round I pick only team in the second division…randomly :-)
In the future we can use a better criteria, like the one you mentioned. Sounds interesting.
talk about altruism :) but I think I agree with you. Lets see if we have more opinions/arguments here.
cheers!
Anything different for donators is wrong in my opinion. The game is either free entirely or payed. I would pay for this game, but while it is free, everything has to be equal for donators and non-donators.
Ok!
I imagined that you guys ‘d have some sort of club ranking.
But do you use it as a criterion to sort teams in nat’cups or something like that?
Is there a criterion to sort teams or it’s just pure lucky?
We were doing some performance tests, MediumTicker is back, FastTicker is 1 hour late but will be back to normal after next tick.
Cheers!
Hi,
so far no medium tick … after two attempts (16h, 17h – Portugal Time)
We already have a club ranking. We just dont show it to you guys yet :). But we will.
cheers!
You guys could create a club ranking, based on titles and league positions. It’d be nice to be used instead of sorting as a way to define national cup’s matches… just like it was in libertadores until 2006: the best club against the worse, the 2nd best against the 2nd worse… think about it!
Best!
Well, one possibility that I was talking to Gabriel about is to dedicate one of our access points to donators only. As for the game features, I agree that there should be nothing available to donators only.
We still have to study the possibility, but the only advantage would be the very fast access to the game. The idea is that the donator should at least have a quicker access to the game. What do you guys think about that?
cheers
Answering your question Polat, trades are not possible at the moment. We could add this option and require some kind of approval before the trade is completed, either by me and Danilo or by users with Dimension administrator rights (we’ll probably have something like that in the future).
Cheers!
trading shoulde be allowed amongst clubs and managers however as indicated the administrators should look at the fairness side and see if it is a real deal or just someone trying to cheat. it should be an option where u can go to the managers of each club and offer for their players with money or for a trade like a swap. obviously theres gotta be restrictions where u cannot offer a straight swap of a crap player for a star player but thats for people to give their options and decide what they think the restrictions and regulations should be…….cheeers
i would also like to make a suggestion my cousin who is the manager of arsenal used my ip adress once now we cant do nething. Anyway me and him would like to make a trade with two players which is completely fair. im giving him a defender 92 tac and his giving me a keeper with 93 kee i would like it if u had a trade page to make this possible.
Cheers…
I make it clear that I am completely, absolutely, entirely against the file idea, BUT
if it is NOT and advantage, than it should NOT be restricted to Donators or be available only by payment.
I think I know the reason…fixing that right away! Thanks for reporting.
Cheers!
Hi
Last season on medium I finally won something, Copa do Brasil. But for some reason I don´t appear on the winner table of that competion. Also, on my medium startup screen I don´t see the title there.
Thx
I don’t agree with files for donators, what I think is that it’s a good service to have the files as an extra paid service, available for anyone (paid).
It’s no advantage (what ruin!!!) to receive the files by mail instead of log in and copy/paste, except for the time, and time is money, this is a point where ruby can score some extra $, though I believe only 16 people might really be the target of the service…
Well ive been relegated becos i simply cannot get my team to score! I scored something like only 5 goals in the entire season and i tried every formation and tactics i could. Ive got a decent team but its got to the point were i dunno what to do anymore to get the team to score :(
I’m against this file idea, there should be no difference between donators and non donators, but if any file shoud be added, than everyone should have access to it. I also consider boring to search for players on this files. It would become very easy to find players.
Interesting suggestion, could work :-)
Donations public/private detailed information are now available. You can see your private info info by clicking on your username here in the forum. Sorry for the style, I hope you all understand why I did not want to waste too much time on this right now.
I think a page we could see all transfers made between same ip would be good, so we could analyse the correctness of the negotiation and if something weird happened, the managers involved could be punished and the negotiantion could be rolled back.
I don’t see any difference between a single file or a bunch o files. I think one file or any file would ruin the fun of findind a good player. By the way, I work all day long and can’t access from work either.
Scouts are the only way to go on this matter.
Well, players under their real value are not a problem, you’re right Hugo, we can let everybody bid for underpriced players, but when we talk about overpriced players the thing is a little bit different. We’ll find out a way to watch overpriced transfers between same ip managers and let the ones with a fair price or underpriced without any restrictions. Makes sense to me.
Cheers!
He was used as a goalie, at least on this match:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/36310
sorry, yahoo.
Saw this on google. Anybody know what it is?
In the portuguese league we have the same problem, about half the teams have managers working in the same place, or for the same company, we live with it since season 1 and it would be nice to trade with each other… And fair is not what you said, you probably know that we had a few overpower teams, they released a lot of players for 5K, free, whatever, with unrealistic wages, it would be fair for us to trade in these cases too.
Fair is to stay in negotiations minimum 3 ticks, and if a good player is sold under his real value, at least cpu teams should be in if not other managers :) everyone will have 3 ticks for that!
Cheers
I completely disagree with any kind of paid advantages to anyone. The trade offs should be in game, more money in game, scouts, rules to generate scout reports. That’s the way of a free game (if that is the way).
I believe we have server problems because too many new leagues were implemented at the same time, and now we have lots of free teams to overload the server, but that is another story. If we want to help, besides donating, advertise the game, more players, more donators too. (I know this is the hard way too… Sorry Danilo/Gabriel.)
The special delivery is a good idea too, pay to receive the transfer lists in your e-mail with schedules saves the time of coming in game and generate them, it’s not a real advantage, and gives you more money. As long as you send 8 files like the ones possible to generate in game with copy paste…
Cheers