Recent Posts
18,542 posts(s) found
Check this topic:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/forums/5/topics/378
The table for the divisions 1 and 2 of Brazil in the fast ticker are not correct. The number of victories and draws does not produce the number of points for the teams.
DrG
I find it difficult when a youth player asks for a contract to give him one or not when he has not improved yet. I know this is part of the game and everyone has probably the same problem but maybe you can give a hint if a player is a new talent or not. Then we know that we can expect big improvement or not. When there is a board they can do it perhaps. It’s only a suggestion.
looks good.
Hy, I’m having some troubles with card issues. It isn’t shown in the formation screen, only in the turn of the game. Could it be some bug?
i dont think those scores have much to do with the “cheat type” Dereck was performing. But, strong evidence found means punishment applied. This is our policy here.
cheers
Yes. It’s a good solution for now.
Thanks Gabriel and Danilo,
In the past I warned you to a possible Dereck cheats because he always win games by 30×2, 50×0 (Beta 2), problably he manage simultaniously this teams and improve one in detriment by the other. Now I’m very atempt to Cruzeiros manager (fast).
Thank you.
Sounds great!
Congrats for the decision!!! Keep up the comitment and the good work!
EDIT:
A question: Will you correct the league table counting the victories to the clubs? At the moment we have only the points added.
Cheers!
i will use this opportunity to repeat: we still dont have “the board”, so it is still not time to “test cheats” :).
regards
Dereck William Schilte will be punished on both dimensions. He was warned in the past but did it again. He managed Nautico, Fluminense and Ipatinga on FastTicker, Palmeiras, Boca Juniors and Manchester United on MediumTicker, he will be fired from all his teams and they’ll lose all points in the league. The teams who lost or draw with their teams will get the points.
I know he is probably not the only multiple account user we have, but we have enough evidence to punish him.
I think it would be a nice improvement.
That would be good. Not too easy, not too hard.
A great way to go until the system gets more complex.
Suggestion about player improvements:
-keepers: when he improves at least one point will be on keeping, passing or speed, the attributes that matter. Then he improves from 0 to 2 points on any other skill (including keeping, passing and speed)
-other players: when the player improves it will never be only on keeping, unless this is the only attribute left to improve.
What do you guys think?
I know I asked you not to comment on this topic, but is anyone against changing the stamina recovery back to 2 but reducing the amount lost from 4 to 3? This would be an intermediate solution.
That’s exactly how it works Ricardo, the problem is that non youth players were initially generated in the middle of their career, that’s why they already need a considerable number of matches to improve. 17 years old players start better than 16 years old players, that’s why they require a medium number of matches before improving while the younger ones require 1 or 2 in the beginning.
About keeper evolving other attributes and non-keepers evolving keeping I kinda agree with you Toni. Maybe I’ll remove keeping from non-keepers evolution and skills like dribble and shooting from keepers evolution, so they wouldn’t improve useless attributes, which makes sense.
I guess we have that on our list, at least links on in-game messages. Nice suggestion anyway :-)
Hugo’s approach is good …
3 for young players below 30 yro
2 for oldies 30yro and up
3
My suggestion would be to gradually decrease the player’s improvement time. Something like having a stat boost over the first 5-6 matches, then make him play like 5-10 matches to gain another stat, and on a third phase gain stats after each 15 match or so… but only on the ones that are born to be stars.
Sorry to raise this topic again if it is still too soon…
But anyway, around half a season now, around 20 matches played in most divisions.
I myself got a little worried as I took a look at my young (17y.) keeper, C.Tappin, that has played almost every match for me without getting much improvement.
I think he has played 16 league matches and 3 cup matches and has not gained any points to his keeping skill. Maybe a couple of points as a whole but dribble and shooting aren´t exactly what I was hoping for.
I am “lucky” now that I don´t have a better number one keeper so he has been able to play a lot. But unluckily, without results. If I had a better keeper, no 77-keeper would play half of the season, especially when no improvement.
And making players improve gets even more difficult when you get a little better team that can not afford losing many points and if friendlies don´t count as much as “real” matches.
I know I am one of the players most willing to keep the game challenging but even I think this is too tough now. Maybe adjusting it a little, maybe meeting us halfway? (compared to what it was)
Or is the player just total sh*t and lacks talent? Doesn´t have any potential left on his keeping skill? :D
Hope you find a nice solution with making it a little better but still keeping it challenging.
Cheers!
How about having links that send us directly into the related subject. For instance, why not have a link in match result mail that sends us directly into the report of that game. This is particularly useful when you’re checking on real e-mail.
3 for now.
If you consider that Ricardo (Académica) is in a big development team from the same company, you have to consider his disadvantage, as he cannot sell players to half of the portuguese teams :) even among ourselves we discuss the resell practice policy, some follow as you can see in the portuguese market and others don’t…
I believe a topic about player market regulation with time to players express themselves would be very participative, an ingame message to participate with ideas can only benefit the game. I have heard and have many. And all should remember that this situation is temporary, in the end of the season a huge amount of players will be available to all top players teams, and the remain players don’t spend the time necessary to complaint with Académicas…
3 to 28 years
2 to 29 or more…
I havent seen it. Thanks.
those of you who want to not see the results (see the ? wildcards instead) on the welcome screen will now have to go to your manager settings screen. i´ve changed the default because of the questions here.