Recent Posts
18,542 posts(s) found
I kinda agree with you Ricardo. They do develop faster in the beginning, maybe not fast enough in a few cases. But that fast initial period cannot be attached to the skills as you suggest, remember that in the future we’ll have countries where most players won’t reach high 70s/low 80s. :-)
In SS after they turned 19 they would never (ok, VERY rarely) improve another single point, and i used to find that really annoying.
I’m liking this new system, but it’s a lot harder to tell if a player is going to be good or not. I think they could maybe develop a bit faster in the beginning, until they reached high 70s/low 80’s. Aside from that, the system looks pretty nice. :)
Do you see they improve regularly (at least the 16 years old ones)? Every time they improve they will have to play the same number of matches needed for the previous improvement or more to improve again. The main ideia here is that a player usually won’t be at his best with 19 or 20 years old. If they were it would be easier to determine whether a player was worth buying as a promise or not.
I got your point, I used to play MS like you and the improvement system was a bit different. Hopefully ours will prove to be good as well over the seasons, specially with a few more adjustments.
Thanks for the feedback, it is very important to us!
Hi everybody!
I think it would be very useful a performance chart to see the progress our team had during the season. It could be displayed as a link in the table chart screen or something.
Thinking in a more advanced chart, it could have an option to choose 1 or more teams performance to be displayed in the graphic.
Thanks!!!
Lobba
I bought a couple of promising young players hoping that they would improve their skills during the season… specially if they played friendlies.
Well, they played a lot of matches but there was little or null improvement.
One thing is having a played that doesn’t play any matches so it’s logic that he will never get better. Another thing is a 16 or 17 year old player, with an average 65/70 in skills who plays regularly… this kind of player has to improve.
Don’t you agree?
Best regards,
Jorge Correia > Fast > Portugal > Division One > Naval
ok that sounds fair.
thanks
Manchester United was punished at a certain point due to a multiple account user, and the teams he had won or tied got the points lost until that date, but the wins, draws and losses record was not updated. That’s the reason :-)
Cheers.
In MediumTicker England, Reading and Middlesbrough have the same record 6-1-9, and Reading has 21 points, Middlesbrough only has 19 points which is the correct amount of points.
The limit is high enough to allow such wage Ricardo. We’ll have other limitations to help prevent this kind of situation, like a maximum number of players a team can have in the main squad, restrictions on free transfers when the team is low on money, minimum period before selling a player you’ve hired (I’ll work on this one first). I’m pretty sure these changes will improve the market significantly.
Cheers.
Nice suggestion, I’ll check if we have this one on our list, if we don’t I’ll add it.
Cheers.
I thought the board wasn’t allowing high wages anymore… but it must be a very high limit. I just saw a 400k estimated value player going from the free transfer list on a 32k wage. Either what the board allows must be lower, or there has to be some kind of action when the club’s balance goes negative, because we keep seeing this from the same managers, managers who have tons of players on their squad… it’s kinda unfair for the ones who try to play as all should, worrying about the finances.
Cheers
Agreed, good idea. Would be very useful when choosing the MOs.
It’s only a tiny change, but I think it’d be useful if on the Scheduled Matches screen the user could choose to display friendlies/league/cup/all games.
Ok Danilo, thank you!
We would fix this situation Stramazi, if we had history for that. Without history, there is no way for us to properly analyze what happened. Sorry again. But it is like you said: we will work prevent this and other bugs from happening in future.
cheers
You Should at least go back this transfer if this bug is detected.
I saw some others situations that even for the managers mistakes they request and you went back his mistakes!
But, anyway, your the developers, this is a Beta game, a free game and I have to be quite if I want to continue playing this! And I certain think you’re working hard to exterminate this situations!
It’s hard to loose a player with this caracterists due to a bug.
Thanks
Best Regards
Stramazi
We don’t have history yet, so things will stay as they are for now. Sorry :-(
Cheers.
Thanks Gabriel, please, take a look at the history and you’ll be sure of what I said.
If its a bug, this player will continue with this manager?
Cheers!
If the values are correct Stramazi it must be a bug. In the game, a player won’t choose a lower wage when both offers have the same length (3 seasons in your case). We need to store the transfer history in order to easily investigate this kind of problem.
I’m sorry for what have happened, I’ll review this logic anyway.
Cheers.
Still using this topic, please developer, can you tell me what happened with a negotiations between me and a player called “Manuel de Jesus” that was been selling by 6.000.000 and his wage was something around $ 52.000, I offered him $ 20.0000 for 3 seasons and he denied opting for Académica (Portugal) that has offered 16.900 (3 seasons too)???
Thank and best regards
Stramazi
Hy, I just have a 75 GK selling on Brazil trasnfer list, if you dont’t find a 80 Gk, I’ll have a pleasure to negociate with u!
Regards
Stramazi
I’d find it very handy if on the team_matches or match_report screens (or both if possible) I could see the name of whichever of my named formations I used in the match.
My “Reserves” and “Youths” squads often share a number of players, so it can be hard to tell, looking back at past matches, whether I put out the reserve team or the youth team.
I’m searching a goalkeeper with GK around 80. (Probably everybody is doing this) but if you have such a goalkeeper and you want to sell him send me a message.
I will give you a lot of money for him. :-)
Cheers
You’re right Tiago. We have a bug entered in our bug system to fix that. CPU teams will not use their first squad on friendlies. After we change that we’ll also make CPU teams invite other teams for friendlies in order to evolve their squads.
Cheers.
Hello,
I was p.ferreira manager in portugal medium ticker, and i had a lot of friendly matches scheduled in order to advance my youth a other squad players. I resigned p ferrerira in favour of spoting.
i noticed that, after my resignation, the computer started to sell many players, that is correct because i had 35 or so… but in all the friendly games the computer uses always the best team… so, i think this is one way of cheating, if a team is not being managed by a person, just invite them to play every single tick and if they accept, you will have a way of ruining their championship.
Take a look at p ferreira stamina.
regards
Friendlies wanted!
Portsmouth, FastTicker.
I can play every turn.
Fixed.
Ok. But he is already 30 years old. With a younger and better player I would do this. But he’s not worth it. He won’t be in my mean squad. Thanks anyway.
Yeah, the problem is that he won’t accept an abrupt wage reduction, so you’d have to accept the high wage if you wanted to buy him and then try to reduce it on contract renewal.
Cheers.
The player on which I did a bid was Andy Jones