Recent Posts
18,551 posts(s) found
30 + 6 would also be my choice. 30 + 6, at least one more season. The limit of 30 players is messing the game. No one buys or sells.
I think it would be fair to make this change (that i agree!) step by step.
that makes sense
I’m sorry :)
thanks for the answers
cheers
The 2nd of the spanish league qualifies directly to the second life, Levante finished in 4th, not 2nd :-)
We used the ranking to get 10 teams for the first round, so we’ve got 4th from Spain, 4th from England, 3rd and 4th from Italy, 2nd and 3rd from Germany, 2nd and 3rd from France, 2nd and 3rd from Portugal. The 5 winners join the other 11 qualified teams for the 2nd round.
I agree Philipp, that was discussed some time ago and I was thinking about doing the following:
-limit the maximum rating based on the number of goals conceived
-give a bonus for clean sheets (unless there were no shots on goal)
I’ve discussed that once with some friends, a few suggestion came up:
-at the end of player generation, change position field according to generated attributes (so in the example above the player would be a midfielder)
-at the end of player generation, change position field according to generated attributes + potential (so in the example above the player would be a midfielder only if passing + potential in passing was greater than tackle + potential in tackle)…that could give away something about potential, like in your example, if the player was still a defender you’d know that he’d evolve his tackle at least until 79
-allow manager to change player’s position
-use the first ideia plus dinamically change player position during game when evolution caused one of the 3 main attributes to become greater than the others
In my opinion none of these solutions would add that much to the game, but if I had to choose one I’d go for the last one.
the position is much more like “I think I should be a defender, because I like it” than “I AM a defender”.
The tendency to have your main attributes better than others is not always followed, just as any other tendency :).
i’m curious how the rating get generated & if there isn’t smth to improve.
my concern is as follows.
in fast ticker my team played 11 league matches
a) my goalie conceiced just 2 goals (and ~1-10 shots per game) but has a AVG of 5,8
b) the 11 opponent goalies got ALL a 10! (parries 50-89 shots from my side)
i guess you create the rating via the number of shots that the gk parries.
BUT
a) i would say 2-3 world class actions from a goalie could be reasonable for a higher than 8 rating aswell
b) not every goalie should get a ten if he got to defend 50+ shots, some gk have “bad days” even if they parry 50 shots. with a “bad day” performance there should be a higher number of conceived goals than with the status “10”.
but why has the 2nd of the spanish legue to qualify for 2nd round? normally (in RL) it’s 3rd & 4th of a season must qualify …
very often players best skills and their native position favour are contradictory.
my latest example:
i got this youth with 79 in PASSING & 63 in defending as a DEFENDER… should be a midfielder, right?
Karl Moschny (Fast > Germany > Hertha)
Position: D <<<
Keeping: 25
Tackle: 63 <<<
Passing: 79 <<<
Shooting: 47
Speed: 66
Dribble: 57
Control: 68
Aggressiveness: 100
thorpedo is right Rui, you’ll start in the second round, which is 6 turns after the first round’s second leg.
Cheers.
Because you’re team is free in the 1st round. Am I right?
we have protections similar to what managersim had. We know that this sometimes can harm people who are not trying to cheat. but we believe that, for a greater good, those protections are ok for now. was that player previously owned by someone you know?
cheers
Hi there,
why the spanish champion, Valladolid (my team), is not at the champions league and the team who finished second, Levante, is? :)
cheers
Rui
I’ve tried to make an offer for Jonathan Lecomte on a free transfer, and got this message:
“Prevented by anti-cheat protection. If you are not trying to cheat, contact admins.”
Well, I’m not cheating. Sadly I’ll lose the player, as he already has an offer from another club.
Thanks!
Renaud: are you logged on FastTicker when trying to access the links?
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/20254
The same here. I know I don’t have the best GK but my attackers are good. And my shooting is on short.
The previous season I used the same tactics and scored enough goals and now they can’t score even one. If it’s just one game it’s ok but I’m a little desperite at the moment. Already looking at the next season.
I hope my CL will be better.
Regards
I can’t read the 2 links now
I go directly on my board
Ouch, missed that one. Thanks :)
Yeah, I know, terrible report. Look at mine
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/16428
We’ll do something about it, for sure.
Thanks for reporting mauro, I know what’s going on, will fix it soon.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/23562
guess the manager got a 9 point penalty for using a player from his medium ticker team … http://www.rubysoccer.com/forums/2/topics/400
What’s wrong with Stuttgart in FastTicker? They have 7 matches, 7 wins and 12 points.
Cheers.
the young player’s name links to “http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/” instead of “http://rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/xxxxx” where xxxxx is the id of the player
If a manager gets sacked for going bankrupt then the team should lose 10 points also.
System generated in-game messages now contain links to teams, managers, players and match results they refer to.
The manager in question was punished – he lost 9 points on the league.
cheers
Added to our list. I’m surprised it wasn’t there, as it has been an issue for a while.
Cheers
Added to our list, will discuss that with Danilo.
Cheers.
i don’t like reading in the report that my player with the by far least shooting skills shot the penalty (btw: a defender & he missed). So a set up for the standards like penalty, free kick & corner would be helpful.