I’ll work on that, so please those who know the criteria on each country (England, Spain, Germany, Portugal, France, Italy and Argentina) let us know.
Brazil (used worldwide in RS now): number of victories, goals scored – goals conceded, goals scored, direct confront (to be added)
Cheers!
And I am from Bolton and the ‘fake’ champion. Can’t say that I feel that much of a champion, but I have tried to play different in order to get wins more than draws. Also by adding strategies to some games in order to get wins, well I think they did no good, but anyway I experiented and might have let in a few extra-goals because of that. I understand my team was unable to score as much as I would have hoped to, but it certainly wasn’t because of too defensive tactics. In medium I play with 4 A:s most of the time to get as many wins as possible since last season I had a lot of draws. I really can’t say how much results depend on what I do, but who could say?
So because the criteria is wrong (I also think it should be localized) I am the champion. But I did try to get wins, even if it wasn’t succesfull in most cases. Anyway, I would feel better if the priority queue would be changed, since I am not used to this Brazilian one. But this was the criteria this season and I played according to it. So I do not like the “fake champion” title, even though Wigan performed better in matches between us.
Artur, sorry for the short answer but it is late here. Here´s what i think (i will try to order the facts logically):
1) we have a limited amount of time to work in the game;
2) there is a HUGE development queue organized by what we think is more important or what we feel that would be fun to implement;
3) we don´t agree that to have localized league rank rules is a huge priority comparing to the rest, nor we thought that this would give us a “coding good time”;
4) we told everybody how the league rank rules would be from the start, and thats what matters in a competition: know, play and win by the rules. I don´t think the English rules are better than the Brazilian – they are just different.
We really appreciate and respect your help and feedback. As a result, we will reconsider our priority queue and I hope we can get localized league rank implemented in time for the next season end.
And about motivation, well… Lemme try to mention some of the most important motivation facts, in my opinion:
- the game is 6 months old and already has a LOT of functionalities, despite our lack of free time
- we are very available and open to user feedback. Which means that you are an important part of the process
- in my opinion this is a good and free place to spend some time, have fun and interact with a nice community
- surprise factor. who knows what new stuff can be available next time you login? :D
well, time to get some sleep. cheers!
Well, congratulations, you now have a fake champion in England.
I have never putted in cause the developers commitment to the game, I just can´t understand, how you start to put so much new things into the game and left something such important has this one for last.
I have been helping with feedback and suggestions everytime I thought it was necessary, I have probably been one of the most active managers in this game since it started, passed a great part of this last season tweaking my team, I don´t even have a squad good enough to do what I did, it was a great effort, based on keeping the players stamina and managing the suspensions to always have the better squad possible playing.
Fact is, I just won the league under English rules, but because you don´t have those rules aplied to this league, a team that has less goals scored, more goals conceded, and also loses on the direct confront against me is declared champion.
Do you think this is fair?
I will be staying and helping you with whatever you need, but tell me what´s the motivation I have to play the game like this?
Put yourselves in my place, and tell me what would you think.
Regards…
My friend Mr. Lobba, do you readed the newspaper yesterday? Andrés Sanches announced a new stadium to 2010. 52.000 capacity.
Regards
Danilo
I agree, will work on that as soon as possible.
Cheers!
What about sponsorship and TV right incomes? They would be very important pieces of the economy at this moment.
The stadium expansion logic is finished and will be added to the game on next season start. I’ve done some research on the average spent by all managed teams with their players wages on each dimension in order to come up with a reasonable size for the stadiums after the reduction. The numbers I ended up with were 33200 seats for FastTicker stadiums and 22800 seats for MediumTicker stadiums.
Some people may complain that they will have financial problems, some may say that rich teams will benefit from that as they will be able to continuously increase their stadiums and have an advantage over the other teams. These are valid points and I feel I’ll have financial problems in FastTicker as well. What can we do? Let’s try to sell or fire some players, be careful when offering high wages. Hopefully most of us will be able to live with that or recover from any financial problems or squad quality reduction.
Keep in mind that the most adequate solution for stadium reduction would be resetting the dimensions, and I’m pretty sure that’s not what most of us want (if I’m wrong please let me know :-))
Cheers!
I’m sorry to hear that spartacus, hope that at least the rebalance helped you have a better squad :-)
Cheers!
I have being trying to improve my squad baste on player side and position and have bought 2 player for their specific postions, but since the new rebalance they dont play the postions i bought them for, not a complaint and i my of missed the announcement that there would be a new rebalance.
Great Game.
Each country is free to define its own criteria. It’s good to see you care so much about your team, that’s the level of attachment we want our users to have. What you don’t seem to care about is game development and the fact that the developers (me and Danilo) don’t have as much time as we’d like to improve this game, make it bigger, better and fun for everybody but despite of that the game is improving relatively fast.
I really hope you can change your mind and stay with us, no matter the result of your league.
Cheers!
I really dont care about your criteria, thing is, I have advantage over them, either on goal average, either on matches among both teams, I couldn´t care less if they even have 30 more wins than us, real FIFA rules and most of all FA rules, say 1st condition is goal average, 2nd is results among both teams, so this is wrong, let´s just hope they win this league because they have more points, otherwise, I surely assure you that I will be leaving this game.
I rest my case.
it is not a bug. this is the brazilian criteria, which is applied to all countries. the other team has more wins. we have an enhancement on the queue to customize the criteria (use the correct local criteria) for all countries. sorry for that.
cheers
2 matches to end at Premiership, I am Wigan, staying in 2nd now, Bolton is 1st.
Problem is, we have lost 2-1 at their home and won 3-0 home.
We have better goal average, 62-14 for us, 60-23 for Bolton, right now their are placed at 1st and we are 2nd, there is no explanation for this.
Maybe they can win the league in the 2 matches to come, maybe not, thing is, if it would end now, they would be champions without a reason.
Please take a look at this and fix it.
Thank You
It would be very interesting if we could negotiate sponsorship contracts with the companies (period, amount of money and prizes for winning titles).
Lobba
Player sides have been rebalanced per zone for all teams and will start affecting the match performance on next season start.
Prizes are something everybody asked since the beginning. I’ll add that to our list.
Cheers!
yeah, to make it real you should give 1mil per win in group stage, 500k for a draw in the group phase. Then each victory in CL starting in the knockout phase should have a prize according to reality!
cheers
Do we receive money from wining a champions league game?
cheers.
We’ll have money from TV in the future, as well as sponsorship. Sponsorship is supposed to increase with team’s success, merchandise increases if you have better players in your squad.
Cheers!
Not yet Sly. As you can see, our game still has a lot to improve, but it’s becoming better and more complex relatively fast, if I may say so ;-)
Hope you’re enjoying and stay with us to help RubySoccer grow!
Cheers!
What about money from TV increasing from QF in national cup and 2nd round in CL and UEFA etc.
What about a bonus when winning or being 2nd in cups and leagues
Why is merchadising not improving in relation to the team success? i had the same amount in the season 1, i have now after winning 3 times the league and 1x cup … that’s to improve.
Found it never mind :)
I do have 1 point though. Why can’t I bid on a player who ISN’T LISTED. There is no function for it?
How can I pull back an offer for a player? I made one but don’t want it anymore :).
I can’t find how I can change this :(
Hi, I’m an oldschool Managersim.com player.
I was trying to find some left over info about managersim through google and found this site. It seems to be quite the same but some miner things being different.
Are there any other old managersim managers out there? Maybe you still know me :). I use to manage Middlesbrough in Eurotest :). I was pretty good at it if I may say so :).
Hope to see you on the pitch!
Regards,
Sly
Looks like you’re right Torres, so we’d better start working on the logic which will make option 3 possible.
Cheers!
agreed. But we have antecipated that market balance would take some time to be achieved. a lot of rules and adjustments need to be implemented for this to happen. keep coming with suggestions/feedback. we will keep doing our best to make this important balance a reality as soon as possible.
cheers!
Hi mates!
The season is about to finish and we still don’t know what option is going to be chosen.
I hope that it will be option 3 (and I think that most people have the same opinion)
Cheers!
the great problem of this game is that teams need no money and they only transfer the players to show that they have them or praying that some wanker will afford them.
thats my point, in ms teams needed money and financial problems were very common…
cheers
Nice suggestions Hugo, we can probably add all of them and some are already planned (make CPU teams play friendlies, limit the amount they will pay for a player). We’ll announce new behaviours as they are implemented. Thanks!
Cheers.