Recent Posts
18,542 posts(s) found
It should count Hugo, if it is not we need to fix it. Thanks for reporting.
Cheers!
Players in field by substitutions count for history stats?
I have this game http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/70178 where Cristian Mendonça is in for an injured player, but he’s not in player history stats.
He did play 65 minutes (plus extra time if there is extra time lol).
Cheers…
Hi,
Here Murcia in Fast Ticker…i only have 3 youths for now…please get “me” fixed, to…
Tks
Paulo
Just released a youth goalkeeper … to get a new youth goalkeeper. Can you please implement some kind of GK limit.
Maybe you can work with positionchanges. I mean a player like Stefano Sferrella, a striker who is much better on the midfield than in the attack, can have a position change after a certain period and become a midfielder ( If there are DA, DM, MA, etc he can become a MA). But this only happens when a player is much better on another position then his normal position.
So the players will increase their skills as they do it now and we can’t predict this evolution on the basis of the other skills.
I don’t know if this is possible because I don’t know anything at all about programming a game.
It’s just an idea :-)
Cheers
Let’s say that they give a certain percentage more of what they give every 3 turns. A good league performance means good publicity for the sponsor. I think it is for good publicity that they are sponsering the team :-)
Ops, forgot this one Torres, will work on it.
Thanks!
The prize based on expectations would be nice, but where would that money come from? I mean, when you win a competition the entity responsible for the competition would give you the prize, but if you ended the league in 10th when the board expected 16th who would pay for it? You could say sponsors…well it’s possible, not sure if they should give you more than the sponsorship value paid every 3 turns though ;-)
Cheers!
Dave: players with multiple positios are in on our plans :-)
Torres: Maybe the solution is not generate players like Stefano Sferrella, I mean, an attacker wouldn’t have shooting almost 20 points lower than his passing or tackle, it could be like 3 points lower at most when the player reaches his maximum potential…the only disadvantage I see on this situation is that you would know in advance how much the main attribute would increase in some situations, like if we had already this rule you would know that Stefano would reach at least 78 in shooting…
Another possible solution is never let the main attribute for the player position be lower than the main attribute for the other positions or even train the player to play in other position when we have added coaches to the game.
Cheers!
Hi Gabriel!
The problem with Hector is already solved. But now I have another problem…
I receive the same message when I try to put on the loan list one of my youth goalkeepers.
Cheers!
Maybe the prize money must be connected on the board’s exspectations. When you reach these exspectations you gain a certain amount of prize money. Then smaller teams also have the chance to gain prize money.
I think this is possible now the time of the multi-millionaire teams is gone.
Besides this there can also be prize money for winning the league, CL , Uefa cup, national cup, etc.
Cheers
Hi guys!
I agree with your idea, but what happens with players like Stefano Sferrella? He is A L, tackle 55 passing 81 shooting 63. Would he be penalised for playing as midfilder? I think is quite obvious he should play as midfilder.
In my opinion we need to do something to prevent people playing with a totally unrealistic 10 forwards team, but we have to keep in mind this kind of exceptions.
The problem is that I don’t know how we can do it :-)
Cheers and thanks for trying to improve the game every day!
I’d expect severe penalties for playing a player out of position. (A as a M… etc.)
Even worse penalty than playing him on the wrong side. (L on R)
I’d also like to see “DA”, “DM”, “MA” for players capable of playing more than one position.
Meanwhile… playing players out of position should still be penalized.
Agreed Ricardo, that’s on our plans and should be done soon.
Cheers!
Done.
On bankrupcy the manager should be fired, the board should release the high waged players and inject money on the club, something like 2M, the minimum to allow someone else to be able to manage the team.
Cheers.
I’ve just analyzed the problem and realized it would be an “expensive” operation to determine the international competitions spots on previous seasons. Maybe fornow we should just hide this information when displaying previous leagues, don’t know.
Cheers.
I think a youth can always be hired by the team, no matter how much money the team have. You’re right about free players, you can’t hire them if you are low on money or negative. I like your ideia to allow free players to be hired with a low limited wage in all cases.
Glad to hear that the economy seems more regulated now, we’ll do our best to keep it this way :-)
Cheers!
For what I know a bankrupt team or a team with no money reserves, is blocked by the board, and will have a maximum wage zero. If this is the case, then is wrong.
Simple points:
If one of these teams receives a special youth, the special player can not be hired and can not be sold!!! He will be in youths until lost for the market (for free, no income to the bankrupt).
It is not possible to hire free players for low wages but if the squad is too small the board will auto renew players with higher wages (no matter how high).
These teams still can loan players with high wages!
I’m not able to test all conditions, but if the conditions are possible then I think you should consider my conclusions.
Teams should always have ways to get free players and juniors with small wages, I think you should set a minimum wage too, like 3, 4 or 5 Ks, and unlimit wages for the team youths. They need to hire new and cheaper players to release the expensive ones too.
The overall economy seems quite good and regulated, everyone needs to take care of their bank account now :) high wages are droping.
Cheers
New source of income: sponsorship. The amount of money received from sponsors every 3 turns is defined based on the team’s recent performance. As the performance history started being recorded when the manager ranking was added it is not complete yet, which means that the sponsor value will be lower than it should for now, specially on MediumTicker. The stadium size will limit the amount of money received from sponsors, but it will probably only affect teams with a great performance.
Cheers!
Do you still have this problem?
Hopefully all the bugs reported here are fixed by now, let us know if they aren’t or if you guys find anything else.
Cheers!
You’re right JD, we are already aware of this bug, apparently it happens only when you’re creating or deleting a strategy for a formation other than the Default one. We’ll check it out.
Cheers!
Hi,
This is not a “serious” bug but rather an annoying one. Every time you create/delete a strategie, the stratagies list on the right side desapears and a page refresh is needed.
Thanks for your understanding. I know that is tuff to reply to all posts :p.
I am sure that you are doing almost everything to take rubby into a balanced game.
An our misson is to give you feedback… but sometimes, since we are playing the game for a while, I almost forget that this is a beta game and I am expecting not so drastically changes :p.
keep the good work.
Cheers.
because of this limitation/bug … a goalkeeper that had his contract expiring was renew automaticaly by the board. :(
still with 6 goalkeepers
Hmm, your problem seems to be different Torres, but it is also a bug. Thanks for reporting.
Cheers!
You’re not the only one in this situation Ricardo, I’m facing the same problem on FastTicker. I agree that millionaire teams are something from the past, we’ll finally be able to add other sources of income to the game.
Cheers!
Thanks for reporting Hugo, we’ll have to check.
Cheers!
The stadium reduction was a good ideia. But something is not working quite well… My team, during the league, was always in the top 5, my players wages are normal and my finance is going critical and last season I went to champions league semi-final and won the league cup.
I would say that most of the teams that are not going critical, is because they had plenty of money before the stadium reduction.
Instead of getting a big bank account, I invested on good players , therefore looking for more incoming.
I only had 2millions after the reduction… of course bankrupt will be my destiny. Theres is no way to make more incoming, since my base incoming was the stadium.
Yes I have one or two players that have medium wages… but how am I suposed to think of winning with the bad players I had? Ohh, that’s right… I am in the portuguese league.
I know that I am not the best manager arround here and that there are a lot better managers (I am not beeing ironic.) but I was making my own way.
I am not angry with anything nor anybody, only sad for my team.
Maybe I am the only manager with this problem. Suggestions are wellcome.