Recent Posts
18,542 posts(s) found
Hey Vicente,
I had an e-mail that said good result with 1-0 in our match. Don’t think u should bother to much on it.
i had it last match in the ligue
This is my substitution rule:
In any match, after minute 55, if we are ahead by 1, replace the player on zone D, side RC and mentality 1 by Adulio Garcia De Olmo on zone D, side RC and mentality 1
he got replaced in the 75min when we got ahead by 1
Is it normal that EVERY MATCH that I lose, I have a messege from the board like this “BAD RESULT, we are disappointed with your last match against ….”????, is not normal to lose a lot of matches in the season with much much much more better average in your players, better stats and etc, but is less normal to have always the same message when your players have better stats and better average.
I think that the board can’t tell you BAD RESULT when you are doing a good game (your players have better average and better stats) you are not lucky and you are lossing a game away from home in SemiFinals UEFA Cup (lossing 1-0), is that a bad result?
Regards
Vicente
that sound good… it is the work of a coach to find the best position of a player.
I’m all for doing something like that.
Thank for the change in loan´s system.
I got a small suggestion. When the loan period contract is about to expire, can we implement a feature such a extension of the contract if both sides agree and so it is not need for the player to come back to the home team and have to put player again in the loan market…… this can save time and be good for contract than might expire in critical moments of the different competitions…
salud
I had to sell many side players already =(
For when a improvement in this thing? I think having a pitch with no wing play it’s not real football…
And what about having the players on R, L, RC and LC more next to which other, if there was no player on the middle? To be more easy to do a 4-4-2, for example, which is a basic formation nowadays in football.
Seeing the name purchasing players window, i thought of having a market window. Say it 40 turns between the end of the season and the beginning of the other and 10 turns in the middle. It would be like in real life, and it will reduce big teams from constantly improving their teams, as smaller teams struggle. Constructing the team will have to be more a strategic plan for the season, than an “on the fly” adjusting strategy.
If the the player value in the game was “better”, meaning, if it was more realistic / adequate, you could use it to block high/low selling prices. An example… a player with a value of $4000000, could not be sold below $1000000 or above $8000000. But, because the calculated value of the player is sometimes strange, this has to be corrected first, i think.
And about changing the price, i think you could add the manager reputation in the market, plus the financial punishing. And you could use that reputation not only for other players to see, but also to fire the manager and when he was looking for another job. This would imitate the chairman of that club won’t accepting it because of his bad reputation.
Cheers,
Alexandre Freitas
conclusion: keep everything as it is now :)…things will start smoothing out :). Tbh, I don’t get the “no growth complaints”. I have tons of players who suddenly turned into starts :)….the new system only did me well! I now have players who are worth 40-50 mill. Before the system I was happy I had 2 players who were 10+ million.
No, there are no bonuses in a Cup final.
Alban is right when he says that there are improvements to be made in other areas that will affect this discussion. Big clubs will end letting some starts go cause they’re unhappy :)
Sorry if it was asked before !
When playing a Cup final, are there home/guest sides ? Does home side get +3 bonus to all attributes ?
To be serious, several months ago I was called “a cheater” and people argued about how was possible my team in Fastticker had sooo many high valued players. It was true that all of them were acquired from the free transfer market and developed into stars playing friendlies like crazy =)
But now I am totally for the “slowing” of the improvement process. And it is not dealy dangerous for weaker teams, totally not ! You see, big clubs and small clubs all have 1 limit: 30 players + 6 youths, so even Big clubs have to free transfer players who seem to be too weak for them. Also, after the system is a bit changed by the developers, I mean after we can’t keep 1 main squad and 19 more players who sit on the bench (when the “happiness” system comes or when players start temporarly lose skills if aren’t used in official matches), even Big clubs will have to lose STAR players.
This is the process, this is the evolutuion. Big club has small potential for growth, weak clubs have plenty of it. But, as in real life, they need some patience and many work, as every manager of the Big clubs had to do several seasons ago. Don’t forget, the game is pretty fast, it takes 24 days to play 1 season. Look at the Brazilian league – many clubs fight for the title. But a couple of seasons there was only 1 title winner – Cruzeiro.
And don’t forget that soon when more countries are added, all free transfered youths from Big countries will be taken by clubs from new countries and if they keep them, in 3-4 seasons they will have own stars.
That’s even better than real life is. Because here we have like 15 times more good players =)
Well, maybe we just change the attribute system to 1000s, not 100s, then even 10% of potential will result in many “blues” during the season =))
well… gabriel i would say the current improvement is not that bad… but i still maintain that definition of youth should include all the teenage players… ( rather than those just in the academy)…
that way we will see a lil bit faster development in our players…
yes i think it is a little slow now….. but maybe in a long run it could be good because managers dont want to way that long and so players can go to the market and then they can be a star….
maybe just the 10% of youths should grow very fast, and get maximum skills at very young age, and keep the same path than it is going on now to the rest of players.
Like i say, this might be better for small team, so the can get some good players fast, the market now is so crazy than even clubs with money can´t afford good players ( it is not real but also a top price for player could be set, and so give a chance to buy players to many managers).
salud
He must have reached his maximum potential for this season. Remember luck is also involved on player development, you may have a player that gets more potential earlier in his carreer. ;)
I have a small suggestion that won’t change the average total skill points earned by players but may improve the general feeling about this subject. What if players improved less skill points at once, but more frequently? Currently it takes at least 4 official matches or 12 friendlies (2 official or 6 friendlies for youths) to improve. On each improvement the player gets from 1 to 6 skill points, 3.5 in the average. We could reduce the number of matches needed and reduce the average number of skill points earned (like from 2 to 4, 3 in the average).
I’d still have to think about the exact numbers, I’m just giving a draft of an idea :)
It might just be me, but i still think the youth growth is waay to slow it seems like you have timed 0 with 2 :)
I have a super youth :) now worth 2 mill 79 in shooting, he has gained 2 times during this entire season and he have played 72 matches whereof 63 is friendlies, its general for all my youths every time i log in to check noone has risen in stats. in my world thats MEGA boring and completely useless i expect to see gains more often in youths than in regulars but this is not the case, im very disapointed with the way youths works now.
I hope we can bring this up to discussion again and take a new look at the way youth grows…
The reason for your losses is that you don’t know how they could happen :).
cheers
Don’t you know? In CL…..anything can happen :). How I can lose vs CPU teams in the league and beat the reigning CL champion 4-1 I don’t know! It’s football!!! YOU NEVER KNOW!
yes, that’s what i mean…. i got a uefa match but a red card in the ligue and the player is shown as unavailable.
I guess I am already out of competition for the next round in this group of death. Most of the 3 matches I had more ball possession and as many shots as my opponent. But still I lose with a clear result. Kind of frustrating.
Why I could win almost of my league games (except one) and lose all my CL matches? I really don’t know…
Hmm, some pattern going on here, i wonder if sylvain had some old scores to settle :) He got me back involved too. I was ex eurotest, was with chelsea last few seasons and played it for about 2 years
I’m surprised I never put my name on here. Not sure if many of you remember me, but I’m Henry Medeiros. I managed many teams along the way, but at the end I was managing Betis Sevilla in Eurotest. I joined SSim in it’s early days and always have a soft spot for Derby County as this was my first team in 3B. Again, like a few above, I have to “blame” Sylvain for getting me back into the game. Currently managing PSG in FastTicker.
You mean when he is unable to play next match (let’s say League) and you’re preparing the formation for CL he is displayed as unavailable? I suppose we could add some kind of filter so you can say for which competition you’d like to see the red cards in the formations page.
You’re right, Vaughn, so if the loaned player plays less than 35 minutes he is considered to have missed that match.
America-RN sale
Romain Brault
Age: 23
Estimated Value: $86,157,044
Position: M
Side: C
Keeping: 60
Tackle: 78
Passing: 91
Shooting: 79
Speed: 95
Dribble: 100
Control: 91
Header: 80
Aggressiveness: 1
Certainly one of the best performing midfielders of the game !
official matches played are counted by minutes played? Cause players that are playing less then 35min won’t improve right? What the technical system on that?