Recent Posts
18,555 posts(s) found
yes i think it is a little slow now….. but maybe in a long run it could be good because managers dont want to way that long and so players can go to the market and then they can be a star….
maybe just the 10% of youths should grow very fast, and get maximum skills at very young age, and keep the same path than it is going on now to the rest of players.
Like i say, this might be better for small team, so the can get some good players fast, the market now is so crazy than even clubs with money can´t afford good players ( it is not real but also a top price for player could be set, and so give a chance to buy players to many managers).
salud
He must have reached his maximum potential for this season. Remember luck is also involved on player development, you may have a player that gets more potential earlier in his carreer. ;)
I have a small suggestion that won’t change the average total skill points earned by players but may improve the general feeling about this subject. What if players improved less skill points at once, but more frequently? Currently it takes at least 4 official matches or 12 friendlies (2 official or 6 friendlies for youths) to improve. On each improvement the player gets from 1 to 6 skill points, 3.5 in the average. We could reduce the number of matches needed and reduce the average number of skill points earned (like from 2 to 4, 3 in the average).
I’d still have to think about the exact numbers, I’m just giving a draft of an idea :)
It might just be me, but i still think the youth growth is waay to slow it seems like you have timed 0 with 2 :)
I have a super youth :) now worth 2 mill 79 in shooting, he has gained 2 times during this entire season and he have played 72 matches whereof 63 is friendlies, its general for all my youths every time i log in to check noone has risen in stats. in my world thats MEGA boring and completely useless i expect to see gains more often in youths than in regulars but this is not the case, im very disapointed with the way youths works now.
I hope we can bring this up to discussion again and take a new look at the way youth grows…
The reason for your losses is that you don’t know how they could happen :).
cheers
Don’t you know? In CL…..anything can happen :). How I can lose vs CPU teams in the league and beat the reigning CL champion 4-1 I don’t know! It’s football!!! YOU NEVER KNOW!
yes, that’s what i mean…. i got a uefa match but a red card in the ligue and the player is shown as unavailable.
I guess I am already out of competition for the next round in this group of death. Most of the 3 matches I had more ball possession and as many shots as my opponent. But still I lose with a clear result. Kind of frustrating.
Why I could win almost of my league games (except one) and lose all my CL matches? I really don’t know…
Hmm, some pattern going on here, i wonder if sylvain had some old scores to settle :) He got me back involved too. I was ex eurotest, was with chelsea last few seasons and played it for about 2 years
I’m surprised I never put my name on here. Not sure if many of you remember me, but I’m Henry Medeiros. I managed many teams along the way, but at the end I was managing Betis Sevilla in Eurotest. I joined SSim in it’s early days and always have a soft spot for Derby County as this was my first team in 3B. Again, like a few above, I have to “blame” Sylvain for getting me back into the game. Currently managing PSG in FastTicker.
You mean when he is unable to play next match (let’s say League) and you’re preparing the formation for CL he is displayed as unavailable? I suppose we could add some kind of filter so you can say for which competition you’d like to see the red cards in the formations page.
You’re right, Vaughn, so if the loaned player plays less than 35 minutes he is considered to have missed that match.
America-RN sale
Romain Brault
Age: 23
Estimated Value: $86,157,044
Position: M
Side: C
Keeping: 60
Tackle: 78
Passing: 91
Shooting: 79
Speed: 95
Dribble: 100
Control: 91
Header: 80
Aggressiveness: 1
Certainly one of the best performing midfielders of the game !
official matches played are counted by minutes played? Cause players that are playing less then 35min won’t improve right? What the technical system on that?
Hey! Here i am again..I found it kinda irritating and not confincing that when u lineup a player for UEFA or CL when he has a red card in the ligue it shows that he is not able to play next match. Maybe make a better link to the signup you give in the “matches” page?
Yeah right, like your the only one who has it hard :)
My opponents have a 100 goaly, 100 goaly and 99 goaly :)…how the hell should my 83 and 93 shooter get past that! :)
Very good player up for sale. Have a look at his stats.
Quinidio Arteaga
Attributes
Position: D
Side: R
Keeping: 46
Tackle: 82
Passing: 64
Shooting: 69
Speed: 70
Dribble: 70
Control: 82
Header: 80
Aggressiveness: 30
Stamina: 100
Hello,
Have a look to this group if you want to see the spanish (Atletico), french (PSG), italian (Genoa) current regular league leaders and the second best german (Bayern M.) team… all in the same group!!!! Uffff… Incredible teams… Good luck to all the rest of teams, but my Atletico de Madrid will try to pass to next round… I hope… ;)Javier.
FT: Atletico de Madrid (spa)
MT: Rosario Central (arg)
Matches missed due to red cards or injuries won’t count as missed official matches on loan clauses. ;)
new loaning clauses: will matches that players misses due a red card suspension counted as a “1 missed official match”? It shouldnt be b/c it’s probably not the managers fault/will.
We can try it, but probably not on next season…even though it’s simple I’d have to test it :)
… so nobody is against it. Can we try one of the options mentioned above? (just if it doesnt take too much time from more important tasks/enhancements)
Sergio, every time one of the sides of a transaction is trying to cheat we cannot validate the transaction. Even though you are innocent, the manager who sold you the player is not, and was already banned from the game. In such cases, the transaction is compromised. There is no such thing as arbitrary change of rules. We always try to be fair and keep the game free from cheaters as much as possible. If all the time we spend on cheating prevention/detection was spent on new features this game would be at least one year ahead. Sometimes these decisions affect honest managers like you, but their purpose is to keep the game fair. We’ve already rolled back a transaction from a friend of us, the situation was exactly the same.
The desire of the developers is a fun and fair game for everybody. We’d be much happier if nobody was trying to cheat and such decisions didn’t have to be made. I hope you understand us.
Cheers!
Loan clauses improvement.
When listing a player for loan you’re now able to specify the minimum level of coaching desired and the maximum number of official matches that can be missed. Teams wishing to loan your player must have at least the level of coaching you specify. If after loaning your player their coaching is downgraded below that level the player will return to your team. The second condition is a way to guarantee your player will play official matches while loaned, if that’s your intention. If the player misses more matches than you wanted, he will return to your team.
For existing loans the minimum coaching level is set to 0 and maximum number of matches missed is not specified, meaning the player can miss any number of matches without penalty. We decided that it wouldn’t be fair to include loan clauses on existing loans, as they were not there when the player was loaned. Individual situations can be discussed in game.
Cheers!
During the last week one of my transactions was rolled back in the name of game fairplay. This act of autoritarism perpetrated by one of the game developers was actually very unfair because i’m not responsible for the actions of other managers.
If the game rules are arbitrarily changed by the developers to match their desire the purpose of this game should be pleasing the game developes and not managing.
Here goes an extract of the exchanged mails:
>From: Danilo Castillho
>Subject: Re: suspicious transaction I´m sorry, but our priority is to keep the fairplay. >Sometimes teams have losses in the name of that priority, but I am sure you will be able to find >a good deal to replace that player, if you search the market.
>In a near future we will try to come up with a way to have a more fair situation when one of the >teams did not take confirmed part on the suspicious transaction. But for now unfortunately we >don’t have.
>If you have any further questions please let me know.
>cheers
>>>From: Sérgio Freitas
>>That’s very unfair because i bought the player according to the game rules and it was very important for my participation on the uefa cup.
>>>From: Danilo
>>>Antorio Viraldo has sold one of his best players for an unrealistic price. That is the reason why. And now he was fired for unactivity, which points one more reason for me to maintain my decision.
>>>
>>>I hope you understand that we have to maintain the fairplay in our game.
>>>
>>>regards
>>>>From: Sergio Freitas
>>>>I dont now why?
>>>>>From: Game Masters
>>>>>Subject: Transaction Rolled Back
>>>>>
>>>>>The last transfer involving player Rogério Sampaio was rolled back by the game masters.
>>>>>
>>>>>Can you explain me please?
Almost done, just need to finish and test the logic to return a player when he is not playing, which is the most important piece of this enhancement :)
Don’t worry Sly, I’m not changing anything anytime soon, specially without a convincing yes, as you said :)
If people keep complaining about that I’ll do an official poll so more people can give their opinions. In the other hand, if we already had a convincing yes I could work on something earlier, but that doesn’t seem to be the case.
Cheers!
I’m one as well (fulltest) and I can confirm that 3 of my friends playing in the in Mediumticker are also former soccersim/managersim
Are there any updates? I’m still in the same situation. I loaned a player who isn’t playing. So please, could you try and come up with some possible way to recall the player. He’s losing valuable playing time. I was actually subbing him myself and then noticed on 1 day I loaned him out. I was happy to see this at first, but now I’m regretting it since he’s NOT PLAYING!!
Received the email, thanks! Is anybody else experiencing a similar problem?
well I dón’t think 5 vs 4 is a very convincing yes. I would like to see double this in order for you to push it through. I’M REALLY REALLY NOT LIKING THIS IDEA!!!!!!!!. You are making it harder for smaller teams this way because of the reasons stated above. FOR GODSAKE PLEASE THINK THIS THROUGH!!! Please keeps things as they are now, since I think people are just to darn inpatient…..that’s why they now want to change things. It’s only been 2 seasons since the change and you already want to change it again? Common…just wait it out for another 3-5 seasons ATLEAST!!