Recent Posts

Subscribe to Recent Posts 18,548 posts(s) found

March 03, 2009 20:47

71 posts(s)

Donator

 

Hmm, some pattern going on here, i wonder if sylvain had some old scores to settle :) He got me back involved too. I was ex eurotest, was with chelsea last few seasons and played it for about 2 years

 

March 03, 2009 19:39

31 posts(s)

 

I’m surprised I never put my name on here. Not sure if many of you remember me, but I’m Henry Medeiros. I managed many teams along the way, but at the end I was managing Betis Sevilla in Eurotest. I joined SSim in it’s early days and always have a soft spot for Derby County as this was my first team in 3B. Again, like a few above, I have to “blame” Sylvain for getting me back into the game. Currently managing PSG in FastTicker.

 

March 03, 2009 19:20

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

You mean when he is unable to play next match (let’s say League) and you’re preparing the formation for CL he is displayed as unavailable? I suppose we could add some kind of filter so you can say for which competition you’d like to see the red cards in the formations page.

 

March 03, 2009 19:16

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

You’re right, Vaughn, so if the loaned player plays less than 35 minutes he is considered to have missed that match.

 

March 03, 2009 18:37

375 posts(s)

 

America-RN sale

Romain Brault

Age: 23
Estimated Value: $86,157,044

Position: M
Side: C
Keeping: 60
Tackle: 78
Passing: 91
Shooting: 79
Speed: 95
Dribble: 100
Control: 91
Header: 80
Aggressiveness: 1

Played Goals DP AVG Rating AVG Goals AVG DP MotM 324 19 47 9.62 (!!!!) 0.05 0.14 96 (!!! 1/3 of matches MOM !!!)

Certainly one of the best performing midfielders of the game !

 

March 03, 2009 17:04

609 posts(s)

 

official matches played are counted by minutes played? Cause players that are playing less then 35min won’t improve right? What the technical system on that?

 

March 03, 2009 16:26

609 posts(s)

 

Hey! Here i am again..I found it kinda irritating and not confincing that when u lineup a player for UEFA or CL when he has a red card in the ligue it shows that he is not able to play next match. Maybe make a better link to the signup you give in the “matches” page?

 

March 03, 2009 10:54

678 posts(s)

 

Yeah right, like your the only one who has it hard :)

My opponents have a 100 goaly, 100 goaly and 99 goaly :)…how the hell should my 83 and 93 shooter get past that! :)

 

March 03, 2009 04:11

651 posts(s)

 

Very good player up for sale. Have a look at his stats.
Quinidio Arteaga
Attributes
Position: D
Side: R
Keeping: 46
Tackle: 82
Passing: 64
Shooting: 69
Speed: 70
Dribble: 70
Control: 82
Header: 80
Aggressiveness: 30
Stamina: 100

 

March 02, 2009 22:13

53 posts(s)

Donator

 

Hello,

Have a look to this group if you want to see the spanish (Atletico), french (PSG), italian (Genoa) current regular league leaders and the second best german (Bayern M.) team… all in the same group!!!! Uffff… Incredible teams… Good luck to all the rest of teams, but my Atletico de Madrid will try to pass to next round… I hope… ;)

Javier.
FT: Atletico de Madrid (spa)
MT: Rosario Central (arg)

 

March 02, 2009 20:26

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

Matches missed due to red cards or injuries won’t count as missed official matches on loan clauses. ;)

 

March 02, 2009 19:44

387 posts(s)

 

new loaning clauses: will matches that players misses due a red card suspension counted as a “1 missed official match”? It shouldnt be b/c it’s probably not the managers fault/will.

 

March 02, 2009 11:21

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

We can try it, but probably not on next season…even though it’s simple I’d have to test it :)

 

March 02, 2009 10:23

387 posts(s)

 

… so nobody is against it. Can we try one of the options mentioned above? (just if it doesnt take too much time from more important tasks/enhancements)

 

March 01, 2009 20:54

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

Sergio, every time one of the sides of a transaction is trying to cheat we cannot validate the transaction. Even though you are innocent, the manager who sold you the player is not, and was already banned from the game. In such cases, the transaction is compromised. There is no such thing as arbitrary change of rules. We always try to be fair and keep the game free from cheaters as much as possible. If all the time we spend on cheating prevention/detection was spent on new features this game would be at least one year ahead. Sometimes these decisions affect honest managers like you, but their purpose is to keep the game fair. We’ve already rolled back a transaction from a friend of us, the situation was exactly the same.
The desire of the developers is a fun and fair game for everybody. We’d be much happier if nobody was trying to cheat and such decisions didn’t have to be made. I hope you understand us.
Cheers!

 

March 01, 2009 15:59

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

Loan clauses improvement.

When listing a player for loan you’re now able to specify the minimum level of coaching desired and the maximum number of official matches that can be missed. Teams wishing to loan your player must have at least the level of coaching you specify. If after loaning your player their coaching is downgraded below that level the player will return to your team. The second condition is a way to guarantee your player will play official matches while loaned, if that’s your intention. If the player misses more matches than you wanted, he will return to your team.
For existing loans the minimum coaching level is set to 0 and maximum number of matches missed is not specified, meaning the player can miss any number of matches without penalty. We decided that it wouldn’t be fair to include loan clauses on existing loans, as they were not there when the player was loaned. Individual situations can be discussed in game.
Cheers!

 

March 01, 2009 15:57

1 posts(s)

 

During the last week one of my transactions was rolled back in the name of game fairplay. This act of autoritarism perpetrated by one of the game developers was actually very unfair because i’m not responsible for the actions of other managers.

If the game rules are arbitrarily changed by the developers to match their desire the purpose of this game should be pleasing the game developes and not managing.

Here goes an extract of the exchanged mails:

>From: Danilo Castillho
>Subject: Re: suspicious transaction I´m sorry, but our priority is to keep the fairplay. >Sometimes teams have losses in the name of that priority, but I am sure you will be able to find >a good deal to replace that player, if you search the market.

>In a near future we will try to come up with a way to have a more fair situation when one of the >teams did not take confirmed part on the suspicious transaction. But for now unfortunately we >don’t have.

>If you have any further questions please let me know.

>cheers

>>>From: Sérgio Freitas
>>That’s very unfair because i bought the player according to the game rules and it was very important for my participation on the uefa cup.

>>>From: Danilo
>>>Antorio Viraldo has sold one of his best players for an unrealistic price. That is the reason why. And now he was fired for unactivity, which points one more reason for me to maintain my decision.
>>>
>>>I hope you understand that we have to maintain the fairplay in our game.
>>>
>>>regards

>>>>From: Sergio Freitas
>>>>I dont now why?

>>>>>From: Game Masters
>>>>>Subject: Transaction Rolled Back
>>>>>
>>>>>The last transfer involving player Rogério Sampaio was rolled back by the game masters.
>>>>>
>>>>>Can you explain me please?

 

March 01, 2009 12:50

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

Almost done, just need to finish and test the logic to return a player when he is not playing, which is the most important piece of this enhancement :)

 

March 01, 2009 12:48

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

Don’t worry Sly, I’m not changing anything anytime soon, specially without a convincing yes, as you said :)
If people keep complaining about that I’ll do an official poll so more people can give their opinions. In the other hand, if we already had a convincing yes I could work on something earlier, but that doesn’t seem to be the case.
Cheers!

 

March 01, 2009 11:09

25 posts(s)

Donator

 

I’m one as well (fulltest) and I can confirm that 3 of my friends playing in the in Mediumticker are also former soccersim/managersim

 

March 01, 2009 10:03

678 posts(s)

 

Are there any updates? I’m still in the same situation. I loaned a player who isn’t playing. So please, could you try and come up with some possible way to recall the player. He’s losing valuable playing time. I was actually subbing him myself and then noticed on 1 day I loaned him out. I was happy to see this at first, but now I’m regretting it since he’s NOT PLAYING!!

 

March 01, 2009 04:50

1,003 posts(s)

Administator

 

Received the email, thanks! Is anybody else experiencing a similar problem?

 

February 28, 2009 18:24

678 posts(s)

 

well I dón’t think 5 vs 4 is a very convincing yes. I would like to see double this in order for you to push it through. I’M REALLY REALLY NOT LIKING THIS IDEA!!!!!!!!. You are making it harder for smaller teams this way because of the reasons stated above. FOR GODSAKE PLEASE THINK THIS THROUGH!!! Please keeps things as they are now, since I think people are just to darn inpatient…..that’s why they now want to change things. It’s only been 2 seasons since the change and you already want to change it again? Common…just wait it out for another 3-5 seasons ATLEAST!!

 

February 28, 2009 15:58

1,003 posts(s)

Administator

 

We already have a theory on what happened. Can you please send a screenshot of the strategies you have for that formaion to our email (admins at rubysoccer)?

cheers!

 

February 28, 2009 15:20

375 posts(s)

 

It is too easy at the moment, but in MS strong youth could refuse to renew contract with weak team, we also had clauses like BCC or relegation. Now we can keep the players forever

 

February 28, 2009 14:19

9 posts(s)

 

I had a wrong substitution during my champions lieague game, i had 2 players coming in at minute 70, instead of 1, and i had a substitution that wasnt made. the player coming in was bruno Caudron that was about to be loaned.

 

February 28, 2009 13:12

651 posts(s)

 

Adolfo Tafoya De Fritas
Attributes
Position: G
Side: -
Keeping: 89
Tackle: 26
Passing: 65
Shooting: 41
Speed: 79
Dribble: 72
Control: 76
Header: 80
Aggressiveness: 99
Stamina: 100

 

February 28, 2009 12:35

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

In the past all the shots in a penalty shootout were displayed, now we have a bug and they’re not displayed anymore. The player order is based in the shooting skill. So it’s a combination of luck and skill ;)

 

February 28, 2009 12:04

387 posts(s)

 

Nothing, in any way of the game, should be too predictive. But some core of the logic (income, player skills, improvement, etc.) need to be pre-adjusted, and that’s what we were talking about – for the the “improvement logic”

 

February 28, 2009 11:33

117 posts(s)

 

Guys please explain how this works.
Team with the highest shoot stat?
luck?
etc etc