Recent Posts
18,542 posts(s) found
I totally agree !!! It will be easier a lot ! I just can’t wait till the LA starts ! =)
My couple of points:
1) we need at least 10 more countries for balanced skills and players’ transfers
2) we could change from 120 points on average to 110 or 100. But don’t forget that lots of good players will only increase the importance of good tactics
My opinion is NO. If we speed up the youth growing process, it will make everything more predictable, less future stars will go on a free transfer list….but it is more real
I must admit I still have some issues with the new way players develop. I simply think it takes to long time to see any changes. I think it sounds reasonable that players shouldn’t peak at age 21-22, but it shouldn’t take so many experience point in order to grow. I will refer to my own player Davide Brollo (again): He has played a total of 108 matches 11 of these has been official games. He may or may not have star potential, but he does not grow. It’s like time stands still with this guy. I generally like the idea of a skill pool with 10-20% percent being released every season, but if you can’t get the players to improve even with a coaching level of 10 and a heck of games something is wrong.
my vote goes to YES.
abracos
damago
I like Philipp’s suggestion because the maximum potential is only reached at the age of 24 – 26. I think 22 is too soon to reach a maximum potential. Then everybody will search for new young players and you can’t sell old players anymore. And with old I mean players above 27. This is not good for the game I think.
So when the age of reaching maximum potential is 26 y.o. (or older) then I vote ‘yes’ otherwise ‘No’.
In this system we also need extra skill improvement by experience for older players. This makes it more interesting to buy or hold older players.
i don’t know if it’s just me, but i would prefer to start with the international matches earlier in the season. so there’d be the “international” athmosphere not just at the season end.
At the moment CL starts on turn 89 with qualifying. why not start the CL-season right after the cup finals ~t58? (with a bigger pause between group phase and round of 16) or at least on t74 (group matches 83,89, 95, 101, 107, 113).
what do you think?
We had an enhancement for that and it was canceled. I guess we have more pros than cons in this case. I’ll reopen it.
Interesting suggestion Alban, we may consider something like that :)
YES: Parag, Philipp, Alexander (3)
NO: Sly, Hopjes (2)
Answering your question Alexander, the player would have 45% of his skill points available for improvement. A team with high coaching would be able to catch up these extra points in a few seasons while in a team with low coaching level the player would probably keep on growing to a later age.
Very good keepers are hard to beat. Maybe too hard. If the shots were from long distance it would also be an explanation, as long shots are easier for the keepers. We’ll have to make some tests :)
Could you add a feature to cancel loan if BOTH managers agree. Penafiel manager in Fastticker loaned my player doesn’t need him anymore, I want to loan him to anther club, so we are both for the cancellation. So there should be no breaking loan fees, just the player should return home =)
Maybe it is possible to implement that after 100 official matches he becomes AD ?
A little extra question here. If a 18 year-old player haven’t been played at all and therefore haven’t recieved any experience points is bought, what happens with his potential growpoints? Will he then be able to improve e.g 45% of total skillpoints in one season (15% for each age 16-18) or will he just keep on growing to a later age?
Definitely a YES vote from me. Lets bring back the fun in youth development.
The Curious Case of Pascali Agosti..
Take a look at this match report
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/275842
it was a match against Atletico Madrid (currently # 1 in La Liga)
they had 40 shots and 36 shots on goal!!!, but whats more interesting is that we ended up 0-0!!
I know Pascali Agosti is a Very good keeper but this is just strange,
7 of Atletico’s players had a 9.9 or higher!
just imagine what would of been if i had my second keeper with rating 84?
Hard to say, but hopefully until the beginning of next week.
Hugo Correia , 20 years old
Sampdoria GSeite: -
Halten: 90
Zweikampf: 28
Passen: 72
Schuss: 29
Schnelligkeit: 84
Dribbling: 75
Kontrolle: 80
Kopfball: 80
Agressivität: 79
Ausdauer: 100
Make your bids.
This sounds very interesting indeed. No more loaning out great youngsters only to be placed on the bench. When can we expect this feature to be implemented?
those are astronomical at the moment for me :)
Player History Show All Previous Next
Season Turn Value Event
20
66 150000000 Transfered from Avaí to América-RN
for Danilo Viana
my record ;)
read above… Hopjes votes NO aswell :)
sponsors are not the only way for income… there are other sources too… :) any way… that question of mine was just for fun, but then.
regarding real life, look at spurs and new castle … ( new castle’s problem for next year is not due to wins/loss, it is a different story)…
Voting is fine, there is nothing decided yet :)
We plan to have a formal system for voting important change like that, but for now we’ll have to use the forums.
So far Parag and Philipp vote YES and Sly votes NO.
Let’s have a vote, since I really don’t like the age idea. I’m ok with the acadamy thing, but after that it should be fair game. I think it’s nice to see a 21-23 year old player increase. It gives more chances to smaller teams to get decent players. This has 1 simple reason. If you know a player will increase more or is more likely to increase from 17-20, those players will never be sold or found anywhere. And if they are sold it’s unlikely they will be cheap and affordable for the smaller teams. In the current way it’s possible a superstar is being missed because he’s 22 but never really played any real matches. Managers could mistake his age for a player that is “done” increasing. This gives way to a smaller team to pick up this player for a decent price and later find out he got a superstar in the rough. PLEASE RECONSIDER THIS CHANGE! I truly think it’s a bad idea and will give a negatice spinoff for smaller teams!
thanks gabriel… that would be good.
welcome back gabriel…
i am fine with what you and philipp have said… in fact i like the idea.
good ideas, hope for change. But i think it will be good to reduce value of players to a maximum of 100 mill. i´m tired to search the transfer list and see player for sale with crazy price tags, what in some case means that not interest on selling him. Now i just will place player on transfer list for max value than is more than 2k mill …..yes stupid but….
mucha suerte
damago
I’m working exactly on loan clauses! You’ll be able to set the minimum coaching level desired and the maximum number of official matches your player can miss. If the other team fails to meet the coaching clause it will not be able to loan your player. If he meets the clause but downgrades the coaching department below the minimum level afterwards, the player will return to your team. The same happens if he misses more official matches than he was allowed to.
I’m back!
You’re right Parag, you’ve read it somewhere. There is nothing implemented yet so I didn’t forget to tell you anything this time, Danilo ;)
What I plan to do is, as Parag said, give other players some kind of bonus when elder players are in the field. Not sure how it will work yet, I’ll post something about it when I start implementing.
Cheers!