works now… thanks:)
I thought my 16th place teams’ beating of the then 4th placed (now 5th) Espanyol deserved some mention in the newspaper:P
Tenerife :) prepare yourself for the assault lol :P (I know i don’t have a chance:P)
I guess it should better reflect the difference in class between teams =)
The following error appears while trying to view the newspaper..
“RubySoccer System Error
Oops! It looks like there was an error. Please try again (this may be related to a server restart / high load)."
By the way, why does that %{match.result} also include team name?? i thought the results were supposed to be understood in the form home X away team scores. if it is so, team names would be redundant, won’t they?
thanks… that was mine… :)
The ranking and The Board are not connected. The Board evaluates your performance against what was expected while the ranking purely reflects match results. So a draw when you have more than 100 points in the ranking will always mean you lose some points, no matter against who you played.
Don’t be pissed Davison, I’m sure you’ll find another similar player soon :)
Unfortunately it won’t. Rules are applied individually so when the first one is checked it won’t be applied cause there is already a player on that position, it assumes you don’t want to swap. Danilo should be the one to comment that and discuss any improvement as he’s the one who designed the match actions stuff.
don’t worry, we will be reviewing everything gradually. i’ve just fixed one article like that, by the way.
and the Board was happy with the result, by the way…
After a draw at home against Varzim I’ve gone down from 184 to 183 in manager rating points ! Is it fair ? =)
im pissed cos now im fked out of getting that player…
-In any match, after minute 45, move the player on zone A, side C and mentality -1 to zone A, side C and mentality 0
-In any match, after minute 45, move the player on zone A, side C and mentality 0 to zone A, side C and mentality -1
I hope this will result in players swapping their attacking positions….
Some typing errors are causing problem in the newspaper articles. like usage of ‘(’ brace instead of ‘{’ ( in my case).
i hope u would let us correct them once more…
There at least 4 basic differences between your picture and the current design:
1) text font: that is a part that could be worked on. but we have to keep in mind that sometimes we can´t have huge fonts on titles. some of the titles are long!
2) the column in the right: well, this is the first version of our newspaper and, as we said, it only contains match result types of articles, for now.
3) the picture: i will still implement tat. the idea is to have a good variety of pictures, but they have to be very generic for this type of article.
4) Interview: again, to be implemented. only match result article types for now.
Other than that, we still don’t have enough templates do populate all of our most important news, and we still need to adjust/provide some more parameters for our reporters.
Here’s my suggestion so we can improve the current design: save one of our newspaper pages (backup the files), make your adjustments and send us back both packages (the backup and the adjusted one, so we can compare and see the code differences). I understand that, with the current design, you don’t even want to be mentioned as a contributor for that page :D.
cheers!
here, a little spoiler to guys who didn’t see it yet, http://www.kreja.nl/rommel/ruby-newsp.jpg ;)
No, I like this picture :). Kidding, will remove soon.
About the newspaper: It would be nice to have some option about the level of the match, so some articles wound’t sound so strange talking about a friendlies… Or the levels of the teams. So when we had a Bayern vs Hertha in Germany it could be named in the newspaper as the “match of the season”.
PS: please remove the picture too :P
i still like the page i designed…this doesn’t look anything like it!
now it would be a good time for a suggestion, in this case :)
it looks…sorry….ugly! Or is that only firefox?
up
I’m looking for good attackers and new, younger than 24 years and above 85, kick, interested, please send a message to me to be able to open negotiations.
By the way, thanks again to our “reporters” ! I will add their name in each one of the articles. cheers!
Our newspaper presses are on! It is still a little bit buggy due to the fact we did not get the fix from our developer plugin and other smaller things, but I think it is already enjoyable as a “beta”! So enjoy!
I think the average is ok, but we could reduce the “standard deviation” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation) making it harder to have superstars or crap players at the end of their evolution path.
I decided to make a scout search of players with 97+ shooting. WHy 97 ? Because I think there are more than 100 shooters with 95 skill. And it looks like the game is full of…well 97 and higher looks like a guy is a supershooter…the FT gameworld is filled with guys who can score a goal from long distance without any effort. I think it would be better to have the average skill decreased =)
I’ve seen this kind of behavior before, and the reason was a virus. Would you mind trying a full system scan?
@ Nirabdha no ad agency in the world would tolerate that. It is not a fraud, but will not bring customers, so the ad agencies will not pay for such clicks.
@ Gabriel you are right, if we (developers and managers) create a community where everyone is interested in football and discussions, this will increase the chances of profitability greatly