Recent Posts
18,535 posts(s) found
i have no clue what it’s good for…and it only annoys me alot since everytime i look i think those are the points.
It’s % of points won, no matches :)
This is pretty common on brazilian league tables, that’s why I’ve added this information. Anybody else liked / disliked it?
% of matches won.
I don’t like. Just kills my eyes now. Besides, a club with highest victory % can still lose the title. At least arithmetically.
Benfica will fight for the title :D
I think the order is the same we see in the groups right now Sly so you are the 6th. And with the new acquisitions Benfica is now the 2nd best in Europe :D Fans are delighted Gabriel :D
I can try the pot idea suggested by Filipe.
allways do…. im the champ of youth
Makes me wonder where I’m ranked then :). I guess I’m 6th or something? My board says this: International expectation: Reach the quarter-finals . So I assume I’m atleast top 8, and since #7 is in group 2 and #8 in groups 1……….you do the math :)
Newton Mourao
Attributes
Position: D
Side: R
Keeping: 26
Tackle: 80
Passing: 67
Shooting: 74
Speed: 72
Dribble: 75
Control: 70
Header: 77
Aggressiveness: 51
Stamina: 42
Age 23
Board wont let me go below $153,809
seems pretty fair when u look at it from qualitative perspective, but then if you look from the country perspective, things don’t look good.
gab, i know it will be difficult to have just one team from one country in a group (in the current qualitative group formation scenario), but how about trying to ensure that there are no more than two teams from the same country in a group… three is a bit too harsh…
It’s hard to make it like in the real CL? Teams would be sorted by pots, like nº1s, nº2s, nº3s and nº4s. Than chose 1 from each to make a group, with the restrictions about the same country…
As you said, unlucky spread. I’m not sure if I’m mentioned how we form the groups, if I didn’t I’ll do it know.
- sort the 16 teams by quality and give them numbers from 1 to 16 (1 being the best, 16 the worst)
- group 1 will have teams 1, 8, 9, 16
- group 2 will have teams 2, 7, 10, 15
- group 3 will have teams 3, 6, 11, 14
- group 4 will have teams 4, 5, 12, 13
eheh This CL is very weird, first because I’m not there :P and then because there are many teams from the same country in the same group. Only spain has 3 teams separated, and as they are most likely to pass we will have 3 Spanish teams in the finals…
Now this is some unlucky spreading of the teams. 3 German teams in 1 group and also 4 french teams only devided by 2 groups :). Last but not least we have 2 teams from portugal and they are ALSO in the same group :).
Gabriel, care to explain here? I know it can happen now and then, but this is just sad :)
3 german teams in 1 CL group …
.
up
actually i thought i had deleted this one, so i sent that pm…
I’ve already answered Nirabdha by in-game message, but let me answer that here too. To make sure the swap will work with the current logic we have you should put each rule in a different minute (lilke 40, 45 and 50).
i can do simple html to, but look @ there coding!
That looks pretty awesome Vaughn.. if you are working on Photoshop I can put that together into HTML.
In any match, after minute 45, move the player on zone A, side C and mentality 0 to zone A, side LC and mentality 0
In any match, after minute 45, move the player on zone A, side C and mentality -1 to zone A, side C and mentality 0
In any match, after minute 50, move the player on zone A, side LC and mentality 0 to zone A, side C and mentality -1
Then, will this do the swapping??
You’d lose more points in the ranking if the draw was against a weaker team ;)
We’ll create a different variable that will have only the score and review the approved articles that should use this new variable. It will be something like %{match.score}
Regarding your team result not being in the newspaper, maybe it would be if we had enough templates, who knows :D
you want me to adjust the coding of the page “newspaper” ? I’m kinda a newbie with codes :)
I think u got yourself in trouble by accepting different numbers of characters. The only way i see that we can improve the layout is to make the top bar with news only max like 200 characters and use the larger generated text below the first collum. Maybe make a max and min with like 25 characters difference? Should be alot nicer to see then and not those huge big gabs.
I’ll try to make a decent page in html and send it u when i got some time this weekend.
works now… thanks:)
I thought my 16th place teams’ beating of the then 4th placed (now 5th) Espanyol deserved some mention in the newspaper:P
Tenerife :) prepare yourself for the assault lol :P (I know i don’t have a chance:P)
I guess it should better reflect the difference in class between teams =)
The following error appears while trying to view the newspaper..
“RubySoccer System Error
Oops! It looks like there was an error. Please try again (this may be related to a server restart / high load)."
By the way, why does that %{match.result} also include team name?? i thought the results were supposed to be understood in the form home X away team scores. if it is so, team names would be redundant, won’t they?
thanks… that was mine… :)
The ranking and The Board are not connected. The Board evaluates your performance against what was expected while the ranking purely reflects match results. So a draw when you have more than 100 points in the ranking will always mean you lose some points, no matter against who you played.