Recent Posts by Gabriel Cesario
4,201 posts(s) found
Não tenho idéia do que possa estar acontecendo, se vc quiser pode mudar de senha e enviar a nova pra mim ou pro Danilo, assim a gente tenta descobrir qual o problema.
Abraço.
Yes Hugo, if you don’t change the transfer price is like you’re refusing the offer, the player won’t negotiate with the other team. You can send the guy a message just to make it clear to him that you’re not willing to accept the price :-)
Cheers!
I’ve created a bug anyway, Fabrizio. I think this problem needs a deeper investigation to make sure it is only encoding related.
Cheers!
I thought I had fixed left-right problem yesterday but today I realized it is partially fixed. If you watch the match from 10 to 10 seconds you’ll see the players in the right sides, but in the intermediate seconds the left and right sides are swaped, producing an annoying effect if you’re watching the replay continuously instead of step-by-step. It’s easy to fix, I’ll try to do it tonight.
Cheers!
Totally agree Ricardo! Added to our list.
Cheers!
Your problem should be solved Torres. Unfortunately it’s probably too late for you to test it, but at least it shouldn’t happen again :-)
Cheers!
You probably have a player whose name contains a character like ‘ç’. I can’t see my replays also because of that. While we don’t fix the problem I’ll change all ‘ç’ to ‘c’ and remove those names from our lists so no more players are generated with them.
Cheers!
It is a bug, but also the expected behaviour of the system. The logic to select the players to complete the squad does not take into consideration the position of the unavailable players, it simply choose the player with best main attribute, no matter his position. We know that’s really annoying but that’s on our list to fix it. After a long time growing our list of bugs is becoming smaller (not that small, we currently have 73, including bugs and enhancements) so we may be able to give a higher priority to this problem.
Sorry for your bad result :-(
Cheers!
I became worried for a few minutes until I looked at the code. The problem is only in the full match replay, not in the match simulation, so don’t worry, your players are playing in the side you positioned them, not in the opposite one :-)
Cheers!
Posted on the admins only topic by Pinto:
“Is the full match replay already working? Does it work with Firefox 2?”
The answer is yes, if yours is not working it`s probably due to enconding problems, characters like `ã` in the player names could cause that. We’re working to fix it.
Cheers!
I liked the suggestion to improve the match engine between seasons (that would mean between MediumTicker seasons). Totally agree about the 4 players line problem, my ideia is to place the players on those intermediate positions in the match instead of creating extra positions in the formation screen. We just need to make sure that doesn’t break anything in the match.
The important thing is that now everybody can see what happened during a match and give us feedback about it. We know there is a lot to do on that matter and it will require patience from all of you guys. Let’s see if we can deliver an improved engine every MediumTicker season.
Cheers!
p.s.: I liked the married vs singles analogy, it really looks like that! :-D
This error will happen when the replay is incomplete due to some specific characters like ‘ã’. We’re waiting for a new release of our programming language to fix that, I’m seriously thinking about removing this kind of character in the meanwhile…we’ll see.
Cheers!
Danilo already fixed the authorization bug, now everybody can access the replay (requires java 1.4 or later). Another know bug: if you have a player with the character ‘ã’ within his name you’ll probably be unable to watch the replay.
Of course not! :-)
Now that we have an initial version of the match replay running I’ll be able to look into it.
Cheers!
I had feedback that non admin users are not able to see the replay (and I know the reason). Also I had an error while loading the replay. Tonight things may be fixed…or not :-)
Cheers!
Yeah, looks like an long updated, the previous FastTicker league tick an in about 25 minutes, not sure why this one took so long…maybe our host is slower today. We’ll keep an eye on it anyway :-)
Cheers!
Ops, my fault :-)
Now you should be able to do that.
Cheers!
Sorry Sly, I’m kinda stuck with the match replay right now. Maybe Danilo could do it, even tough I took care of this whole transfers and contracts thing :-D
Cheers!
You may be low on money relatively to your wages expenses. We have an enhancement on our list to allow you to hire free or cheap players with limited wage even when low or negative on money.
Cheers!
a – you have to put the wage before, but the payer won’t negotiate with you if your offer is lower than the transfer price.
b – yes, the 3-turns rule remains the same to avoid last minute changes on the price
Cheers!
Your effective tackle % would roughly explain that. But you are right, I promised the match replay some time ago but ended up working on other features. Let’s see what we can do. :-)
Cheers!
Managers can make transfer offers with a transfer price different than the specified. The selling manager will then be notified that a lower proposal exists. The proposals value will be public and displayed for everybody in the player info page or in the negotiation details. Lower proposals won’t be accepted unless the selling manager reduces the transfer price accordingly. All proposals whose value is greater or equal the transfer price will negotiate with the player, there will be no privileges for higher proposals. When the transfer price is changed (raised or reduced) all managers with offers are notified.
That’s really strange pg, my guess is that the board automatically renewed his wage, but that should only happen if the number of players you had (that were not transfer or loan listed) at the time of contract renewal had reached the minimum allowed of 14 if I’m not mistaken.
Unfortunately we don’t have this kind of history yet, but we will :-(
Cheers!
Sorry Philipp, no progress on that yet, but I feel the moment is good for something like that. Hopefully it will be out there soon.
Cheers!
Agreed guys, poor or negative teams should be able to hire cheap or free players with a limited wage. Added to our list.
Cheers!
The board opinion is based on your best players on each position. If I remember correctly you had lots of attackers (some of them used as defenders or midfielders due to their good tackle or passing) and not so many defenders and midfielders. Well, if your best midfielders and defenders are marked as A, AD or AM the logic will look at them as attackers, so your team is probably underrated. Don’t worry, this information is not connected to any other logic, for now it’s just to let the manager roughly know how his team looks like compared to the others.
You should be proud, you had success with a discredited team! :-D
Cheers!
You guys are having bad luck, I have 1 youth GK in FastTicker and 1 in MediumTicker. I’ve also made some queries in the database to see if the number of youth goalkeepers was too high. We have 448 youth GKs and a total of 3787 youths, so around 12% of the youth players are goalkeepers, as I would expect. :-)
Cheers!
Easier than I though, FastTicker should already have balanced home and away league matches on next season.
Cheers!
I’m sorry to hear that thorpedo :-(
When I first designed the league matches generation I remeber having read something about how to balance league matches between home and away…I’ll have to do some research to find that again.
Cheers!
- 3 no matter where the player is used, that will probably change later :-)
Cheers!