I’ll create an enhancement request in our list for a transfer approval system on these situations, but don’t expect this to be developed so soon :)
OW WTF come on….the 10.000 time i get screwed over…
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/302389
it’s getting hilarious!
the same old face always winning. cheers Javier
I think we need it at least to fight cheaters ! plz =)
yeah the memories…darn. I think I will give Ruby another try starting today :D
There was a post that all existing players were adapted to the new system
which 2 players are they then. I’ll have a look and explain to you again why they are not growing anymore….
I used to play Managersim before it died, and they had an option that would allow you to select which players u are looking for and only show those players, then once it is only showing the player type that I want i would like to be able to sort by Wage Value Transfer, the ability to sort by stats would also be nice but i understand reasons to not allow it to be done. Maybe allow age but not other stats
Come and live down-under – Australia.
What does that majority means…??? i am having my new semester started and with all these assignments and term projects, think about the 1 hr reduction… No way…
Vaughn, that limit was set before sometime, when gabriel changed the player evolution system. Since those changes, it is like what u just described above, but i am not sure that was the same thing applies to the players who were born before those changes were applied.
Lets not make this an issue, its just that i liked those 2 players. Still they are very good players. Hope they will improve. Still pretty much time left.
I think brazil has the majority of coachs, more than all countries of europe together
Yes, that would be nice, the previous schedule was the best in Portugal, official games ticks at 12h and 24h :D
Regards
go to the player option, there is a little blue round thing with arrows, click on that and u can change them to A or M in your setup list, should be sorted with your Ms or As
You can click on the sort word “pos” to sort G > D > M > A
That what u looking for?
There was recently a suggestion about adding a colorize feature to feature list, I don’t really care one way or another about coloring the stats. But I would like to see either the ability to sort my things other then the transfer value or a drop down menu for position/side that would allow me to eliminate positions that I am not interested in looking for.
I am tired of looking at transfer lists and seeing tons of Goalies when I don’t need a new goalie.
Cheers
Nevermind I can play them out of position, it is just a little annoying to have to look for players that I want playing Mid under my Attackers.
Players stats are set before they come into the game, the growing of the player is also set before they enter. So when he has fully grown to what he has to be he stops. You can’t expect from EVERY player to grow till say like 24/25 and get “good”.
Is there a reason that I can not change the position of players that are on loan to me? I recently loaned a AM hoping to play him as M but because he is listed as AM I can not place him in Mid but the option to change his position is not available to me.
Do I need to contact the loaning club and ask them to change the position for me?
Couldn’t this create problems for my line up if the loaning club changed the players position before ticks so that he can’t play?
Since we have the majority in europe, maybe it’s an idea to adjust the ticks according to the summer time, so remove 1 hour from each tick? Checking the tick @ 2am is kinda impossible.
Anyone else agree?
well, there are complaints about there being to much money in the game. This is a good way to lose some of that money :)
4mil…hahahahha!
fire him:) will lose less amount…
but who is the manager that did this contract… he should be banned from rubysoccer.com
Everyone is allowed some level of stupidity, but pls don’t abuse your priviledge
eneral Info
Age: 37
Nationality:
Club: Albinoleffe
Previous club: Vitória
Estimated Value: $2,428,885
3-Turn Wage: $4,000,000
Contract Begin: Season 21, Turn 104
Contract End: Season 22, Turn 104
Good he is retiring in 30 ticks. Bad that the club will lose 40M in those 30 ticks !!!!
i used to play world elite soccer before that pile of crap died lol
anyways the one thing i enjoyed was the ability to train a certain skill or work on a certain skill Ex tackle, strength , speed ect
i think it would be a great addition
also make players differenciate to training so wheres one player may work hard in training but other may not… like have that as an ability.. maybe use the stamina or aggressiveness ability to judge how much they learn or grow from indiviural training.. maybe have it cost extra money
Hey filipe,
i got the same problem with sylvain, unfortunally we have to deal with it i guess.
Bordeaux Vs Monaco
This game could also be a good example for all what u have said above. I don’t want to add any more in that it would just be a redundant summary of what u ppl have said above.
But making any changes to match engine is not everyday’s job and any changes should be discussed well and should be robust. I know Gabriel and Danilo are working hard everyday to ensure the same. With all the job priorities and abrupt bug fixes they have to do almost every day, it is quite possible that updates to match engine may not be as frequent as we may hope.
But then what we should understand is whatever the condition of the match engine, we all are playing on a level field. It is the same engine for everyone. So, lets make the best of what we have at our disposal.
I agree with most of things were said here, it is true that tactics and strategies must have great influence in the game, and players with great secondary skills should play better than players which have only one great main skill…
But I must agree something must be done with the match engine… at least with the ratings players have in the final of the matches… In the match Philipp notice ahead 8 players from Napoli has a 10 rating at the final of the match and the one with the lower rating has 7,3… If Napoli’s players had more possession and more shots and they couldn’t score (even lost) they should not have that rating in the final of the match… That way Napoli’s manager could check what went wrong and make changes…
Regards from Benfica,
Filipe
The football gods like me, what can I say……
I told my mom that all that time spent at the other “church” wasn’t worth it, the Glorioso church of Benfica would benefit me one day.
haha, have a look at my post above and then take a look on the latest CL match Napoli x PSG:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/317777
this couldn’t better be illustrated then with this match (report). one team was way better by possesioning, ratings and shots – and didnt won. ok, that happens sometimes in RL aswell, but not that often as in here. Regarding the reported match facts in this case the (PSG) tactics have failed, but at least in this match the luck was on their side ;)