Recent Posts
18,562 posts(s) found
2 Torte that was a bad option – when you have one of the top teams even a very good player wouldn’t be enough for an improvement ;)
2 Felipe the players come at an unrealistically high rate.
xxx
Current situation: players reach top potential at 23-24 years. Players ask for the promotion at 17-18 years. You have to wait 6 seasons to see what he grows into. Of course, if he has all low 60-s or very low skills, you can release him, knowing that he wouldn’t grow into 99 sho, spe and dri for sure. But there exists an opinion that the squad size should be increased because currently everyone has about 30 players and gets at least 2 youths per year to be promoted. I say that it is useless to increase the size of the squad because promoting 2 youths each season will make your squad a kindergarten…The better way is to increase the time that those 6 (ok, maximum 8 maybe ? =)) youths will have to spend in the academy to prove that they are worth using in the main squad and to get rid of those bad thoughts that that player in that French team was your undervalued released youth =))
I liked the system in ms where your coach would mail you telling you this player is going to be a star, it wasn’t always true but gave you some indication, he would also tell you if he wouldnt improove your team. Maybe this is something that could be added in time or maybe this is making the managers job too easy?
There is no way to tell which player will become better, if you fire a player before he turns 24 you can easily regret it later.Thats exactly what is being discussed here. Being forced to fire a player because of the squad limit not because you believe he wont be good.
I’m not sure I reed correctly but you are complaining that you have to fire excellent players because the team is too good? :P
At least in the Portuguese league that is not a problem :P
Now seriously, you only fire the player because you believe he will not become as good or better than the ones in your team. But that player can be a star in a lower country… My best players are Brasilian an yet they would probably not be used by you if you had them on America-RN, because you had better ones…
Thats an interesting idea Kuroyuki.
Dirk , in medium ticker i play in Argentina which is currently ranked 6th. I have developed some pretty good players. A 100 keeping 100 speed goalie, 98 and 96 tackle defenders, one 91 passing midfielder, two 92 shooting one 93 shooting attackers over the course of six seasons or so. Thats not bad for a country ranked 6th in the rankings IMO. Better overall from what i got from my team in Fast Ticker Brazil in the same period.
How can you explain this? Can we assume it is depended on more luck than rankings? I think Alban has a point here when he says “Currently almost any player is good”..they just need alot of playing time.
Well, I am lazy……but the way I see it is this.
I could trawl through loads of teams offering friendlies to lots of teams that don’t want them or just won’t accept them (due to inactivity or something) and then I have to withdraw those offers and make some more…and so it goes on.
Or, I let everyone know that if they find a free slot in my schedule and send an offer, I will accept it.
More efficient all round!
btw – I still have loads of free dates, so offer away!
Thank you very much!
I didn’t know this rule about the goalkeeper
Regards
alright mate… :)
ill hope for the best
At the end of the season it is possible they had already reached their maximum for that season. If that’s the case they receive new points to improve on season start and also reset their experience points needed for the next improvement.
Player growth difference: the answer is yes, players in the lower division needs 10% more experience points to improve. When we add a third division it will be 20% more and so on.
Home players skills: it makes sense…I also like the idea of experience positively influencing this skill reduction.
Luxury tax…interesting!
The experience and morale are the attributes missing right now, so much to do… eheh
Regards
Yeah, raise your coaching level and get my young stars :P
yeah not really a fair “match”. France simly just doesn’t get many talents. You are not that special, unless all those brazials came from your own acadamy :). I’ve seen teams in brazil who had like 50+% of players from there own acadamy. Now that’s special. Look at my team. From the 28 players I have, 14 are from Brazil so….they just produce the best players.
Good players for loan all aged 22, lots left to improve, and perfectly suitable for any midtable team
Wages to pay: 0%
Coaching level: 7
Missed matches allowed: 3
Lived in sin, welcome in boys :)
my lads arnt improving …. coaching is highest n all.
playing them in premier league games at the end of the season for like 2-4 games didnt do shit
Currently almost any player is good…but we have so many youths released by stronger countries like Brazil and Spain that noone pays attention to developing players from weaker leagues. I am sure with less players there will be more stars from EVERY country if the overall skills don’t get decreased, of course.
It’s a good idea in strong leagues like Brazil where you have at least several good youth players of the 6 players you get.
In minor leagues the chance of getting a good youth is much smaller (lower country ranking) so when none of your youth is good you need to wait 3 or 4 seasons till you can release them and get a new one.
regarding ‘Home Players Skills’: i agree, reduce the visiting players skills.
.
playing home brings out the best of a player, 100% of his skill values (not more). playing away can reduce the values (-5%), could differ within the players – e.g. the factor “experience” could have a positive influence on the player skills in away matches (just minus 1-3%).
1. Player Growth Difference
Is there any difference of player growth between lower division and premier division?? (obviously for the same coaching level)… ?? I mean do the players in lower division have slower growth rates for same coaching level??
2. Home Players Skills
Which one is better?? to give home teams +3 skill advantage or to reduce -3 from the visiting players?? Either way home players will have the advantage, but i don’t see how any player can gain +3 skill points just bcoz they are playing in home. But away teams are likely to suffer on some of their skills because of travel disorder, fatigue during travel, adjusting to new scenario etc. May be if we had some attribute like “WillPower”, it would have made more sense to increase that attribute for home players.
This could also be somewhat helpful in reducing some factors like passing accuracy, shooting accuracy and effective tackles as players will then have less overall skills, although the difference between teams remains the same.
sensible idea:)
Yeah that would be a solution….slowing down the supply of new players can also bring some activity to the transfer market which is dead right now.
Amac gave me a bright idea !
Additionally It seems like the only advantage of playing in a top league is receiving better youths right now but because of the squad limit we have to let go some of them or fire semi-developed players to open up space. So its not a real of an advantage and everybody can get their share of promising youths which is cool.But the problem is it takes 6-7 years to fully develop a player and 3 youths on average asking contracts a year. With this rate you have to give up way too much. I am sure everyone would hate to fire a player that they put time to develop to open space for a youth.
So, my suggestion is simple:
increase the time youths spend in the youth academy
Sometimes you get a youth aged 16 in the last ticks of the season. Next season he is already 17. Soon he asks for a contract. So, make them be able to stay at the youth academy before they reach 19 or 20. Or let them come at the age of 15. Generally, if the youths spend in the academy 50% more time, it will benefit more than squad size increase.
Or….idea !
Hmm thanks Gabriel. So basically clubs around the world has more or less same income. We have to remember that you need good players to compete in high level leagues and good players come with high wages. If you decide to increase the wages please consider these two facts. Dynamic ticket prices maybe be a solution.
Additionally It seems like the only advantage of playing in a top league is receiving better youths right now but because of the squad limit we have to let go some of them or fire semi-developed players to open up space. So its not a real of an advantage and everybody can get their share of promising youths which is cool.But the problem is it takes 6-7 years to fully develop a player and 3 youths on average asking contracts a year. With this rate you have to give up way too much. I am sure everyone would hate to fire a player that they put time to develop to open space for a youth.
So you can maybe consider at least to increase the squad limit for example by adding 5 more possible spots in expense for a tax.
We can call it luxury tax :0
30 +1: You pay %10 off your total wage as luxury tax every billing cycle if you decide to add one extra player to your squad.
%15 for 2 , %20 for 3 and so on.
Ticket prices are the same in all countries.
The number of ranking points earned in a win or draw depends on the opponent quality, not on the country. Of course as you have higher quality teams in Brazil you earn more points in a victory against a brazilian team than agains a team from Paraguay :)
Lucas Brás
Average all round stats, good player for small team
Age: 28
Position: D
Side: LR
Keeping: 47
Tackle: 80
Passing: 76
Shooting: 76
Speed: 97
Dribble: 85
Control: 80
Header: 84
transfer price: $2,587,761 (board wont let me go lower)
get some coaching level :)
And stop offering your superstars ! I have a low budget and wanna build some cash, so I don’t want to pay millions of YOUR wages !
hehe, joke, didn’t get any offer yet =)
When the wages become 2 times higher, only then we can start these prize talks…