Recent Posts
18,555 posts(s) found
alright mate… :)
ill hope for the best
At the end of the season it is possible they had already reached their maximum for that season. If that’s the case they receive new points to improve on season start and also reset their experience points needed for the next improvement.
Player growth difference: the answer is yes, players in the lower division needs 10% more experience points to improve. When we add a third division it will be 20% more and so on.
Home players skills: it makes sense…I also like the idea of experience positively influencing this skill reduction.
Luxury tax…interesting!
The experience and morale are the attributes missing right now, so much to do… eheh
Regards
Yeah, raise your coaching level and get my young stars :P
yeah not really a fair “match”. France simly just doesn’t get many talents. You are not that special, unless all those brazials came from your own acadamy :). I’ve seen teams in brazil who had like 50+% of players from there own acadamy. Now that’s special. Look at my team. From the 28 players I have, 14 are from Brazil so….they just produce the best players.
Good players for loan all aged 22, lots left to improve, and perfectly suitable for any midtable team
Wages to pay: 0%
Coaching level: 7
Missed matches allowed: 3
Lived in sin, welcome in boys :)
my lads arnt improving …. coaching is highest n all.
playing them in premier league games at the end of the season for like 2-4 games didnt do shit
Currently almost any player is good…but we have so many youths released by stronger countries like Brazil and Spain that noone pays attention to developing players from weaker leagues. I am sure with less players there will be more stars from EVERY country if the overall skills don’t get decreased, of course.
It’s a good idea in strong leagues like Brazil where you have at least several good youth players of the 6 players you get.
In minor leagues the chance of getting a good youth is much smaller (lower country ranking) so when none of your youth is good you need to wait 3 or 4 seasons till you can release them and get a new one.
regarding ‘Home Players Skills’: i agree, reduce the visiting players skills.
.
playing home brings out the best of a player, 100% of his skill values (not more). playing away can reduce the values (-5%), could differ within the players – e.g. the factor “experience” could have a positive influence on the player skills in away matches (just minus 1-3%).
1. Player Growth Difference
Is there any difference of player growth between lower division and premier division?? (obviously for the same coaching level)… ?? I mean do the players in lower division have slower growth rates for same coaching level??
2. Home Players Skills
Which one is better?? to give home teams +3 skill advantage or to reduce -3 from the visiting players?? Either way home players will have the advantage, but i don’t see how any player can gain +3 skill points just bcoz they are playing in home. But away teams are likely to suffer on some of their skills because of travel disorder, fatigue during travel, adjusting to new scenario etc. May be if we had some attribute like “WillPower”, it would have made more sense to increase that attribute for home players.
This could also be somewhat helpful in reducing some factors like passing accuracy, shooting accuracy and effective tackles as players will then have less overall skills, although the difference between teams remains the same.
sensible idea:)
Yeah that would be a solution….slowing down the supply of new players can also bring some activity to the transfer market which is dead right now.
Amac gave me a bright idea !
Additionally It seems like the only advantage of playing in a top league is receiving better youths right now but because of the squad limit we have to let go some of them or fire semi-developed players to open up space. So its not a real of an advantage and everybody can get their share of promising youths which is cool.But the problem is it takes 6-7 years to fully develop a player and 3 youths on average asking contracts a year. With this rate you have to give up way too much. I am sure everyone would hate to fire a player that they put time to develop to open space for a youth.
So, my suggestion is simple:
increase the time youths spend in the youth academy
Sometimes you get a youth aged 16 in the last ticks of the season. Next season he is already 17. Soon he asks for a contract. So, make them be able to stay at the youth academy before they reach 19 or 20. Or let them come at the age of 15. Generally, if the youths spend in the academy 50% more time, it will benefit more than squad size increase.
Or….idea !
Hmm thanks Gabriel. So basically clubs around the world has more or less same income. We have to remember that you need good players to compete in high level leagues and good players come with high wages. If you decide to increase the wages please consider these two facts. Dynamic ticket prices maybe be a solution.
Additionally It seems like the only advantage of playing in a top league is receiving better youths right now but because of the squad limit we have to let go some of them or fire semi-developed players to open up space. So its not a real of an advantage and everybody can get their share of promising youths which is cool.But the problem is it takes 6-7 years to fully develop a player and 3 youths on average asking contracts a year. With this rate you have to give up way too much. I am sure everyone would hate to fire a player that they put time to develop to open space for a youth.
So you can maybe consider at least to increase the squad limit for example by adding 5 more possible spots in expense for a tax.
We can call it luxury tax :0
30 +1: You pay %10 off your total wage as luxury tax every billing cycle if you decide to add one extra player to your squad.
%15 for 2 , %20 for 3 and so on.
Ticket prices are the same in all countries.
The number of ranking points earned in a win or draw depends on the opponent quality, not on the country. Of course as you have higher quality teams in Brazil you earn more points in a victory against a brazilian team than agains a team from Paraguay :)
Lucas Brás
Average all round stats, good player for small team
Age: 28
Position: D
Side: LR
Keeping: 47
Tackle: 80
Passing: 76
Shooting: 76
Speed: 97
Dribble: 85
Control: 80
Header: 84
transfer price: $2,587,761 (board wont let me go lower)
get some coaching level :)
And stop offering your superstars ! I have a low budget and wanna build some cash, so I don’t want to pay millions of YOUR wages !
hehe, joke, didn’t get any offer yet =)
When the wages become 2 times higher, only then we can start these prize talks…
Evandro Goes
Age: 24
transfer price: $30,000,000
Attributes
Position: D
Side: R
Tackle: 93
Passing: 87
Shooting: 76
Speed: 92
Dribble: 87
Control: 86
Header: 81
pls send me friendly requests for only after the turn 30
vaughn, lets not go into why… that is not our concern… i was just stating what happens in EPL, i wanted nothing more than that…
I’ve filled my schedule spending not more than 20 minutes (combined). People love friendlies !
you know, you’re really lazy! ;)
Thanks for the games, but keep them coming.
I still have pleanty of free dates.
i am not sure if all the leagues have this provision, but, in EPL, three new entrantsto the premier league get 50m at the end of the season. Newly promoted clubs bank this fund and get loan so that they can get some good players
You are saying, 3 new teams in the EPL that are promoted from div1 are getting 50mill each at the end of the season and they can use that money to buy players. Why do you think banks do this stuff? Because all the big clubs like ManU, liverpool etc have a much bigger loan standing out.