Recent Posts
18,557 posts(s) found
Example of a good player that simply never got enough playing time to reach his potential
Those players are perfect for smaller teams who want to build a good squad cheaply – although it does take some effort to give those players some field time in the beginning
Happened to me with my GK in fast. Had never played a match before his 30s, got him on free transfer. Now he plays for England national squad…
http://rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/774420
My strategy is to give youngsters some playing time when the match is already won (e.g. ahead by 2 goals) and get them to slowly improve until they are good enough to attract interest from a CPU team to loan them
He’s 89 passing, but rated D
So I cant sell him because hes a D.
I cant play him, cause he wont get better. Will just release him I guess.
This was an issue which was mentionned before. The skill decrease after 30 was there from the very beginning of the game. The different improve profiles came later. So players with a profile of full improvement on 30 were already loosing their skills again.
It has been fixed by the devs a couple of seasons ago but only for new players.
Since you’re playing in mediumticker there will be older players that still have this crazy improve profile.
Be happy you have such a player. They will be extinct in short notice. ;-)
There is nothing you are doing wrong, the player is probably not good enough for most cpu teams who are looking for this position. That is another thing to notice, each cpu team will be looking for the position they believe they need the most at the moment.
Hi, so I’ve got this player who my Coaches report says
This player is unlikely to reach his full potential before his 30s
I got him at 30. Unfortunately, his main skill is now 11 points below his Evolution stage report.
Even more unfortunately, his skills are decreasing, he lost a point on his main skill.
http://rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/695905
So will you fix the coaches reports to say “this player cant reach his full potential ever, so your scout report was wrong, and your other coach report was wrong, waste of time to deal with this horrible player”
Hi, so
http://rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/842722
C player, Estimated value 4.2mil, wage is 8k
Am selling him for 2.5mil, what am I doing wrong?
I like the idea of having deals with lower class clubs so you can send some players to play there. In the meantime I try to loan them out and I am usually successful, but for the ones that are too weak I give them some match time against weaker opponents.
It changed relatively recently when different cpu teams started having different behaviours. There are some further changes planned to be done in the new year where cpu teams will look into managed teams players first, if the price is fair. In the meantime it is not always possible to sell D players or worse, usually C or higher sell more easily.
How do big clubs give younger players playing time? Loan them out? What do they do for back up goal keepers? There must be lower leagues they can send them to, related clubs they have deals with. Can we do that?
If i spend 20mil on a player…i dont want a horrible player.
I dont want to get a negative trait.
I dont want a lame positive trait either.
How can u put in a low skill goalkeeper? They bleed goals and losses.
Hi,
I got some young players who were worth a bit. Unfortunately, the scout report said they were horrible.
So i waited 72 turns as no team wanted to loan them from me.
How do i sell them?
I got a couple guys woth 3.5 mil, selling for 2 mil, but no team has put in an offer.
Any advice? When did selling players change?
Regards,
Yeah, I feel the same way. Sometimes a player had a single great match then was sold, but he remain in that list for the rest of the season. I’ll add this fix to our tasks.
Can we change the average rating to players that have played at least 9/10 matches? When you go into it and look at Top Scorers and Assists in any country it can be misleading as some players have played 2 matches and have ratings of 9.0.
Both my goalkeepers have a negative trait “bad on pk”. He stays one of the best gk in fastticker. So I don’t consider it as worse in league competition or international matches with home and return. My strikers only need to score one more goal. :-)
I only consider it as negative in Cl Final or Club world cup when it comes to penalty kicks after 90’. I have lost them on pk’s.
You may have noticed some CPU teams have more than the limit of 40 players in their squads. This was due to a bug that has now been fixed, CPU teams will respect the same limit of players human managed teams have, even if it changes in the future. Of course that any teams currently above the limit will remain so until they sell their exceeding players, but they won’t be able to hire/loan additional players in the meantime.
The field image is misleading, I grant you that. The GK mark in there is only correct if you’re looking at the heat map for the home team. In other words, for the home team the defenders should be at the bottom and the attackers at the top, for the visitor it’s the other way around.
Maybe we could have directed training in the future to remove negative traits?
Do you really think “bad at saving PKs” is that bad at the moment? PKs need serious re-working IMO as at the moment there are way too many saves.
I’ve wasted 60 on such players! Lol, I hate when keepers have bad at saving penalty kicks, keeper becomes useless then to me.
I dont want to spend 20 million on a player who then develops a shit negative trait and/or a positive trait that isnt that good.
It just ruins the player.
It just ruins my money.
It just ruins my team.
Hi,
are the heat maps back to front?
My attackers are all spending their time at the end where the GK is shown.
My defenders are all spending their time at the other end, opposite to where the GK is shown.
The last poll results are in:
24% – keep inactive players frozen in their inactive teams
76% – randomly free transfer inactive players throughout the season
Thanks for voting!
Players will now improve a higher number of attributes in a single improvement when younger and a lower number when older. Previously all player improvements gave them a random number of points between 1 and 6 (1 and 5 for goalkeepers), but now the earlier improvements are guaranteed to give them more (between 4 and 6 and then 3 and 5) and the later improvements will give them less (between 2 and 4 and finally between 1 and 3). The average number of points a player receives after all his improvements remain unchanged. This change is effective immediately for existing players as well, in proportion to the number of improvements left in his career.
The main goal of this change is to have better players than can be used as first team at a younger age, instead of relying solely on old players. This could also bring a new dynamic to the transfer market as managers may be willing to sell “not so old” players knowing they will have to wait less time to renew the squad.
I like this trait for GKs when they are still young and improving. At least then, when I put them in matches to improve skills (always on the 2nd half), they won’t suck as much :-)
Sporting Clube de Portugal !!!!
Nest of CR7
I have to agree that this trait is not useful for goalkeepers, but I had this before in some of my players and it seemed to work well for me. I had an attacker that had this trait and I always had a sub rule for him at 50 minutes, and he did pretty well. To be honest I didn’t compare his performance when I did this to when he played from start, now that I think of it.
All players should get both a positive and a negative traits if they reach their potential. There was an exception to this unfortunately due to a bug, but it has been fixed for some time now. Of course if you’re talking about MediumTicker more players will have the bug than in FastTicker, as things take longer to smooth out in there.
Imo the national team is not a better competition. They meet a couple of days yo play a match and the players join their own teams aigain. They don’t train tactics like they do in their own team.
You don’t see the best football in national team competition. The best football is played in Champions league.
You can loan out these players but a striker would become man of the match easier than a goalkeeper.
Plays better when playing on second half only
Why is that considered a positive trait? That is just negative, saw it on a goalkeeper, useless.