Recent Posts

Subscribe to Recent Posts 18,568 posts(s) found

February 03, 2010 01:50

828 posts(s)

 

who ever releases a 27 fing years old epic player ?

tell me who and ban them from the game or reverse it

im sorry but if its not due to a computer managed team releasing a young player like that with excellent skill
then its cheating in my book

who the fuck is this rob love dude that the player came from whos ranked 120 or something.

i demand that this is reversed

personally i think priority right now next to match engine is free transfer
now if a manager cannot afford to keep a player thats one thing
but to have a manager leave a team as a pile of over payed shite then start to do the exact same thing is to me one of two things

1) hes a shit manager and shouldnt be allowed at big clubs
2) hes a cheater

 

February 03, 2010 01:14

241 posts(s)

 

I think saying “there is no progress in the game” is not fair. Updates like age and stamina effecting players performance are excellent for example . How about press box and auto friendly scheduling etc. I am optimistic that game will improve drastically after some fixes, especially with CWC. We just have to be a little more patient as free users.

 

February 02, 2010 23:49

120 posts(s)

Donator

 

What i see is than today is much harder to build a top gun Team, Before was much easier because youths grow faster than today. I build a much greater Getafe than the one i have today and it is not eassy to level all aspects, stadium, staff dep., sales and buys….. i hated because i have a worst team than before, BUT i think it makes it much better and a real competition. Now, unknown teams win tittles, big teams fall down…. so thats good, thinks changing from one season to another. Before it was always the same team wining tittles or getting to finals.

fix is need it in all aspects, but for me the fun will came with the world club cups and some improvements.
What i hate is new countries, unless you open (i mean start) it when at least 5 managesr apply to join than league. lack of competition just make it so boring…..
also i agree with Filipe but also i understand everything else……
SALUD

 

February 02, 2010 22:57

803 posts(s)

 

I also find that deal to be strange, but it seams to be ok because that one was not canceled.

About players overpaid I believe it will happens what happen with blackpool, selling players for creapy prices because no one is willing to pay that wages. I just hope he can manage it this time betther than Blackpool…

 

February 02, 2010 22:46

828 posts(s)

 

i have 6 mill to spend
if you can give me a 29 year old solid defender, mid, or fwd

then ill do buisness with you

 

February 02, 2010 20:36

34 posts(s)

 

already finished what I would do. Equador closed.

 

February 02, 2010 19:14

34 posts(s)

 

I blame myself for Equador.

 

February 02, 2010 18:22

102 posts(s)

 

Hi all,

Jakob is right on target with his comments. I’ve been with Napoli since season 14, but interest has been very low for a long time. There is no progress in the game and the development of new players takes decades.

/Alexander

 

February 02, 2010 18:20

44 posts(s)

 

two fantastic dc for sale at maritimo. and check sebastiano balzano too. 97 pass and just 25 years old.

 

February 02, 2010 16:38

241 posts(s)

 

I agree that economy needs a fix, i think the coaching department is too expensive to maintain and its a must because only way to develop players needs decent coaching level. You have to somehow keep selling players to balance your economy.

I dont agree however that players should develop too fast. That would make the game less challenging.

Players develop very slowly with only friendlies but play them in official games as well and they develop pretty good rate. Off course doing that and staying competitive is not easy and you have to make a choice.

Ideal conditions a player can reach near his potential around 22 which is not that bad. I would say with 9 coaching roughly you need 500 friendlies and 50 official games. You can do that in 5-6 seasons.

I just focus on just giving them as many games as i can, I dont accept them to develop every tick that wil make you disappointed.

 

February 02, 2010 15:50

803 posts(s)

 

I don’t think it is that hard to build a competitive team from nothing… 30 years old 95+ skilled players are being sold for less than 5M, there still lots of average youngs for free without no one fighting for them… I just think the loan market is still not that attractive for loaners, but there are still great players there…

About the economy, I think it is just taking too long for people to lower prices since the changes made in the game economy…

 

February 02, 2010 15:19

25 posts(s)

 

Hi all,

I thought i would post my evaluation of this game after playing it for some time.

My general opinion is that the game is way to “slow” and boring. Let me explain:

I have been with the same team in fastticker Bayern München since season 14 and this season out of complete boredom changed to a brazilian side, ok so why don’t i just leave if i find it boring?.. good question :) because i want this game to be better than Soccersim were and because this game have potential to be so. Here are my main arguments:

Dead economy

This game has the most boring economy i have ever seen, it is almost impossible to sell a player unless you sell your 17 year old youth player with 600.000 in starting value for 2 mill. It is impossible to make a profit on a semi strong side by just having standard training facilities and normal salaries, only in weeks with matches is it possible to make a positive result. This is simply not good enough, and makes the whole game frozen and boring.

Way to slow player development

A player develops till he is 27 or maybe even later, i find this way of progress to slow and boring, i am big fan of the SS philosophy where they stop growing around 19/20. Maybe not realistic but it makes the game more interesting, fun and accessible for new players. It takes a minimum of 10 seasons to build a competitive side with the player developing system of today, critical if you want new happy users, they will simply get bored before they fall in love.

Big club clause

Yes i know many of you hate it, but it gives an golden opportunity to find a good player in lower teams, it takes alot of personal effort to find players this way, so it also works as a motivation for dedicated players, a kind of treasure hunt.

General things

Of course the game lacks things like countries, realistic game engine, realistic european tournaments etc. by i dont find that as important as the above mentioned
I know this game is new and made by people who dont do this as a full time so its totally understandable that everything is not in place yet.

The cornerstone of soccersim which made the game interesting for the masses was that you could join the game and relativily fast build up a strong squad with some dedication and luck, find a promising youth in a country where not everybody else looked, now i cannot see how i can build up the stadium, and it takes minimum 10 season to build a competetive side if you start in a new club from scratch NOT ACCEPTABLE if you want new happy users. Each of my clubs economy is going down even without any stupid investments. The backside in Soccersim where that some managers had a billion in their bank account but seriously so what???

This is not ment to be understood as negative but as a debate on how the future for Rubysoccer has to be, so please post you feelings about this topic and let’s discuss.

 

February 02, 2010 12:47

637 posts(s)

 

Still 4 90+ players for sale.
.
Bonilha M C (overall score: 626)
Tac 82
Pas 94
Sho 81
.
Spe 96
Dri 94
Ctl 92
Hea 87

Ballester M C (overal score: 618)
Tac 80
Pas 90
Sho 85
.
Spe 95
Dri 83
Ctl 96
Hea 89

Reina AM RC (overal score: 616)
Tac 81
Pas 85
Sho 95
.
Spe 98
Dri 93
Ctl 72
Hea 92

de Ceca A R (overal score:616)
Tac 79
Pas 84
Sho 90
.
Spe 94
Dri 83
Ctl 95
Hea 91

 

February 02, 2010 12:10

6 posts(s)

 

pois, mas eu posso ter uma equipa que não marque muitos golos e ganhou os dois jogos(casa e fora) aquela equipa e nao tiro vantagem disso! é uma sugestão, o confronto direto como criterio de desempate em primeiro que a diferença entre golos!

 

February 02, 2010 10:06

15 posts(s)

 

i agree. and he made 2 deals (at least) with the blackpoll. one for a defender with 92 tackle for 70M (SEVENTY) that was canceled by the administrator and 40M for a striker that i think they should cancel either because he is cheating. we all know that the guy doesnt worth 40M and that the market have better options. he is a CHEATER.

 

February 02, 2010 08:26

828 posts(s)

 

http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/79229

 

February 02, 2010 08:22

828 posts(s)

 

Felipe Santos that managed blackpool for ever
left blackpool and took bayern munichen

the only problem i have with this is the state he left blackpool.

over payed old shite
all of his player wages are so high
and hes just doing the same thing to munichen hes just joined the team and has signed 2 free agenst to 80,000+ contracts

i mean really?

we allow ppl to cheat thier way to winning free agent bids, which btw its a mystery to why such young and excellent players would be free agents

ive warned you guys about this so many times and now look
hes doing it agian

i think its bullshit, hes ruining the transfer market with his b.s prices n all

just my opinion
but had to speak it

 

February 02, 2010 01:30

4,319 posts(s)

Administator

 

(pt-br) Confronto direto como criterio de desempate ainda nao foi adotado. Na verdade cada pais tem um criterio diferente, entao resolvemos generalizar para todos como sendo diferença entre gols a favor e gols sofridos, se ainda houver empate, gols a favor. A unica excecao eh o Brasil cujo primeiro criterio de desempate eh numero de vitorias.

(en) Direct confrontation was not adopted yet. In fact, each country has a different criteria, so we generalized for all using goals difference, and if they’re still tied, goals scored. The only exception is Brazil where the first criterion is number of victories.

 

February 02, 2010 01:13

6 posts(s)

 

ola,
Ja reparei que no meduimticker(nao sei se no fastticker é igual) o desempate entre equipas com os mesmo pontos nao é por confronto directo! é uma coisa que está muito mal…

 

February 02, 2010 01:10

4,319 posts(s)

Administator

 

Don’t stop dreaming DaMaGo ;)
Just a side note, it would be much easier if this World Cup replaced existing continental competitions, but I know this is not what the majority wants…let’s see.

 

February 02, 2010 00:42

241 posts(s)

 

Well in MT south america there are not many active managers in countries other than Brazil which makes their job easier but believe me Argentina didnt move up the rankings in one day. Yes , crap teams in Paraguay and Uruguay makes the job easier but eventually you have to face ranked 1 Brazilian teams in later stages and you cant get that enough points to move up without beating them. If you look at it that way maybe you will see its not walk in the park.

Anyway i think adding more countries makes this situation worse because now you have more chances facing poor teams in qualifying.

In Fasticker after countries like Russia, Greece and Turkey added didnt it make easier for top dogs to qualify in CL and EL? I dont see any complain there.

And i am all in for World Clubs Cup.

 

February 02, 2010 00:08

287 posts(s)

 

(en) I didnt understand. Say in english and in your default language.

(pt-br) Não entendi nada. Fale em inglês e em outra língua também.

 

February 01, 2010 23:19

6 posts(s)

 

hello, I wanted to put a question!
why that in meduimticker the sattle of matter enters equips it is not in first place?
my english is not very well, but of the one to understand!lol
regards

 

February 01, 2010 23:08

120 posts(s)

Donator

 

I had been saying for so long than we need to change the countries ranking system, because todays ranking system, gives always Brazil the best youths, so the best players.
But now i noticed in MT than Argentina, with just 5 managers its getting more points than most of the europeans, so the will get the second best youths.

NOT FAIR AT ALL!
I though a world club´s cup will be implement, but so long i stopped dreaming.

Now something have to be done, hope soon.

What´s your oppinion?

salud

 

February 01, 2010 22:19

241 posts(s)

 

I think starting value is still good indication but it comes down to players hidden potential. Cases like this are very rare. Now what are the chances a player reaching both 100 in tackle and passing with starting value 118k : http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/87904

I did also choices that made me regret later.

Bottom line is you cant keep them all and you did and will fire someone with great potential .

i really like this aspect of the game, you can only make educated guesses but you can never be sure.

 

February 01, 2010 21:52

34 posts(s)

 

already finished what I would do. Peru closed.

 

February 01, 2010 19:35

34 posts(s)

 

I blame myself for Peru

 

February 01, 2010 14:46

34 posts(s)

 

as I said earlier most viable balance the first south america, or a set number of seats for each country regardless of ranking, as is done in real life, something also to balance more competitions how to select the fighting pre-liminary and also in the group stage to try to create the best teams facing the best and the worst facing the worst, if not always the same countries will be in the hearts and occasionally new countries will have teams playing these competitions, which will not cause your rankink improve .

 

February 01, 2010 14:42

34 posts(s)

 

some players dropped the value.

 

February 01, 2010 14:22

287 posts(s)

 

96 in average!!!! o.0 Amazing