Recent Posts
18,551 posts(s) found
I’m pretty sure it can :)
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/657611
check this game… it´s kind a funny.
my 94 shoot attacker made 11 shoot at the target and no goal.
his 73 shoot attacker made 2 at the target and score 1 goal.
his 80 shoot attacker made 3 at the target and score 1 goal.
Can it be done?
I’m going to focus on my young players, so I sell all my 90+ players for cheap prices. Take a look at Bordeaux.
Just develop to 81 shooting skill
A few things that stick out:
Valenciennes has 5 losses and 2 ties with a score of 10-16 and total shots of 183-70
Average shots per game: 26
Average sh/g allowed: 10
Ratio average shots per game: +2.6
Goals per game: 1.43
Goals allowed per game:2.29
Ratio average goals per game: -1.6
Average shots per goal scored: 18.3
Average shots per goal allowed: 4.375
Ratio of average shots per goal: -4
Facts: Weak Goalie. Strong Outfielders all over the pitch
Rennes
4 losses, 2-6 in goals, 84-31 in shots
Ratio avg shots per game: +2.7
Ratio avg. goals per game: -3
Ratio avg. shots per goal: -8
Toulouse CPU
4 wins, 8-4 goals, 44-111
Efficiency: 4
Troyes
2 wins, 2 draws, 7-3 score, 51-120 shots
Efficiency: 5.5
Fact: Above average goalie, Defense, Midfield. Less than Average Strikers
Bottom line: It takes Valenciennes 4 times the effort to score a goal to its opposition. It takes Rennes 8 times to do the same thing. Toulouse on the other hand, has been 4 times most efficient in its 4 wins
What do you guys make of this. Any opinion is welcome!!!
Villareal is looking for a top gun shooter and we play fair money or trades in exchange.
please send me ingame mail to start negotiation.
cheers
Damago
I want to point out something again about the unfair relation between stadiun investments and future profits.
I know a fair change will benefit me the most, but although it is a fair change than have to happen, i hope soon.
salud2
95 shooter for sale..all decent offers would be considered!
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/63440
Current French League Standings Week 19
(only human teams)
CL 1 16-human Auxerre******45
CL 2 16-human Grenoble*****42
CL 3 16-human Brest********39
CL 4 16-human Nice********39
EL 5 16-human Marseille*****38
EL 6 16-human Rennes******32
EL 7 16-human Valenciennes**30
8 16-human Troyes******30
9 16-human Monaco******29
10 16-human Lyon********24
11 16-human AC Ajaccio***23
12 16-human Bordeaux****23
16 16-human Guingamp****18
19 16-human Lens********12
20 16-human Niort********12
Current Classification Without Deviations
1. Auxerre********48 +3
2. Valenciennes****47 +17
3. Grenoble*******45 +3
4. Rennes********44 +12
5. Brest**********43 +4
6. Marseille*******40 +2
7. Nice**********37 -2
8. Monaco*******35 +6
9. Ajaccio********22 -1
10. Lyon*********21 -3
11. Guingamp*****20 +2
12. Bordo********19 -4
13. Troyes*******20 -10
14. Lens*********13 +1
15. Niort********11 -1
Please change the system… more one result unfair. This will be a draw…
3 × 0
4-4-2 formação 3-5-2
46% posse 54%
17 remates 18
17 remates no alvo 14
88% passes acertados 84%
58% desarmes eficazes 58%
1 cantos 1
9 foras-de-jogo 0
5 faltas 1
The other goalkeeper have 10 ok.. but my goal keeper 8.5.
But how is possible a player with 69 shooting and with 4 shoot score 2 goals ?
Posição: M
Lado: LC
Guarda-Redes: 41
Desarme: 66
Passe: 80
Remate: 69 -—
Velocidade: 83
Drible: 75
Controlo: 80
Cabeceamento: 79
Agressividade: 69
Condição: 88
Week 18
Sosho-Bordo 0-0 (19-9)
Bordo +1
Week 19
Nancy-Rennes 1-0 (4-19)
Rennes -3
Toulouse-Valencieness 4-3 (9-34)
Vale -3
Mid Season Classification
Troyes 12
Bordeaux 4
Lyon 3
Nice 2
Ajaccio 1
Niort 1
Lens -1
Guingamp -2
Auxerre -3
Brest -4
Marseille -2
Grenoble -4
Monaco -6
Rennes -12
Valenciennes -17
Indeed, I have always known him to be the main problem, even though I figure his handicap to my team is way too disproportional
I have kept playing him as he’s still growing, alas not where he’s supposed to :(
I just checked your keeper and i think he is below average for top league. Maybe is a big part your team loosing points?
Imagine he would be 88 keeping and 81 speed in away games which is basically 85.2 keeping.
lol, I was measuring something completely different :D
You’re a life saver!!!
For one on one situations i think its (0.6*keeping + 0.4*speed) * dribble/100
From Wiki
Keeping: responsible for 60% of goalkeeper defense power; not used by other players
Speed: responsible for 40% of goalkeeper defense power on defending shots, other players use it to run
Dribble : …used by keepers to limit their defensive power if your formation does not have any defender on mentalities -1 or 0
Control:….for goalkeepers it’s used to decide if he catches, deflects or punch teh ball to outside the field in a good defense
Header: ..also responsible for 40% of goalkeeper defense power on defending headers
I apologize for being so slow but how is a goalie’s skill measured again???
:)
This team is 5 officials matches without loose and beating great teams (like my one damit!). After 6 games without win, what happened? Have you found a great formation?
footyman – this is possible yes, even that many more countries entering the south america, less vague Brazil will have to ensure that the competition for ranking points.
young players for sale. 22 years old attacker with 85 shoot, 83 speed and 82 heading just for 10M (still developing). and others. maritimo – portugal
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/251
Several players on sale, great players who can help your team, do not miss this opportunity and make your purchase.
Para mim seria deixar como esta mas apenas quando se compra um jogador que esta emprestado automaticamente o loan acabar…..
Moi je parle Francais, Anglais, Espagnol , Portuguais, la situation n est pas la…. le jeu a changé est beaucoup des resultats sont tres injustes quand on domine avec plus de 20 tirs que l adversaire… incompréhensible d avoir des attaquants avec 100 de tirs et en par exemple 30 match avoir 1 ou 2 buts… je comprends que avoir 60 ou 70 c etait trops… mais quand meme….
Please guys, let’s keep the topic discussion around the topic’s subject. As Dhimitri said “we all want this game to develop and progress. Point at the problems is the best way to start improving it”.
Cheers!
DaMaGo, I thought you may have been French.
Where to begin…
First & foremost:
chauvinism –
1 : excessive or blind patriotism
2 : undue partiality or attachment to a group or place to which one belongs or has belonged
3 : an attitude of superiority toward members of the opposite sex; also : behavior expressive of such an attitude
as per Miriam Webster
Wrong way to describe my attitude towards the following sentences you’ve posted:
“This teams must be in a black list, you just have to read the posts to read how mush unfair shit is happen to then……..”
“…but by then i dont remember nowbody complaining than their attackers score to much….. but now it is all complains, and threat to go on vacations)????”
D’ailleurs, pour ta référence, je suis d’origine française…
Et finalement:
“you the one who need to find what world we living and dont give MIERDA to others ethnical groups…”
-Comment dire une imbécillité pareille sans même me connaitre? Pour ta référence, j’ai vécu à plusieurs endroits dans le monde. Au fait, hablo español también.
Il me semble que contrairement à toi, je ne me crois pas supérieur aux autres suite à mes expériences personnelles. Pourquoi avoir même pris cette approche dans le débat en tant que tel?
Aucune surprise avec la façon dont tu as réagi…
The post is not about winning a victimization award, as you assumed in the previous post. That’s why so far, in the so called classification above, all 15 human managed teams are listed (Hence, the impact on all of us, not a personal level). The goal is simple, measure the full deviation of the results from what we consider “normal”.
Second, this post is an effort to help on things, not put the game down as you again assumed.
Since all of us, including Patrick, you, and me, are here debating about the game shows our commitment to the game (whether we are consumers or creators).
Rest assured that we all want this game to develop and progress. Point at the problems is the best way to start improving it.
Dimitri, we both agree match eng needs changes. I lost games or tie like the one you point out. But this is happening to everybody…… while we wait we have to work with what we have.
To Patrick c., i want you to know than i was born in Paris, i have family in France and i grow with a mixt of cultures, plus i lived 13 years out of Europe.
So the highlights our cultural differences are true, you are a chovinist!!!!! big time. But careless….. i think is you the one who need to find what world we living and dont give MIERDA to others ethnical groups….. the world is too small dude!!!
and to every else sorry this is my last personal post…
SALUD2
Clearly DaMaGo is emotion-driven. The entire point of this post in an analytical approach to the entire situation.
Myself, posting to go on vacation is what we call humor. Evidently, your interpretation of my sentence highlights our cultural differences…
The reason of this thread is not to cry but simply to collect some evidence of what is wrong with the game engine. Hopefully that can be constructively used when the match engine gets fixed as it is being now.
FYI…in RL, when weak teams win versus strong teams, they usually deserve it, it’s not a matter of accident.
Alcocorn fully deserved the 4-0 score against a shitty display by RM
Both United and Liverpool got thrown off the FA cup while playing at home against 3d and 2nd division teams respectively. And the fact is both winners deserved to win. It is very rare for a week team to win if it plays like shite. However, it’s common for a strong team to win games even when playing bad. Actually that’s a MUST for teams to win their leagues, that’s how most top teams, apart from Barcelona, manage to be consistent.
FYI…The game here should reflect RL as much as possibly, however, try as you must, our virtuality here cannot and shouldn’t be as much complex as RL. The game is a matter of numbers, quality is numbers, performance is numbers, and hence quantity of number decides. Things like player emotions or referee mistakes or turf quality and weather conditions don’t apply in virtuality.
FYI…the cases listed here are not based on the quality of strikers or the whole team. The only factor considered is amount of shots made on goal as a measurement of performance on the pitch. This is a reality of numbers, hence it is expected that a team making 2-3 times more shots than opposition, then it should win the game no matter the quality of its players. In addition, if the team dominating is also far superior in player quality then it is expected not only to win but also to crash the opposition. You may argue as much as you like, but the numbers beat abstraction in our case.
If Toulouse wins 3 games versus 3 of the best teams in the league with an aggregate of 4-1 goals and 35-77 shots, then something is clearly very wrong. You do understand that, don’t you???
So far, in 16 games played in the league I have outshot opposition in the 15 of those games. The only one games was against Brest lost 0-3 and was completely thrashed. No complain there.
I lost 4-0 to Marseille, 19-16 shots in my favor, no complain there. Next game tied at home with Monaco 3-3, 19-12 shots in my favor. No complain there, despite the fact that I wonder how can my D leak 7 goals in 28 shots against (I do have only an average goalie at best, but great defensive players) and my offense scores only 3 in goals in 38 shots made when. Again these matches was not included.
As for the rest of games, wins, losses, or ties, Valencieness has been dominating over and over, yet I find myself in mid table with a team averaging 637 pts per player and 2.5 times the shots made on goal versus opposition.
The quality of my shooters cannot hurt me as they are great. The quality of shots (I don’t buy this either) cannot hurt, for I shoot from close or medium range. Possesion?? I got it!!!. Tackles made?? Every frigging game. Strikers??? I got them!!! Mids, I got them!!! Everything you want, other than a great goalie, I got it. So don’t philosophize with me!!!!
FYI…Regarding the strikers scoring less, and the rest of the team more…I was the first one to cherish the new change, when most of the rest were crying out loud why they strikers wasn’t scoring 10 goals per game. This has got nothing to do with what we are talking about.
Bottom line: If all the numbers are showing me that my team is performing in full gear and if my team is full of quality, then I am left with no explanation why there’s no end product. And if there’s no logical answer, then things are not as they should be and should change!!! ;)