Recent Posts
18,535 posts(s) found
i bought a player recently that the team that i bought from had him out on loan.
know that he is my legal property
his contract is with me and not the loanee
the contract with his previous owner is null and void
i requested his rightfull return from “loan”
no response
so please put him on my squad so i can get him in his first game in a sunderland uniform
thank you
Edouard Allain
Pos: M
Sd: LR
Tk: 68
Pass: 99
Sht: 77
Spd: 87
Dri: 98
Ctrl: 93
Head: 93
Age: 23 still developing
Price: 50M
This and more:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/701
Our host rebooted our machine around the tick time so I ran it manually about 30 minutes past the regular time.
strikers:
Monteiro 100 shot, 100 head, 92 dribble
Spaltini 100 shot, 94 dribbel, 96 control
Gouveia 95 tackle, 93 shot, 96 speedy
Defenders: all with 97+ tackle
Middle: very high tackle, pass and dribble
Goalkeeper: 99 goal, 100 head, 98 control, 89 speedy (his average: 94)
And playing home.
Ok to loose for 0×1, 0×2 or 1×2, but 0×4??? insane.
The game engine is complete BS… Mind you, I wouldn’t want to be Valenciennes but I’m heading down your way Dhim.
Is there a tick time change in fastticker? An hour too late.
Valladolid with 90+ shooters with in all its departments maximizing its scoring chances. In almost all players are good all around players, basically you have a compacted offensive minded team that can bite you from everywhere :)
i think valladolid plays with netter players, better defense and better middlefield and bettter attackers.
Valenciennes selling interesting players. All prices negotiable so let me know!
cheers
D
Great players, great defence, great middlefield, playing home:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/658314
Week 13
Monaco-Nancy 1-2 (30-14)
Monaco -3
Marseille-Ajaccio 1-1 (24-9)
Mars -2
Aja +1
Troyes-Strasbourg 2-0 (13-20)
Troyes +2
Classification after week 13
Troyes 9
Nice 5
Bordeaux 2
Lyon 2
Ajaccio 1
Lens -1
Grenoble -1
Brest -2
Marseille -2
Monaco -6
Rennes -6
Valenciennes -12
Busy field day at the office Week 12:
Toulouse-Monaco 1-0 (14-26)
Mon -3
Lens-Lyon 1-2 (21-14)
Lens -1
Lyon +2
Ajaccio-Troyes 0-0 (19-8)
Ajaccio -2
Troyes +1
Nice-Valenciennes 3-1 (14-20)
Nice +2
Vale -1
Classification after week 12
Troyes 7
Nice 5
Bordeaux 2
Lyon 2
Lens -1
Grenoble -1
Brest -2
Monaco -3
Rennes -6
Valenciennes -12
Ajaccio evens out
I would kinda agree but since im new to the game this is the first match engine if worked with. At the start of the season i couldnt win a game with Chelsea and went through various tactics and formations until i watched the match engine and came up with what i use now.
Now everytime i log onto RubySoccer im disappointed if i lose, i just won the FA cup in my first season so im over the moon! If it does get changed it only needs tweaked, i think its good at the minute.
All i would say to you is watch your last few matches and you will see a trend starting to happen. Dont wanna give away to many secrets!
Week 11
Valencieness-Auxerre 1-2 (21-6)
Val -3
Aux +3
Classification after week 11
Troyes 6
Nice 3
Bordeaux 2
Ajaccio 2
Grenoble -1
Brest -2
Rennes -6
Valenciennes -11
Auxerre goes even
Interesting fact that my team was making long shots, when the setting was at medium. Anyway, I’ll stop trying to make sense and just go with the flow :D
tested these forms and the rest was the same, losses behind the losses, I do not know what to do, such as individual tactics work? I never got hit with them too.
players for sale. all position and all age. even if they aren.t listed we can make a deal. maritimo-portugal
Week 8 was calm
Week 9
Grenoble-Ajaccio 1-1 (21-11)
Grenoble -2
Ajaccio +1
Classification after week 8
Troyes 6
Nice 3
Bordeaux 2
Ajaccio 2
Grenoble -1
Brest -2
Auxerre -3
Rennes -6
Valenciennes -8
MARKET WILL SET UP THE PRICE. like always had been.
now the market is low as in a long time, you can find great players with lower tag.
few season ago most of good players was selling between 50 mill and 150 mill,,,,, so it is going down…
It is up to manager, to manage all aspect of the club, and in this case how much you want for a player….
for me all of this IT IS NOT IMPORTANT, It is just fair market!!!!
We have to focus in important issues. like match eng. and CLUB WORKD CUP !!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! please.,…..
MARKET WILL SET UP THE PRICE. like always had been.
now the market is low as in a long time, you can find great players with lower tag.
few season ago most of good players was selling between 50 mill and 150 mill,,,,, so it is going down…
It is up to manager, to manage all aspect of the club, and in this case how much you want for a player….
for me all of this IT IS NOT IMPORTANT,
I don’t think there should be any control for max price, if some one has a player listed for much more than he worth he simply wont sell him. As well as if we want to sell a player we need to ask a price we know someone will accept… The only danger I believe there is it’s the speculative prices of young players, but there are very few teams that sell their younger players these days.
Maybe we could have 2 systems? One for under 25’s and over 25’s? The 3.1 ratio would be good for the 25+ and maybe 5.1 for the younger generation. This would bring more stability to the game.
You could have a higher ratio than 3:1, I just pulled that out as an example pricing ratio.
Anyway you look at it their has to be some means of placing a price cap on player transfer prices. Afterall management currently gets involved when you try to set a player transfer price which they think is too low, why not have management get involved when a player transfer price is being set too high.
I see some problems If a ratio like that is applied . For example would you sell a promising young player worth 1M for 3M? You pay 200k-300k for coaching every 3 turns to develop the player and you are gonna let him go for just 3m? That would be terrible return on investment. You would rather keep him and that means less transfer activity=boring.
Let the market mature, eventually the prices would go down. If someone really wants to sell a player he eventually has to reduce the price at some point anyway when there is no demand.
The 3:1 ratio is pretty much at work right now. Most good players range around 10-15 million and they usually get selled between 20-30 million. Very few players get sold above 30 million.
As a matter of fact, this is very much a buyers market right now
I think having some sort of pricing control is needed in this game. I like the idea of using a pricing ratio to do this.
It would work like this: the pricing ratio could be set at say 3:1, so if player A has a current value of $1 million, he can be sold for an amount up to a limit of $3 million, if the player is worth $10 million, he can be sold for up to $30 million, etc. I think you get the picture of this idea, so what does this everyone think of an idea like this?
I need some help!!!!!
I cant get good results even with teams that have players with Worst Skills than mine.
In Uruguay I have one of the best teams if not the best individual players, I have good Midfielders. good defence, 2 solid strikers (in comparison to the other Uruguayan teams) but there is a problem……. I can’t win!!!!!!!
I am currently on 2nd place I have won 12 games, tied 6 and lost 4.
i do not know if its because of the Match engine upgrade (I think it is) because I have been champion the last 3 seasons, and have been improving my team A LOT if you look at the other teams they dont have good players, with the exeption of Peñarol all the other teams are BAD, and yet Peñarol have lost 5 matches, in a league where Peñarol and Dinubio have Superstars in comparison to the other players.
Out of the last 10 matches I have only Won 4 matches Lost 3, and tied 3.
I think this is not acceplatble according to the skills of my players and the skills of players of other teams.
Something needs to be done. There is something wrong
Yeah i can see were your coming from and ‘Super clubs’ i supposed have the right to be there with managers doing great jobs, i still reckon there should be a cap put on a players, so they cant ask for stupid money.
Have you tried 3×5×2 or 3×6×1?
Middlefilders are too much important now. M+1 and M+0 it is good for good shooters too.
Yes I’ve noticed this as well on quite a few occasions…this aspect of the game engine is HIGHLY unrealistic.
Fantastic post Dhimitri! I was even in fact planning on compiling the same kind of statistics…