Recent Posts
18,551 posts(s) found
it´s seems like there is a very bad match eng. just for a few teams. This teams must be in a black list, you just have to read the posts to read how mush unfair shit is happen to then……..
tHIS MATCH ENG is for everybody, and you just have to ajust to it, like everybody else.
Its true it is not the best, but at least is allowing weaker teams to have a shot winning the top teams. this is like in real live… no the best always win….. see real madrid vs alcorcon!!!!!!! mills against pennys….. and pennys beat then 4-0……..
Managers have to approach different now days, i think differnt teams lay out are to be choosen for home and away games…. attackers now score like in real live….. no more than one goal average per game ( remember before up to 3 goals!!!! but by then i dont remember nowbody complaining than their attackers score to much….. but now it is all complains, and threat to go on vacations)????
Administrators are working in the new match eng, please STOP Crying! blow your nose and let it go….
We all play under the same rules……..
SALUD2
There is indeed something wrong. I shouldn’t have tied against Valenciennes and I played with a lot of my young players, not my best 11 so that’s makes it even stranger.
we are already in vacation. till the changes are made, we can have fun with our regressive league here
Week 16 Winners
Valencienes-Bordo 1-1 (28-9)
Bordo ties the game with one man down
Val -2
Bord 1
Brest-Lyon 1-1 (24-10)
Lyon ties the game with one man down
Brest -2
Lyon 1
Rennes-Sosho 0-1 (19-6)
Rennes -3
Classification after week 16
Troyes 12
Bordeaux 3
Lyon 3
Nice 2
Ajaccio 1
Niort 1
Lens -1
Guingamp -2
Auxerre -3
Brest -4
Marseille -2
Grenoble -4
Monaco -6
Rennes -9
Valenciennes -14
I may as well go on vacation mode and let the CPU take care of my team.
k so uh great i get to wait for this idiot to agree to cancel loan
btw in the past ppl who bought players that i had ON loan told me it was the rules to return the player
so fuck that bs
Yesterday I’ve started working on the match engine again. I’ve created action profiles for each position to try and fix this behavior.
After you have changed -1, 0 and +1 logic, it is been common, at least at my team, players from position D +1 been more present near oponnets goal than striker at position A-1.
For me defender -1, should stay just in defence and rarelly at middlefield
Defenders +1 should be more common at middlefield but very rarelly in A +0 or A +1
Summarizing:
Position / Acting positions
D-1 / ALL D, M-1, M0
D0 / ALL D, ALL M
D+1 / ALL D, ALL M and A-1
M-1 / ALL D, ALL M
M0 / D0, D+1, ALL M, A-1, A0
M+1 / D+1, ALL M, ALL A
A-1 / D+1, ALL M, ALL A
A-0 / ALL M, ALL A
A+1 / M0, M+1, ALL A
Forget about Troyes, check out Toulouse
In the last 4 weeks they have won against Auxerre (1st), Nice (4th), and Monaco
3 wins, 4-1 goals, 35-77 shots
And they don’t have a manager :D
hmm Troyes manager must be doing something right.
Toulouse-Nice 2-1 (8-28)
Nice -3
Classification after week 15
Troyes 12
Nice 2
Bordeaux 2
Lyon 2
Ajaccio 1
Niort 1
Lens -1
Guingamp -2
Auxerre -3
Brest -2
Marseille -2
Grenoble -4
Monaco -6
Rennes -6
Nice suggestions :)
Auxerre-Toulouse 0-1 (23-13)
Aux -3
Grenoble-Troyes 1-1 (31-10)
Gre -2
Tro +1
Guingamp-Niort 2-2 (21-10)
Gui -2
Nio +1
Classification after week 14
Troyes 10
Nice 5
Bordeaux 2
Lyon 2
Ajaccio 1
Niort 1
Lens -1
Guingamp -2
Auxerre -3
Brest -2
Marseille -2
Grenoble -3
Monaco -6
Rennes -6
Valenciennes -12
Should be interesting to change this. Like:
- If a player is loaned you can´t put him on transfer list
or
- Before u put to loan you have an option in contract: brake or not if player is transfered
or
- Loan contract receive an auto terminate in 12 or 18 turns.
This was changed a while back to foster loans by allowing teams to plan, as DaMaGo mentioned. In the old way the team who loaned the player could suddenly “lose” the loaned player, without notice. In the new way the team who is buying is able to decide whether or not buy a loaned player, knowing he will be back only when the loan period ends.
that is the way it is…..
when you bought the player, he was loaned, with contract, and with a period of time, so the team can plan use him all that period….. it will be unfair to take him out of the squad….. next time make sure he is not loaned so you can use him right away…..
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/81850
i bought a player recently that the team that i bought from had him out on loan.
know that he is my legal property
his contract is with me and not the loanee
the contract with his previous owner is null and void
i requested his rightfull return from “loan”
no response
so please put him on my squad so i can get him in his first game in a sunderland uniform
thank you
Edouard Allain
Pos: M
Sd: LR
Tk: 68
Pass: 99
Sht: 77
Spd: 87
Dri: 98
Ctrl: 93
Head: 93
Age: 23 still developing
Price: 50M
This and more:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/701
Our host rebooted our machine around the tick time so I ran it manually about 30 minutes past the regular time.
strikers:
Monteiro 100 shot, 100 head, 92 dribble
Spaltini 100 shot, 94 dribbel, 96 control
Gouveia 95 tackle, 93 shot, 96 speedy
Defenders: all with 97+ tackle
Middle: very high tackle, pass and dribble
Goalkeeper: 99 goal, 100 head, 98 control, 89 speedy (his average: 94)
And playing home.
Ok to loose for 0×1, 0×2 or 1×2, but 0×4??? insane.
The game engine is complete BS… Mind you, I wouldn’t want to be Valenciennes but I’m heading down your way Dhim.
Is there a tick time change in fastticker? An hour too late.
Valladolid with 90+ shooters with in all its departments maximizing its scoring chances. In almost all players are good all around players, basically you have a compacted offensive minded team that can bite you from everywhere :)
i think valladolid plays with netter players, better defense and better middlefield and bettter attackers.
Valenciennes selling interesting players. All prices negotiable so let me know!
cheers
D
Great players, great defence, great middlefield, playing home:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/658314
Week 13
Monaco-Nancy 1-2 (30-14)
Monaco -3
Marseille-Ajaccio 1-1 (24-9)
Mars -2
Aja +1
Troyes-Strasbourg 2-0 (13-20)
Troyes +2
Classification after week 13
Troyes 9
Nice 5
Bordeaux 2
Lyon 2
Ajaccio 1
Lens -1
Grenoble -1
Brest -2
Marseille -2
Monaco -6
Rennes -6
Valenciennes -12
Busy field day at the office Week 12:
Toulouse-Monaco 1-0 (14-26)
Mon -3
Lens-Lyon 1-2 (21-14)
Lens -1
Lyon +2
Ajaccio-Troyes 0-0 (19-8)
Ajaccio -2
Troyes +1
Nice-Valenciennes 3-1 (14-20)
Nice +2
Vale -1
Classification after week 12
Troyes 7
Nice 5
Bordeaux 2
Lyon 2
Lens -1
Grenoble -1
Brest -2
Monaco -3
Rennes -6
Valenciennes -12
Ajaccio evens out
I would kinda agree but since im new to the game this is the first match engine if worked with. At the start of the season i couldnt win a game with Chelsea and went through various tactics and formations until i watched the match engine and came up with what i use now.
Now everytime i log onto RubySoccer im disappointed if i lose, i just won the FA cup in my first season so im over the moon! If it does get changed it only needs tweaked, i think its good at the minute.
All i would say to you is watch your last few matches and you will see a trend starting to happen. Dont wanna give away to many secrets!
Week 11
Valencieness-Auxerre 1-2 (21-6)
Val -3
Aux +3
Classification after week 11
Troyes 6
Nice 3
Bordeaux 2
Ajaccio 2
Grenoble -1
Brest -2
Rennes -6
Valenciennes -11
Auxerre goes even
Interesting fact that my team was making long shots, when the setting was at medium. Anyway, I’ll stop trying to make sense and just go with the flow :D