Recent Posts
18,535 posts(s) found
1. How about increasing stamina of all players by 50 points at season start. Basically all players will start the season with stamina between 53 and 100 depending on how they end the season before. It’s like assuming that players have had a real season break of 8 weeks with no friendly or official matches played.
This will be helpful in the future when more official matches will be added up when CWC takes place.
2. I believe that “Individual Tactics” in the formation page should be “Positional Tactics”. The orders should apply to the position, not the player. If I order my attacker in AC 0 to move forward, that order should also apply to the player substituting him at the same position during the match, or in the next match if I haven’t changed tactic. As it is, the order applies to the player directly, which means that every time I change players in the same formation, I have to repeat my orders again.
Two last players for transfer, for now it will be all.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_info/326
@Markkö: not yet, we’ll need to prepare international cups to have 8 groups instead of 4 before adding new european countries.
Yes, Paradokus idea is great.
For the two continets
As for the CWC, the final eight in CL and Libertadores should qualify. Four groups with two European and two Latin American teams in each group. Or it can can be with two legs knock out rounds, except for the final
But the Game Engine should be first priority. And I believe DaMaGo should agree with me on this after losing the CL final in MT, despite smashing Angers in every department.
I like Paradokus idea if we don’t have the CWC
@Mr. Davison:
i have not been talking about your pricing, ever.
Freire lowered 10m, Martinez lowered 9m, Quiros lowered 7m, Lobo lowered 10m. So what?
Next season : Switzerland + Sweden OK?
selling a future star defender and more
you call that lowerd ?
wow and you said my prices were bad
hypocrite
New players on the TL.
and
other players have been lowered in price.
I think everybody wants it to happen to fast… It’s probably a proces that will take a lot of seasons.. Maybe it’s an idea to balance europe and south america by dividing the ranking and youth progress by continent.. The best country in Europe has the same as the best in America visa versa
Ballester and also Gomes are still for sale. They haven’t the highest main skill but are both good overall. They are an extra strenght for your team and are very cheap.
young keeper with 275000m initial value and just 70 friendlies for sale. negociable price. reason: i have 5 young keepers.
@amacb: that’s a good point, but I’d rather combine CL with Libertadores and Europa League with Sudamericana (with some kind of qualifying stage with teams from the same continent) than keeping them and extending CWC to have more teams from each competition.
@Filipe: yeah, I realize there are 2 functions for the ranking but we can sort that out. Regarding your suggestion to have a real schedule for national squads I completely agree, we’d have a 4 season cycle of qualify for continental cups (south america don’t have it since there are only 10 countries, but anyway), continental cups, qualify for world cup, world cup…we could even add some additional tournaments like confederations cup.
Also the ranking is used to determine the number of teams qualified for the international competitions so it should not be determined by the national teams, we should use two different rankings, one for the players quality determined by the national team performance, the other for the qualification places determined by the clubs…
I like the idea of national teams competition, but it would be difficult to schedule their matches aswell. I think this competitions should be done like in real life, from 4 to 4 years the World Cup and in the middle, the nation team continental cups, with the qualification matches the year before each. This way we would have matches every season but not so concentrated and it would be realistic…
Gabriel I think the motivation to create a new competition should be based on more players playing each other. Your idea doesnt adress this problem .
I have played this game now for some time now but never played against most of the users here. Such a waste dont you think?
I thought about that too Filipe you are right, but also this gives them some extra turns with friendlies to develop their youth and becoming better. Anyway seems like there is no solution to make everyone happy :/
two players still on sale
a suggestion for this could also be increasing the number of players for each team, instead of time, each team lessons that have 35 or 40 players would make it easier to play several competitions.
ai many will ask, but the payroll could be revalued and reduce the salaries by 5% percent of each player, and even also with renewals of contracts downloading a little percentage for renewal.
In regards to youths, you could structure it like this:
All countries get the same quality youth players stats wise with the exception that the talented youth players have a higher chance of appearing in countries based on its rank.
I.e.
1st rank – 1 in 8 chance of producing a star player
2nd rank – 1 in 11 chance of producing a star player
3rd rank – 1 in 14 chance of producing a star player
4th rank – 1 in 17 chance of producing a star player
and so on.
The probability of star players being produced in a country could be higher or lower, as I used the above numbers as an example.
Filipe nailed it. I have the same concerns. Too many competitions if we keep CL, Libertadores, etc, too unrealistic if we remove them. That’s why I proposed the national squad world cup as an alternative. We’ll have national squads at some point anyway, so I thought why not use them sooner and base the ranking on them?
That would probably be boring for the teams that only have one competition, most of them managed by new managers in the game, the ones we want to be enjoying :D
If the turn number per season can be increased then all competitions can be played maybe. For example if you increase the number of turns from 3 to 4 for each week the season will contain 192 turns,48 extra turns.
I think the main problem about that is to keep or not the Continental cups we have (CL, Europa, Libertadores, Sud). We will have too much competitions and it would be probably impossible to schedule that… It can be done with a small CWC but then it will probably have a small effect on the ranking… Maybe the best solution is to replace the actual cups for a new CWC but then it would be less realistic…
You have a real nice situation here Gabriel :P
I rhink that’s a better idea! I like a certain amount of realism.. Also having players that get caps for their national team should be a part of the amount of income a club has from merchandise.. It gives more star status to some players.. A small club world cup isn’t a bad idea but i don’t think it should be a factor in the rankings!
2 DaMaGo: Maybe FIFA wants it in real life but it isn’t working.. The big European clubs that are at the club world cup usualy bring their reserve team..
I think some realism can be sacrificed in favor of game play. Would you rather face cpu teams or other fellow players?
What if instead of a fake club word cup we had national squads for the countries we already have and a mini national squads world cup? The ranking could then be based on their results instead. At first they would all be cpu controlled, but in the future managers could be invited to manager a national squad.
World Cup IT IS THE BEST ANSWER, yes indeed !!!!
it will level the ranking, bring top quality competition, fill up leagues, and the best for me FUN FUN FUN, no doubt,
Maybe is not yet in real live, but fifa is moving in that direction as well….
We dont have the real world cup, so world club cup will make up great for that…
I cant wait to play againts america…..
saludos
I think making the groups bigger is a good idea… I even think the more countries we get the bigger the groups should get. But that is for the future to discuss.
Growing to fast is not a good option.. There are other matters of more importance in the game you should focus on then getting more countries. When other things improve the game will get more human players.. And that is what we need to improve further..
Tadeu Nolasco
Age: 31
Nationality: Brazil
Estimated Value: $19,470,251
Position: D
Side: RC
Keeping: 39
Tackle: 94
Passing: 82
Shooting: 78
Speed: 100
Dribble: 100
Control: 100
Header: 95
Aggressiveness: 78
Stamina: 89
Price: 7 mill, negotiable. Good veteran defender who still has 2-3 years minimum on his shoulders
Maximiliano Botelho
Age: 23
Nationality: Brazil
Estimated Value: $8,068,288
Position: G
Side: -
Keeping: 91
Tackle: 28
Passing: 76
Shooting: 34
Speed: 84
Dribble: 96
Control: 96
Header: 93
Aggressiveness: 1
Stamina: 100
Price: 12 million, negotiable. Young goalie still improving :)