Recent Posts

Subscribe to Recent Posts 18,551 posts(s) found

February 22, 2010 12:57

104 posts(s)

 

Boa tarde

Venho fazer uma sugestão sobre a alteração da percentagem de satisfação do clube. O facto de lutarmos e tentarmos por uma equipa mais ou menos boa faz com que como é normal o clube seja mais exigente mas… a avaliação das equipas estão a ser exageradas e serem beneficiadas equipas mais fracas.

Ora no seguinte exemplo dos meus últimos jogos sem derrota esta quanto eu subi e desci de percentagem

Gondomar 1 x 0 Benfica +1 %
Belenenses 1 x 1 Gondomar -4 % Mau resultado
Gondomar 3 x 0 Beira Mar + 1 %
Leixões 1 x 2 Gondomar + 1 %
Gondomar 1 x 1 Sporting -4 % Mau resultado
Boavista 0 x 3 Gondomar +1 %

Ora é quase impossível ganhar os jogos todos da época e se a cada empate da um mau resultado… não da para manter uma equipa.

Minha sugestão:

Vitoria com mais de 3 golos de diferença = Bom resultado + 4 %
Vitoria com 3 golos de diferença = Bom resultado + 3 %
Vitoria = + 1 %

Derrota com mais de 3 golos de diferença = Mau resultado – 4 %
Derrota com 3 golos de diferença = Mau resultado – 3 %
Derrota = – 1 %

Empate em casa = 0 %
Empate em casa com equipa muito mais fraca = – 1 %

Empate fora = 0 %
Empate fora com equipa muito mais forte = + 1 %

Jogos amigaveis:

Vitoria por mais de 3 golos = + 1 %
Derrota por mais de 3 golos = – 1 %

O resto das possibilidades de resultado ficaria em = 0 % visto serem jogos amigaveis.

Penso que ajudaria e muito e tragaria realismo principalmente a treinadores que ate estão a fazer bons jogos e bons resultados mas que estão sempre a subir e a descer na percentagem arriscando a serem despedidos por mau desempenho que não corresponde a realidade.
Assim também não haveria o erro das equipas serem mal avaliadas.
De certo que muita gente concordara com a sugestão.

 

February 22, 2010 07:14

828 posts(s)

 

hey tommy just remember who the hell you asked for advice in this game…. remember that…. and who helped you with formations
who sold you players for cheap to help you out only for you to quit that team and go to an easy already powerhouse.

just remember that i started with a pile and have a powerhouse :) i mean no offense but i mean me bringing up the b/s prices is a real issue with the game next to the bullshit match results…. does anything get done about it ?

with that said
im having a sale http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/166

 

February 21, 2010 23:31

44 posts(s)

 

hey davison, sometimes i don´t like the prices too and you know what i do? i don´t buy him and try another one. don´t agree, don´t buy. easy.

 

February 21, 2010 23:25

51 posts(s)

 

dude, can you just stop complaining about transfer prices?
1-2 times, ok but now ur becoming a bit annoying…

 

February 21, 2010 21:52

828 posts(s)

 

looking for a young defender

im not willing to over pay the bullshit prices we see on this game.

the players that I should sell for such inflated prices i dont and i sell them at thier estimated value or lower.

i expect the same integrity from my fellow managers

but i know they dont have it

 

February 21, 2010 18:06

11 posts(s)

Donator

 

I am currently working on this now so, hopefully have something for you soon.

 

February 20, 2010 10:13

44 posts(s)

 

andre sciarappa, the wonder kid, for sale. 21 years old, 89 shoot and all caracteristics above 80 (tackle is the exception). and others great players for sale.

 

February 20, 2010 00:19

104 posts(s)

 

Agaistn Cpu Braga

0 × 0
3-6-1 formação 3-4-3
53% posse 47%
23 remates 8
19 remates no alvo 7
86% passes acertados 89%
63% desarmes eficazes 44%
2 cantos 0
4 foras-de-jogo 6
5 faltas 7

 

February 19, 2010 07:17

39 posts(s)

Donator

 

For a quality defender or mid we will spend $

 

February 18, 2010 23:09

299 posts(s)

 

well, I think we are all satisfied with the fact the whole team out there can and is scoring goal.
However, the way this is happening is just wrong IMO.
A catastrophe of a shooting midfielder always seems able to score once he gets that Maradona like slalom all the way from the back and that one shot at goal. Meanwhile, those 3-4 players who are tactically selected to make 90+ percent of the shots, can hardly manage to put one past the goalie, despite a combined 30+ shots.
Basically, M&Ds out there have it much easier to score (as a percentage of shots made) than the professional scorers out there.

I also think that this is perhaps the reason behind some of the freak results out there where a weak team, outplayed by 20-30 shots, can still manage to tie or win a game because of the random goal from some unsuspected midfielder or defender :)

 

February 18, 2010 22:37

299 posts(s)

 

What’s going on with game engine lately??? It seems scoring has been reduced considerably as of late.
However, useless goalies continue to gain MOTM, and 60 pt shooters still wreck havoc with their single shot per game :).
Rumor has it that some of the game superstrikers, haunted by their inability to hit the goal, have lost their way between their wives’ legs. ;)

 

February 18, 2010 14:07

287 posts(s)

 

Like we say in Brazil:

soccer is a little surprises box

 

February 18, 2010 13:33

678 posts(s)

 

Check my result vs the cpu team Strasbourgh :)

2 × 2
3-5-2 formation 4-4-2
39% possession 61%
9 shots 32
5 shots on target 28
88% accurrate passes 93%
23% effective tackles 61%
0 corners 4
3 offsides 7
8 fouls 6

They are really annoying :)

 

February 17, 2010 23:51

828 posts(s)

 

i have 6 mill to spend on a striker that has over 92 in shooting and at least 85 in speed and controll

hit me up if you can match this price

 

February 17, 2010 11:44

287 posts(s)

 

Now it is ok. Post from Rui Antunes was showing in news feed.

 

February 17, 2010 11:08

4,309 posts(s)

Administator

 

@Ulisses: what about it?

 

February 17, 2010 11:08

4,309 posts(s)

Administator

 

From Rui Antunes in the Improvements topic:

the problem remains.

score: 1-1

57% possession 43%
41 shots 9
35 shots on target 6
89% accurrate passes 90%
63% effective tackles 26%

From Ulisses:

Gabriel, how about fix news feed?

 

February 17, 2010 01:40

828 posts(s)

 

this is the same bullshit i have been dealing with for the past 2 seasons

check all my results

but check this one out
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/696398

pisses me off and it gets me to the point where i stop giving a shit about this game.

which sadens me because i love this game

 

February 16, 2010 21:05

44 posts(s)

 

striker jonas cuciuffo for sale. 94 shoot, 92 speed, 85 heading and the other caracterictics above 80. just 13M.

 

February 16, 2010 18:08

296 posts(s)

 

4-3-3 works best for me.

 

February 16, 2010 16:47

34 posts(s)

 

Help me.

 

February 16, 2010 15:34

34 posts(s)

 

http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/251
sale

 

February 16, 2010 12:23

44 posts(s)

 

great players for sale. a top defender just 3.5M. make your offer if you don´t agree with the value.

 

February 16, 2010 03:09

1,003 posts(s)

Administator

 

I’ve performed a full upgrade on our server. That should improve everybody’s experience since we were using ubuntu 8.10 and now we are using 9.10 (with a lot of package upgrades as a consequence). It really is a big step.

But if you see any problems, please let us know at once. Cheers!

 

February 15, 2010 23:28

287 posts(s)

 

This match is totally awkward:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/699952

My team: 60% ball possession, 30 shoots
His team: 5 shots

Result: he won for 2v0!!!!

 

February 15, 2010 20:41

117 posts(s)

 

Well based on previous experience, they’ll (hopefully) go on a major losing streak effectively shutting them out of international competition.

It’s happened to other CPU controlled teams throughout the past few seasons.

 

February 15, 2010 19:44

299 posts(s)

 

lol, I was about to point out the same thing. hehehe
Sur-Mer has had an easy 7 games so far with the exception of Marseille, wich they tied. I think they will start losing a lot of points starting the game after next.
However, it seems to me they will still manage to grab a place, at least in the Europa qualifying spots. That would definitely be a shame :(

 

February 15, 2010 19:11

4,309 posts(s)

Administator

 

Scottish league sounds like a good addition. New european countries require changes to our code to accomodate more than 32 teams in international cups. This will have to wait until we work in the match engine enhancements. it doesn’t mean we can’t get new countries ready to be added as soon as we have made the changes. This topic explain how to help: http://www.rubysoccer.com/forums/3/topics/1539

 

February 15, 2010 18:26

11 posts(s)

Donator

 

I was just wondering if the Admin team have any plans to add in the Scottish league?

 

February 15, 2010 16:00

1,003 posts(s)

Administator

 

Now that I am back, this is probably going to be one of my first todo’s. One thing that you guys could consider is that we currently mostly have top countries. Soccersim had all kinds of countries. If we added some of the crap countries, the scenario would be dramatically affected.