Recent Posts

Subscribe to Recent Posts 18,535 posts(s) found

February 17, 2010 11:08

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

From Rui Antunes in the Improvements topic:

the problem remains.

score: 1-1

57% possession 43%
41 shots 9
35 shots on target 6
89% accurrate passes 90%
63% effective tackles 26%

From Ulisses:

Gabriel, how about fix news feed?

 

February 17, 2010 01:40

828 posts(s)

 

this is the same bullshit i have been dealing with for the past 2 seasons

check all my results

but check this one out
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/696398

pisses me off and it gets me to the point where i stop giving a shit about this game.

which sadens me because i love this game

 

February 16, 2010 21:05

44 posts(s)

 

striker jonas cuciuffo for sale. 94 shoot, 92 speed, 85 heading and the other caracterictics above 80. just 13M.

 

February 16, 2010 18:08

296 posts(s)

 

4-3-3 works best for me.

 

February 16, 2010 16:47

34 posts(s)

 

Help me.

 

February 16, 2010 15:34

34 posts(s)

 

http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/251
sale

 

February 16, 2010 12:23

44 posts(s)

 

great players for sale. a top defender just 3.5M. make your offer if you don´t agree with the value.

 

February 16, 2010 03:09

1,003 posts(s)

Administator

 

I’ve performed a full upgrade on our server. That should improve everybody’s experience since we were using ubuntu 8.10 and now we are using 9.10 (with a lot of package upgrades as a consequence). It really is a big step.

But if you see any problems, please let us know at once. Cheers!

 

February 15, 2010 23:28

287 posts(s)

 

This match is totally awkward:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/699952

My team: 60% ball possession, 30 shoots
His team: 5 shots

Result: he won for 2v0!!!!

 

February 15, 2010 20:41

117 posts(s)

 

Well based on previous experience, they’ll (hopefully) go on a major losing streak effectively shutting them out of international competition.

It’s happened to other CPU controlled teams throughout the past few seasons.

 

February 15, 2010 19:44

299 posts(s)

 

lol, I was about to point out the same thing. hehehe
Sur-Mer has had an easy 7 games so far with the exception of Marseille, wich they tied. I think they will start losing a lot of points starting the game after next.
However, it seems to me they will still manage to grab a place, at least in the Europa qualifying spots. That would definitely be a shame :(

 

February 15, 2010 19:11

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

Scottish league sounds like a good addition. New european countries require changes to our code to accomodate more than 32 teams in international cups. This will have to wait until we work in the match engine enhancements. it doesn’t mean we can’t get new countries ready to be added as soon as we have made the changes. This topic explain how to help: http://www.rubysoccer.com/forums/3/topics/1539

 

February 15, 2010 18:26

11 posts(s)

Donator

 

I was just wondering if the Admin team have any plans to add in the Scottish league?

 

February 15, 2010 16:00

1,003 posts(s)

Administator

 

Now that I am back, this is probably going to be one of my first todo’s. One thing that you guys could consider is that we currently mostly have top countries. Soccersim had all kinds of countries. If we added some of the crap countries, the scenario would be dramatically affected.

 

February 15, 2010 13:26

117 posts(s)

 

The current leader in Europe’s strongest league is managed by the CPU.

For how much longer can Boulogne-sur-Mer keep it up…

Allez les ch’tis!

 

February 15, 2010 00:00

296 posts(s)

 

As it says in title.

 

February 14, 2010 18:32

104 posts(s)

 

Percebo o ponto de vista mas quem baixa de 10M para 1 M ?… O clube tem um limite minimo de venda de um jogador. A sugestao é o facto de ganhar turnos perante os adversários claro mas tendo negociado com o outro treinador um preço. Por exemplo esta um jogador a venda por 10 M eu dou 8 M e falta 1 turno…. depois de negociar com o treinador ele baixa para 9M e eu subo para 9M entretanto quem negociou pode sair prejudicado relativo a outros treinadores darem a oferta porque voltou a 3 turnos.

Em relaçao se vai haver mudanças com trocas como foi dito ja é bom.
Deveria se ver algumas mudanças relativo a perca de percentagem do clube, empates que fazem perder 4 por cento ???? Um empate nao é uma derrota ainda por cima quando a equipa joga melhor :P

 

February 14, 2010 16:24

287 posts(s)

 

Have you read my post from Aug 5, 2009 5:46am – Update from version 0.0.5 to 0.1.0 ?

 

February 14, 2010 15:58

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

O Cristiano disse exatamente o que eu ia dizer :)

 

February 14, 2010 15:56

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

Poder recusar propostas não me parece uma boa idéia, pode gerar problemas de trapaça. Ao invés disso podemos permitir excluir um máximo de X clubes que não poderiam fazer propostas, além da cláusula da liga.

Quanto a trocas, pretendemos desenvolver um sistema de trocas separadamente, portanto a exclusão de outros clubes não seria usada para esse propósito.

=====

In English:

The ability to refuse proposals does not sound like a good idea, it can lead to cheating. Instead, we can allow the exclusion of a maximum of X clubs which wouldn’t be able to make proposals, and the same league clause would be kept.

Regarding swaps, our intention is to develop a separate system for that, so the exclusion of clubs wouldn’t be used with this purpose.

 

February 14, 2010 13:42

387 posts(s)

 

My 2 cents to that topic. In a nutshell.

Player development / max skill level
- one reason the TL market is down: too easy to acquire (16-18yro) & develope 90+ players on your own
- still absolutely too many player with 90+ in main skills and secs

- suggested skill allocation at start: mainly 40 to 60, 60-70 rarely, 70+ very rare)
- according to that, a bigger difference between the countries or the teams

Big Club clause
- would be great for small (acquisation vs big teams) & big teams (“stealing”) – one of the ssim fun parts: find a 2 golden star 90+ midfielder in Andorra’s 2nd div

Economy
- major teams with success sould profit from reaching QF/SF/finals and winning trophies, not just by tickets. in RL CL winner earns ~25M Euro (throughout the tournament) by prize money only.
let’s assume this is 1/2 of yearly salaries a bigger team in RL has to pay, consequentially within Fast ticker a CL winner should earn ~13M prize money (~500k/week on salaries = 26M a year).
Teams should profit from success, not just from transfer business
Illustration – i won all titles in S34 in Fast ticker – My balance:
Earnings
Prize money: 0$
Tickets (75.000 seater): ~18M (for the tickets in league/cup) and ~5M (for CL/WC)
Sponsor and merch: ~600k/week = 30M
i guess “Sponsor and merch” is close to an average team in any league, it should be a wider range there, i mean Real Madrid probably earns much more than twice as Real Santander in RL, (just a guess ;-)
Spendings
Salaries: ~30M
Coaching(7)/Maintanance: ~ 16,5
.
So, despite transfers, a team that wins all national/international titles in a season, that pays more or less normal wages, that has some renomee (the succes in all history) just makes a profit of: 6,5M (18+5+30-30-16,5) a season -
WHAT’s THE ECONOMICAL BENEFIT OF SUCCESS?
.
I assume the difference to a team that wents 4th in league, reaches Semis in cup and QF in Europa League is marginal.
.
I would be interested in number of other teams

 

February 14, 2010 12:05

44 posts(s)

 

isso tornaria tudo mais facil para fazer batota. imagina que um jogador esta a venda por 10M e aparece alguem que oferece 1M. se o preço fosse alterado mesmo antes de o 3º turno das transferencias acabar o jogador sairia por 1M, nao tendo os outros hipotese de fazer a sua proposta.

 

February 14, 2010 09:38

40 posts(s)

 

yes, installed 0.8.20100211.5 version

 

February 13, 2010 23:29

104 posts(s)

 

Boa noite

Queria fazer outra sugestão… alterar o tempo de espera para uma transferência para outro clube que esta em 3 turnos para 1 quando o valor da transferência é alterado. Por exemplo estou a comprar um jogador por 10M e falta um turno… se o outro jogador aumentar para 12M e eu quiser dar esse valor passa a 3 turnos … o que não é justo porque o tempo de espera já o tivemos, deveria manter se o turno que falta se o preço for alterado… se a transferência for cancelada e o jogador de novo posto na lista ai sim seriam os 3 turnos do costume.

 

February 13, 2010 23:16

104 posts(s)

 

Boa noite

Venho propor algo nas transferências, quando pusermos por exemplo um jogador a venda deveríamos poder aceitar ou recusar as propostas de outros clubes mesmo que dêem o valor da transferência… visto não ser nenhuma clausula de rescisão… Isso para evitar que alguns jogadores vão para clubes rivais ou para facilitar as negociações com outros clubes com trocas de jogadores… assim não viriam outras pessoas estragar as negociações que por vezes demoraram vários turnos para se chegar a um acordo. Da mesma forma funcionaria no empréstimo de jogadores não só a opção " mesma liga " mas sim podermos aceitar ou recusar a quem desse proposta.
Não sei até que ponto isto é possível mas de certo iria ajudar muito e também as equipas mais fracas visto que daria mais hipótese de competir nas contratações com as equipas mais forte pois não se ira vender a rivais sem mutuo acordo.

 

February 13, 2010 20:28

637 posts(s)

 

Check Bordeaux in French league 2.

 

February 13, 2010 17:32

117 posts(s)

 

Since the computer scheduled “automatic” friendlies with a 2nd division team, I’ve cancelled all of them.

In light of this, please feel free to send me your requests…

 

February 13, 2010 15:44

18 posts(s)

 

Great deals at Vila Capanema!!!
All players are negociable.

http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/5

 

February 13, 2010 08:45

1,003 posts(s)

Administator

 

Im already trying to decide what to do next (functionalities)… Any ideas?

 

February 13, 2010 01:09

39 posts(s)

Donator

 

Aussie! Aussie! Aussie!
Welcome to the promised land!