Recent Posts
18,577 posts(s) found
This Alberto Chavez should give his name to your stadium Ulisses ;)
Just double checked the formula, it uses a base value and a random factor. This base value is based on your team performance, in other words, the team score in the teams ranking. If your team base value is greater than your stadium capacity times 10, then your stadium capacity times 10 is used as your base value. So I was almost right :)
I haven’t confirmed if the formula is exactly that, so don’t consider the values above as the truth. But answering your question, the maximum can be obtained by having good performance. More specifically, sponsorship value is directly related to you team’s score in the teams ranking.
If you have a 16,000 seat stadium, by your formula you would have a $160,000 sponsorship maximum. How would you attain that maximum sponsorship?
The stadium capacity was supposed to limit the sponsorship value somehow. Not sure what the exact formula is, but it would be something like:
10,000 seats → 100,000 sponsorship maximum
15,500 seats → 155,000 sponsorship maximum
…
and so on.
Can you explain about Stadium capacity and sponsors?
is not a big thing when he plays so many seasons in the 2nd league, with weak teams. even a ch***t striker would have score many goals.
Take a look on this one:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_stats/55550
Nice isn´t it?
My striker scored 956 goals, all in the same club! I really wish him to score 44 goals more even if he is a bit old now^^
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_stats/63635
0 × 2
4-3-3 formation 3-5-2
45% possession 55%
31 shots 11
20 shots on target 10
93% accurrate passes 83%
63% effective tackles 60%
3 corners 2
4 offsides 6
10 fouls 2
another one :
augsburg-hertha bsc berlin
0 × 1
4-3-3 formation 4-4-2
58% possession 42%
28 shots 5
22 shots on target 4
89% accurrate passes 97%
74% effective tackles 42%
3 corners 1
0 offsides 10
2 fouls 11
sorry but this must be a joke :
Augsburg-Rio Ave : champions league qualification
Date: Season 37, Turn 89
1 x 5
4-3-3 formation 4-4-2
55% possession 45%
23 shots 14
20 shots on target 12
85% accurrate passes 88%
64% effective tackles 32%
1 corners 2
6 offsides 5
4 fouls 10
We do understand, Jakob. According to our plans you wouldn’t lose your best defender anyway, cause our intention is to make the board automatically renew the best players contracts to make it harder for cheaters.
With bonus it will be possible to transfer money from teams.
See this topic:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/forums/3/topics/1353
It is a similar suggestion
When you loan out a player, you should give a bonus to the club where you loan the player as for exemple :
If the players plays :
*20 matches, the club will get 200.000
*25 matches, the club will get 300.000
Etc…
It would be better than the clause of “loan stops because of X matches missed”
Hi,
I just took over a new club in mediumticker (Atletico Madrid), and 3 players where up for negotiation of new contracts.
I made an offer to all 3 during my first tick in the new club only to lose my best defender Rubén Montenegro in the very next tick due to an slow and stupid CPU.
My suggestion is that when a new manager arrives you prolong all deadlines with minimum 3 ticks so there is time to clean up and get things sorted out.
It is very sad to join a new club only to lose your best defende in the first tick after you arrived.
I dont expect i could get him back but please fix it for the future… Hope you understand.
Kind regards
Jakob
If you need a good central defender in loan for next season :
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/110815
I can loan him for free (0% salary) if he plays all matches
I’m very rarely complaining but this season for my team in Medium Ticker, it’s begining to make realy too much :
7 stolen games (specialy the last ones) on 18 played, and we are not half season yet… Grumpf !
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/742812
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/742884
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/742928
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/784877
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/742972
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/743016
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/743038
Torino x Parma
0 × 1
3-5-2 formation 3-5-2
55% possession 45%
22 shots 8
18 shots on target 6
91% accurrate passes 81%
69% effective tackles 57%
5 corners 1
2 offsides 4
4 fouls 10
Cerrito x Progreso
2 × 0
5-2-3 formation 4-4-2
48% possession 52%
8 shots 24
7 shots on target 22
85% accurrate passes 92%
53% effective tackles 42%
1 corners 10
5 offsides 2
3 fouls 7
Striker 100 shot. missing 2 penalties in the same game:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/766758
Final Cup
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/785156
Average grade from my team: 7.1 / away team: 6.6
1 × 1 (P.K. 1 × 2)
4-3-3 formação 4-5-1
49% posse de bola 51%
24 chutes 5
22 chutes a gol 4
89% passes certos 89%
73% roubadas efetivas 58%
5 escanteios 0
6 impedimentos 6
5 faltas 7
I feel you Dirk, I’m also at 1% after this loss:
Progreso x Danubio
1 × 3
4-4-2 formation 4-3-3
58% possession 42%
25 shots 10
19 shots on target 9
86% accurrate passes 85%
46% effective tackles 27%
5 corners 0
5 offsides 3
3 fouls 9
Torino x Roma
0 × 1
4-4-2 formation 4-3-3
58% possession 42%
22 shots 4
16 shots on target 4
78% accurrate passes 91%
82% effective tackles 39%
1 corners 1
6 offsides 8
2 fouls 13
10 min: Dantas (a) scores
71 min: The referee shows Guedes (a) a red card.
The previous times I was just posting weird match results for help but this time I’m not.
I’m going to loose my job because of this. I lost in the cup against Grossetto and now my board opinion is only 1% anymore. So if I’m not on the CL spots at the end of the season my hard work of building a strong team is thrown away.
When we contacted him on his previous team about this behavior he responded saying his team’s finace was good enough to support it. And he was right. I believe it is the same situation again.
I am not saying I’m happy with it and that I agree, we will change the way players pick the team they’re going to, probably adding some personality attributes.
I do think it might be wise to suspend Bayern from acquiring players via free transfer until a suitable solution is arrived at. He is clearly just abusing the system with little interest in the long-term shape of his franchise.
i think that the teams should´nt allow to left the good players leave for free. see what is happening in sporting – portugal. he had a great team and in one turn he loose 3 fantastic players (all to bayern, a little suspicious) to free tranfers. a great team is now a che@t team.
ps: about the bayern coach…no words.
I want to state that I am not in favor of agent fees, at least not huge ones like managersim had. I really think better (and more realistic) solutions are in changing the way the team’s board allows a team to sign free transfers, and in how a player chooses which team to play for.
The problem in Turkey is that we are usually able to find decent free young players instead of raising ours. When more countries are added this is likely to change since the competition for good free players will increase and our young ones will become more interesting and useful.
Good luck with your player, let me know if you ever build up a star whose career started at Sivasspor :)
@Admir M: I still read the forums and access the game even when I am not developing anything new ;)
Danilo said everything I would say about game development, so I have nothing to add. About the agent fee suggestion I feel we will probably have to add something like that. And also the player personalities, this one we already had in mind.