Recent Posts
18,577 posts(s) found
2 × 1
3-4-3 formação 4-3-3
44% posse de bola 56%
9 chutes 24
9 chutes a gol 21
85% passes certos 91%
49% roubadas efetivas 50%
2 escanteios 4
5 impedimentos 2
4 faltas 7
For SALE
Carmine Valcarenghi
Nationally: Italia
Club: Inter
Estimed Value: 2,231,299
Age: 30
Position: AM
Side: C
Shooting: 81
Speed: 87
Dribble: 81
Control: 91
Header: 85
Transfer Price: 15,000,000
Negotiable change price.
For SALE
Alessandro Rais
Nationally: Italia
Club: Inter
Estimed Value: 13,101,,875
Age: 31
Position: M
Side: RC
Passing: 97
Speed: 100
Dribble: 84
Control: 87
Header: 90
Transfer Price: 20,000,000
Negotiable change price.
player for sale
Angelo Deoma
Nationally: Italia
Club: Inter
Estimed Value: 13,348,329
Age: 30
Position: D
Side: C
Tackle: 100
Speed: 95
Dribble: 86
Control: 90
Header: 90
Transfer Price: 25,000,000
Negotiable change price.
We are not looking at this right now. I’ve tried to change it a while back but it turned out more complicated than I initially thought, so I postponed, but we will certainly go back to this problem.
Interesting suggestion, we can certainly foster the discussion around this idea.
Currently there is no relation between fitness and improvement.
Cheers.
it would be nice to get an update from the administrators about this… I know that it’s been discussed before but I would just like to know where it all stands…is there any way possible to avoid this
I think it could be nice if a human club can make a partnership with a BOT club as follow :
*you can select only one club partner per country maximum
*the club partner as to be in 2nd division (when the country has 2 divisions)
*you have to pay 1.000.000 per year per club which is/are your “satellite”
in exchange :
*you can decide the players you will loan to the club (the club partner will pay 0% of the salary)
*you can make offers/bids to the players of the BOT club who are not on the transfer list
Then
The partnership automatically finishes when :
*a human manager took the control of the club
*the BOT club is promoted to 1st division
*the “human club” is relegated to the 2nd division
*the “human club” did not pay the “BOT club”
*the “human club”’s manager resigns
Really I have 4 young players I would like to make play loaning them, and I would be also really pleased to pay one club to make them play. Wish this idea is possible to be realized!
força mourinho !!!
I would like to know if more the players are tired they improve less? and If yes what is the limit of fitness to not go under to keep a good potential of improving. thanks!
GO Inter .. Inter … Inter
Yeah, that sounds alot more reasonable. Maybe if it was something where in the loan options you could select bonus and opt to pay 10 or 20 % of the increase in value.
Not that you need more, but here:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/793317
1 × 1
4-4-2 formation 5-2-3
59% possession 41%
24 shots 7
18 shots on target 5
93% accurrate passes 94%
69% effective tackles 27%
4 corners 2
6 offsides 3
3 fouls 7
Several good players available for loan at Napoli. Take a look at:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/297
@Dhimitri: making the reward proportional to the player improvement changes things, now we can start considering this idea :D
I think this is a good idea.
Yes, but the loaner cannot decided who the loanee is a going to be, which diminishes the chances of cheating greatly. In addition, the “monetary reward” to a loanee for improving your player should proportional to the value increase, which again should keep things in check.
For starting managers, this could be a good way to get some cash.
I think he is not doing anything illegal. Not everyone is active in the free market. If someone is willing to buy a player with huge wage for some millions i assume they would offer similar when he is free….he is active in the game and thats the reward he gets so cant really blame him.
If theres someone to blame its not him but the guys who buy his high wage players…dont buy high wage players problem solved….
As Ulisses mentions, the concern would be that this would allow the passing of money between teams, potentially making it easier to cheat.
I am not a bayern supporter but i hope they trash inter in the cl final. Its sad that you can reach the final defending whole game with %25 ball possession….fuck mourinho arrogant piece of shit and their style of play!!!!
This is a good idea, would be nice to get something for improving a player for another team.
2 season in a row I’ve faced 2 teams from my league in the champions league group stage…3 out of 4 teams are from france, that’s too much, and we as a league lose points by playing between us
C’mon Ulisses, you won this one…just kidding :D
Cough, cough…there is a lot of dust around here! RubySoccer ain’t dead mates, it has finally been updated. Hopefully following news won’t take so long.
Managers now can’t fire or let their best players go, their board won’t allow it. Of course there will be lots of discussions around how the board evaluates the best players, but at least it is a start. One of our goals with it is to prevent users from losing good players for lack of attention or doing it on purpose.
Cheers!
We already invested some time in the game after moving to Australia guys, but clearly not enough. Danilo is working in modifications that will allow us to better test and change match engine parameters. While he does that I may work on the matter discussed here.
I’m not going to say my opinion about what this or that manager is doing, I’m just going to tell you what are my plans and how they could change this scenario. They are in the order we are likely to implement them:
1) Automatic renewal of best players: the board will be more strict and renew best players contracts automatically and will not allow the manager to fire them as well.
2) Player personality: each player will have its own personalitiy, some may prefer high wages, some long-term contracts while some may prefer playing in its own country or being in a team where he has more first team opportunities. This will make free transfers (and regular transfers) a little bit more complex than a wage war.
3) Player satisfaction: players that are never used in official matches or that have much lower wages than similarly skilled teammates may become unsatisfied and refuse to renew their contract. This may negatively affect other players in the squad. This will make it harder for managers to hire lots of players just to make profit or to experiment.
These are the main ideas, some of them are not straightforward as they seem but I believe they will bring more fun and strategy to the game.
Cheers!
sorry everett it wanst u comparing cristiano ronaldo to 100 shot ! my mistake! lol :P
I know that u can give a player less then he ask u! the thing is for the economy of the game 99 999 or 80 000 even 60 000 is not healthy for ur team! maybe some teams can afford that but me with my 6M I can’t and I bought a player or two from him.. but I dont know why u defending the guy?! he already destroy one team now he’s doing the same. I don’t have problem with him personaly but still u gotta admit that he’s a dumb manager! and more u are always there comparing this to acual salaries and on one other post u compare 100 shoting to cristiano ronaldo or somthing. it’s not that good of a simulation to be comparing it to real life so… and who knows maybe he’s ur friend so I should stop saying that he’S dumb I gonna touch ur feelings.. no for real it is a great game and it’s great for a free game and with time it will get even better! and I get u everettb it’S not cool from davison to put out he’s anger like that.. and saying the game is dieing and all but sometimes it gets frustrating..
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/791603
1 × 2
4-3-3 formação 4-4-2
36% posse de bola 64%
2 chutes 42
2 chutes a gol 32
94% passes certos 92%
26% roubadas efetivas 80%
0 escanteios 13
7 impedimentos 7
5 faltas 3