Recent Posts
18,578 posts(s) found
Is it hard to do by hand Gabriel? Rebuilding is fun, so I think I would’t mind to pay say 20 dollars for not getting fired in 2013.
Few new players listed, all with the same quality people always find when dealing with me:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/172
Here is a good example of what is wrong.
16-email-old Champions! The Board 94 616-email-old Match Result Report 94 6
16-email-old Bad result The Board 94 6
I draw 2-2 in the final and end up winning it, my performance is kicked back to 1% right after winning the cup, i really dont hope my job can be in danger because of this bug.
/Jakob
cheers Willy, really familiar name.
Welcome back and good luck!
Welcome Willy, you are going to enjoy!!!!
welcome
Hey guys! I played soccersim ages ages ages ago. Not sure if you all remember me. I was active in the forums and even did several data files for new countries. Not sure if you remember but we ended up with a new “Challenge 3” or something, a game that ticked super fast and Italy had Serie A through to like H. Good times. I ran a couple “Friendlies” tournaments as well. It’s exciting to see a game so similar to the SS I know and love.
Anyways, good to see some familiar names! If any mods or “important” people see this I’m always willing to help develop. For free of course :P As long as there’s no “Forening” or whatever the hell that was. Also, no Dave Wallace.
See you on the pitch!
lol dimitri haha merry Christmas
Yep, not getting fired would be a good feature for VIP members.
We don’t mind having paid upgrades as long as they are not something that give such an advantage that non-paying users have no chance of success. This is an example that would not have an impact of this kind, so we could make it happen in the future.
Just had a look at your matches and main formation, I can’t see anything wrong. The only situation where it should fail is if the player was unavailable (red card or injured), otherwise the sub should happen. I’ll have a look in the code later, see if I can find anything wrong when dealing with position MC1, but I’d be surprised to find an error that specific!
make it a pay upgrade
when i say that i mean have it come out of the financials of the Team.
or you could even make it Pay upgrade for vip ruby members but i know you guys wannaa keep this game free
I’ve selected the player. it happens ONLY with the MC+1. All my subs are ok only when I put to sub some player into this position that nothing happen.
Have you selected a player or "best position? Otherwise you will only change the position of the player on the field.
I’m selling all my experienced players to rebuild my team.
The best of them is Alberico Maciel, a 90 average midfielder. The highest bid will win although the transferprice of 200M is always welcome :)
Take a look:
Alberico Maciel – M R 90avr
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/176480
Em qualquer partida, após o minuto 45, substituir jogador em zona M, lado C e mentalidade 1 por João Rocha.
Any match, after 45 minute, change player in M one, C side, mentality 1 by João Rocha.
Davison has a point, but there should also be an option to “auto-manage” for the people who don’t want to get into the details of training…
what are you settings for the substitution?
For many rounds I’m trying to sub my MC+1 during the game and nothing happens. Until now only in this position that I’m facing this kind of problem.
set it 3 stages rebuilding, est seasons, board demands rebuilt or fires if at the end of rebuilding you have not improved the squad.
have to make it a dynamic manager environment. also have a training type choice ( intense, rest, medium,) and be able to select what you want individual players to be working on in training. i think this is a necessity for this game. seriously its needed.
$4,560,090 now, avg stats 84, but still a good player: 10 goals in his 8 league matches.
ya, those initial bad results, where you transfer a few players and have good potential youth playing, really gets you off on the wrong foot. You start at 50% but before you know it you’re already down to 20-30% at the end of the 1st season… perhaps lower in some cases. :)
Interesting point, maybe we can consider a way to “tell” the board you are doing a long term work as you said Dimitri. I don’t think it can be too loose like a 3 season grace period as Charles mentioned, but it could make the board take it easier on your initially bad results :)
I think that punishing teams filing in younger players should be reviewed. My proposal: Young players gain experience when playing important matches. If the number of matches of a young player exceeds some limit (may be a hidden attribute), he should be considered sufficiently experienced not creating a penalty for the team.
Perhaps a 3 season grace period or something like that. I wonder what repercussions it would have on cheating (if it would curb it or increase it).
a good manager wouldnt get fired even during rebuilding
Most of us know about ‘rebuild mode’: instead of focussing on short term results, you focus on the long term, getting talented young players and developing them. It’s fun to do it, I think, to see how your players become better and better. There is one disadvantage though: since on the short term you lose a lot of matches, the board will think you do very badly. This means that if someone else applies for your club, you’ll be fired.
Imagine how this feels: you put a lot of work in a club, put together a real good squad of talented players, and just before you expect the good results will start, someone else takes over your position and reaps the fruit of your labor. That sucks, right?
Wouldn’t it be better if the board is more tolerant of bad results in rebuild mode?
selling some solid 19 year olds of all types im looking to buy defenders and midfielders that are 21-24 years old must have 90 tackel ( def ) 90 passing ( mid)
Performance: I understand what you’re saying, when you play most of the season against weaker teams it’s much harder to get your ratings up as any loss or draw, any early elimination or position below expectation in the league would drop your performance considerably. Maybe after finishing the economy changes we can rethink the manager performance evaluation process.
Retiring players: completely agree. That should be easier to change :)
Cheers