Recent Posts

Subscribe to Recent Posts 18,542 posts(s) found

December 27, 2012 07:30

828 posts(s)

 

December 27, 2012 03:29

57 posts(s)

 

Hey guys! I played soccersim ages ages ages ago. Not sure if you all remember me. I was active in the forums and even did several data files for new countries. Not sure if you remember but we ended up with a new “Challenge 3” or something, a game that ticked super fast and Italy had Serie A through to like H. Good times. I ran a couple “Friendlies” tournaments as well. It’s exciting to see a game so similar to the SS I know and love.

Anyways, good to see some familiar names! If any mods or “important” people see this I’m always willing to help develop. For free of course :P As long as there’s no “Forening” or whatever the hell that was. Also, no Dave Wallace.

See you on the pitch!

 

December 26, 2012 08:58

828 posts(s)

 

lol dimitri haha merry Christmas

 

December 26, 2012 08:56

639 posts(s)

Donator

 

Yep, not getting fired would be a good feature for VIP members.

 

December 26, 2012 07:54

4,300 posts(s)

Administator

 

We don’t mind having paid upgrades as long as they are not something that give such an advantage that non-paying users have no chance of success. This is an example that would not have an impact of this kind, so we could make it happen in the future.

 

December 25, 2012 21:57

4,300 posts(s)

Administator

 

Just had a look at your matches and main formation, I can’t see anything wrong. The only situation where it should fail is if the player was unavailable (red card or injured), otherwise the sub should happen. I’ll have a look in the code later, see if I can find anything wrong when dealing with position MC1, but I’d be surprised to find an error that specific!

 

December 25, 2012 10:03

828 posts(s)

 

make it a pay upgrade

when i say that i mean have it come out of the financials of the Team.

or you could even make it Pay upgrade for vip ruby members but i know you guys wannaa keep this game free

 

December 24, 2012 18:20

18 posts(s)

 

I’ve selected the player. it happens ONLY with the MC+1. All my subs are ok only when I put to sub some player into this position that nothing happen.

 

December 24, 2012 16:14

637 posts(s)

 

Have you selected a player or "best position? Otherwise you will only change the position of the player on the field.

 

December 24, 2012 16:09

637 posts(s)

 

I’m selling all my experienced players to rebuild my team.
The best of them is Alberico Maciel, a 90 average midfielder. The highest bid will win although the transferprice of 200M is always welcome :)

Take a look:
Alberico Maciel – M R 90avr
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/176480

 

December 24, 2012 14:19

18 posts(s)

 

Em qualquer partida, após o minuto 45, substituir jogador em zona M, lado C e mentalidade 1 por João Rocha.

Any match, after 45 minute, change player in M one, C side, mentality 1 by João Rocha.

 

December 24, 2012 13:50

301 posts(s)

 

Davison has a point, but there should also be an option to “auto-manage” for the people who don’t want to get into the details of training…

 

December 24, 2012 13:49

301 posts(s)

 

what are you settings for the substitution?

 

December 24, 2012 12:07

18 posts(s)

 

For many rounds I’m trying to sub my MC+1 during the game and nothing happens. Until now only in this position that I’m facing this kind of problem.

 

December 24, 2012 01:58

828 posts(s)

 

set it 3 stages rebuilding, est seasons, board demands rebuilt or fires if at the end of rebuilding you have not improved the squad.

have to make it a dynamic manager environment. also have a training type choice ( intense, rest, medium,) and be able to select what you want individual players to be working on in training. i think this is a necessity for this game. seriously its needed.

 

December 23, 2012 20:30

639 posts(s)

Donator

 

$4,560,090 now, avg stats 84, but still a good player: 10 goals in his 8 league matches.

 

December 23, 2012 16:41

301 posts(s)

 

ya, those initial bad results, where you transfer a few players and have good potential youth playing, really gets you off on the wrong foot. You start at 50% but before you know it you’re already down to 20-30% at the end of the 1st season… perhaps lower in some cases. :)

 

December 23, 2012 08:48

4,300 posts(s)

Administator

 

Interesting point, maybe we can consider a way to “tell” the board you are doing a long term work as you said Dimitri. I don’t think it can be too loose like a 3 season grace period as Charles mentioned, but it could make the board take it easier on your initially bad results :)

 

December 22, 2012 00:20

37 posts(s)

 

I think that punishing teams filing in younger players should be reviewed. My proposal: Young players gain experience when playing important matches. If the number of matches of a young player exceeds some limit (may be a hidden attribute), he should be considered sufficiently experienced not creating a penalty for the team.

 

December 21, 2012 13:30

301 posts(s)

 

Perhaps a 3 season grace period or something like that. I wonder what repercussions it would have on cheating (if it would curb it or increase it).

 

December 21, 2012 10:07

828 posts(s)

 

a good manager wouldnt get fired even during rebuilding

 

December 21, 2012 09:54

639 posts(s)

Donator

 

Most of us know about ‘rebuild mode’: instead of focussing on short term results, you focus on the long term, getting talented young players and developing them. It’s fun to do it, I think, to see how your players become better and better. There is one disadvantage though: since on the short term you lose a lot of matches, the board will think you do very badly. This means that if someone else applies for your club, you’ll be fired.

Imagine how this feels: you put a lot of work in a club, put together a real good squad of talented players, and just before you expect the good results will start, someone else takes over your position and reaps the fruit of your labor. That sucks, right?

Wouldn’t it be better if the board is more tolerant of bad results in rebuild mode?

 

December 18, 2012 21:16

828 posts(s)

 

selling some solid 19 year olds of all types im looking to buy defenders and midfielders that are 21-24 years old must have 90 tackel ( def ) 90 passing ( mid)

 

December 16, 2012 22:59

4,300 posts(s)

Administator

 

Performance: I understand what you’re saying, when you play most of the season against weaker teams it’s much harder to get your ratings up as any loss or draw, any early elimination or position below expectation in the league would drop your performance considerably. Maybe after finishing the economy changes we can rethink the manager performance evaluation process.

Retiring players: completely agree. That should be easier to change :)

Cheers

 

December 11, 2012 20:42

639 posts(s)

Donator

 

Again a very exciting season. AGOVV and PSV had the same amount of points with three matches to go, AGOVV was ahead by just two goals. Then they won their next matches with 14-0 and 12-0! Between them and the title was just an away match against Ajax… which they lost 4-2. So by winning the last three matches PSV again became champion!

Also Feyenoord did very well this season by qualifying for the CL by taking the 4th place. They have a very young squad which will probably compete for the title in the near future. NEC for the second time in a row just managed to avoid relegation, but they will probably compete for European football in two seasons. There were also two new managers and decent results in Europe, the Dutch League is doing well at the moment!

 

December 11, 2012 16:32

639 posts(s)

Donator

 

So what does the board say? Win the league with 20 points ahead?

 

December 11, 2012 14:57

25 posts(s)

 

First the performance, i find it a bit hard to get this rating up after the latest change. I won the league 5 out of 6 seasons, the cup 3 out of 6 seasons, and been in european group stage the last 10 seasons, i have improved the stadium to 60.000 seats and the bank is above 1 bill.

My current performance rating is 5%!! Im a real life FC Copenhagen fan, and in real life they would be building statues all over Copenhagen of me for this kind of performance :) :)

Just think its to hard to achieve a positive rating now, focussing to much on some issues and not at all on others.

Retiring players: I find it wrong that they would ask for more salary if you fire them in their last year, taking in note that they themselves have terminated the contract already.

You could argue that the transferlist link should be removed, or maybe allow for a low transfer price.

/Jakob

 

December 11, 2012 09:07

4,300 posts(s)

Administator

 

Oi Henrique,

Na verdade o Robert Junior vendeu esse jogador ao Rampla Junios, que na época não tinha treinador.

Abraço

========

Just clarifying that the player mentioned was sold, not bought, by Robert Junior.

 

December 11, 2012 00:41

639 posts(s)

Donator

 

Damn cheating cpu managers!

 

December 10, 2012 18:56

1 posts(s)

 

O treinador do Botafogo, Robert Junior, na época que treinava o Rampla Juniors, na temporada 37 ao turno 98, comprou um jogador por um preço muito maior. (Robert Junior Matheus Rocha 45721929 Transferido de Botafogo para Rampla Juniors.)
Idade: 22
Nacionalidade:
Clube: Rampla Juniors
Clube anterior: Botafogo
Valor Estimado: $41,870,900
Atributos
Posição: G
Lado: -
Goleiro: 78
Roubada: 34
Passe: 72
Chute: 28
Velocidade: 79
Drible: 75
Controle: 83
Cabeçada: 83
Agressividade: 44
Vigor: 100

Fora da realidade!