Recent Posts
18,548 posts(s) found
i don’t vaughn. mostly, i can’t understand the the option for a 68 keeping goalie in a CL game! this manager would be fired everywhere if, because of that, his team lost 11-0.
I kinda agree that it might be better to get some kind of penalty or -board. However, i can understand why people do it (do/did it myself to).
100% agree with Filipe.
Reminds me of what happened last season in group D of the CL. Ajax was 3 points and 7 goals up before the last round, then this happened:
Dinamo Zagreb 1 – 7 Olympique Lyon
Ajax 0 – 3 Real Madrid
Real Madrid 6 6 0 0 19 2 +17 18
Lyon 6 2 2 2 9 7 +2 8
Ajax 6 2 2 2 6 6 0 8
Dinamo Zagreb 6 0 0 6 3 22 −19 0
Yes Berhan. And cool!
I’m ok adding the new column, it’s not something hidden or anything, just helping with the math for those who like average stats.
Are you sure?
Is that a guess or that is truly so?
/BK
Very unfair to you, you had a much better goal difference and still managed to strike 2 against the group winner.
We can’t do much to prevent this from happening, Benfica had no interest in the match and had a cup final very near. I’m pretty sure if he used just the main keeper and the same field players he would lost by 3 or 4, you would pass the group and he’d still have the players ok for the cup final…
Maybe a really high penalty performance in this kind of competitions would be in order, this teams have no problems with board performance but still, would make them think better if a result like this made the board remove 30% the performance…
Another suggestion would be to when morale gets implemented, results like this should have effect on all the team players morale… With demotivated players for the cup final in mind, Benfica could have another aproach in this match…
R A P A Z
A
P
A
Z
Que absurdo esse resultado.
Não deveria acontecer isso.. deveria?!
Apesar que o Bayern colocou 9 no hamburgo esses dias, mas sei lá ein..
This sucks 11-0 seems a bit too much
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/3036657
put it in the game
enjoy it while you can. cos i think est value is full of shit
A positive correlation with player quality.
Dimitri, what does that column tell?
/BK
There are currently two ways to quickly rank your players: estimated value and (with a script) average stats. The script (currently) only works if there is an estimated value and it’s unclear if the script will be updated.
But there is a solution: add a column for average stats in the game (as a replacement for estimated value, or in addition).
(and I know the average stats don’t say anything, but that is also the case for any other number in the game…)
Which means that if the estimated value have to be removed for some reason, it should be replaced by adding a column for average stats (in the game, not with a script).
(I’ll make a separate posting for it)
Thanks! Now I can make sense of the players screen again.
Sly, it works because Gabriel put the values back. The values will disappear again when the new scouting system will be added and the script will be down once again.
As long as you make it generally not accurate I’m ok with it, this should give the manager an opinion, which as he’s own may be wrong. Even for older players you should not make it too accurate. They could be more accurate telling you when players have done improving, that would be nice and not too harmful…
cheers
It works again, thank god! Saves me alot of extra work of tracking increasements. Not to mention too quickly view avarage stats of players.
Yes, the report will work for all players. In the future we’ll end up allowing transfer proposals for non-transfer listed players anyway.
Yes, the scout report will work for your own youth academy players, but as I said they will be less accurate for such young players.
Done..or should I say, undone.
Put back estimated value for players until the new scouting reports functionality is ready.
Cheers
I still have 2 questions:
- Will the the new scouting report work for all players? Transferlisted or not?
- Will it make you able to scout the potential of your own youth academy players? I hope not because only crap players will be on the (free) transferlist.
So, will the removal of estimated value be undone or not? I think the play currently is unplayable (making it very difficult to see quickly how good your players are), so this is an very important issue for me (not much point in continueing to play otherwise).
@Vaughn: interesting point regarding small teams, maybe I should reconsider the amount of time to generate the report being variable and use the scout level just to provide more accurate reports.
@Sly: Exactly, all your reports will be listed in a new screen, and also be available in a new tab in the player’s info screen (for the players you’ve requested a report, of course)
So if you ask for a new scout report on another player it will be added to the report page? So you can create some kind of list with multiple scout reports then I guess?
I kinda like it, but how about the small teams with these changes? If you put time to get a report back from your scout then the teams with scouting 10 will “steal” everything away before you even get a report back.
For example: if a 19 year old players get’s listed you want a report asap. If a big team get’s a report in 3 ticks and a small team in 10 ticks, the small team will never be able to buy a player trough the scout report. I think small team still won’t use the option scouting then.
exactly how i would of made scouting. thank you
Yup, I like it.