Recent Posts
18,554 posts(s) found
The board is too harsh sometimes, the only good thing that comes from that is people have the chance to eventually manage a club they like. Also, only a manager above you in the ranking can steal your job, so if you are doing well and the board still complains you only have to worry if one of the few doing better than you is interested in managing your club.
well at least theres shit to do on there…. im rather disappointed in what rubysoccer is at the moment…dull and mundane…still love this game…and still hope shit gets going…but manageing a team on here takes minutes…wheres over there you have to spend time and manage
bring back RubySoccer to glory
I do play Managersim, but I think it’s very userunfriendly. I do appreciate Rubysoccer more because of it :)
I actually left the game for the same reasons. I’m back now, but I would probably leave again if my job gets stolen again.
Lol Davison is just negative! Managersim has had two serious crashes already! It’s not perfect either, a lot of trading between friends on there
Hmm, i knew berhan had managersim, but he couldn’t get it working. Cool he finally got it working.
yup…. this game is dead while that game is looking well take notes gabriel :)
Uuh, Managersim is back?? I assume thanks to berhan?
I am sure you noticed we’ve had some changes recently – like the new Mobile UI
Nope, hadn’t noticed as I don’t use my mobile for online stuff. But what the game needs is new features, not just making it playable on a mobile. I log in, look at the team then log out, there is nothing else to do. Apart from the change to board points, there seems to have been very little added or developed in the game in a long time. There needs to be more to do as a manager to keep people logged onto the site for a longer period of time, it all seems very stale/static at present.
I won the Euro cup a few years back and the board still hated me and gave me a 1% rating for my job, so someone stole my job and I left in disgust for a year!
managersim has its perks, but we’re confident we have the right plans in place to catch-up with managersim in the areas where we feel we need to. after we do that, I think there’s space for both in the market. Davison, the game is not dead, its just going through a quiet phase – partially due to managersim. but we are sure the main reason was our long inactivity. this is something we intend to fix.
I got fed up with managersim
dw mate ive met every expectation my board wants and still they are upset with me…so basicly the board can get fucked lol
that wont fix the problems. looks like everyone went to managersim ?
Last season after promotion the board wanted me to fight against relegation, managed to avoid relegation by a few points. This season they want me to “fight for the title”, seems a little unrealistic to me.
Then switch team or league for new enjoyments, that helps me :)
zzzzz…im bored ….this game is dead……:(
I must admit I never look at the newspaper in this game but I would if it had manager interviews etc in it.
On the contrary! Both me and Gabriel are committed to being as active as we can be. The last weeks have been challenging, as Gabriel is on holidays and I have some family visiting – but we will definitely be back afterwards. I am sure you noticed we’ve had some changes recently – like the new Mobile UI.
Filipe’s answer is spot on. I will most likely start working on the game again in a couple week’s time. Even though I recognize the newspaper is a great tool to add content to the game we have been neglecting it on purpose to try and revamp other critical areas first, but it never left our radar of areas to improve.
And it is definitely not over ;-)
The developers are on vacation this weeks, before that they were starting to work on the game again, as you can see from the announcement pages.
About the newspaper I think they have plans for that but probably isnt a priority… I personally dont see much use for the newspaper, too much work for something people rarely use…
I’ve written a number of newspaper articles that are over a year old that are still waiting for approval. Even something simple like new content in the newspaper might feel like it is starting to spark the game back into life, even if everything stays the same as it was before.
If users are generating content, but the devs aren’t using it, what incentive is there for people to continue trying to help improve a game that isn’t theirs?
I am currently on holidays so don’t expect any new features from me during the next 4 weeks. Once I’m back I will try to move the focus from game economy to player related fearures.
Seems nice, thou as you say would give some advantage to teams already doing well…
Something you could consider about the stadium is the return of a fixed number of seats, managers would add new seats by the season Investments, this would be nice for people that stay much time in a club… To control the seats level you could make some stadium restructure, say, when a manager leaves… Also stadium investments would add very low seats if it it a large stadium already…
I agree with you Filipe. I think we can attach stadium level to the number of seats and use the attendance to determine the penalty on opposition players, this way it does not matter if you are level 10, if your fans don’t go to your match there is no pressure on the opposition. One could argue that this will benefit teams that are doing well already, as their matches have more attendance, but I don’t think that side effect is too different than what happens in real life.
Something I think you should consider is changing the Stadium inventments levels… Level 10 gives home teams too much advantage making it a requirement for any team that wants to compete… Also think older players should always have some away advantage in order to make them more valuable…
My suggestion:
Level 10 – 3 penalty for younger/ 2 penalty for older players
Level 9 – 3 penalty for younger/ 1 penalty for older players
well it would be a good way to keep the transfer market alive… cant sign everyone full squads eventurally…and well it would allow for more worthy options on free transfer and transfer.
Not sure about the quality because that’s driven by the country ranking…but I would definitely have it to increase the quantity…more youths will give you a higher chance of getting better quality players anyway.
youth academy,
higher it is the better quality youth you get
Have the security exception but still not working…
Java is updated, tried Chrome, Firefox and IE..