Recent Posts by Gabriel Cesario
4,200 posts(s) found
This is something that was changed recently and is being subject to discussions, so I decided to open a specific topic about it. The idea of keeping the loan was introduced to protect smaller teams who rely on loans to be competitive. You may say it’s not fair for the team which is buying the player, but he knows the player is loaned and should expect the player to be available only when the loan ends.
What do you think, if a loaned player is sold to another team, should the loan be terminated?
Done.
Davison, I guess we don’t need to tell you again to be careful with your words, do we? ;)
It has come to my attention that I might (ooops) have forgotten to announce that loans are not cancelled anymore when the player is sold. Sorry about that.
Shouldn’t this be under FastTicker forum? I suppose this is about FT, right? :)
Brazil can only fall after we implement the extended Club World Cup ;)
I had to say that before Da Mago :D
You swapped the values Nirabdha, it’s -1 for 30 yrs and -2 for 29 yrs :)
It doesn’t matter, it is the responsibility of the team who loaned in the player to make sure the clauses are not broken. The other team has the option to reject or even ignore your termination request :)
In your example manager B would be punished since he was the one in charge when the loaned player missed the last match. I know, it doesn’t sound fair, but manager A was in his right when he made the player miss 5 matches since he was allowed to miss even 6 ;)
I’ll fix that for you Simon. Recently we made a change were a player is still loaned when sold. I didn’t consider the case where he would be sold to the team loaning him :D
I think that was mentioned before. We’ll make sure this is included in the match engine enhancements, since we currently don’t store the number of assists.
No, your loan embargo history is not reset so after letting a player go for the third time your embargo duration will always be 45 turns whenever you let that happen again.
Of course ppl read the newspaper! I gues…anyway, ppl will read when we improve the news and add some interviews ;)
Thanks Chris, shouldn’t happen again!
Loan Embargo
If you let loaned players return for having missed more matches than allowed by contract you will suffer from a temporary loan embargo. The duration of the embargo depends on how many times you let that happen. It will last 15 turns in the first time, 30 turns in the second and 45 turns from the third on. During the embargo you won’t be able to loan players from other teams. The goal of this enhancement is to prevent situations where the same team keeps loaning players without using them.
Currently stamina affects the players ability to recover during the match. The more tired a player harder it will be to recover. In practice, it means those with low stamina tends to become slower earlier in the match.
It is now possible to request loan termination. If the other team agrees the player is returned in the following turn.
The correct calculation is:
Stamina: penalty
100: 0%
99: 0%
98: 0%
97: -1%
96: -1%
95: -1%
94: -2%
…
4: -32%
3: -32%
2: -32%
1: -33%
Beware of your players stamina! Next season the rules will be more strict affecting the overall skills of the players instead of only their recovery after running. Every 3 points below 100 stamina will reduce all skills by 1%.
The away match penalty reduction is still on discussion, so for next season we won’t reduce it for 27-28 years old player yet, we may do that for 29 (-2) and 30 (-1) years old players only. Stay tuned!
This is a known issue, I couldn’t find out how to fix it the first time I saw it…we’ll need to check it again.
Thanks!
Ladies and Gentleman, I give you Peter Strand:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/manager_info/2675 (MediumTicker)
http://www.rubysoccer.com/users/2430
For those who doesn’t know Peter he is the creator of ManagerSim, the football management game that made me and Danilo decide to create RubySoccer. Peter kindly joined RubySoccer to take a look on what we have so far. It’s an honor to have him around! This game would probably not exist if it wasn’t for our addiction to MS.
We’ll that, I agree it’s completely ridiculous :)
I was thinking about punishing managers who do that…if a manager let’s a loaned player exceed the number of matches without playing 3 times we forbid him to loan players for a given period…how does that sound?
This 27-28 upgrade seems like a controversial subject…what about -1 for 30 y.o. and -2 for 29 y.o?
To reduce the impact on the current season we’ll wait until next season to activate an enhancement for the older players rules: -2 away penalty for 27-28 years old players and -1 away penalty for 29-30 years old players.
I’ll implement Alexander’s suggestion next season, -2 penalty for 27-28 years old players and -1 penalty for 29-30.
Waiting for the season start means we’ll have this kind of change every 48 days only :D
I understand your complaints, but old players will still have their skills decreased, it’s just a way to make them valuable for an extended period. And you have a great team, you’ll be able to face this challenge ;)
You need to wait 1 complete season (144 turns) before being able to a recently managed team.
I’m with Dirk on this one, we cannot lower too much the age since the idea is to make older players more interesting and strategic.
It is possible that we return to the original idea of letting managers decide the ticket price, but first we need to develop a good and consistent relation between ticket price and match attendance (considering of course the factors that we already consider like match competition, team quality, league position or cup round, etc).