Recent Posts by Gabriel Cesario
4,164 posts(s) found
Just did it, players with more than 30 years old won’t be penalized when playing away matches.
No Alexander, we now display formaton status for the 3 next matches to alert you in advance. This is specially useful if your next match is a friendly or for when you have a league match followed by a national cup match for example.
Yeah, the idea is that old player positively influence the youngers. I also like this suggestion of not losing stats by playing away, sounds more interesting and easier to implement.
No worries Tiko, you probably opened your invitations page and the friendlies were withdrawn right after that :)
We’ve not gave up on this idea, working on higher priorities now (match engine, to be more specific).
I understand but the idea of moving the player back to his original team is also to prevent the original team from being weakened by cheaters, that’s why I can’t put him back in the market. I could return you the players if nobody hired them already, as an exception. Whenever you see such strange deals it’s better get suspicious ;)
I’ll review headers in my current work on match engine, they’re not being as useful as they could be ;)
Of course I can. The manager who sold the player joined the game and made two ridiculous transactions right away: sold his best defender to you and bought a ridiculous midfielder from another team. Both transactions were rolled back and the manager was fired and banned.
I assure it’s not random, otherwise we wouldn’t have some managers winning titles in a row in some countries ;)
But don’t worry, a new match engine is on its way, with more realistic behaviour and results!
With negative balance your departments will be downgraded until you reach positive balance. If that’s not enough, players will be “sold” and disappear from the game. If that’s not enough (you’ve reached 14 players and is still negative) you’re fired and the team finances restructured (wages are balanced and the team receives enough money to be in regular situation.
Looking into it. I suppose you’re filling the fields in the “Field reassign” section cause that’s the only situation where I’ve had problems. You don’t need to do that if you wanna replace your keeper, just fill the “from” position with G, uncheck the “generic” option and select the keeper to replace the one in the field.
Yes, please…let’s try to avoid conflicts in the forums ;)
My bad…things are back to normal now ;)
Probably…could you be more specific, Charles? ;)
We could create something like that, it would be very interesting. Unfortunately not for players who retired already, their statistics have been removed.
What is this supposed to mean? :D
We haven’t done anything recently…glad to know players are smarter now :D
@Nirabdha: I agree when you say it doesn’t make sense if the board allows you to fire your player but not lower the price…picking the 14 that can’t be fired is an interesting idea, at least for start :)
Exactly, that’s where the idea came from :D
Thanks for reporting Nestor, we’ll look into it!
I agree with you Davison, maybe reverting just 3 was not the best option, but giving the tools I have for doing that right now and the little time available this decision seemed to be ok. Improving the admin tools takes precious time but we know that needs to be done and will be done. In the meanwhile there are simpler restrictions we can add like not allowing a manager to fire more than 1 player per tick.
I reverted the top players transfers, the ones indicated by the admin tools.
Returned the 3 most important ones, the manager fired them just before resigning…that’s ridiculous!
@Davison: I’m already sick, probably more than anyone else :(
We certainly need more restrictions to prevent situations like these and we’ll add them…first things first, match engine work will take some time.
Não entendi… :(
The -3 penalty is applied if you put the defender on zone A in your formation, or use individual tactics to make him move forward to midfield…if you put him on defense in your formation and he ends up shooting during the match (including penalty kicks or free kicks) he will not receive any penalty.
The defender was the best player available to take the penalty kick. The one who was better than him had received a red card.
Thanks for reporting, looking into it.
We’ll change that, don’t worry :)
What should happen is, if any player has the ball in what we call the crossing zone (left or right side of the penalty box) he should cross the ball to the box if any teammate is there. If it isn’t happening I’ll have to check what’s going wrong. I’ll make sure I review this logic while working on the match engine enhancements.
Poderiamos estabelecer um valor maximo sim, mas nao podemos simplesmente levar em conta o valor estimado, teriamos que considerar tambem a idade (na verdade o valor estimado poderia considerar a idade no calculo).
Quanto a clausulas de contrato certamente teremos, vão tornar as negociações bem mais interessantes :)
==
In English:
We could establish a maximum value for the transfer price, but we can’t simply take the estimated value in consideration, we need to consider the age (in fact the estimated value could consider the age on its calculation).
Regarding contract clauses, we’ll certainly have them, they will make negotiations much more interesting :)