Recent Posts by Nirabdha
651 posts(s) found
Attributes
Position: A
Side: C
Keeping: 52
Tackle: 68
Passing: 66
Shooting: 79
Speed: 76
Dribble: 81
Control: 92
Header: 80
Aggressiveness: 59
Price : 900,000 only (negotiable)
Only reason to sell him is i feel my squad has many relatively good strikers, and i want some open slots…
I just checked this seasons champions league group stage matches and got quite bemused to see two french teams in the same group… i think it is good to have separate teams from different leagues in one group during the group stage.
I feel playing in the champions league is about playing against the teams from different leagues. And i don’t think it is justifiable to play against the same team that you have been playing season-in and season-out everytime in your national league.
It should be a different story in the knockout stages though. you should be ready to play anyone at that time…
Since there are 4 groups i don’t know why we couldn’t have 4 teams in different groups. i don’t think teams require protection at this highest level… just my opinion though.
Edit:
Similarly, i saw that two spanish teams were in the same group last season despite having only 3 spanish teams at that stage… and similarly italians and spanish teams suffered the same fate the season before that.
well, sly no one is accusing french teams… vaughan has himself said he wanted to focus on champions league rather than the league and that he had little chance against monaco. watch his 3rd and 5th comments on the related thread. and i think other teams lower than him benefited rather lose anything with that decision. In fact he didn’t cheat against anyone in the league with that decision, but then since he could not do well in the CL, he did against his on board…
But having said that i have always said there should be some penalty against manager from the concerned club. and i think removing this 10 point penalty limit is the best option for now…
do well u get rewarded, do bad you pay
yah… one of them is…
Edit: didn’t know what i was thinking at that time:(
( probably my lab seminar was on top of me)
Gabriel, Check out these blogs…
Ambience Of Life
and
News Analysis
I am not sure if i am right to complain, but then if a team gets 3 penalties in the first 30 minutes then there should be something fishy, right???
In this MT match Zwolle Vs Utrecth , Utrecht got 3 penalties within first 30 mins, first in 7th min (scored), 2nd in 28th min (penalty saved), and more surprisingly 3rd one in 29th min (scored). it looked as if the match engine wanted the home team to scored at least 2 goals :) ;)… After that it couldn’t get one.
i hope i am not complaining just for the sake of it…
i wasn’t talking about my current team… i was talking about when i was managing bordeaux… i tried not to renew the contract of one of my old players (he was around 33 i guess), and the board renewed the contract themselves…
and i still remember the board re-signed him on a different wage… so, i am sure there is no bug in this case… its been been explicitly implemented to avoid conditions when managers try deliberately to weaken their squad ( i am not saying or implying luc is trying to do so)…
Very Good Player For Almost Free ;)
Nico Schmidt
Position: DM 16-swap
Side: C
Keeping: 31
Tackle: 84
Passing: 69
Shooting: 73
Speed: 76
Dribble: 65
Control: 62
Header: 80
Aggressiveness: 65
Stamina: 95
transfer price: $248,548
Current wage: $4,012
all the best , good price for a very quality striker…
although my board wouldn’t allow me saying we already have enough players… they never accept they don’t have enough money ….
yah… and that was pretty fast too:)
has happened to me before… don’t think that is a bug, but rather the board overriding managers so that they have sufficient squad of players
Embedded the link to my blog… Parag’s Blog
if you have similar easy to embed code for rubysoccer (football) , i could add that to my site too…
EDIT: i am not aware if we are allowed to give our blog here… although it was not for ad purpose… will remove it duly, if not allowed
gabriel,
just curious how the new chatroom would function…
hehe… don’t do so… otherwise how could we get players for nothing ( albeit at higher wage rate:) )
Did Ravenna go into administration?? A player worth 36 million was in the free market… or was he sold to the game system ? Danilo Campello was in the free market last night. how did that happen… did the computer player just fire him because they couldn’t pay 19K worth his wages or did they get something for him??
just curious… ( actually i missed out on him narrowly… lets not go into that..)
Another promising player was also in the free market at the same time and this was also a similar situation. Sebastien Kalb , and luckily i could get him…
But still i am not able to understand whether these computer-players get anything in return for firing those players ( or is it actually firing… i read somewhere that when the club goes bankrupt, the higher wage earning players were sold to the game system, never to return again to the game. But seeing them on free transfer makes me wonder…)
well, i don’t want a direct interference, but some in-game checks could be kept in place.
For eg; if you lose any official games by more than certain no of goals (say 10), your board appreciation falls by more than usual percentage (for eg, 25% or 50%) and repetition of such results within the same season could lead to manager being fired… (especially when u r in the top half of the league)
yah… we are going to have europa league from next season onwards… i think its better
i am for the first option…
thanks gab:)
you can’t beat our imagination;)
well, its been long since we have had any improvement to the newspaper section, may be revealing transfers occurred in the previous turns could be one way to do so. More importance should be given to club to club transfers. they should appear in the headlines on the basis of amount they were transferred. and may be free transfers and fired players details could be given in the back pages.
gab i hope this is included in your enhancement list… i don’t think this would take long…
well, i wish fortaleza manager would sometimes visit forum and answer our queries… we can only speculate what he might have thought.
may be he saw the potential in that player, but then the player didn’t improve as expected, who knows…
vaughn, if you want to get your players back, then u should not renew the loan. but if you renew, it should be treated like a new agreement. so, the clause should also reset.
i’ve got one too, but i am not sure if he can be a first choice…
but still u could look at Alexander Treibel
here is a situation. A player X was loaned for 144 turns with the clause “max official matches missed = 6”. Lets say he missed a total of 2 matches during those 144 turns. Later, when the loan agreement was renewed with the renewal option, i see that those 2 matches he missed during his last loan agreement still appearing for the current agreement. Since the loan renewal agreement is signed in the last 12 ticks window, it can still appear in that window period, as the new agreement starts only at the end of that 12th turn. But i feel that the matches missed in the last loan period still appearing for the renewed loan agreement.
with the minimum matches clause for loan players, i have been thinking if it would be possible to display “loaned” information in the formation page. that would be easy rather than going back and forth to see if the player is loaned.
yup, considering his skills, that is one hell of inflation
will we have some other tournaments or just world cup… i think world cup would be great to start with…
dhimitri’s suggestion regarding player selection is good, worth consideration… gets my vote…
would be exciting :)
or translate.google.com makes it so easy for us…( which is true for me).
There are two important basic formulas:
(keeping x 0.6 + speed x 0.4) for shots
(keeping x 0.6 + header x 0.4) for headers
Dribbling is used only for one-on-one situtations. More specifically, dribbling is only used if your formation has no defenders on mentalities 0 and -1. In such cases the following formula is used.
(keeping x 0.6 + speed x 0.4) [x dribbling / 100, optionally] for shots
(keeping x 0.6 + header x 0.4) [x dribbling / 100, optionally] for headers
check this for more information RubySoccerWiki