Recent Posts
18,557 posts(s) found
English premier League is starting to become a lot more competitive, it’s a good chance to start over a new team and challenge yourself against human managers without a bunch of giants already established…
There’s many teams with good base for starting over, take a look and peak one!
Evaristo Hernandes still for trade, simbolic price now.
A nice player for a medium team in international cup, +3 makes him a excellent forward… 4 goals in CL this season, with my class D team…
All good with our options to login with Google or Facebook. Thanks for your patience!
Some users have experienced issues login in to the game using Google or Facebook. Please let us know if you experience any issues so we can give you alternatives while we investigate the problem.
Your selling prices are much too high in my opinion. If you really want to sell players, you might try to lower them.
It is logical that you have to pay much more for players that are not transferlisted.
Hi,
to buy a player on another team is terrifying. It costs how many times their estimated value?
How come there is such a discrepency when selling players? I doubt I could even get double for high skilled players, let alone anything like the amount I’d have to bid on non-transfer listed players.
Having a limit on the number of players in a squad, and the real loss in money when trying to sell someone is just a bit harsh atm.
Regards,
Not a bug, that’s one of the effects of having “better youths” type of star players in your squad. They basically have two effects for new youth players: their base skills start higher (if you are not already a top ranked country) and they may improve one or more times immediately after joining, fast-tracking their evolution path.
A new player arrived at my club in fastticker. At the same day, I got this message:
Richard Kleinjan skills have increased 5 times.
Sounds good, but I suppose it’s a bug?
Good change!
I’ve published it in the Poll Results topic, but basically the option to disallow wage reduction won. I’ve also published what the rules will be like in our Facebook page, here they are:
- players currently in your team when the new rules come into effect will still accept wage reductions as per existing rules
- new players hired by human managed teams will NOT accept wage reduction when renewing the contract; the only exceptions to this rule are if the player lose skills or lose stars
- new players hired by CPU managed teams WILL accept wage reduction
- players will accept wage reductions when being transferred between teams
I will also include alert messages about it in the contract offer and negotiations screens.
I have some additional ideas to change the way competing bids work so that smaller clubs always have a chance, but I won’t get into much detail on that before finishing the new wage reduction rules (development well underway).
How were the vote counts?
I really think this should go ahead, to try and stop some crazy wages we sometimes see, every time there’s 4 or 5 teams bidding on a player I simply look away because one of them is probably giving a 500k wage… They can only do that because they can lower that 500k to half in one or two seasons…
Yeah it would be planning forced transfers, and just kind of weeding out players I may have the budget for, but don’t really want because they’re expensive as is.
I have recently added the option to only return transfer listed players within your transfer budget, does that help? Or maybe you are interested in filtering by estimated value for non listed players, so you can plan your forced transfers?
Maybe adding a scout’s ability to search for estimated value.
Greater than x
Less than x
Between x and x
Estimated value is a value we can all see on every player already, so it would be a valuable tool for scouts to weed out players that would be out of the budgets of lower level teams. Like mine haha
Another very close poll about player wage reduction, these are the results:
38% – Do not allow wage reduction
26% – Lower the amount that can be reduced on renewal
32% – No change
4% – No answer
It will take some time for any rule changes to take effect as we need to make sure CPU teams are not adversely impacted as well as managers who “inherit” big wages when joining a club.
I only checked averages on a specific competition, not overall season average across all competitions played.
I thought I didn’t see a lot of 9+ averages in the world team of the season, but I guess it’s more common than I expected. Still strange that no one wanted to buy him.
There are 11 players in FastTicker that have played at least 7 matches in the same competition this season that have an avg rating better than Dennis. Still, a very impressive performance!
Gabriel, do you know if Dennis Bakker (who I kept because people didn’t want to buy him, even for a cheap price) is the best player of the game currently with 9.01 average?
This is a great idea.
In fact the requirement is to play in a country at least 3 positions above his home country..so for example if an English player in FastTicker has that requirement he can play in any of the first 11 countries (England is currently in 14th place). Of course that for players born in the top 6 countries that means they have to play in the top 3.
That said, I’m willing to change these fixed steps to something more dynamic, where players can still improve even if playing in your team, but would improve much faster if other requirements were satisfied. While that is not done, a simpler solution would be what Dimitri proposed (to have a step that benefits lower ranked countries) as well as relax the existing step a little bit to allow for top 6 countries or any country above the player native country.
Add ‘This player needs to play outside the top 3 countries’. Problem solved?
(instead of ‘man of the match’ would be my wish)
Juan Morán won’t renew contract, he’s mad at me :(
Will go for the best offer, take a look:
https://goalfc.net/game/player_info/1025978
“This player needs to play for a team in the top 3 countries.”
There are elite players in more than just 3 countries in real life. There’s 7-8 top tier leagues. I really really hate that in order to be the best you have to be either Spain, Brazil or Portugal. So managers go there, and the other leagues remain empty, and underdeveloped.
I suggest increasing this requirement to the top 7-8, at LEAST.
I get that low leagues won’t develop top tier talent, but getting your country into the top 3 is actually impossible. Giving them a chance to get into the 7th or 8th spot is at least possible, and would create competition.
If the game were much much larger then top 3 would work better, but right now, it’s 3 massive leagues and then 1 or 2 managers in the rest.
Yeah, I guess the question was a bit simplistic, but I always try to get straight to a specific point with them as there is not a lot of room for explanations. Even if we change that little thing there is certainly a lot of room for improvement in terms of player contract negotiation and what you mentioned in terms of having different wage and contract length expectations at different ages is definitely one of them.
Hi,
the vote was interesting, I would say that players who are 36+ should not be expecting wages the same as they got in their prime. Significantly less wages, and 1 or 2 year contracts.
Juan Morán 96+2 worse class – 70M
Darren Carpenter 94 – 12 M
Evaristo Hernandes 93+3 international cups – 15M
Ok, obrigado pela atenção. Vou verificar.
Pedro Ferreira, age 31
https://goalfc.net/game/player_info/948296
He has only 83 average but is cheap and has
Plays better in international cups (+3)
And João Vargas, A-player, age 29
87 average with 98 speed.
Plays better against teams with a class better than his team (+3)