Recent Posts
18,515 posts(s) found
I have recently added the option to only return transfer listed players within your transfer budget, does that help? Or maybe you are interested in filtering by estimated value for non listed players, so you can plan your forced transfers?
Maybe adding a scout’s ability to search for estimated value.
Greater than x
Less than x
Between x and x
Estimated value is a value we can all see on every player already, so it would be a valuable tool for scouts to weed out players that would be out of the budgets of lower level teams. Like mine haha
Another very close poll about player wage reduction, these are the results:
38% – Do not allow wage reduction
26% – Lower the amount that can be reduced on renewal
32% – No change
4% – No answer
It will take some time for any rule changes to take effect as we need to make sure CPU teams are not adversely impacted as well as managers who “inherit” big wages when joining a club.
I only checked averages on a specific competition, not overall season average across all competitions played.
I thought I didn’t see a lot of 9+ averages in the world team of the season, but I guess it’s more common than I expected. Still strange that no one wanted to buy him.
There are 11 players in FastTicker that have played at least 7 matches in the same competition this season that have an avg rating better than Dennis. Still, a very impressive performance!
Gabriel, do you know if Dennis Bakker (who I kept because people didn’t want to buy him, even for a cheap price) is the best player of the game currently with 9.01 average?
This is a great idea.
In fact the requirement is to play in a country at least 3 positions above his home country..so for example if an English player in FastTicker has that requirement he can play in any of the first 11 countries (England is currently in 14th place). Of course that for players born in the top 6 countries that means they have to play in the top 3.
That said, I’m willing to change these fixed steps to something more dynamic, where players can still improve even if playing in your team, but would improve much faster if other requirements were satisfied. While that is not done, a simpler solution would be what Dimitri proposed (to have a step that benefits lower ranked countries) as well as relax the existing step a little bit to allow for top 6 countries or any country above the player native country.
Add ‘This player needs to play outside the top 3 countries’. Problem solved?
(instead of ‘man of the match’ would be my wish)
Juan Morán won’t renew contract, he’s mad at me :(
Will go for the best offer, take a look:
https://goalfc.net/game/player_info/1025978
“This player needs to play for a team in the top 3 countries.”
There are elite players in more than just 3 countries in real life. There’s 7-8 top tier leagues. I really really hate that in order to be the best you have to be either Spain, Brazil or Portugal. So managers go there, and the other leagues remain empty, and underdeveloped.
I suggest increasing this requirement to the top 7-8, at LEAST.
I get that low leagues won’t develop top tier talent, but getting your country into the top 3 is actually impossible. Giving them a chance to get into the 7th or 8th spot is at least possible, and would create competition.
If the game were much much larger then top 3 would work better, but right now, it’s 3 massive leagues and then 1 or 2 managers in the rest.
Yeah, I guess the question was a bit simplistic, but I always try to get straight to a specific point with them as there is not a lot of room for explanations. Even if we change that little thing there is certainly a lot of room for improvement in terms of player contract negotiation and what you mentioned in terms of having different wage and contract length expectations at different ages is definitely one of them.
Hi,
the vote was interesting, I would say that players who are 36+ should not be expecting wages the same as they got in their prime. Significantly less wages, and 1 or 2 year contracts.
Juan Morán 96+2 worse class – 70M
Darren Carpenter 94 – 12 M
Evaristo Hernandes 93+3 international cups – 15M
Ok, obrigado pela atenção. Vou verificar.
Pedro Ferreira, age 31
https://goalfc.net/game/player_info/948296
He has only 83 average but is cheap and has
Plays better in international cups (+3)
And João Vargas, A-player, age 29
87 average with 98 speed.
Plays better against teams with a class better than his team (+3)
Another good player for sale: Federico Haedo, age 30.
https://goalfc.net/game/player_info/987722
92 passing, 87 average.
Plays better against teams with a class better than his team (+3)
Sobre os investimentos olhei seu histórico financeiro e eles estão zerados no mínimo desde a temporada 83, não foram zerados agora. É possível aumentar os investimentos mas o primeiro deles tem que ser o HQ (Sede), nenhum dos outros pode ficar com nível acima desse. Se não estiver conseguindo aumentar o nível da sede me avise que posso te ajudar.
Sobre o algoritmo não é questão de estar certo ou errado, é apenas uma tentativa do jogo de se moldar aos atributos que estão sendo valorizados pelos managers no momento. Os pesos de cada atributo pra cada posição são recalibrados toda temporada e isso pode gerar essa variação de classe dos jogadores e time. Concordo que seu time tem desempenho muito melhor do que teria um time D, de fato o algoritmo está longe de ser perfeito mas na média não tem errado por muito, espero que essa temporada tenha sido uma exceção (ou então é mérito seu de levar um time em teoria mais fraco a bons resultados) ;-)
Todos os itens do investimento estão zerados. Como pode isto?
Desculpe mas continuo achando que esse algorítmo deve estar com algum problema pq o time tem ótimo desempenho com jogadores muito melhores do que times de classe D e sem possibilidade de alterar os investimentos todos zerados.
Olá David,
No começo de cada temporada o jogo recalibra o cálculo da qualidade dos jogadores pra uma determinada dimensão além de recalcular as classes deles e dos times, baseado na força relativa da equipe com relação a todas as outras. São levados em conta apenas os 11 jogadores que o jogo consideraria titulares e mais uns poucos “reservas”. Dei uma olhada na sua equipe e imagino que ela seja considerada mais “fraca” porque seus jogadores não têm bons atributos secundários, embora sejam muito bons nos atributos principais.
Quanto a nível de treinadores no zero basta aumentar o nível do headquarters (sede) primeiro, nenhum outro investimento pode ter nível maior do que o da sede.
Meu time foi rebaixado para classe D e nivel de técnico ZERO sem possibilidade de aumento.
As finanças estão regulares e o time foi vice campeão, com muito bons jogadores.
Isso foi um erro do sistema???
Solis — D — age 24 — tac 96
Peralto — M — + 2 in international matches
Tac 84 pas 89 sho 84
Rabassa — M — tac 85 pas 93
Isco — M — +3 in international matches
Pas 90 sho 83 spe 94 ctr 95
Domene — M — +3 against teams a class worser
Tac 86 pas 89 sho 80 dri 94 hea 94
Civelli — D — avg 88
Tac 93 spe 89 dri 92 ctr 93
Marinelli — avg 88
Hi, many players for sale at Liverpool (English 2nd Division at the moment)
Take a look and fell free to ask coach reports or traits for any of them.
Most players in transfer list still with good potential (92+)
Cheers!
Added report age and proper sorting, hope you guys like it ;-)
Improved the player tooltip in the formations screen. It now contains the player’s pressure handling and traits. In addition to that the skills are shown in the same order as in other game screens.
There are not many better players for B-teams though. It’s true that you cannot use him all games (for full effectiveness), but the same counts for players with reasonable/poor pressure handling.
Also 8.36 avg rating this season so far.
It is a decent player for B teams or lower I think. I agree there aren’t that many with the same characteristics available, but maybe those who could use the player would rather try to invest in younger ones that could become even better than yours? Or maybe it’s just that not everyone checks the forums :-)