Makes sense, added to the list.
Thanks!
To be exact: Not Neymar was at 17% after five games, still critical. Then he went to neutral, but 0%? A few ticks later he’s suddenly at 48%. Is it bugged?
broken is broken
I agree that young players should be happy with playing just a few matches. I have one who has played 5 matches so far, but he is stil critical. It’s not Neymar.
Perhaps send a message when a player gets injured during a match?
Not at present, everything seems to be running ok, thanks.
I probably did for that one, any other players to watch?
It’s running again!
Cheers
Fast ticker stuck at 9%
It was Steven Cass (fast ticker) but now his morale has shot up and he will renew. Not sure if you did something to fix this or not?
I see, so Neymar should be ok with not playing until he is 25…? Just checking.
an 18 year old should not have a critical moral how the fuck does he expect to get 1st team play critical should only effect 25 year olds and higher
Wait, I couldn’t see it happening on the test I just did. Can you please let me know here or via in-game message which player are you concerned about so I can keep an eye on him?
Critical and bad morale players have the same small penalty on their own performance. They don’t affect the performance of their teammates.
That is definitely a bug! Anyone else on the same situation? I can fix it manually for you whilst the bug is not fixed.
Thanks for reporting, Sniff!
So I loaned a young player out and his morale doesn’t improve when he plays games at the CPU team and now his contract is running down he doesn’t want to renew. This seems to be a problem, if players morale doesn’t improve whilst playing for CPU teams.
I can’t play all my squad players so my thought was to loan them out to improve morale, but it would appear that for loans to work you have to loan out players with good morale, which sort of defeats the purpose of either the loan or the morale, does it not?
And what is the effect of morale on performance?
Yes Gabriel your right that’s what I mean! I haven’t accessed the game yet on a desktop, I’ve been using the mobile version.
@Joseppi: I think I know what you mean about the formation, you mean make the field section of the screen come before the tactics section. On a mobile device that means formation on top, on desktop it means formation on the left, maybe that’s what got Danilo confused…or maybe misunderstood as well. For the strategies and match report screens I’m not too sure about the change, it could make it too ugly for the desktop version.
@Dirk: I agree that is not very nice on mobile devices, we’ll see if it makes the desktop version too ugly.
These are some of the challenges you have when trying to make the same screen work on desktop and mobile devices :-)
In the inbox the new messages detail is shown below all the existing messages. Isn’t it possible to show them above the new messages? It would be much better on mobile devices.
I want you guys to start communicating more, so I’ve spent some time to make the forum more usable on a mobile device. There’s still some things that need to be done but the current changes should already make the experience much better.
Do you mean like it was before, inside of the grey header of that box? Also, the challenge with the match report is real estate – and getting a screen that is not too sparse. I’m not 100% sure what you mean, do you think you could quickly use paintbrush to manipulate a screenshot and demonstrate visually what you mean?
Hi, quick improvement here I think would really help a lot. When you go into the formation screen, should the formation not be at the top and the tactics below? Same in the strategies section. Also I match report can we have the stats at the top and then the player ratings of both teams? Would be nice if player ratings could also go side by side.
@Fabio: each player individually will have an individual impact between 1% and 8% and the total impact will be the sum of all your critical players impact. The more experienced the player more likely he is to causing a greater impact. For example, let’s say you have 2 critical players, one with a 2% impact and the other with a 5% impact making the total 7%. If you hire a new player and he plays his first match in your squad his morale would go to 93% instead of 100% due to your critical players bad influence. It also impacts players that are not playing. Let’s say one of your players would go to morale level of 10% even without playing his first match in your club, either because he is low on stamina or he acknowledges he is not on par with your club level yet…in the example above he would go to 3% instead.
@Dimitri: it doesn’t matter if they are transfer listed or not.
And does it matter if they are transfer listed or not?
Can we have an idea on the intensity of the critical morale player on the rest of the squad’s morale?
And by soon I meant now! The morale changes are now in place, you can remove your critical players from the transfer list but don’t forget they will start to negatively impact everyone else’s morale, so you’d better give them some match time or get rid of them.
The morale system will be improved soon to give back some more control and decision power to the managers. Critical morale players will not be automatically transfer listed, they will instead negatively affect the morale of other players as time goes by. It will be up to managers to decide whether to transfer list them, try to recover their morale or ignore them. Bear in mind they will still refuse to renew their contracts, so if you don’t want to lose them you need to get them out of critical in time.
If you hire stars from abroad you would temporarily boost number of stars in the country in the current season and potentially in the next season, because players will lost at most one star in between seasons. Eventually it would even out again unless people keep hiring stars from abroad :-)
Do we have a volunteer to write our “What is?” page and take the screenshots that should be included in it? I will discuss with Gabriel and think of a nice reward for the fine gentleman that does it. Or madam… The only problem is that it would be nice if we could have it done asap.