Recent Posts
18,557 posts(s) found
is it already implemented? i can’t see any change in Beat 1 …
Just to give everybody an update on international cups status. I’ve already implemented a country ranking that will be used to determine how many spots a country will have for each international competition. That is not very realistic for South America because here we have a fixed number of spots per country, but as we plan to have dynamic country skills I decided to balance the number of spots and use a ranking as UEFA has. For those who are not familiar, these rankings will be updated based on the country performance on international competitions in the last 5 seasons.
We’ll have 4 international competitions to start: Champions League, UEFA Cup, Libertadores da America and Copa Sudamericana. As we have only a few countries, all the competitions start in the knockout round. In the league table screen for first divisions you’ll be able to see to which competition the first positions teams will qualify.
What is next? Create the matches for the competitions and update rankings at the end of the season.
Cheers.
I´d like to have the minimum (time to buy a player after the first bid) of two ticks for 3-ticker and maybe 4 ticks for a 6-ticker.
I hate it when I am the first to find a good, cheap player and then, after three or four or whatever ticks there are at least 50 other teams bidding on the player.
Unfortunately, that’s the current behaviour, the game picks the “best” players available, no matter which position they play. In the future, we’ll consider the positions you’ve setup on your formation in order to complete the missing players with other from the same position.
Cheers.
Another game… where a different formation was used:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/30997 … but I think in this case I had a player with a red card. But why it changed my tatic that was 3-3-4 to 5-2-3? After the game the screen formation has the right formation.
Maybe I loose another game because of this behaviour. For me it is impossible to see my team every tick.
Why can rubysoccer rearrange the team players using the same formation?
regards,
Ricardo
Hmm, that’s possible…I’ll take a look.
Ok. They have 11 players but 2 of them are GK. Maybe that’s the problem.
That’s strange, even though Torino has 11 players, I’ve just seen a match report where there were only 10 lined up, that is not supposed to happen. I’ll fire the manager anyway, he’s been absent since mid october.
How many players must be in the line-up at the beginning of a match because I see that Torino for example has only 10 players in the line-up and can play the match without a W.O. report. I just noticed it.
Sorry about all the mess with Napoli Commanche but I have a job in sales so I’ve been away in and out of the office for the past several weeks. This hasn’t left me much time to take care of the team…
I am quite sure. I did saw my formation minutes before the game and I do not have a 4-3-3 formation configured. If it happen again I’ll post again.
Danilo has just fixed it.
Oops! Looks like we have a bug. :-)
Thanks for reporting, we’ll look into it.
Hi!
When I try to chose “Contracts” in the “Players” Menu I always get:
-———-
RubySoccer System Error
Oops! It looks like there was an error.
-———-
It seems that maybe there is a problem in that menu
Thanks!!!
Are you sure there is no defender placed on M – 1 instead of D +1 for instance? That would make a 3-4-3 instead of a 4-3-3 :-)
check patrick getting dominated by other italian teams!
Hi, I am on Newcastle on dimension 2. After playing this game http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/31216 I checked that the formation that was reported was 4-3-3. This is wrong… I used 3-4-3… and I checked before and there was no player unavailable.
thanks,
Ricardo Marques
yep, dont worry. this will probably go away soon, with a few new versions that are coming out.
I’m sorry I just saw there already is a topic about an incomplete match report. But I ’ve already reported it.
I think there is a bug in my match report for Vicenza – Cagliari. (beta 1-Italy)) The result is 0-3 but in the match report there are only 2 goals scored. The last sentence is “the referee shows”. Maybe the match report is not complete. It’s not so important for me who scored the goal but maybe you can take a look at it.
“Also, the ability to offer transfer price below or above what the seller is offering.”
right, that would be a plus – but the transfer listed price shall change automatically with the acceptance of a lower bid.
AND
the minimum time a player is on th TL should be 3 ticks (starting from the first bid) or even more
AND
what about the highest bid? if someone likes to pay more to negotiate alone? therefore a “drop bidder” option for the seller must be implemented.
I think to make initially generated players better to create a more vibrant transfer market. At the moment I’m trying to find a good defender to improve my team – it’s very difficult to find any choice of good players. Also, the ability to offer transfer price below or above what the seller is offering.
I think step by step is ok
But who want more elaborated, can do that now, here, same the others did
Give them, Philipp, a more precise name for all the teams, now, and will be easy for them to update
But…if you dont know all, just start with what we have
I think we are used to see team names in the short form here in Brazil, that’s why we did it that way :-)
Here we call São Paulo Futebol Clube → São Paulo, Clube de Regatas do Flamengo → Flamengo and even Benfica that you gave as an example we call just Benfica.
But if it is a general opinion that we should change that we can certainly do it. Or maybe have someone from each country to tell us how team names are usually written in his/her country.
Cheers.
understood, but i meant not the fullll name, but a more precise.
São Paulo Futebol Clube
could be São Paulo FC
I agree with Danilo, the team info screen may display a full name in the future, but screens like league table, team matches should display the short version
I agree that we have to put that info somewhere (someday), but we shouldnt use this information on the table… In Brazil, for example, we have large team names, like São Paulo Futebol Clube. This kind of name can easily mess up our screens.
Wouldn’t it be nicer to have the full team names, not just the short versions or cities?
like
“Benfica Lissabon” or “Olympique Marseille”
instead of
“Benfica” or “Marseille”
I’m looking for some friendlies to make my youth players better. So challenge me…
Cagliari – Beta 1
Regards
Thanks Tiago!
I’ll update our files today.