Recent Posts

Subscribe to Recent Posts 18,542 posts(s) found

October 28, 2009 14:27

678 posts(s)

 

Check out Stewart Farrell:
ttributes
Position: M
Side: R
Keeping: 50
Tackle: 75
Passing: 91
Shooting: 67
Speed: 82
Dribble: 64
Control: 78
Header: 80

Only asking 2 million.

 

October 28, 2009 13:56

4,300 posts(s)

Administator

 

It doesn’t matter, it is the responsibility of the team who loaned in the player to make sure the clauses are not broken. The other team has the option to reject or even ignore your termination request :)

 

October 28, 2009 13:24

651 posts(s)

 

before getting my super human goalkeeper, i could only win 1 of the 18 matches although many of them were draws. But goalkeeper was my weakest link…
Now, after i have had him, i have won all 3 matches, out of which 2 are away and the home game without a decent striker.

 

October 28, 2009 13:13

287 posts(s)

 

I know he was the man of the match, but 2×1 could be more fair. I was shooting with strikers 97, 95 shooting and another 100 head and medium distance.

 

October 28, 2009 12:51

637 posts(s)

 

Great players but… If I have to pay these transferamounts I’m broke.

 

October 28, 2009 12:30

803 posts(s)

 

Finn Hohmann 95 Shooter 21 years old

Available for loan, as usual he may stay in your team for 2 loan periods if you want.

If he is sold you can still keep him to the end of the loan period. A nice opportunity I would say…

http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/87262

 

October 28, 2009 11:07

651 posts(s)

 

but what if the loan termination request was not granted???

 

October 28, 2009 10:02

4,300 posts(s)

Administator

 

In your example manager B would be punished since he was the one in charge when the loaned player missed the last match. I know, it doesn’t sound fair, but manager A was in his right when he made the player miss 5 matches since he was allowed to miss even 6 ;)

 

October 28, 2009 09:01

120 posts(s)

Donator

 

VILLAREAL IS HAVING THE BEST PLAYER SHOW DOWN IN THE MARKET!!!!
you never see this quality and quantity in the market place.
Take a look, and build a great team, this is one time opportunity.

Name Club Pos Sde Age Kpg Tac Pas Sho Spe Dri Ctr Hea Agg Wage Value Transfer Amt

Silvano Herraiz
Villarreal D L 22 35 100 66 82 78 97 78 76 67 $10,513 $7,465,963 $65,000,000 Transfer

Paolo Speranza
Villarreal A C 24 45 81 80 96 83 76 100 80 84 $15,402 $11,095,998 $55,000,000 Transfer

Anderson Noronha
Villarreal M LC 23 32 82 93 80 72 79 84 92 6 $28,390 $6,407,944 $45,500,000 Transfer

Cristiano Nóbrega
Villarreal G 24 98 29 81 35 91 79 72 73 84 $24,383 $26,579,499 $45,000,000 Transfer

Pedro Ricardo Queirós
Villarreal A RC 23 30 80 79 88 91 92 81 98 75 $28,011 $24,869,285 $45,000,000 Transfer

Mark Beardsley
Villarreal G 23 94 27 76 24 96 79 91 100 22 $12,026 $35,832,027 $41,000,000 Transfer

Hugo Quiñones De Leon
Villarreal M RC 24 46 88 86 82 86 79 79 78 50 $14,019 $6,646,080 $25,000,000 Transfer

Paul Lee
Villarreal A L 21 38 58 73 87 93 72 86 86 43 $6,377 $7,648,603 $21,500,000 Transfer

Alexander Moll
Villarreal M RC 24 36 88 85 75 81 97 83 81 38 $26,250 $8,067,222 $21,000,000 Transfer

Ademar Menezes
Villarreal M L 24 32 68 90 73 78 80 78 80 76 $17,264 $3,104,667 $18,000,000 Transfer

 

October 28, 2009 07:08

651 posts(s)

 

@onions, nowadays players don’t get +3 while playing at home, but the away team players get -3 penalty on all the skills.

a new update was recently issued so that players who are 31 or above do not receive -3 penalty on their skills. ie, they will be as good as when they play at home. this was issued to make elder players more valuable and their experience count.

 

October 28, 2009 06:36

25 posts(s)

Donator

 

I just want to make sure. If you play at home all your players get a +3 while playing away all players under 31 get a -3 ?

 

October 28, 2009 03:20

651 posts(s)

 

Who will get the punishment?? the manager who hired or the manager who let him go…
Hypothetical situation:
Manager A hires player P who has been allowed to miss 6 matches. Suppose he misses the first 5 matches during manager A’s regime, and then the manager gets fired or leaves the team. Lets say CPU takes over some time and during that period he misses 1 more match. After that lets say a new manager B comes in and finds that loaned player was not good enough for the team. so, he doesn’t select him for the match but requests a loan termination to which the other team does not respond. (due to any reasons, financial or not being online at the moment or any other)

Now subsequently the player returns back after missing more than 6 matches.

Now, i am just curious as to how the punishment is divided over managers A, CPU and B. and what happens in case the loan termination request is not responded…??

EDIT: these kind of problems will occur in future, so, it is better to develop a consensus on how to tackle them before they arise…

 

October 28, 2009 02:45

651 posts(s)

 

@ulisses, goalkeeper was not just good, he was also the man of the match:)… but i have to agree i got away with that… both of my first choice strikers were red-carded :s (+remember u were playing away)
the one that scored the second was a 19 year old 86 shooter… well done my young talent;)

EDIT: i never complain when i lose, because, we know these guys are working on match engine and will take some time to fix, but then the last two results showed me, that match engine is not that much random either… i always knew a GK was my weakest link, so, i always found myself at fault for not being able to get a decent keeper…
But now with a good keeper at helm for the last two matches, i can effectively say, good balanced team can improve your performance even under current situation. But then that doesn’t mean ME is perferct…

 

October 28, 2009 02:06

287 posts(s)

 

2×0
39% possession 61%
16 shots 34
15 shots on target 32
31% effective tackles 53%

Ok, the goalkeeper is good, but 32 shots with 61% ball possession and nothing?
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/542259

 

October 28, 2009 00:53

1,003 posts(s)

Administator

 

It is a nice idea Onions, if you have the confidence that the community as a whole will help us… As you can see by our donations balance, wiki and bug tracker, that is not our case :D.

 

October 28, 2009 00:46

803 posts(s)

 

Waiting fot the FT tick we can check old posts we do not knew they existed :D

This days R.Madrid is probably the club with more fans, at least they should be :)

I am a Benfica fan od course :D

Regards

 

October 27, 2009 23:34

25 posts(s)

Donator

 

I have a idea for the newspaper. Instead of just writing the results, someone can do an article from time to time about the situation in the league or a specific team. Like if they are 3-4 teams fighting for one spot, we can talk about that, what their chances are etc. Or if some team is doing unexpectedly good this year or bad for some reason we could write about that also. I’ll be glad to do a couple of articles during the season for the French league in MediumTicker (where I’m playing at the moment).

 

October 27, 2009 17:54

651 posts(s)

 

10m would have been good for him

 

October 27, 2009 17:49

637 posts(s)

 

I am to late :s Damned
It was early this morning when I posted the message and put the players on the transferlist.
I really regret it…I counted 40M more for him :(

 

October 27, 2009 15:25

117 posts(s)

 

I’ve already sent him an in-game message but with no response…I hope that he logs in quickly as he’s about to regret it.

 

October 27, 2009 14:55

678 posts(s)

 

Perhaps he’s willing to share his wisdom on the game and help make it better :)

 

October 27, 2009 14:01

803 posts(s)

 

lol
Let’s see if he comes back cause thats almost as fighting for a free transfer player

PS: For those who come here to see whats happening, check my team for not this cheap players, but not too far:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_info/326

 

October 27, 2009 13:54

803 posts(s)

 

Nice change by the way, one more incentive for teams to loan players.

Hoping for more on that because I still have very nice players I can’t loan :D

 

October 27, 2009 13:52

651 posts(s)

 

you should not remind him filipe;) waiting 2 more hours:)

 

October 27, 2009 13:48

803 posts(s)

 

Dirk you are asking 4,5M for Galeno. You probably missed a “0” there hehe

 

October 27, 2009 12:38

651 posts(s)

 

Price for Jose-Manuel Tomé is $7,854,995 (negotiable, just quote in your price)

 

October 27, 2009 07:33

637 posts(s)

 

2 great midfielders and 1 striker for sale in Bordeaux!

Phil Budden

Position: MD
Side: C
Keeping: 36
Tackle: 86
Passing: 100
Shooting: 86
Speed: 80
Dribble: 79
Control: 80
Header: 77
Aggressiveness: 8

Galeno Rodrigues

Position: M
Side: LC
Keeping: 35
Tackle: 75
Passing: 100
Shooting: 77
Speed: 91
Dribble: 80
Control: 94
Header: 87
Aggressiveness: 60
Stamina: 100

Great striker!

Miguel Paulo Alves

Position: A
Side: L
Keeping: 32
Tackle: 81
Passing: 69
Shooting: 100
Speed: 88
Dribble: 84
Control: 98
Header: 87
Aggressiveness: 30
Stamina: 100


Prices are negotiatable! Give your price and I will adapt mine if reasonable.

 

October 27, 2009 05:05

651 posts(s)

 

The following very good goalkeepers are available on loan:
try them out…
Jose-Manuel Tomé (Available for sale too. still improving…)
Attributes
Position: G
Side: -
Keeping: 89
Tackle: 31
Passing: 83
Shooting: 28
Speed: 93
Dribble: 87
Control: 97
Header: 100
Aggressiveness: 65
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/65582

Orestes Paiva

Attributes
Position: G
Side: -
Keeping: 93
Tackle: 24
Passing: 81
Shooting: 25
Speed: 88
Dribble: 100
Control: 94
Header: 86
Aggressiveness: 56

http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/78069

 

October 27, 2009 02:56

651 posts(s)

 

Assists in the match report too

 

October 26, 2009 22:50

4,300 posts(s)

Administator

 

I’ll fix that for you Simon. Recently we made a change were a player is still loaned when sold. I didn’t consider the case where he would be sold to the team loaning him :D