Recent Posts
18,554 posts(s) found
It has come to my attention that I might (ooops) have forgotten to announce that loans are not cancelled anymore when the player is sold. Sorry about that.
Shouldn’t this be under FastTicker forum? I suppose this is about FT, right? :)
Nicolas Papis (27) – 95 shooting, 97 header, 93 speedy, 92 dribble 17M – http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/66339
Can France overtake both Spain & Portugal?
Highly unlikely this season but watch out for the seasons to come!
My predictions at the end of season 30:
1-Brazil (no surprise)
2-Portugal (upset wins in both CL & UEFA predicted)
3-Spain (will come back in force in season 31)
4-France (status quo for the moment but may be a sleeping giant with the recent manager additions)
5-Italy
6-Argentina
7-Germany
Brazil can only fall after we implement the extended Club World Cup ;)
I had to say that before Da Mago :D
brazil will never fall……
Will Portugal take over the second spot from Spain next season?
Can resurgent Argentina topple Italy down for the fifth spot?
Germany and England vying for seventh and eighth…
Honours on line… it will be a long due change if Portugal really get better of Spanish giants…
When will the mighty Brazil fall off the cliff;) (easiest one to answer)
Any predictions;)
ahh… sorry… didn’t notice that… (thats how bugs are created) ;)
You swapped the values Nirabdha, it’s -1 for 30 yrs and -2 for 29 yrs :)
that is still in the discussion from next season onwards… possibility is that 29 yrs would receive -1 and 30 yrs -2.
but i don’t like the 27-28/29-30 idea… that will make the market too expensive as players get older…
I wish I knew about this rule change before, I would not have sold my 30+ year old defenders. But I’m all for doing a -1 penalty for 29-30 and -2 for 27-28
ok:) guys… i guess thats crystal clear now;)
Check out Stewart Farrell:
ttributes
Position: M
Side: R
Keeping: 50
Tackle: 75
Passing: 91
Shooting: 67
Speed: 82
Dribble: 64
Control: 78
Header: 80
Only asking 2 million.
It doesn’t matter, it is the responsibility of the team who loaned in the player to make sure the clauses are not broken. The other team has the option to reject or even ignore your termination request :)
before getting my super human goalkeeper, i could only win 1 of the 18 matches although many of them were draws. But goalkeeper was my weakest link…
Now, after i have had him, i have won all 3 matches, out of which 2 are away and the home game without a decent striker.
I know he was the man of the match, but 2×1 could be more fair. I was shooting with strikers 97, 95 shooting and another 100 head and medium distance.
Great players but… If I have to pay these transferamounts I’m broke.
Finn Hohmann 95 Shooter 21 years old
Available for loan, as usual he may stay in your team for 2 loan periods if you want.
If he is sold you can still keep him to the end of the loan period. A nice opportunity I would say…
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/87262
but what if the loan termination request was not granted???
In your example manager B would be punished since he was the one in charge when the loaned player missed the last match. I know, it doesn’t sound fair, but manager A was in his right when he made the player miss 5 matches since he was allowed to miss even 6 ;)
VILLAREAL IS HAVING THE BEST PLAYER SHOW DOWN IN THE MARKET!!!!
you never see this quality and quantity in the market place.
Take a look, and build a great team, this is one time opportunity.
Name Club Pos Sde Age Kpg Tac Pas Sho Spe Dri Ctr Hea Agg Wage Value Transfer Amt
Silvano Herraiz
Villarreal D L 22 35 100 66 82 78 97 78 76 67 $10,513 $7,465,963 $65,000,000 Transfer
Paolo Speranza
Villarreal A C 24 45 81 80 96 83 76 100 80 84 $15,402 $11,095,998 $55,000,000 Transfer
Anderson Noronha
Villarreal M LC 23 32 82 93 80 72 79 84 92 6 $28,390 $6,407,944 $45,500,000 Transfer
Cristiano Nóbrega
Villarreal G 24 98 29 81 35 91 79 72 73 84 $24,383 $26,579,499 $45,000,000 Transfer
Pedro Ricardo Queirós
Villarreal A RC 23 30 80 79 88 91 92 81 98 75 $28,011 $24,869,285 $45,000,000 Transfer
Mark Beardsley
Villarreal G 23 94 27 76 24 96 79 91 100 22 $12,026 $35,832,027 $41,000,000 Transfer
Hugo Quiñones De Leon
Villarreal M RC 24 46 88 86 82 86 79 79 78 50 $14,019 $6,646,080 $25,000,000 Transfer
Paul Lee
Villarreal A L 21 38 58 73 87 93 72 86 86 43 $6,377 $7,648,603 $21,500,000 Transfer
Alexander Moll
Villarreal M RC 24 36 88 85 75 81 97 83 81 38 $26,250 $8,067,222 $21,000,000 Transfer
Ademar Menezes
Villarreal M L 24 32 68 90 73 78 80 78 80 76 $17,264 $3,104,667 $18,000,000 Transfer
@onions, nowadays players don’t get +3 while playing at home, but the away team players get -3 penalty on all the skills.
a new update was recently issued so that players who are 31 or above do not receive -3 penalty on their skills. ie, they will be as good as when they play at home. this was issued to make elder players more valuable and their experience count.
I just want to make sure. If you play at home all your players get a +3 while playing away all players under 31 get a -3 ?
Who will get the punishment?? the manager who hired or the manager who let him go…
Hypothetical situation:
Manager A hires player P who has been allowed to miss 6 matches. Suppose he misses the first 5 matches during manager A’s regime, and then the manager gets fired or leaves the team. Lets say CPU takes over some time and during that period he misses 1 more match. After that lets say a new manager B comes in and finds that loaned player was not good enough for the team. so, he doesn’t select him for the match but requests a loan termination to which the other team does not respond. (due to any reasons, financial or not being online at the moment or any other)
Now subsequently the player returns back after missing more than 6 matches.
Now, i am just curious as to how the punishment is divided over managers A, CPU and B. and what happens in case the loan termination request is not responded…??
EDIT: these kind of problems will occur in future, so, it is better to develop a consensus on how to tackle them before they arise…
@ulisses, goalkeeper was not just good, he was also the man of the match:)… but i have to agree i got away with that… both of my first choice strikers were red-carded :s (+remember u were playing away)
the one that scored the second was a 19 year old 86 shooter… well done my young talent;)
EDIT: i never complain when i lose, because, we know these guys are working on match engine and will take some time to fix, but then the last two results showed me, that match engine is not that much random either… i always knew a GK was my weakest link, so, i always found myself at fault for not being able to get a decent keeper…
But now with a good keeper at helm for the last two matches, i can effectively say, good balanced team can improve your performance even under current situation. But then that doesn’t mean ME is perferct…
2×0
39% possession 61%
16 shots 34
15 shots on target 32
31% effective tackles 53%
Ok, the goalkeeper is good, but 32 shots with 61% ball possession and nothing?
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/542259
It is a nice idea Onions, if you have the confidence that the community as a whole will help us… As you can see by our donations balance, wiki and bug tracker, that is not our case :D.
Waiting fot the FT tick we can check old posts we do not knew they existed :D
This days R.Madrid is probably the club with more fans, at least they should be :)
I am a Benfica fan od course :D
Regards
I have a idea for the newspaper. Instead of just writing the results, someone can do an article from time to time about the situation in the league or a specific team. Like if they are 3-4 teams fighting for one spot, we can talk about that, what their chances are etc. Or if some team is doing unexpectedly good this year or bad for some reason we could write about that also. I’ll be glad to do a couple of articles during the season for the French league in MediumTicker (where I’m playing at the moment).
10m would have been good for him