Recent Posts
18,535 posts(s) found
i replied because i didn’t see any contract being broken…
don’t worry about brazil. they (Gab and Dan) are going to introduce average rating system to rate the league. I guess that will happen with the introduction of the world cup. After that things might change… but brazil will still have advantage because they get better youths.
As for the second position, i think this is the right time for portugal to pass spain, and Portugal deserve their promotion… Although portugal have an advantage during the latter stages of the champions league as their season ends earlier… Firstly, the competition in spain is very tough and secondly, they have to manage players stamina for both League and Champions league during the end of the season, which makes it relatively easy for Portugal to win more games in champions league. An advantage of not playing 4 league games :)
Gabriel is asking about suggestion. I said that my one is that loan should terminate and the seller should lose some money.
ulisses, there is no broken contract involved in this case… it is the responsibility of a buying manager to check if the player is loaned.
There are clear indications to let everyone know if a player on the transfer list has been sent to another team on loan…
I want to say that seller have to lose money because of broke contract.
It’s true Filipe… I didn’t know about this particular rule but i don’t agree with it.
After last turn match V. Guimarães vs Marítimo ending 4-2 Gimarães fans went crazy because for the first time in history the have won the SuperLiga competition. In all places in the city people went to the streets celebrating, players party all night with the fans, a total craziness :D
“I’m extremely happy with this title, after 5 seasons of hard work we not only played the SuperLiga but we won it” said a very happy Guimarães manager Filipe Silva.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_info/326
Season 15, Turn 130
The day Southampton took the victory in the EPL on medium ticker, with a supricing runner up. Queens Park Rangers came out of no were to the top of the EPL in medium with limited resorces and players.
After season 13 being 2nd in the division 1 with my new team, where i just entered, we promoteded to the EPL in medium. After a season of trying and finding my place we ended up on a steady 12th position. Not a bad start for a new manager and team.
Queens Park Rangers had a very bad season start and was standing last in the league table. With some drugs and testoterone the players of Queens Park Rangers got the boost they needed and started winning. Winning so much that soon we got boosted up into the top 5 of the EPL. We kept on winning and counldn’t believe our eyes in the league table.
Queens Park Rangers on 2nd place. The board, the fans or either the team had expected these results. Soon we discovered that our team could fight for the title. The team gave there absolute best to achieve this goal that was in range of our hands to pick up. Unfortunally with some bad luck we tied the most imported 2 games of the season and handed the title to Southampton. The spirit was still in the players to get the best out of the best and ending up with the result of being tied for the title.
Congratulations to the manager and players of Southampton.
Queens Park Rangers
Manager Nicky Broos
(didn’t check for typo’s)
Ricardo, the problem there is that you didn’t knew about this rule, not the rule it self…
I think Gabriel forgotten to announce it when he created the rule, but this was one isolated case, all changes in the game are anounced so every one can know how the game works…
Of course not! Same for match engine and world cup ;)
I bought Fábio Guedes yestarday because i needed another striker till the end of this season.
I payed 5,3m for him and i couldn’t have the player in my team because he was loan out to another club and i did know this rule.
No problem. I fired him now and another rich club will get him for sure… probably the club i bought him the first place.
i guess we dont need to tell you to fix the financial system :D <3
Hehe finaly Portugal has a chance to pass Spain :D I belive it will be this season, but if not it must be the next as the Spain will lose much more points than Portugal.
Things are very close for the second place, but the first continuous untouchable :D
I think in real life the player still stays in the loaner team till the end of loan contract.
In my opinion the best way is as it is now. The buyer knows the conditions he is buying, and so the loaner must know he can keep the player for the duration of the contract.
its between eggs and chickens…
well, according to my idea, in that case, you have to stick with him:) same for everyone else:) ( but we can have a clause in that case for players above 30)
what happens then if my best player is a 32 year old i cant get sold but i don’t wanne pay his wages anymore? You say i can’t fire him, tbh i think managers should have that freedom.
The problem Nirabdha is that other managers don’t accept the loan termination and it was not you who loan the player.
This is a trick solution.
In real life this don’t happens. If a club buy a player, the owner of the player decide if he want to loan him or not. It’s no FIFA or UEFA that decides were he will play.
My opinion is more radical that Philipp. For me if a manager buy a player he should be in his team after the deal is done. The end.
The crap conversation of rich clubs and poor clubs it’s bullshit.
If there were a certain number to transfer for season or a maximum to get free transfered players maybe poor clubs could get less poor.
i like the way it is right now… a buying manager knows before hand who is on loan and who is not… so, it is his decision to buy or not…
he can always request the loan termination … or look for other players…
A fair opinion from Philipp.
the owner of a player should be able to sell a player – if loaned out or not.
.
but the manager who uses the loaned player, should be given a “transmission time”.
.
When the deal is done (transfer is final, cash exchange) the player stays for additional 6 turns on his side, then he wents to the buying manager. 6 turns should be ok for rearrange the formations and looking out for new loans.
Aand how about an email explain the changing?
managers will still have 16 players to fool around with… and those 14 players will be the best players… you can sell them, but not fire…
it is not something for owners to do…
it is the job of that manager who is trying to buy a player…
hum… to avoid this situation why didn’t the owers of the game develop something to avoid selling loan out players????
We are trying to reach a less conservative approach here. We want you guys to really be the managers of your teams, and this is the kind of limitation that could spoil that. We have to find a balance between the limitations and the functionalities.
i don’t understand why seller should receive anything at all?? he is the one who is selling the player on loan…
And buyer is also aware that he is buying someone who is already on loan…
i approve the change… it is upto the manager to check who he is buying…
Terminate, but the seller should pay a fee.
Other (not good) option is to reduce to 12 turns the loan time
I don´t aprove this change.
Of course the loan should terminate.
This is something that was changed recently and is being subject to discussions, so I decided to open a specific topic about it. The idea of keeping the loan was introduced to protect smaller teams who rely on loans to be competitive. You may say it’s not fair for the team which is buying the player, but he knows the player is loaned and should expect the player to be available only when the loan ends.
What do you think, if a loaned player is sold to another team, should the loan be terminated?
Done.