Recent Posts

Subscribe to Recent Posts 18,548 posts(s) found

October 31, 2009 16:37

651 posts(s)

 

filipe, you deserve it… congratulations

 

October 31, 2009 16:34

651 posts(s)

 

yes i vote for it… ( and then filipe can’t complain he can’t improve his youth ;) :P )

 

October 31, 2009 15:11

287 posts(s)

 

I know it is agains me, but my player Guilherme Mesquita received a red card last and are not suspended for next one.

Player: http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/58811
Game Report: http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/542409

 

October 31, 2009 14:49

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

We need to make this rule more flexible, that’s for sure. Currently this is not related to the manager nor to any kind of ban or punishment, this rule simply was always out there :)

 

October 31, 2009 14:48

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

That’s what I thought you guys would say :)

 

October 31, 2009 14:25

35 posts(s)

 

I was currently hired to manage America-RN I am trying to hire a player Paulo Porto

http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/59325

when I try to place an offer this note comes up. Cannot hire player whose previous club is yours. well i think this is not fair, I had nothing to do with the selling of this players 2 seasons ago, I want to improve my squad and I want to be able to purchase any player in the market. I do not understand why I can not purchase this individual player, if there is a ban it should be for the MANAGER that sold the player of there should be a 1 season Ban but not an indefinite ban for the purchase of a player that played a team I manage but was sold 2 seasons ago by a different mananger

 

October 31, 2009 14:17

120 posts(s)

Donator

 

YES, please do it.
FAIRchange.

 

October 31, 2009 13:32

803 posts(s)

 

I vote yes :D We lose some reality but it is better that way

 

October 31, 2009 12:24

301 posts(s)

 

i’m all up for “normalizing”

 

October 31, 2009 12:23

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

Congratulations Filipe. You had the guts to leave the victorious Benfica for a new challenge and there you are, at the top again!

 

October 31, 2009 12:22

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

I know it is not the appropriate topic and I’ll probably make a poll about it, but since you guys brought it up I’ll ask…what do you think if all leagues had 20 teams instead of some having 20, others 18, 16 or even 10 (Paraguay second division)? I’m seriously thinking about “normalizing” the leagues size so that all countries have the same chances. To do that I’d remove some teams from leagues with more than 20 (div 2 on Spain and England I guess), promote extra teams to div 1 on countries with less than 20 on div 1 and add extra teams on div 2 of countries who need it.

 

October 31, 2009 11:16

803 posts(s)

 

Stamina influences it, but as you can see Portugal have 3 teams in the finals and one end 4th in the group with 9 points. And as I remember we always have many teams at this fase, they star losing now, so I don’t belive stamina influences that much. Also spanish and the other leagues have more matches were they can develop players and as they have better youths it is a considerable advantage…

Good luck guys :D

 

October 31, 2009 08:40

651 posts(s)

 

Orestes Paiva K: 93 P: 82 Sp: 88 D: 100 C: 94 H: 86
Available for loan… Loaning team will have to pay only 50% of the wages.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/78069
-—————————————————————————
Cayetano Abeita K: 80 P: 68 Sp: 69 D: 73 C: 71 H:73
Very Talented youth goalkeeper will be available for sale as soon as he gets a contract…
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/100649
===============

Jose-Manuel Tomé K: 89 P: 83 Sp: 93 D:87 C: 97 H:100
Hasn’t played much first team football… still has a lot to improve. Already has an average of 92. Available for both, loan and sale… 5.5 millions
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/65582

===========
Danny Hack M T: 72 P: 88 Sh: 75 Sp:100 D: 86 C:87 H:91Age: 27 years.

Valued at 3.5m, a good player, but i want to replace him with my young players
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/65744
-——————————————————————————————-
These players could be very good at newer leagues… just let me know if anyone is interested….
Money constraints will never be a problem….

 

October 31, 2009 02:16

651 posts(s)

 

i replied because i didn’t see any contract being broken…

 

October 31, 2009 01:51

651 posts(s)

 

don’t worry about brazil. they (Gab and Dan) are going to introduce average rating system to rate the league. I guess that will happen with the introduction of the world cup. After that things might change… but brazil will still have advantage because they get better youths.

As for the second position, i think this is the right time for portugal to pass spain, and Portugal deserve their promotion… Although portugal have an advantage during the latter stages of the champions league as their season ends earlier… Firstly, the competition in spain is very tough and secondly, they have to manage players stamina for both League and Champions league during the end of the season, which makes it relatively easy for Portugal to win more games in champions league. An advantage of not playing 4 league games :)

 

October 31, 2009 01:50

287 posts(s)

 

Gabriel is asking about suggestion. I said that my one is that loan should terminate and the seller should lose some money.

 

October 31, 2009 01:41

651 posts(s)

 

ulisses, there is no broken contract involved in this case… it is the responsibility of a buying manager to check if the player is loaned.
There are clear indications to let everyone know if a player on the transfer list has been sent to another team on loan…

 

October 31, 2009 01:15

287 posts(s)

 

I want to say that seller have to lose money because of broke contract.

 

October 31, 2009 00:50

23 posts(s)

 

It’s true Filipe… I didn’t know about this particular rule but i don’t agree with it.

 

October 31, 2009 00:46

803 posts(s)

 

After last turn match V. Guimarães vs Marítimo ending 4-2 Gimarães fans went crazy because for the first time in history the have won the SuperLiga competition. In all places in the city people went to the streets celebrating, players party all night with the fans, a total craziness :D

“I’m extremely happy with this title, after 5 seasons of hard work we not only played the SuperLiga but we won it” said a very happy Guimarães manager Filipe Silva.

http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_info/326

 

October 30, 2009 23:08

609 posts(s)

 

Season 15, Turn 130

The day Southampton took the victory in the EPL on medium ticker, with a supricing runner up. Queens Park Rangers came out of no were to the top of the EPL in medium with limited resorces and players.

After season 13 being 2nd in the division 1 with my new team, where i just entered, we promoteded to the EPL in medium. After a season of trying and finding my place we ended up on a steady 12th position. Not a bad start for a new manager and team.

Queens Park Rangers had a very bad season start and was standing last in the league table. With some drugs and testoterone the players of Queens Park Rangers got the boost they needed and started winning. Winning so much that soon we got boosted up into the top 5 of the EPL. We kept on winning and counldn’t believe our eyes in the league table.

Queens Park Rangers on 2nd place. The board, the fans or either the team had expected these results. Soon we discovered that our team could fight for the title. The team gave there absolute best to achieve this goal that was in range of our hands to pick up. Unfortunally with some bad luck we tied the most imported 2 games of the season and handed the title to Southampton. The spirit was still in the players to get the best out of the best and ending up with the result of being tied for the title.

Congratulations to the manager and players of Southampton.

Queens Park Rangers
Manager Nicky Broos

(didn’t check for typo’s)

 

October 30, 2009 21:08

803 posts(s)

 

Ricardo, the problem there is that you didn’t knew about this rule, not the rule it self…

I think Gabriel forgotten to announce it when he created the rule, but this was one isolated case, all changes in the game are anounced so every one can know how the game works…

 

October 30, 2009 20:42

4,306 posts(s)

Administator

 

Of course not! Same for match engine and world cup ;)

 

October 30, 2009 20:41

23 posts(s)

 

I bought Fábio Guedes yestarday because i needed another striker till the end of this season.
I payed 5,3m for him and i couldn’t have the player in my team because he was loan out to another club and i did know this rule.
No problem. I fired him now and another rich club will get him for sure… probably the club i bought him the first place.

 

October 30, 2009 20:23

828 posts(s)

 

i guess we dont need to tell you to fix the financial system :D <3

 

October 30, 2009 19:58

803 posts(s)

 

Hehe finaly Portugal has a chance to pass Spain :D I belive it will be this season, but if not it must be the next as the Spain will lose much more points than Portugal.
Things are very close for the second place, but the first continuous untouchable :D

 

October 30, 2009 19:51

803 posts(s)

 

I think in real life the player still stays in the loaner team till the end of loan contract.

In my opinion the best way is as it is now. The buyer knows the conditions he is buying, and so the loaner must know he can keep the player for the duration of the contract.

 

October 30, 2009 16:47

651 posts(s)

 

its between eggs and chickens…
well, according to my idea, in that case, you have to stick with him:) same for everyone else:) ( but we can have a clause in that case for players above 30)

 

October 30, 2009 16:41

609 posts(s)

 

what happens then if my best player is a 32 year old i cant get sold but i don’t wanne pay his wages anymore? You say i can’t fire him, tbh i think managers should have that freedom.

 

October 30, 2009 16:32

23 posts(s)

 

The problem Nirabdha is that other managers don’t accept the loan termination and it was not you who loan the player.
This is a trick solution.
In real life this don’t happens. If a club buy a player, the owner of the player decide if he want to loan him or not. It’s no FIFA or UEFA that decides were he will play.
My opinion is more radical that Philipp. For me if a manager buy a player he should be in his team after the deal is done. The end.
The crap conversation of rich clubs and poor clubs it’s bullshit.
If there were a certain number to transfer for season or a maximum to get free transfered players maybe poor clubs could get less poor.