Recent Posts
18,557 posts(s) found
Only took you 14 seasons :). Congratz…
Levante wins the Spanish Cup…
sorry to disturb u guys, but then this is my first ever title in ruby soccer…
I feel for Javier though, he had to manage his team for 4 consecutive official matches…
gabriel, i would like to see the same statistics after you implemented the updates???
i think the change is good, once we find the optimum setup
Hmmmm it looks reasonable on paper but I’d like to have some form of real-life comparison.
After a quick search, I found some websites discussing non-strikers goals (but I can’t seem to find hard statistics):
http://soccerword.com/index.php?blog=2&title=goals_from_non_strikers_premier_league_s&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
http://soccernews.bigsoccer.com/article/02ve8O78THcP3
http://www.fifa.com/worldfootball/clubfootball/news/newsid=667326.html
Also, if strikers are to be a less important part of the game (which I have nothing against), there should be more midfielders that excel at shooting which I don’t think is the case presently…I recall ManagerSim having considerably more offensive or defensive minded (read: more talented) MAs & DMs…am I remembering things correctly???
My best striker hasn’t scored very often since your changes. Check him out: Mauricio Malta in FastTick…In fact, the top strikers list in France seems frozen in time. Nothing has changed since the game engine modifications.
It is happening cause players tend to run towards the goal more often if their path is free of opponents. I believe having more goals by defenders and midfielders is a good thing, but it may be exaggerated right now. The statistics for season 32 are not that bad, look:
Attackers: 35916 goals
Midfielders: 10204 goals
Defenders: 2726 goals
Isn’t it reasonable? :)
normal price? check the transfer list. find me another defense like this one. and 24 yo, still improving…
Des Pas Rmt Vel Dri Ctr Cab
99 82 72 100 91 98 86
i agree
productivity has come from midfielders and defenders
the strikers that are 93+ in shooting havnt been scoreing
i also feel there should be sponsor bonus every 12 turns
yes
i believe goalkeepers are now getting more MOTM because the midfielders and defenders are getting more shots at the goal rather than proper strikers. In my case i have seen 50% of shots coming from mids and defenders. so, these goalkeepers, most of the times save these shots and that is i think more of an important factor in making goalkeepers invaluable…
for eg, if a team has 30 shots on target and lets say 15 of them are from strikers and 15 from other players, goal keeper has more chances to save those latter 15 shots, which i think is good enough to give him a good rating…
( i am not saying other players shouldn’t get a strike, but it has certainly made goalkeepers look better… In real life tall defenders/midfielders are really handy during the corners and AMs ( attacking midfielders) are scoring more often… but i think we should still wait for some time, try more tactics before judging this new system…
I like the current system in the sense that it has brought down those too many high scoring matches… but i still can’t figure out how i could get a chance to score)
Gabriel, is it possible to extract statistic as to the scoring % of defenders, midfielders, and strikers? Since your changes, I’ve noticed that the attackers are no longer scoring very often…
Personally, I don’t find it very realistic to have one of my defenders scoring in 1 out of every 2 games.
@Nirabdha, I´m not complaining about match result. I just want to alert Gabriel that goalkeepers are getting very often MOTM. They are making too much difference. A lot of times they compensate a weak defence line. (not your case)
@ulisses, that was a pretty good match… my team having less no of shots does not mean that my shooters are bad, it is just because the way i want my players to shoot at the goal… you had 52% of possession against 48% of mine (that is ok given it was your home match)… which is not a great deal and moreover this percentage calculations is not accurate as gabriel said somewhere in the forum ( i will find it out someday for you).
And remember i beat you 2-1 in the reverse fixture… it is just how you use you players… and i believe after the recent changes no one is quite sure how they can find the best strategy, and i think we all are doing the same thing, trying to find a better strategy…
i am not saying that system is too worse… it is just that you picked the wrong match to complain…
check this match… keepers being the man of the match doesn’t basically mean that his team wins or he does not concede… http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/599926
(and finally hiring good players is the first stage of creating a good strategy)
More one time boring game 0×0: http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/614609
and again the goalkeeper was the MOTM!
I can´t afford striker 100 shooting, 100 dribble and 100 control :P for make games more interesting
BTW my last league game we have again goalkeeper MOTM: http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/599898
if you would ask a normal price, you would maybe actually sell him….
Don’t say that, of course player skills play an important role ;)
There will be more fixing, the match engine changes were not completely done, I just decided to release what I already had. Financial will have to wait until the extended club world cup is done, since I promised this before :D
2 × 1
Nice vs Brest
4-4-2 formation 4-4-2
39% possession 61%
7 shots 19
4 shots on target 16
82% accurrate passes 88%
48% effective tackles 57%
0 corners 1
9 offsides 5
5 fouls 7
you have the option to ask for termination of loan contract… in most of the cases, people agree to terminate them.
i agree with the money penalty, but only if that money goes to the system rather than any of the teams…
this game has nothing to do with player skill it seems
i wish there was more fixing of such issues as this, the financial, and transfer value
same with formation issues
i agree
after a certain amount of time i think we should be able to voluntarily cancel the loan
especially if you have played that player
Boring game 0×0 : http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/599858
More one time goalkeeper is the MOTM and compensate his weak defense
ladislau gois for sale.
Des Pas Rmt Vel Dri Ctr Cab
99 81 72 100 91 97 85
and just 24yo.
Hi, i think it would be a good thing to insert agent fees when signing a player in free transfer… it would prevent a bit more the money making tricks.
I know sometimes rand() my players don´t play well, but my two goalkeepers with average skills 94 and 93 (pretty good isn´t it?) had grades 4.9 and 5.7 in the same match.
And his goalkeeper has grade 10.0 with average skill 86!
The worst is 4 goals from players shooting skills: 73, 75, 72, 90 (ok, 90 is fine!) And I was playing with my first class defenders.
Maybe 1×0 or 2×0 would be more reasonable.
It is the unfair way…even though I don’t see why it is unfair since ticket income is split on friendlies :)
About “Schedule friendlies on season start”: is it scheduling home and aways or is it like the unfair way with computer team playing allways home and other away?
If wage and period are the same, the next criteria is worst club in terms of player quality, since it means a higher chance of being in the first team.
I have requested a player (was the first one). 100% wage and my negociation has failed. I was the first to request this player. What is the criteria?
It definitely won’t be Belgium :D Group G is surely the toughest one.
Since new match engine update my players grade has fallen 30%. Strikers are not working anymore and I lost the last game by a goal from a middle fielder with 78 shooting skill.
I ll have to think again about my tatics