Recent Posts
18,535 posts(s) found
We already had shots deflected by the goalkeeper, now the ball can hit or be intercepted by a defender on a shot. That’s the difference.
Group E is the toughest IMO. No weak teams here, even though the Europeans are favorites to make it past.
I’m looking forward to these teams:
Holland, Denmark, Serbia, and of course England to take it all :D
I’ve got a feeling this will be the best WC yet
wow….people actually read the newspaper? :)
Currently 8 cpu teams are negotiating with my player , Chrish Gallagher, http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/51905 , but i did not get a single message in my mailbox regarding this… i hope you could change this…
or you could check their stamina before signing a loan deal…
having said that,
i agree with you that there should be a lower limit for stamina, below which should official games should not be counted… May be below the stamina level which affects players skills by more than 5%… i.e. below 85
I’m not sure about Portugal. Ivore Coast has great chances of qualifying. .
Anyway, I hope Brazil wins the World Cup again!
How is possible that people put players to loan with so much lower stamina (have some that have 3!!!)and the minimum offical games that cannot play are only 3 games? It,s crazy.
I suggest that one loaned player that have less than 92 or 93 stamina, dont count for loosing official games.
TXS.
Rocha
“-players can pass the ball to teammates behind when there are no suitable teammates ahead”- thats why my midfielder was continuously passing to my defender… realized at once when i saw the replay… i was playing with short passes and moving all players ahead whenever i had the ball, which meant that the defender behind was the closest guy to the midfielder…
logical change… i updated my strategy ;) valadolid got lucky :)
EDIT : “… since now the shot can be intercepted”, does that mean there is a possibility for deflected shots too ?? ;)
Even though there is still a lot to do in the match engine I decide to release a package of changes:
- decision to shoot depends on how many players are between the attacker and the goal, since now the shot can be intercepted
- players are more aware when the path to the goal is free so they can decide to run instead of passing the ball
- defenders will try to stay close to attackers when opponent has the ball
- players can pass the ball to teammates behind when there are no suitable teammates ahead
These changes are already in place. Please give your feedback in the improvements discussion topic.
GROUP A: South Africa, Mexico, Uruguay and France
GROUP B: Argentina, Nigeria, Korea Republic and Greece.
GROUP C: England, U.S.A., Algeria and Slovenia.
GROUP D: Germany, Australia, Serbia and Ghana.
GROUP E: Netherlands, Denmark, Japan and Cameroon.
GROUP F: Italy, Paraguay, New Zealand and Slovakia.
GROUP G: Brazil, Korea DPR, Cote d’Ivoire and Portugal.
GROUP H: Spain, Switzerland, Honduras and Chile.
My predictions in italics with some of my personal wild cards in bold…
Group F & G should be mighty interesting (can’t wait to see Brazil vs Portugal). Imagine a Portugal vs. Spain game…ay ay ay the Iberian Peninsula will literally explode.
…still not as bad as this game played last year (season 31).
Is this result a joke?
Lens 3 – 3 Monaco
3-4-3 formation 4-4-2
47% possession 53%
4 shots 19
4 shots on target 16
84% accurrate passes 91%
52% effective tackles 45%
2 corners 3
9 offsides 3
18 fouls 13
Obviously, I haven’t gotten over it hehehe.
The empty spaces are there cause nobody is writing article templates anymore. If anybody is interested I can post the ones we’re still missing.
stats aren’t really importent i think in this matter, the weird part is i get a bad result playing against a better team
nah, i am not angry charles… just trying to highlight the flaws… same case could translate to official matches too… and gab you are right about the need of friendlies in newspaper…
i had one more suggestion about newspaper. sometimes we don’t have any news in some sections of newspaper, in those cases why not create a news about the match for the current manager. For eg, if there is an empty column, and there is no news about my team, then a news about my team could appear in the news paper :) this may not be 100% solution, but then worth a try…
you’re just angry my youth decapitated your youth :P
Bordeaux 1 × 2 Amiens
4-4-2 formation 4-1-5
53% possession 47%
38 shots 5
32 shots on target 5
91% accurrate passes 84%
55% effective tackles 49%
12 corners 1
2 offsides 3
15 fouls 9
10 min: The referee shows Schulze (a) a red card.
Only 5 chances and with 10 men after 10 minutes and then a 1-2 los…:s
I think we didn’t even need friendlies in the newspaper :)
Maybe when we have other types of news they won’t be there anyway.
i just wanted to point out that team selected for friendlies should be the worst 11 ( i am not saying that does not happen, that is what happens for CPU teams ), and thus newspaper should also use this factor… rather than the best 11
The draw was written all over the match…before it started :D
Auxerre 10 × 0 Levante
On paper this game had a draw written all over it. However, to everyone’s suprise Auxerre triumphed in a closely fought game.
Auxerre Levante
10 x 0
reporter: James Prentice
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/610658
- I don’t know how you can see a draw written all over that match…;)
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/51905
Position: D
Side: LC
Tackle: 94
Passing: 72
Shooting: 84
Speed: 88
Dribble: 97
Control: 83
Header: 78
8,00,000 <less than1 million… negotiable ;)
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/79846
this good looking young defender is for sale.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/86947
also this MA L quickly developing player
but any one on my team can go
esp oliver if anyones interested
also if you are interested in ANY player
write me that you are and price ur willing to pay and ill post that player for that price
Pedro Ramos Price 36M but negociable…
Posição: M
Lado: LR
Guarda-Redes: 31
Desarme: 81
Passe: 100
Remate: 77
Velocidade: 100
Drible: 87
Controlo: 88
Cabeceamento: 100
Agressividade: 31
Condição: 93
Reinaldo Pereira Price 19M negociable
Posição: M
Lado: RC
Guarda-Redes: 37
Desarme: 77
Passe: 96
Remate: 86
Velocidade: 94
Drible: 96
Controlo: 88
Cabeceamento: 95
Agressividade: 63
Condição: 98
Oscar Carpizo 24 years Price 3M900
Atributos
Posição: D
Lado: LC
Guarda-Redes: 42
Desarme: 86
Passe: 78
Remate: 77
Velocidade: 84
Drible: 90
Controlo: 75
Cabeceamento: 84
Agressividade: 30
Condição: 100
Pedro Nascimento Price 9M
Posição: A
Lado: RC
Guarda-Redes: 46
Desarme: 87
Passe: 70
Remate: 98
Velocidade: 81
Drible: 83
Controlo: 90
Cabeceamento: 86
Agressividade: 90
Condição: 100
Great Players in Recreativo Huelva
Pedro Ramos Price 36M but negociable…
Posição: M
Lado: LR
Guarda-Redes: 31
Desarme: 81
Passe: 100
Remate: 77
Velocidade: 100
Drible: 87
Controlo: 88
Cabeceamento: 100
Agressividade: 31
Condição: 93
Reinaldo Pereira Price 19M negociable
Posição: M
Lado: RC
Guarda-Redes: 37
Desarme: 77
Passe: 96
Remate: 86
Velocidade: 94
Drible: 96
Controlo: 88
Cabeceamento: 95
Agressividade: 63
Condição: 98
Oscar Carpizo 24 years Price 3M900
Atributos
Posição: D
Lado: LC
Guarda-Redes: 42
Desarme: 86
Passe: 78
Remate: 77
Velocidade: 84
Drible: 90
Controlo: 75
Cabeceamento: 84
Agressividade: 30
Condição: 100
Pedro Nascimento Price 9M
Posição: A
Lado: RC
Guarda-Redes: 46
Desarme: 87
Passe: 70
Remate: 98
Velocidade: 81
Drible: 83
Controlo: 90
Cabeceamento: 86
Agressividade: 90
Condição: 100
Hello….i was being sarcastic ;)
Phil Budden
Age: 29
Position: MD
Side: C
.
Tackle: 86
Passing: 100
Shooting: 86
.
Speed: 80
Dribble: 79
Control: 80
Header: 77
Gilberto Borges
Age: 31
Position: M
Side: L
.
Tackle: 74
Passing: 98
Shooting: 74
.
Speed: 91
Dribble: 86
Control: 85
Header: 98
Transferprices are negotiable. The ones on the transferlist are maybe a little high. Just do your bid.
@ amacb: Keeper sucks??? 100 GK ,94 speed and 100 heading. I wish I had a goalie like that. I also took a look at the team set-up and the GK of Napoli in the 2nd half sucks. So Vaughn really had to score one goal.
For me Napoli was just lucky or had choosen the right tactics.
@amacb, what the hell… did you really check his keepers skill ratings??
must have had a bad day at office
Dude, first…. your keeper sucks, he is not really good, i mean even he looks like he had a decent game with 8.5 rating he lets in 3 at home. I think you should be grateful that you didnt loose by a bigger margin, the away striker hat-trick hero got 7.6 rating and his partners 4.2 and 5.4. Imagine if they had a good day.
So i think you shouldnt complain too much.
I guess they just look at the final result and the 3 points. :) They expected you draw or loose with a closer score (0-1, 0-2)
Napoli is lucky now maybe you are lucky at the end of the season and get the league victory. ;)