Recent Posts
18,535 posts(s) found
We’ll have 8 groups, we just need to add 1 or 2 European countries :-)
Hello guys! I’ve just confirmed in our database that all players aged 31 or more are set not to improve anymore. Regarding the player with 100 skills at 38 it is perfectly possible as Danilo pointed out, but of course it is not common, as you can see. Lots of factors can lead to that, the player was lucky not to lose skills frequently and when he did it was never on those top skills.
Cheers!
Santana, M L, 88 average, 28 years, EV = 42.8M, transfer price 20M
So more than 50% discount!
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/133283
I simply don’t agree. I prefer a cpu team over a human team anyday :). In france, I’M HAPPY to play a cpu team. It meens I can play a backup lineup and save stamina.
there are 2 criteria that human manager losing most times against cpu teams could blame: the cpu mechanisms or the human manager.
amacb, the skill depreciation is a statistical algorigthm and, therefore, things like that CAN happen.
regards
Acse, só pelas primeiras duas linhas da sua mensagem já se vê que você não é lá dos mas construtivos com as suas críticas. Diante desse fato escolhi ignorar o seu ponto de vista, pacificamente. Contudo, estou comprometido perante aos nossos usuários construtivos a fazer o que puder para ir melhorando cada vez mais o rubysoccer. Tenho certeza que o Gabriel diria o mesmo.
simplified english:
acse, i can tell you are not a very constructive criticizer only by reading the first 2 lines of your message. Therefore, I will choose to peacefully ignore your point of view. However, I am committed before our constructive criticizers to always improve rubysoccer in everyway I can. I am sure Gabriel would say the same.
Regards
Olá,é verdade que são necessários bons jogadores e boas tácticas,concordo absolutamente,mas tácticas mais simples que o 4-3-3 ou o 4-4-2 é dificil podem ver nos meus jogos,em relação ao campeonato françês de que falei,o da 2ªdivisão,geralmente não havia mais do que 6 ou 7 equipas com treinador e podem verificar as épocas que treinei uma equipa desse campeonato se quiserem.
Cumprimentos,acse
Google translate:
Hello, I’ve been playing this game for some time and I must say that is one of the worst I’ve ever played, it is true that just because I want to play, nobody forces me, but it’s strange because the teams without a coach are clearly favored over trained by humans which in itself does not captivate many people to play, it is also true that just by being human manager can not always win teams without a coach, but I give an example, during various times played with the Saint-Etienne in fast ticker in the 2nd division and the number of teams that went up without a coach was always more than coach also against teams that I coach these teams play 80% of the times 3-3-4 or other weird tactics as 0.4-1-5, 5 -1-4,5-5-0, etc., and what’s funny is that earn 80% of the time, now I’m playing for Racing, Argentina, the team took 6th place and nine or 10 games I played I lost almost all of them or the team played better without a coach than coach because the games played against teams without a coach nearly lost them all.
Regards, Anthony
ACSE Hello, welcome to the forum, as it appears on the front page of the RS game is in development, which means that all aspects of the game are subject to change. If you think something is malfunctioning in to report bugs or suggestions to the admins and analyze your time.
As for the teams without a coach I must disagree with this view, the divisions that speaks only has virtually no coaches or trainers equioas inactive. I think that with any of the most used in the tactical game if you can get good results against teams controlled by the CPU, maybe the problem is in the tactics it has used or instructions. Another important aspect is the GR, without a grain at a high level is difficult to achieve anything in this game, but this would be something that perhaps should be changed …
acse is complaining about the CPU controlled teams and how he seems to have bad results against them. I think he probably needs to find a better tactic against them, most people have good results with cpu teams using the common 4-4-2 with all players in C LC and RC positions…
english?
Olá acse, benvindo ao fórum, como aparece na primeira página do jogo o RS está em desenvolvimento, o que significa que todos os aspectos do jogo estão sujeitos a alterações. Se acha que alguma coisa está a funcionar mal deve reportar nos bugs ou nas sugestões e os admins a seu tempo analisarão.
Quanto às equipas sem treinador tenho que discordar dessa opinião, as divisões que fala só tem praticamente equioas sem treinadores ou treinadores inactivos. Penso que com qualquer tactica das mais usadas no jogo se consegue ter bons resultados contra equipas controladas pelo cpu, talvez o problema esteja nas tacticas ou instruções que tem usado. Outro aspecto importante é o GR, sem ter um gr a um alto nivel é difícil conseguir alguma coisa neste jogo, essa sim seria alguma coisa que talvez devesse ser alterada…
Olá, já jogo este jogo há algum tempo e devo dizer que é um dos piores que já joguei,é verdade que só jogo porque quero,ninguém me obriga,mas é estranho porque as equipas sem treinador são claramente favorecidas em relação ás treinadas por humanos o que por si não cativa muitas pessoas para jogar,também é verdade que só por ser treinador humano não se pode ganhar sempre ás equipas sem treinador,mas eu dou um exemplo,durante várias épocas joguei com o Saint-Etiènne no fast ticker na 2ºdivisão e o numero de equipas que subiram eram sempre mais sem treinador do que com treinador,além disso contra equipas que eu treine estas equipas jogam 80% das vezes em 3-3-4 ou com outras tácticas esquisitas como,4-1-5,5-1-4,5-5-0,etc,e o que é engraçado é que ganham 80% das vezes,neste momento estou a jogar com o Racing,Argentina, peguei na equipa em 6ºlugar e dos 9 ou 10 jogos que joguei perdi-os quase todos ou seja a equipa jogava melhor sem treinador do que com treinador porque os jogos que joguei contra equipas sem treinador perdi-os quase todos.
Cumprimentos,António
closed
Alot of teams have more money than that, you were just unlucky! Sell some of your players and bring in younger ones, that always helps me
Looks good.
I have one formula for CL and EL to make this competitions more intersting
1- 10 country´s
UEFA Coeficient
1º – 2º – 3º – 4º send 4 team´s = 16 team´s
5º – 6º – 7º send 3 team´s = 9 team´s
8º – 9º – 10º send 2 teams = 6 team´s
31 teams + Champion = 32 team´s so you make 8 groups 4 team´s in each groups and done
More games for all teams so more intersting.
Many changes would be welcome, HOWEVER:
You have got to deal with the arbitrary results. It’s the number one game killer in regards to enjoying this game. Because, at the end of the day, all your hard work in building the team and selecting the right tactics comes to the result.
For the second season in a row, I am ousted by the Wolves, in a completely arbitrary fashion.
Last season I won away 2-1 with complete dominance. Then they win at my home 4-3 in another game dominated by Pool. You would think that the away rule affecting players main skills would weaken the opposition skills and yet it seems to strengthen them.
Last season, Wolves went to win the cup in the same fashion against a total dominating United.
Coming back to this season, I draw away 2-2, lose at home 2-3. A 51-28 aggregate on my favor with pretty much better players in every position, especially the strikers.
There is no excuses for these lapses, which, as a matter of fact, are a common phenomena and not a lapses. Much has been said about the quality of shots and how you make the shots, but despite what the justifications are, this is a simple game of numbers vs numbers. Of course, some unpredictability is allowed, but this pushing it too far.
Just to be more specific, I thrashed Wolves away in the league game 6-1, with pretty much the same tactics and players in display from both sides. In all three games nothing much has changed gamewise (tactics, players, shots), but the “ability” of the opposition to add to their scoring with the same amount of work. And, ironically, they triple their efficiency in the hardest game yet, by being away. :D
If on the other hand there’s no problem with game engine, then it must really be the case that most of the managers here are quite dumb, including me, because there’s a lot of managers out there feeling at loss with such outcomes. It’s enough to check out the Match Results Bug section to get a clue. And for every reported case, you can count 10 more unreported. Or even more, as only a handful of managers even attend the forums
What happens on the pitch is the core of the game, the rest is pure decoration. If you get the substance right, then you can start worry about the rest.
PS: One of the main apologies handed out to counter such a phenomena is that “at the end it all balances out.” It does not, and we have seen a lot of cases in the cup competitions where such apology completely loses ground.
It is also important to not that at the end of the day, we all play the game to get some sense of accomplishment, like everything else we do in our lives. If the outcome is decided by arbitration, even if they “balance out,” then, where is the accomplishment in all this?
1. if you invested Stadium you should get a pay out from tickets.
2. World Club better than national team. At least should be play 4 teams or more…
3.Fix so many weird results… it can happen from time to time not like now…
4.get money for goal keeper or any player in the top scoring league from each league.
5. get money if you reach board goals.
6. allow transfer not with money, instead exchange of player in only one step.
If you want to improve your team now, you can loan players. For example, I (PSV Netherlands) have a.o. a 86 average player for loan, and you don’t even have to pay salary.
To generate money, you could play more friendlies. Though they don’t generate a lot of money, every little bit helps.
I think the players value base its to high, its impossible for a new players to buy, i start to play 1 week ago and i take one club and this club have only 700k, how to buy so its impossible only for free, thats the point this manager games sure its very good to win but what is intersting in this ticks, you look for a new player, the negociations, but dont have much here, i only enter int he game to make changes in the time and i leave because i dont have money to buy and in the free transfer dont have good players.
Penso que o preço base dos jogadores esta muito alto, é impossivel para os novos jogadores fazerem alguma compra, eu comecei a jogar tem 1 semana e o clube so tinha 700k, como vou comprar algum jogador, é impossivel apenas jogadores sem contrato, penso que é muito bom se ganhar no jogo, mas o que o torna interessante nos ticks, são as compras as negociações, procurar novos jogadores, mas so entro faço algumas mudanças no time e saiu, porque não tenho dinheiro para comprar, e na free list não tem nada de interessante.
long tick time, assume it is you working on it, but just want to be sure going on an hour
kinda like starting the culture of hey im gonna create my player and fuckn own your players cos i know how to manager my players ect ect ect
then sell these players
+ economy
= win
better formation squares
so i can make a proper formation not this shitty off center form.
i would like to have youth development be alot better regarding training strategy, shooting, defense, offence, ect for each invidual player and set the skill you want then to better
amazing prospects for sale and solid pro vets
come get them
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/166
amazing prospects for sale and solid pro vets
come get them
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/166
Well Danilo i wish before closing the case you could kindly give an answer to my question about this particular player Richard Coleman.
I read the forums and am active in the game also and i am asking this simple question based on the facts given by you guys about players loosing skills after 30.
If you are saying there is no bug and its normal for a 38 year old player retire with four 100 and one 99 skill i have have nothing else to say and i guess i have to go back to school for math lessons particularly about probability.
Regards
And by the way Sly, Alessandro is my cousin’s cousin. If you know what I mean. :D
We’ve been working behind the scenes, but I would like to hear from you guys: what are the new functionalities / improvements you would like to see in rubysoccer? Try to name more than one, if possible!
This whole “what’s going on with Tigre and its players” thing must stop. In rubysoccer, there are no privileges or privileged information: everything Alessandro knows was also explained here in the forum. No team has special logic or treatment – not only because this kind of thing does not interest us, but also bc it would be a pain in the ass to create, in the code, such singular exceptions to the rules. Alessandro’s success is purely due to his dedication to the game, and I am pretty sure you can find everything he knows regarding evolution/skills here in the forum. Or just try asking him, that’s why we have a community and an internal mail system… He really took his time to understand how things work and he is always visiting rubysoccer to manage his team or just to browse the stuff.
Don’t take this the wrong way, but this is the last time I will waste my time to come here to “explain” that. This chapter is closed, at least for me.