Recent Posts

Subscribe to Recent Posts 18,542 posts(s) found

September 02, 2011 18:11

678 posts(s)

 

No Hertha manager has lost intrest in Rubysoccer for quite some time now.

Let’s hope the new manager doesn’t waste his money. Hertha always claimed to have almost 1 billion in his account…..

 

September 02, 2011 18:03

32 posts(s)

 

Could it be the vacation mode problem again?

If so, something should be done. Just doesn’t seem right to see so many long time managers fall from their teams like that.

 

September 02, 2011 15:48

116 posts(s)

 

Why Felipe Santos is a team destroyer?
He played 24 seasons with Bayern Munchen.

 

September 02, 2011 14:14

340 posts(s)

 

Either is good from a game experience point of view.

BK

 

September 02, 2011 14:11

120 posts(s)

Donator

 

Please Admin. DO NOT ALLOW Felipe Santos to destroy Heartha. he did that many times, he takes great teams, leaving then just with 15 players,,,,,,, this guy is not good…..

 

September 02, 2011 13:07

803 posts(s)

 

The real question is what happend with Philipp Leibeck, he was kicked out of Heartha for inactivity, that Felipe Santos team destroyer is now preparing to shatter another team apart lol

 

September 02, 2011 12:24

301 posts(s)

 

I have to agree with filipe. Introducing a transfer window will prolly make the game more frustrating for new GMs…
As such, it might prevent some cheating, but I assume cheaters will just time their cheating ways with the transfer window…
Considering the amount of transfer that will be going on during these windows, it will be hard to detect cheaters…
I mean, its easy to create an account for a few ticks before a window, then just leaving or quitting right after the window is closed…
IMO I don’t think it will reduce the amount of cheating… maybe it might make the life of our admins more difficult to try and detect cheaters…

 

September 02, 2011 11:51

803 posts(s)

 

As so the transfer window is, a manager staring a team from zero would need to be online every turn on that window or he wouldn’t do much… Perhaps here we should not reproduce the real life model, I would have no problem with a transfer window but new guys don’t spend as much time in the game as we do, and If they can’t make transfers at most of that time probably wont be so motivated…

 

September 02, 2011 11:25

15 posts(s)

 

5 transfers per team is low for new managers, that can be a huge problem for getting new managers in.

 

September 02, 2011 02:11

301 posts(s)

 

Montreal Canadiens! Go Habs GO!

 

September 01, 2011 23:02

639 posts(s)

Donator

 

Check the detailed history. The club has a lot of money now, I suppose he will buy good players later.

 

September 01, 2011 20:41

1 posts(s)

 

What’s happen??? Only fifteen (old) players… it’s curious…

 

September 01, 2011 20:30

7 posts(s)

 

that’s it… 20 turns per window… and to be more serious… five transfers per team

 

September 01, 2011 19:43

828 posts(s)

 

2transfer windows per 144 ticks, off season and mid season

 

September 01, 2011 09:57

803 posts(s)

 

The problem here is that not everyone comes to the game every day as we do, we should only try this with a large transfer window or many managers would be out of the market getting it even harder to deal. About the inflated prices I think we should let the market work, if people feel they can sell those players for that price let them have it, if they really want to sell they will have to lower it, don’t see any need to change anything there, we just need to be careful with cheaters, the big ones are identified already but there are many others out there…

The increasing ticket sales would not have the effect you predict, big teams will also benefit from it and there would simply be more money in the game but the difference between big and smaller teams would be the same, if not bigger as we know bigger teams usually have more experienced managers who would invest that money better than the smaller ones…

 

September 01, 2011 08:02

639 posts(s)

Donator

 

Introducing a transfer window would certainly create some problems. It doesn’t solve any problems, as far as I see. Neither does it make the game more fun: on the contrary, I would say.

 

September 01, 2011 07:33

678 posts(s)

 

perhaps knowing you only have a “small window to sell”, it might force certain managers to ask market conforn prizes instead of the very inflated ones we see now….

 

September 01, 2011 07:04

299 posts(s)

 

It’s a very nice idea, i would certainly love to try it. It could make the player movement part of the game a lot more challenging and attractive :)

 

September 01, 2011 05:57

828 posts(s)

 

August 31, 2011 22:47

7 posts(s)

 

I would suggest that you create a period for the transfer occurred.

As in European football we could have a window at the beginning and another mid-season.

I would also suggest that revenues from ticket sales doubled making the poorest teams could get more revenue to invest and thus balance the game.

 

August 31, 2011 20:31

340 posts(s)

 

  • Post removed by admins *

 

August 31, 2011 17:44

24 posts(s)

 

Thnks, I think this will be important for this project sustainability.
For example, HP is going to stop manufacturing or selling PCs, so mobile platforms (phones, tabs, iPod and similars) are going to be cheaper and really more popular

 

August 31, 2011 16:41

609 posts(s)

 

  • Post removed by admins *

 

August 31, 2011 15:29

14 posts(s)

 

  • Post removed by admins *

 

August 31, 2011 15:07

678 posts(s)

 

I’m ok with any changes made what so ever. As long as we are allowed to know what the exact changes are and atleast some effects. This way I and the rest can readup about it and start learning how to adapt to it.

@Davison: You know you can always e-mail me with questions. Try for future refence to be a little bit more constructive. It’s easy to complain about everything. Heck, I like doing it aswell. I get those silly losses aswell, where I’m clueless as to how the hell I lost. I usually think……shit happens. It will happen to others aswell, so in the end we all suffer from it. It doesn’t help to just complain about it. Try to suggest some solutions for certain situation. Like you did about the cheaters. Personally I would never let a fired manager be able to manage a top team which opend up. I must admit I liked your suggestion about letting them only be able to apply to div2 teams. Try to keep that up. Give suggestions and solutions instead of criticism and complaints.

On a side note, it’s nice to know Gabriel and Danilo are still working on it, but like charles said….it’s a free game. They do this stuff in there spare time and we need to respect that.

Keep up the good work Gabriel and Danilo!!


P.s.: If you touch france….you touch me :). Be warned about mentioning anything france related :).

 

August 31, 2011 12:53

31 posts(s)

 

Sport Lisboa e Benfica (SLB! SLB!)
A couple of years back they broke the record for most fan memberships to claim to have the biggest fan base. I’m sure fans of Europes giant teams will disagree but hey, they did it.

From Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.L._Benfica
“Benfica has more than 14 million fans and the Guinness World Record for the football club in the world with most members.”

 

August 31, 2011 12:19

301 posts(s)

 

Just to be precise, I am a Canadian of French/Armenian origins. Pretty much all of what Dhimitri said offended me! :P

In all seriousness, Marc please relax man. I asked you to give constructive criticism and you’re taking a “bashing” tone once again. I guess there’s no point beating the topic of your behavior anymore as it seems most have given up on trying to be nice to you.

Like Filipe said, the game is what it is. It’s fine to complain about it if there are things you think should be changed. but expecting the amount of changes you complain about in a small period of time is unrealistic. (even if you have been complaining for a long time, no pun intended on you, i agree some things about this game needs to change) Besides, you always have to take into consideration the big picture. If you change one thing, it might break other things.

I think both Danilo and Gabriel usually have an easier time implementing extra features that won’t affect others. This way we get extra stuff while they are working on longer projects (improvements). We have to be patient with these guys, there’s really no point forcing them into doing anything because in the end this is a free game and it is still in development stage. We don’t want to push the devs away by being pricks and demanding change. Sometimes things need to take their natural path towards maturity. I’m pretty sure that is how SS/MS was built, with time and paying great attention to detail.

For the record, i’m open to ANY change that would be implemented.

Lastly, @Davison, good delivery or not, you sure as heck know how to get people involved in hot topics, it bodes well for the future of RS.

 

August 31, 2011 11:31

31 posts(s)

 

Option 2!!

(Viva La France)

Henry – I am Canadian!!

 

August 31, 2011 11:22

116 posts(s)

 

São Paulo FC, the biggest one!

 

August 31, 2011 11:15

340 posts(s)

 

Option 2 is the ONLY way to go.
But it has to go with some other changes so it makes it all so much more logical.
It has to be done together with changes to how players develop.

Instead of having maximum possible skill, there are other ways to do it, I’ll mention it to the developers next time.

BK