or developing youth ?
this same team also beat my team both games last round in CL, I have a few above average players, and the scores were only 1-0 and 2-0, but loosing 6-0 seems to be a little too much, and not a normal result. maybe a bug
I find it very strange….
Did you calculate the averages including the penalty for players under 30 years?
Apart from that, off days happen, and a red card doesn’t help the chances of your team.
Hi There,
In Champions league (Quarter-finals), today Kickers Offenbach totally exploded Angers, with a “strange” score : 6 × 0.
I don’t get why this happened, I put my best team (or the team I think the best is), with my favorite strategy (I mean I did not try a new strategy).
All my players were around 97-100 in Stamina (except 3 players, but it was also the case for Offenbach).
One other information, I got a red card for my M0-RC after 28 mins.
I’m not telling I should win, but loosing 3-0 might be already a “big” defeat.
Recap of the game:
Offenbach – Angers:6 × 0
4-4-2 formation 3-4-3
54% possession 46%
20 shots 6
17 shots on target 4
85% accurrate passes 85%
50% effective tackles 49%
4 corners 0
7 offsides 5
9 fouls 11
11 min: Figueira (h) scores
18 min: Stéfano (a) is injured.
18 min: Gaitán (a) replaces Stéfano (a)
18 min: Figueira (h) scores
20 min: The referee shows Watts (h) a yellow card.
28 min: Watts (h) is injured.
28 min: Caballero (h) replaces Watts (h)
28 min: The referee shows Vilela (a) a red card.
30 min: Figueira (h) scores
41 min: Caballero (h) scores
52 min: The referee shows Gaitán (a) a yellow card.
55 min: Figueira (h) scores
55 min: Azevedo (a) replaces Severo (a)
62 min: The referee shows Godet (a) a yellow card.
90 min: Figueira (h) scores
Average of players in the field:
Goalkeeper :
- Offenbach = 88.5
- Angers = 87.8
Defenders:
- Offenbach = 86.1
- Angers = 89.1
Midfielders:
- Offenbach = 85.8
- Angers = 88.4
Attackers:
- Offenbach = 86.6
- Angers = 86.9
Could you please have a look and tell me if this is normal or it might have like a bug ?
Cheers,
Shawn (sad being at 99.99% out of this CL)
I’m not sure if I had a conversation with any of these managers in the past, I don’t think so. Anyone else maybe?
Cheers
Has anyone ever had any contact with these managers? I think I’ve send them like 2-3 mails and they never answer. Not a No, or Yes or I don’t speak english or No hablo Inglés or even Eu não falam Inglês..
Just checking to find out if they are real managers or not. Gabriel perhaps you know? I see 2 managers I mentioned are in the same network with 4 other names who all conveniently logged in at the same time.
The high offer is the winner. The player is:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/235690
Not recently…too much work on “real life” :-(
any updates would be nice.
fixing the game ?
hello ?
anyone ?
Finally The Netherlands managed to surpass France in the rankings. To be fair, the main reason is France doing badly, but still, 6th place is good for a small country.
Thanks Joseppi. Yes, we do encourage help from you guys. As Charles pointed out private messages are usually a better idea.
That said, the new manager is not related to the previous manager, but he is linked to a different network of managers who has been under investigation more than once, so it’s worth mentioning. Of course, he/they could be innocent and just playing “by the rules” now, I’m not pointing fingers, just saying this particular network has done some wrongs in the past.
Cheers
i think the admins encourage us helping them out in finding cheats, but i think its best to do it via private message in game to danilo or gabriel instead of the forums. This way, if we’re wrong, no one takes it personally :)
yeh i thought this also but didnt say anything so i wouldnt get any more bs from ppl
By being bored in work and looking around the game i saw lcd quito top of Ecuador league. Their manager was sacked from bayern from being inactive and took over lcd quito. Now hes returned to bayern and two ticks after that a new manager with no history takes over. Looks like a double account to me. Then again could be innocent.
good now, i guess it was just a 26 min long tick lol
fast tick stuck
so is this being worked on?
this and player moral and maybe even the star thing
Jean was actually not playing anymore and his team was being controlled by a friend, who also has his own user and team, therefore I had to fire him.
True. The problem here is that we use the same system for groups and leagues. While it works pretty well for leagues (usually 20 teams), it generates these pairings for groups of four.
Definitely worth changing!
Noticed ricardo took over hearth after Jean Gauloise got fired.
whats the reason behind the firing? I also saw his rep down to 90%…
I actually posted this before I saw the pairings for the CL in midticker, but it’s a good example of what should be avoided if possible (and it is possible)
:
62 GAIS x AZ Champions League
68 Orduspor x AZ Champions League
74 Angers x AZ Champions League
80 AZ x GAIS Champions League
86 AZ x Orduspor Champions League
92 AZ x Angers Champions League
I noticed you can have three away (or three home) games in a row in the CL/EL etc. I think it’s better not to have that. I suggest the following pairings:
Rd 1: 1-4, 2-3
Rd 2: 4-3, 1-2
Rd 3: 2-4, 3-1
Rd 4: 4-2, 1-3
Rd 5: 3-4, 2-1
Rd 6: 4-1, 3-2
Thanks Imortal, 36 is for resigning from a club, 72 is for firing / transfer listing players :-)
Portuguese: Aí já é mais complicado, pois cada país tem regras específicas com relação aos times classificados pra Libertadores :-)
English: Imortal is suggesting we should implement realistic rules for Brazil, where the winner of the National Cup gets a spot in the Libertadores the following season. My reply says it’s complicated to do that, as each country has very specific rules on which teams qualify to the Libertadores.
is not 36 but 72
Outro tópico Interessante seria Garantir vaga na Libertadores para o Ganhador da Copa do Brasil, uma vez que deixaria o Brasil mais realista com a verdade.
I m looking several new players, i have some money
I can confirm the 36 turn rule applies only to human managed teams :-)
Cheers