Recent Posts by heraser
32 posts(s) found
It’s been almost the same amount of seasons with Europe been favored in the ranking, so I think it’s fair that we tried to balance things a little more, even though it’s understandable that it will never be completely possible until Euro have more managers.
And I didn’t mean just CWC, I assume, since we all keep saying that Europe should get an extra boost, everybody knows that Brasil and Argentina rule SA. The last seasons we got brazilian teams in the finals and semifinals of both Sudamericana and LA, a lot of times with both making the final match. When one of them wins the CWC it’s not just ‘a’ detail, it’s ‘the’ detail.
Can we please redo the ranking system?
I know South America has pratically lost the right to fight for the first position, since euros have more human managers, although, I consider that it’s only because of Spain, France and England; but can’t we at least get a shot at the second?
Brazil wins the CWC 3 times and gets 3rd ranking, at most, in every season. Now look at difference when England gets the CWC.
Anyway…
It would be very easy to get examples from a lot of teams, but of course there are players where the header isn`t one of the highest. Look at your own team and tell me how many midfielders have more shooting or tackle, or attackers with more tackle or passing, etc… than header.
My point is that it would be nicer to see more mids with high shooting, or atackers with high tackle, and so on, than players with high header, which are much more common.
If I recall correctly, it was intended to make this skill more useful in the future, thus the 80 limit was removed. However that still seems far from happening and players with 90+ avg became much more rare.
So a lot of times, when it looks like you are gonna get a really good player… he grows a huge load in header and screws that up.
I think that with the new system of less players with high average in the game, this skill shouldn`t be getting more points than the other primarys.
Not more than the primary, but maybe close to even. The last 3 players I got from my youth academy with 90 average, and they are hard to come by, all got almost 100 header.
I have 2 other players with about 88 average that got 100 header. That kind of thing really screws the chance of a player with low avg. be decent.
Why is this skill so hyped in the point distribution?
I mean it is 20 times easier to get a midfielder with 100 header than 100 shooting or tackle.
The fact that players with more than 88 average are now harder to come by makes it even worse.
Personally, I think it is the least usefull skill in the game. Coudn’t that be adjusted?
Looking at the CL campaign after the new countries additions, it seems things became a little more balanced in comparison to Libertadores – CL got more easy matches. Isn’t it time to adjust things?
South America was already capped before, but now we went from 10 teams to 13 teams to calculate our ranking.
Considering that the calculation is based on the division of the sum of all teams points in each country, that makes things too unbalanced.
I believe that all 13 teams shouldn’t be used to calculate the ranking.
OMG, look at this:
Medium ticker
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1666574
São Paulo 1 × 4 Ituano
4-3-3 formation 4-3-3
61% possession 39%
27 shots 8
20 shots on target 8
93% accurrate passes 95%
62% effective tackles 42%
5 corners 1
7 offsides 5
7 fouls 8
The other team is CPU controlled.
lil TWEAKED trans
Hello, I would like to give my contribution to the game by improving the way teams choose their trainers. It could be added next to the Status tab with a ranking of the coach, which would appear like some kind of a part of the current classification. In this new classification coaches would be distributed according to the time they are in the game (by season). For example, Novice, Amateur, Aspiring, Professional, Teacher and Legend, and another with the average length of stay in the same club. These two new classifications would be used by teams to tie-break when there is more than one coach applying for the same position. For example, a Novice, that had been on a single club, would beat an Amateur who took over more clubs in the same period. This would avoid the constant “escape” of coaches from one club to another, causing them to stay for longer periods in the same club. Thus, his reputation would be worn out, making good teams choose coaches with rankings worse than his, but with a history of longevity in their former clubs. It is what happens in today’s football.
What do you think of this idea?
Yeah, I’m using firefox and it’s like that too.
And he lost a couple points, he used to have all 100 stats.
I still don’t understand the Tigre phenomenon. Did anyone got to ask if he had a special method or not?
Since my last post didn’t have the effect I wanted, this time I’ve collected some data to back it up.
If you feel this is a waste of time, then you can stop at this period.
The post is a little long. Don’t complain about it afterwards; I warned you ;)
At the end I will make some comments.
This is better viewed in a full window ;)
The players stats are here just for easy refference.
If you think there might be errors, then you can check them directly:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/11
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/14
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/30
Juventude’s Main Team
Second Team
Élcio Pontes
Pos: G Age: 29 Kpg: 89 Pas: 83 Spe: 94 Dri: 90
Uriel Galvão
Pos: G Age: 17 Kpg: 70 Pas: 59 Spe: 65 Dri: 72
Jerônimo Gama
Pos: D Age: 27 Tac: 98 Pas: 77 Sho: 83 Spe: 95 Dri: 82
Dirceu Damásio
Pos: DM Age: 16 Tac: 66 Pas: 63 Sho: 61 Spe: 69 Dri: 70
Lúcio Lago
Pos: D Age: 30 Tac: 95 Pas: 80 Sho: 77 Spe: 87 Dri: 93
Jarbas Godinho
Pos: D Age: 18 Tac: 72 Pas: 65 Sho: 60 Spe: 76 Dri: 79
Jurandir Aquino
Pos: D Age: 32 Tac: 92 Pas: 84 Sho: 84 Spe: 85 Dri: 90
Orlando Esteves
Pos: D Age: 17 Tac: 70 Pas: 53 Sho: 62 Spe: 73 Dri: 73
Manolo Andrade
Pos: D Age: 33 Tac: 90 Pas: 76 Sho: 84 Spe: 85 Dri: 88
Virginio Padilha
Pos: D Age: 17 Tac: 67 Pas: 61 Sho: 59 Spe: 68 Dri: 69
Jeremias Neves
Pos: D Age: 17 Tac: 77 Pas: 58 Sho: 58 Spe: 71 Dri: 70
Iran Terra
Pos: M Age: 35 Tac: 81 Pas: 88 Sho: 77 Spe: 86 Dri: 91
Otávio Assunção
Pos: M Age: 27 Tac: 72 Pas: 87 Sho: 78 Spe: 96 Dri: 84
Carlos Sastre
Pos: M Age: 24 Tac: 73 Pas: 90 Sho: 75 Spe: 89 Dri: 88
Edmundo Rocha
Pos: M Age: 20 Tac: 74 Pas: 80 Sho: 71 Spe: 75 Dri: 79
Otávio Assunção
Pos: M Age: 27 Tac: 72 Pas: 87 Sho: 78 Spe: 96 Dri: 84
André Amorim
Pos: M Age: 31 Tac: 76 Pas: 86 Sho: 71 Spe: 85 Dri: 96
Lourenço Quadros
Pos: A Age: 21 Tac: 70 Pas: 69 Sho: 78 Spe: 88 Dri:77
Admastor Cordeiro
Pos: A Age: 29 Tac: 80 Pas: 78 Sho: 92 Spe: 89 Dri: 87
Nuno Vieira
Pos: A Age: 22 Tac: 71 Pas: 73 Sho: 83 Spe: 72 Dri: 80
Renaud Gaubert
Pos: A Age: 29 Tac: 80 Pas: 75 Sho: 88 Spe: 88 Dri: 100
Franklin Santos
Pos: DA Age: 17 Tac: 71 Pas: 65 Sho: 69 Spe: 69 Dri: 69
Flamengo’s Main Team
Second Team
Vincent König
Pos: G Age: 34 Kpg: 94 Pas: 79 Spe: 79 Dri: 78
Ozias Carvalho
Pos: G Age: 21 Kpg: 83 Pas: 74 Spe: 88 Dri: 81
Ricardo Maciel
Pos: D Age: 35 Tac: 92 Pas: 73 Sho: 77 Spe: 93 Dri: 81
Vitor Martins
Pos: D Age: 17 Tac: 72 Pas: 66 Sho: 68 Spe:71 Dri: 67
Jamil Coutinho
Pos: DA Age: 36 Tac: 83 Pas: 80 Sho: 78 Spe: 93 Dri: 88
Natanael Lemos
Pos: DA Age: 17 Tac: 62 Pas: 62 Sho: 62 Spe: 76 Dri: 73
Vicente Araújo
Pos: D Age: 26 Tac: 92 Pas: 75 Sho: 86 Spe: 91 Dri: 82
Javier Maradona
Pos: DM Age: 19 Tac: 69 Pas: 65 Sho: 60 Spe: 70 Dri: 78
Adriano Dantas
Pos: DM Age: 21 Tac:79 Pas: 69 Sho: 68 Spe: 85 Dri: 81
Mauro Mourão
Pos: M Age: 18 Tac:71 Pas: 78 Sho: 67 Spe: 78 Dri: 74
Hilário Faria
Pos: M Age: 24 Tac: 90 Pas: 81 Sho: 80 Spe: 85 Dri: 96
Cristian Lobo
Pos: M Age: 17 Tac: 60 Pas: 70 Sho: 67 Spe: 74 Dri: 71
Alan Mascarenhas
Pos: M Age: 30 Tac: 80 Pas: 100 Sho: 79 Spe: 95 Dri: 90
Ozias Diniz
Pos: M Age: 23 Tac: 68 Pas: 78 Sho: 61 Spe: 78 Dri: 75
Ernesto Ramires
Pos: M Age: 36 Tac: 84 Pas: 90 Sho: 78 Spe: 84 Dri:84
Fábio Batista
Pos: M Age: 17 Tac: 58 Pas: 74 Sho: 61 Spe: 74 Dri: 80
Alexandres Passos
Pos: M Age: 29 Tac: 74 Pas: 89 Sho: 83 Spe: 99 Dri: 92
Fernando Correia
Pos: A Age: 17 Tac: 70 Pas: 66 Sho: 74 Spe: 78 Dri: 74
Danton Beltrão
Pos: A Age: 28 Tac:86 Pas: 86 Sho: 100 Spe: 87 Dri: 81
Aboubacar Lhuillier
Pos: AD Age: 19 Tac: 69 Pas: 63 Sho: 73 Spe: 76 Dri: 78
Roberto Muniz
Pos: A Age: 28 Tac: 83 Pas: 79 Sho: 95 Spe: 88 Dri: 91
Custódio Sousa
Pos: AM Age: 17 Tac: 59 Pas: 65 Sho: 69 Spe: 75 Dri: 67
Diego Cardoso
Pos: AD Age: 27 Tac: 80 Pas: 79 Sho: 91 Spe: 92 Dri: 89
Ituano’s Main Team
Second Team
Getúlio Marques
Pos: G Age: 29 Kpg: 99 Pas: 73 Spe: 91 Dri: 93
Laerte Barcelos
Pos: G Age: 20 Kpg: 80 Pas: 69 Spe: 76 Dri: 78
Lucas Chamot
Pos: D Age: 36 Tac:91 Pas: 74 Sho: 57 Spe: 81 Dri: 88
Inocêncio Sousa
Pos: D Age: 19 Tac: 72 Pas: 63 Sho: 64 Spe: 74 Dri: 76
Nicodemos Sampaio
Pos: D Age: 21 Tac: 74 Pas: 65 Sho: 68 Spe: 78 Dri: 71
Eliel Fagundes
Pos: DM Age: 17 Tac: 67 Pas: 63 Sho: 65 Spe: 70 Dri: 79
Ibraim Gaspar
Pos: D Age: 30 Tac: 95 Pas: 77 Sho: 80 Spe: 85 Dri: 93
Horácio Batista
Pos: D Age: 17 Tac: 64 Pas: 65 Sho: 59 Spe: 76 Dri: 69
Percival Dinis
Pos: D Age: 17 Tac: 78 Pas: 58 Sho: 61 Spe: 70 Dri: 74
Cristian Álvares
Pos: M Age: 37 Tac: 74 Pas: 87 Sho: 81 Spe: 86 Dri: 84
Christian Valentim
Pos: M Age: 21 Tac: 74 Pas: 87 Sho: 67 Spe: 83 Dri: 80
Deivid Maia
Pos: M Age: 20 Tac: 73 Pas: 72 Sho: 63 Spe: 76 Dri: 73
Oswaldo Amaral
Pos: M Age: 27 Tac: 78 Pas: 91 Sho: 71 Spe: 96 Dri: 91
Oswaldo Amaral
Pos: M Age: 27 Tac: 78 Pas: 91 Sho: 71 Spe: 96 Dri: 91
Rodrigo Conde
Pos: MD Age: 29 Tac: 94 Pas: 93 Sho: 77 Spe: 94 Dri: 89
Glicério Oliveira
Pos: M Age: 17 Tac: 60 Pas: 69 Sho: 62 Spe: 65 Dri: 73
Egberto Meira
Pos: A Age: 27 Tac: 80 Pas: 82 Sho: 97 Spe: 100 Dri: 95
Oscar Nóbrega
Pos: A Age: 17 Tac: 60 Pas: 57 Sho: 70 Spe: 64 Dri: 72
Ben Wilkins
Pos: A Age: 21 Tac: 67 Pas: 71 Sho: 83 Spe: 77 Dri: 81
Mairon Albuquerque
Pos: AM Age: 18 Tac: 66 Pas: 65 Sho: 72 Spe: 71 Dri: 73
Alessio Campistri
Pos: A Age: 35 Tac: 66 Pas: 79 Sho: 88 Spe: 93 Dri: 96
Odair Vaz
Pos: A Age: 19 Tac: 71 Pas: 61 Sho: 75 Spe: 72 Dri:72
In Juventude, Otávio Assunção is in both teams, same happening for Oswaldo Amaral in Ituano.
The players’ stats were taken from season 59 turn 91 and the matches are against Corinthians and São Caetano:
Corinthians x Ituano
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1588220
Corinthians x Flamengo
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1587951
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1587950 *
Corinthians x Juventude
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1588132
São Caetano x Juventude
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1588019
São Caetano x Flamengo
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1588206
São Caetano x Ituano
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1588090
*variation: Jean Courtin plays instead of Aboubacar Lhuillier
Now, to the comments:
There is an obvious difference between the teams used against the two adversaries, even considering injuries and suspensions.
You can’t even call the second teams as substitutes, since there are so many youth players.
And even though Juventude’s stamina is depleted, that doesn’t mean it was like that in the begginning of the season, nor it excuses the difference between the two teams used.
That fact enforces that the manager is either a newbie, lazy or a fake. This last one would be my ‘guess’ as well for the other two managers.
My opinion is, any manager has the right to use, without strings to someone, whatever player they want at any time.
The reasons why someone uses a different team could be to save stamina, not having anymore ambitions in the league, develop players, specially against a weaker/too strong to beat/tired team, randomly feel like it, or because they just don’t like the team.
A real manager could also do it to intentionally favor/harm another team. That is unfair play, small thinking, unethical, but is it cheating?
If the person does it out his own free will, with no strings to somebody, I’m not sure. In RL it isn’t, but I think the big teams don’t do it to avoid lowering their own or the league’s image.
And besides, do we really want the game to turn into this? A league of pals that give away results?
That being said, it is completely unacceptable, as well unlikely, that 3 managers spontaneouly decide to take this action, at the same time, to favor a single team. It is as a probable coincidence as winning the lottery a few times.
Did you get the single team remark? Doubt it? Then I dare you to point out any other match in this season, until now, that another team gets this ‘special service’ from them. You don’t even have to show it like I did, just point out the match report and I’ll check the rest.
Go there, I’ll wait
.
.
.
Hard isn’t it? I know because I checked.
It would be a much safer assumption that these 3 managers have some sort of connection.
Are they real people helping someone, or multiple accounts in service of one person?
I’d say it is the second one, although the first couldn’t be completely overruled.
And even though Corinthians is the only team to gain from this, could it not have anything with this?
Sure that would be possible if it wasn’t for these two things: first the situation that called my attention to this whole thing :
tick 63 http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1588220
tick 64 http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1625583
There was a Cup match just before the Ituano match. Since both matches were against strong opponents, a sacrifice would have to be made.
But notice how syncronizedly Corinthians uses subs (a real sub team and not one with a bunch of youths) in the Ituano match, so it wouldn’t interfere with stamina.
Also Corinthians used the subs in all the reffered matches.
My suggestion: Fire the managers, not allowing them to rejoin any of the implied teams. Also, if it has any effect, keep an eye on their IPs.
That is the minimal that should be done, if you think something else then I’d like to hear it.
.
.
PS: Palmeiras also didn’t use the main team in the 2 matches against Corinthians. He did in other matches too, though.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1587968
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1587969
While Márcio Yokomizo was managing CRB, he also did it. In the sequence of that match there was a Cup match.
He left CRB shortly after that.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1587932
Notice how ridiculous both the teams that CRB and Palmeiras used compared to Corinthians’ subs by looking at the match stats. Yes, Corinthians also used subs in all three matches.
I deleted the topic about “Corinthians been favored”, since not only it is a complicated thing to prove, but also to judge.
However, I would like to make it registered in case the situation repeats itself in the returing matches.
Hopefully, that incident was nothing.
Or, at least, people will realize we are not so blind to such things.
I think what we really need is more human (good) players, and not stronger CPUs.
In the of the line it is they who really set the level of the game.
If you think the CPUs are too easy, then I suggest you try stronger leagues, like the brazilian one ;)
How can the CPU pay 23m for a 36 years old player?
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/68093
Is that behavior right?
Could it be the vacation mode problem again?
If so, something should be done. Just doesn’t seem right to see so many long time managers fall from their teams like that.
You have to look at it through the country ranking perspective.
The sooner a team from a determined country gets eliminated, the lesser chances the country will have to earn more points.
And if the country ranking really does have any influence on the youth academy (in reality we don’t quite distinguish that), then it does have a practical value.
But I understand where you are coming from because first and second places in the brazilian league always get Tigre on their group.
Oh, right ;`P
Thought it was a misspell
lol
Doesnt seem that way. He’s still coaching Cruzeiro. Though kinda feel bad, cause he used the money to buy two of my players… Well it’s your call.
Really don’t like it too when a manager enters a team just to buy or sell players then just leaves without even completing a season.
Omfg, that keeper got 599 skillpoints!!!
Best goalie ever in the game?
In all my 30 seasons in rubysoccer fastticker brazilian league, I have never got a single 95+ average player from my youth (just seldom a bare 92). I don’t even remember ever seen another player with 100 average. Did anybody else ever got something like that from their youth?
No more 3 brazilians in the same group!
Is that the “reward” we are gonna get for winning the league? 3 brazilians and Tigres?
Correct me if I’m wrong: the amount of points a player can evolve is pre-determined; the amount of points he evolves each time is random;
If so, a few still questions remain:
1) Is the amount of points for each skill also pre-determined or is it randomly decided each evolution?
2) Having more points of evolution available increase the probability of evolving more points at once?
3) Players receive doubled evolution points at youth academy, however, if after that they don’t use them, do they lose those extra points or do they become accumulated?
Can it be done?
That’s ok, I made the second suggestion a few months ago ;)
http://rubysoccer.com/forums/3/topics/1243The number of friendlies played each season on the player stats would also be helpful
Sds
PS: Você torce pro Flamengo, Gabriel?
Considering that, during the youth academy, players receive double experience, it’d be interesting if the player history displayed the moment that the player went PRO and how many friendly matches they played each season.
On another topic, any plans to add my other suggestion about turns remainning on contract renewals?
When I try to buy a player that is loanned to my squad (he is also for sale), the 30 player limit message comes up.
Also, when I had 29 players and I was bidding on a player, when I tried to change something in the bid, the message also came up.
It is as if the game didnt realise that it is THE SAME PLAYER.
You got it.
And I see what you are saying, as well, but the manager of the team should know the difference between the two, so
there wouldn’t be a need for any extra-subtitles.
I just saw the new detailed history feature.
Well, what can I say?
AWESOME \o/
I don’t know if it’s planned already, but it would be nice if there was a sign with the turns left in the contract renewal part of the negotiations.
Cheers
I noticed that this is not the first time it happened, but my question: Does it affects the experience gained?
http://rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/384176
20 min: Castelo (a) scores (free kick)
34 min: The referee shows Rocha (h) a yellow card.
55 min: Vargas (h) replaces Madero (h)
55 min: Jousset (h) replaces Rangel (h)
56 MIN: PIRES (H) REPLACES MILEU (H)
75 min: Paredes (a) scores