Recent Posts
18,555 posts(s) found
I made a post about it a week or 2 ago, I believe that they added it to be changed however I do not believe it effects the players stats as long as you play him somwhere that he can be used i.e. an AD can play A or D but takes a stat hit for playing M. Atleast that is my understanding.
I think once a player is loaned out, the team who is loaning him should be able to switch his positions eg. ad, da. Not the team who owns him.
i have players tahta are dm which i can switch to md, but i have no clue of what could be the real diference betewen those, when would a dm lose points for playing out of position and when would it happens to a md?
i´m not quite clear also about sides if i play a rught foward to extreme left he will also lose 1 point per skill, right? but where can he play without any penalties?
sumarazing , could anyone comment about players penalties for playing out of natural position
thks
Player: Cássio Nascimento
Club: AC Ajaccio (france)
Age: 22
Position: M
Side: C
Keeping: 41
Tackle: 81
Passing: 89
Shooting: 88
Speed: 91
Dribble: 71
Control: 94
Header: 92
Aggressiveness: 84
Stamina: 84
transfer price: $45,000,000
yeah PSG is cheating!!…..Ask Napoli manager, I’m sure he’ll agree :)………j/k :P
Michael Gröger
Player Info – Player Stats – Player History
General Info
Age: 26
Nationality:
Club: Monaco
Previous club: Atalanta
Estimated Value: $12,500,000
Change transfer parameters
transfer price: $9,999,999 -——————————cheap for a 100 dribble player who has many years left and great all round stats
Block proposals from: -
Loan list player
AttributesPosition: A
Side: L
Keeping: 45
Tackle: 75
Passing: 81
Shooting: 87
Speed: 85
Dribble: 100 -—————————-
Control: 92 -————————
Header: 80
Aggressiveness: 83
Stamina: 99
no offence to psg…but he gets it. Get an uber G and an uber A and u win ;)
hehehe, like I said, I’m not complaining :)….it’s just intresting to see, and it seems there is an explination :P.
.
No offence taken Dhimitri :)
but then “what you see in display may not be exactly what is happening???”
I think you all are looking at the wrong side of the pitch. Look at all those clean sheets Brest had got. Now that’s a BUG!!! :D
Just joking Sly
I’ll take a look at the offside awareness logic ;)
You can expect that, Alban :)
In a match against Flamengo my player Aragonez stayed in off-side for 2 minutes after the corner. He was the corner-taker.
The problem is that there is a glitch when attackers get the ball and shoot without losing any time. This one-touch game makes defenders useless and also increases the number of shots on goal. Because of the number of shots on goal the goalkeepers were made “uber-GKs” and it is really difficult to score against skilled GKs. And also attackers score 95% of goals. But the developers know the problem, so in a couple of months should be solved…I hope =)
The stadium size (or increasing its size) does not affect performance in any way.
Cheers!
Does stadium size affect performance in any way? Or if you haven’t increased in size when you have been in a position to do that affect anything? Also can increasing the size during home matches afect your teams performance?
cheers
chris
and specialy with good players u can put any tactics and u will win
thats is crap
he is litle bit to fast
most of us are menagers on medium
and menagers who are the “best”
keeping lots of good players
that wy leagues are not so good
lots of good players in “GOOD MENAGERS TEAM”
not playing at all
thet is not good for quality of leagues
i don’t know about others, but i tried to set up my team defensively against you… using more defensive approach…
and moreover my goallie had a 99 skill. i was actually hoping for a draw, which i couldn’t get…
I know offcourse it’s not a bug, but it’s really strange or interesting at the least :)
.
I’m dominating my games in stats, but I have been having loads of 1-0 wins. I’m not complaining here…..since winning is winning :)
.
18 Brest 1 × 2 Auxerre Lost Ligue 1 Report
21 Le Havre 0 × 1 Brest Won Ligue 1 Report
24 Brest 1 × 0 Rennes Won Ligue 1 Report
27 Strasbourg 0 × 3 Brest Won Ligue 1 Report
30 Brest 1 × 0 Châteauroux Won Ligue 1 Report
33 Amiens 0 × 2 Brest Won Ligue 1 Report
36 Brest 1 × 0 Bordeaux Won Ligue 1 Report
39 Angers 0 × 1 Brest Won Ligue 1 Report
42 Monaco 0 × 0 Brest Tie Ligue 1 Report
45 Brest 3 × 1 Sochaux Won Ligue 1 Report
48 Lens 0 × 2 Brest Won Ligue 1 Report
51 Brest 1 × 0 Nice Won Ligue 1 Report
54 Bastia 0 × 1 Brest Won Ligue 1 Report
.
.
Last season I ended up with a total of 127 goals in 38 games. That’s 3,34 per game :). Quite a difference if you ask me!!! :)
I missed this topic due to my vacations :)
After reading everything here I must agree with you, Sly. The main change here is the bid negotiation happening before the contract negotiation and that’s what I’ll add to our list of enhancements. We’ll probably keep the 3 turn wait for bid negotiation and all bids above the transfer price will be accepted. After that there will be a 3 turn contract negotiation with the player for the teams whose bids were accepted. I guess it’s better to implement this one change first and see how it goes.
Cheers!
Any admin want to comment here? The way it is now isn’t to my liking and I believe I’m not alone here…..
to be honoust I don’t understand why the system generates players who are DC’s and have better shooting then tackle.
.
I suggest fix the glix. Make sure players don’t have skills which are out of wack with what he is…..
yah… considering other factors would be nice gabriel, but with the power to override the board.
Player rating system (the score they get in a match report) has been changed. The quality of the opponent is now taken in consideration. In other words, your players are expected to play well against weaker teams, so their score might not be that high if they don’t play very well, even if you still get the victory. The opposite is also true, playing against stronger teams your players will have to give their best and that may not be enough, sometimes they will get good ratings (they did well for their capacity) but that wasn’t enough to get a victory.
Overriding the board may be an option…I think there must be an exchange for that, like the board being more strict for a while when you override it (strict regarding rating the manager’s performance). In fact I believe a better improvement would be the player considering other factors while choosing the team where he’d go, like where is he more likely to be in the first squad (this is already planned).
yah… may be board could deny once, but we could have an option to override the board
yes plz! limiting the wages to what the boards want is kinda a disadvantages for the smaller teams. If we can only give 12k wages and bigger team 25k then they will go to the bigger team? abit more flexible please :)
Improvement : Minor adjustments on wage cap formula so that the club’s financial situation is now the most important factor.
This improvement means that we will not make some typing errors.
But also means that clubs with more financial power always take the best players… It doesn’t allow us to take any risk…
Would u rethink or make the limit more flexible, so that sometimes we can override the board decision… ( That way we could avoid the typing errors too)
Great Young Player on loan
Elio Labat
Age: 18
Club: Bordeaux
Estimated Value: $1,086,994
Youth Player
Attributes
*Position: A
Side: L
Keeping: 23
Tackle: 70
Passing: 64
Shooting: 82
Speed: 75
Dribble: 76
Control: 78
Header: 75
Aggressiveness: 35
Stamina: 100 *
The most important thing is you don’t have to pay for wages