Recent Posts

Subscribe to Recent Posts 18,190 posts(s) found

March 04, 2019 14:41

617 posts(s)

Donator

 

A new player arrived at my club in fastticker. At the same day, I got this message:

Richard Kleinjan skills have increased 5 times.

Sounds good, but I suppose it’s a bug?

 

February 19, 2019 11:31

617 posts(s)

Donator

 

Good change!

 

February 18, 2019 23:11

4,119 posts(s)

Administator

 

I’ve published it in the Poll Results topic, but basically the option to disallow wage reduction won. I’ve also published what the rules will be like in our Facebook page, here they are:

- players currently in your team when the new rules come into effect will still accept wage reductions as per existing rules
- new players hired by human managed teams will NOT accept wage reduction when renewing the contract; the only exceptions to this rule are if the player lose skills or lose stars
- new players hired by CPU managed teams WILL accept wage reduction
- players will accept wage reductions when being transferred between teams

I will also include alert messages about it in the contract offer and negotiations screens.

I have some additional ideas to change the way competing bids work so that smaller clubs always have a chance, but I won’t get into much detail on that before finishing the new wage reduction rules (development well underway).

 

February 18, 2019 13:46

798 posts(s)

 

How were the vote counts?

I really think this should go ahead, to try and stop some crazy wages we sometimes see, every time there’s 4 or 5 teams bidding on a player I simply look away because one of them is probably giving a 500k wage… They can only do that because they can lower that 500k to half in one or two seasons…

 

February 18, 2019 01:30

57 posts(s)

 

Yeah it would be planning forced transfers, and just kind of weeding out players I may have the budget for, but don’t really want because they’re expensive as is.

 

February 16, 2019 00:17

4,119 posts(s)

Administator

 

I have recently added the option to only return transfer listed players within your transfer budget, does that help? Or maybe you are interested in filtering by estimated value for non listed players, so you can plan your forced transfers?

 

February 15, 2019 23:49

57 posts(s)

 

Maybe adding a scout’s ability to search for estimated value.

Greater than x
Less than x
Between x and x

Estimated value is a value we can all see on every player already, so it would be a valuable tool for scouts to weed out players that would be out of the budgets of lower level teams. Like mine haha

 

February 12, 2019 21:10

4,119 posts(s)

Administator

 

Another very close poll about player wage reduction, these are the results:

38% – Do not allow wage reduction
26% – Lower the amount that can be reduced on renewal
32% – No change
4% – No answer

It will take some time for any rule changes to take effect as we need to make sure CPU teams are not adversely impacted as well as managers who “inherit” big wages when joining a club.

 

February 12, 2019 21:01

4,119 posts(s)

Administator

 

I only checked averages on a specific competition, not overall season average across all competitions played.

 

February 12, 2019 20:25

617 posts(s)

Donator

 

I thought I didn’t see a lot of 9+ averages in the world team of the season, but I guess it’s more common than I expected. Still strange that no one wanted to buy him.

 

February 12, 2019 12:03

4,119 posts(s)

Administator

 

There are 11 players in FastTicker that have played at least 7 matches in the same competition this season that have an avg rating better than Dennis. Still, a very impressive performance!

 

February 12, 2019 09:07

617 posts(s)

Donator

 

Gabriel, do you know if Dennis Bakker (who I kept because people didn’t want to buy him, even for a cheap price) is the best player of the game currently with 9.01 average?

 

February 12, 2019 03:08

57 posts(s)

 

This is a great idea.

 

February 12, 2019 01:46

4,119 posts(s)

Administator

 

In fact the requirement is to play in a country at least 3 positions above his home country..so for example if an English player in FastTicker has that requirement he can play in any of the first 11 countries (England is currently in 14th place). Of course that for players born in the top 6 countries that means they have to play in the top 3.

That said, I’m willing to change these fixed steps to something more dynamic, where players can still improve even if playing in your team, but would improve much faster if other requirements were satisfied. While that is not done, a simpler solution would be what Dimitri proposed (to have a step that benefits lower ranked countries) as well as relax the existing step a little bit to allow for top 6 countries or any country above the player native country.

 

February 11, 2019 23:49

617 posts(s)

Donator

 

Add ‘This player needs to play outside the top 3 countries’. Problem solved?

(instead of ‘man of the match’ would be my wish)

 

February 11, 2019 22:33

798 posts(s)

 

Juan Morán won’t renew contract, he’s mad at me :(

Will go for the best offer, take a look:

https://goalfc.net/game/player_info/1025978

 

February 11, 2019 22:21

57 posts(s)

 

“This player needs to play for a team in the top 3 countries.”

There are elite players in more than just 3 countries in real life. There’s 7-8 top tier leagues. I really really hate that in order to be the best you have to be either Spain, Brazil or Portugal. So managers go there, and the other leagues remain empty, and underdeveloped.

I suggest increasing this requirement to the top 7-8, at LEAST.

I get that low leagues won’t develop top tier talent, but getting your country into the top 3 is actually impossible. Giving them a chance to get into the 7th or 8th spot is at least possible, and would create competition.

If the game were much much larger then top 3 would work better, but right now, it’s 3 massive leagues and then 1 or 2 managers in the rest.

 

February 08, 2019 06:35

4,119 posts(s)

Administator

 

Yeah, I guess the question was a bit simplistic, but I always try to get straight to a specific point with them as there is not a lot of room for explanations. Even if we change that little thing there is certainly a lot of room for improvement in terms of player contract negotiation and what you mentioned in terms of having different wage and contract length expectations at different ages is definitely one of them.

 

February 08, 2019 05:21

136 posts(s)

 

Hi,
the vote was interesting, I would say that players who are 36+ should not be expecting wages the same as they got in their prime. Significantly less wages, and 1 or 2 year contracts.

 

February 07, 2019 21:07

798 posts(s)

 

Juan Morán 96+2 worse class – 70M

Darren Carpenter 94 – 12 M

Evaristo Hernandes 93+3 international cups – 15M

 

January 24, 2019 01:15

4 posts(s)

 

Ok, obrigado pela atenção. Vou verificar.

 

January 23, 2019 22:37

617 posts(s)

Donator

 

Pedro Ferreira, age 31

https://goalfc.net/game/player_info/948296

He has only 83 average but is cheap and has

Plays better in international cups (+3)

 

January 23, 2019 22:35

617 posts(s)

Donator

 

And João Vargas, A-player, age 29

87 average with 98 speed.

Plays better against teams with a class better than his team (+3)

 

January 23, 2019 22:31

617 posts(s)

Donator

 

Another good player for sale: Federico Haedo, age 30.

https://goalfc.net/game/player_info/987722

92 passing, 87 average.
Plays better against teams with a class better than his team (+3)

 

January 23, 2019 20:50

4,119 posts(s)

Administator

 

Sobre os investimentos olhei seu histórico financeiro e eles estão zerados no mínimo desde a temporada 83, não foram zerados agora. É possível aumentar os investimentos mas o primeiro deles tem que ser o HQ (Sede), nenhum dos outros pode ficar com nível acima desse. Se não estiver conseguindo aumentar o nível da sede me avise que posso te ajudar.

Sobre o algoritmo não é questão de estar certo ou errado, é apenas uma tentativa do jogo de se moldar aos atributos que estão sendo valorizados pelos managers no momento. Os pesos de cada atributo pra cada posição são recalibrados toda temporada e isso pode gerar essa variação de classe dos jogadores e time. Concordo que seu time tem desempenho muito melhor do que teria um time D, de fato o algoritmo está longe de ser perfeito mas na média não tem errado por muito, espero que essa temporada tenha sido uma exceção (ou então é mérito seu de levar um time em teoria mais fraco a bons resultados) ;-)

 

January 23, 2019 16:40

5 posts(s)

 

Todos os itens do investimento estão zerados. Como pode isto?

 

January 23, 2019 16:39

5 posts(s)

 

Desculpe mas continuo achando que esse algorítmo deve estar com algum problema pq o time tem ótimo desempenho com jogadores muito melhores do que times de classe D e sem possibilidade de alterar os investimentos todos zerados.

 

January 23, 2019 10:40

4,119 posts(s)

Administator

 

Olá David,

No começo de cada temporada o jogo recalibra o cálculo da qualidade dos jogadores pra uma determinada dimensão além de recalcular as classes deles e dos times, baseado na força relativa da equipe com relação a todas as outras. São levados em conta apenas os 11 jogadores que o jogo consideraria titulares e mais uns poucos “reservas”. Dei uma olhada na sua equipe e imagino que ela seja considerada mais “fraca” porque seus jogadores não têm bons atributos secundários, embora sejam muito bons nos atributos principais.

Quanto a nível de treinadores no zero basta aumentar o nível do headquarters (sede) primeiro, nenhum outro investimento pode ter nível maior do que o da sede.

 

January 23, 2019 10:19

5 posts(s)

 

Meu time foi rebaixado para classe D e nivel de técnico ZERO sem possibilidade de aumento.

As finanças estão regulares e o time foi vice campeão, com muito bons jogadores.

Isso foi um erro do sistema???

 

January 23, 2019 08:53

631 posts(s)

Game Master

 

Solis — D — age 24 — tac 96

Peralto — M — + 2 in international matches
Tac 84 pas 89 sho 84

Rabassa — M — tac 85 pas 93

Isco — M — +3 in international matches
Pas 90 sho 83 spe 94 ctr 95

Domene — M — +3 against teams a class worser
Tac 86 pas 89 sho 80 dri 94 hea 94

Civelli — D — avg 88
Tac 93 spe 89 dri 92 ctr 93

Marinelli — avg 88