Recent Posts
18,542 posts(s) found
gabriel, i didn’t mean that regarding my first question… what i meant was “high number of shots should not necessary mean more goals”. we can keep shooting from long distance, but that should not increase the chances of goal too much. (unless he is christiano). i meant more number of realistic shots should increase the chances of goals. as i have listed some of those above. we could have more feedback from other players regarding the realistic shots…
Some top players for sale in Genoa. Take a look.
Some prices are negotiatable.
Also players for loan.
Translation for luis post:
“We could have training, it would help on players evolution. By the way, congratulations for the game, I used to play soccersim many years ago…”
First of all thanks, luis. We thought about adding some training specifics before the whole staff departments idea was implemented, we haven’t planned anything related since them. I believe this could be added in the future, but we have to analyze carefully this change in order to not make players evolution a mess as it was before (you were not around, but players used to improve too fast in the past).
It’s possible i didn’t then, i thought i’d checked and double checked it after messing my first game up, not to worry then, thanks for looking. On a positive note i got some good increases on my youth academy :)
Poderiamos ter tambem a questao do treinamento, ajudaria na evolução dos jogadores.
Alias, parabens pelo jogo, eu jogava o soccersim há muitos anos atras…
Hehe, Parana’s manager sits right beside me here at work. He was not happy with the result :D
Players for loan at Hertha
Wow, that’s what I call “effective attack” :
3-5-2 formation 4-4-2
51% possession 49%
6 shots 3
5 shots on target 3
62% accurrate passes 57%
67% effective tackles 62%
0 corners 0
1 offsides 1
40 fouls 42
Score 4×0 vs Parana =)
Thanks Gabriel, much more realistic now. Thanks for all the hard work on the game so far – it’s getting better all the time. I have just donated for the first time.
Cheers,
Tim
I’ve just checked your last FA Cup game, no formation was set so your default was used. Are you sure you hit save button in the matches page after selecting your match formations?
That’s exactly what they have…you just can’t be sure the total is 140, this number is just an average ;)
This could without doubt have been an error on my part, but twice in my fa cup game in medium ticker my default formation was used (friendley) instead of the formation i thought i’d set. After the first game, thinking i’d made a monumental c**k up, i’m 99% sure i made sure i set it, i dont know if you can check this gabriele.
thanks
chris
does that mean they r good for nothing now:S…?? coz i was hopeful they had that pool of 140 points – ( minus used points) left in them
He probably got this value before I implemented the maximum inflation variation logic. I’ll recalculate his value.
I have a player in fast tick(Albacete) that I want to transfer, however the board won’t let me go lower than $23,231,013. He is worth over $92M but I believe that selling him for $23M will be very difficult. I know minimum transfers are in place so that teams can’t be stripped of all their players. I feel that $23M is unrealistic for this player and I won’t be able to sell him – he is taking a valuable spot on my 30 player squad. Can something be done about this?
Wrong Vaughn…those shiny white things in the sky are my Grandpa’s underwear :D
look up in the sky…..u see nice clouds don’t u?
.
look further then the nice shiny clouds….yes there you got it!
.
It’s god!
VILLAREAL IS LOOKING FOR A GREAT PLAYER:
90+… a plus.
young … a plus.
position… a plus.
secondary skills… a plus.
PERFECT CANDIDATE WIL BE OFFER A max. of 30 MILL.
contact club if interested.
Gama has a good squad for you? I think that is a big team
I think there were a lot of big/good teams in Brasil, but I had to bet in one of them, and my bet was Gama.
Cheers
Their experience didn’t start from zero as youth players, but they probably still have some points to improve.
thanks for clearing my doubt gabriel… does that mean those players ( even they are at 24/25) have higher chances of improving their skill?? coz they haven’t had enought matches to improve themselves
Interesting suggestions, Parag, I’ll consider them when implementing changes to the scoring probability.
Regarding your first question (lots of long shots increasing the probability of goals) I was thinking something like making the keeper lose stamina every shot, but the amount lost is related to the difficult to defend the shots, so lots of long shots wouldn’t make him lose that much.
Netherlands was added later on the game, so dutch players “were born” older than usual, except for the youths.
Is this an error?? I have a player in medium ticker, who was born on 10th season. currently this is 12th season and that player is already 24 years of age… It was a shocking information to me, as i thought players were normally born as 16-17 years old??
anyone pls clarify me…
pls check the player here Wessel Wolbers
i have a small question regarding the next update on shots on goal…
we can shoot the goal post every time with a long distance shot from the centre half, but does that increase the probability of goals???
gabriel, i think we can narrow down the type of shots that are likely to score goals ( considering all the factors like goalkeepers abilities and goal strikers abilities)
some of the likely cases to be considered are below:
- a shot is more likely to produce a goal in one on once case
- if the ball rebounds off the goalkeeper, even the goalkeeper with highest quality (in terms of keeping, speed and control) should find it difficult to stop a shot by a striker with lower quality.
- if the goalkeeper has been kept very busy then, he should lose his stamina more than normal times, thus reducing his overall speed and other factors that are affected by stamina.
- if a Shot takes a deflection on the way to goal, thus the goalkeeper is helpless.
- Coolness (may be defined by aggressiveness, less aggressive could mean more thoughtful) of the striker in front of the goal??? could chip the ball instead of firing it blindly…
we could have suggestions on the likely cases where even a keeper of highest quality should find things difficult against him.
feels great to be back after a long time:)
Sometimes we score a lot, but I lost to an outsider 0-3 away just because I lost. It hurts and the Board was mad, but, of course, I am not complaining either =) I just want ny players score easier against weaker GKs and defenders, because “goal festivals” are so rare in Brazil Serie A =)
I just don’t understand why you think Gama is that strong ? =)
Top goal keeper for sale at Albacete Spain
Open to offers
Estefan Alcaraz Player_loaned Player_transfer G 24 91 35 81 40 85 86 91 98 39 100
Priced at $23M – board won’t allow me to set lower price. WILL TAKE LOWER OFFERS!!
Also excellent young defender and midfielders for sale
Italy: Juventus will win italy league and cup
Uruguay: Danubio will win league and cup
Paraguay: Fernando de la mora will win both cup and league
Argentina: almt brown league and cup
The main idea I think we could work on what you’ve written Dhimitri is that as the number of shots on goal raise we could make it increasingly easier to score. I’ll experiment a few changes with this idea after I finish the current match enhancements I’m working on.