Recent Posts

Subscribe to Recent Posts 18,535 posts(s) found

May 03, 2009 10:04

299 posts(s)

 

16-computerGrenoble

G Romuald Bloch 9.5
D Gervasio Ortiz De Zárate 8.3
D Diego Viepa 10.0
M Ruben Rui Miguel 8.1
M Napoléon Barraud 5.4
M Cyrille Peyre 5.8
A Joris Guyon 4.7
A Richard Hankey 4.4
A Giovanni Dentice 6.7
A Geoffroy Brunel P 5.7
A Fabricio Balaguer 9.4

No Manager

=======
=======

4 × 1

2-3-5 formation 4-3-3
40% possession 60%
8 shots 24
8 shots on target 20
65% accurrate passes 56%
35% effective tackles 65%
3 corners 6
4 offsides 1
30 fouls 14

=======
=======

Strasbourg16-human

G Isandro Munguia 5.9
D Willi Wulf 8.8
D * Germano Valente 10.0
D Julián Echeverría 10.0
D Mauro Braga 10.0
M João Abreu 10.0
M André Esteves 8.6
M Sandro Couto 10.0
A Andres Arieta 10.0
A Craig Whitington 10.0
A Vinícius Vasconcelos 7.7

Manager: Dhimiter Gjodede

 

May 03, 2009 09:37

42 posts(s)

 

Well, I noticed that ALL the best managers of the game don’t use wingers! Basically, all they do is to put the whole team to play on the center. The question is: why? Is that because of their lack of eficience at atacking/defending?

 

May 03, 2009 02:47

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

I agree that this kind of match shouldn’t be that common, Vaughn. I’m currently working on the match engine, implementing partial tackles (when the player makes the opponent lose the ball but does not control it) and a few other enhancements will follow this one. Let’s see if these weird results are affected by them.
I’ve seen statistics like this when you don’t have any defenders on -1 or 0 mentalities, giving your goalkeeper penalties on his skills to defend shots. But if you say this is common to many teams it may not be the case.
Let’s keep this discussion going in order to improve the match engine ;)

 

May 02, 2009 20:06

609 posts(s)

 

Gabriel, any reply to me previous post?
.
===
Regarding to some previews posts about the match engine like said in the main post. To many games are random, losing is part of the game, but the stats should be fixed to it. Having 30 shots vs 2 and lose 1-0 with an average player rating of 8.5 is just weird. And when it happens once or twice a season ok….that’s normal..also in real life. But losing 10 of those will get people frustrated.
===
.
Again and again we get screwed over by CPU teams who have stats of like only 8 shots and score 4x vs 27 shots and 1 goal? My team isn’t the best, but what the BEEP is going on? And i’m not even the one who gets the hardest hits when i look at other matches in France. Though, i can’t say anything about other countries.

 

May 02, 2009 13:20

299 posts(s)

 

CPU teams are enjoying a killer season this year :D

 

May 02, 2009 10:54

609 posts(s)

 

there goes the predictions for me winning the cup, 2 nice suckouts vs a cpu team…gg match engine!

 

May 01, 2009 00:27

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

We have this page accessible from the login page. It lists the enhancements we consider high priority at the moment. Regarding date estimation, it’s really had for us to give them. We never know exaclty how much time we’ll have available for RubySoccer development. I wish I had 8 hours daily from Monday to Friday just to work on the game :)

 

May 01, 2009 00:23

609 posts(s)

 

Hello game masters!
.
Maybe it’s an idea to put up a sticky in the admin forum where u make like a to do list of improvements and like a astimated date of release? I would like to know what’s coming and a time or place :)
.
Nicky

 

April 30, 2009 20:58

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

April 30, 2009 20:41

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

Thanks for reporting Julkan, I’ll take a look.
Cheers!

 

April 30, 2009 20:35

15 posts(s)

Donator

 

Good Keeper – Negotiable Price!! Vitória – BRA
Patrizi Parise
Position: G
Keeping: 86 !!
Tackle: 36
Passing: 81
Shooting: 40
Speed: 100 !!!
Dribble: 93
Control: 89
Header: 86
Aggressiveness: 99

transfer price: $45,029,869

Goalkeeper Ability: 86×0.6 + 100×0.4 = 91.6

Compare goalkeeping skills regarding keeping and speed… You’ll realize that he’s better than most keepers on sale!

 

April 30, 2009 20:06

120 posts(s)

Donator

 

Hard to say….. but all my respect to those ones i did not choose. it will be fun to recheck when cups are over and we can see half of the season results.
Best Luck to you all, let’s the good managers roll !!
England:
League : Manchester City
Cup: West Ham
France
League :Brest
Cup:ac ajacio
Germany
League :Bayern munich
Cup:Hertha BSC Berlin
Italy
League :Napoli
Cup:Napoli
Netherlands
League :NAC
Cup:Roosendaal
Portugal
League :Benfica
Cup: penafiel
Spain
League : Betis
Cup: Espanol
Argentina
League :Boca Juniors
Cup:Boca Juniors
Brazil
League :Flamento
Cup: Gama
Paraguay
League :Fernando de la Mora
Cup:Libertad
Uruguay
League :Cerro Largo
Cup: Danubio

 

April 30, 2009 18:25

609 posts(s)

 

haha gabriel, i can’t win the cup :) your list is almost perfect but in france Brest will take an other double

 

April 30, 2009 16:44

25 posts(s)

 

Hi!,

In the international competitions in the medium ticker, appears the table “Maximos Goleadores” but we did not play any matches and there is something strange in links of the players and the teams of each player because by clicking on them, they redirect to the main page of the dimension.

I´ve been investigating and the table is the same of the 12th season of the fast ticker dimension (we are currently in the 12th season of the medium ticker)… it seems that something is been messed.

Regards.

 

April 30, 2009 16:30

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

England:
League : Scunthorpe United
Cup: Blackpool
France
League: Brest
Cup: AC Ajaccio
Germany
League: Hertha BSC Berlin
Cup: Bayern Munchen
Italy
League: Napoli
Cup: Genoa
Netherlands
League: Roosendaal
Cup: Roosendaal
Portugal
League: Benfica
Cup: Penafiel
Spain
League: Recreativo Huelva
Cup: Getafe
Argentina
League: Boca Juniors
Cup: Boca Juniors
Brazil
League: Flamengo
Cup: Paraná
Paraguay
League: Libertad
Cup: Libertad
Uruguay
League: Danubio
Cup: Cerro Largo

 

April 30, 2009 16:23

609 posts(s)

 

Simone Salviato
Age: 18

Attributes
Position: G
Keeping: 82
Speed: 72
Dribble: 72
Control: 74
Header: 72
Aggressiveness: 24
Stamina: 100

minimum wage: 50%
period: 36 – 144 turns
minimum coaching level: 8
maximum official matches missed: 3

 

April 30, 2009 16:19

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

We have that planned already, that’s a good idea :)

 

April 30, 2009 15:34

71 posts(s)

Donator

 

Would it be a good idea to have an option in substitutions to replace player after x amount of time if player rating below x? Obviously taking off a player if he isnt performing well, maybe this could be implemented gabrielle after you have sorted out the player ratings?
cheers
chris

 

April 30, 2009 15:10

56 posts(s)

 

Hi all, this is a little survey about next season predictions, who will you think that will win league and cup in the different countries?

Here are my predictions.

Best regards

England:
League :Scunthorpe United
Cup:Blackpool

France
League :Paris-SG
Cup:Monaco

Germany
League :Hertha BSC Berlin
Cup:Hertha BSC Berlin

Italy
League :Napoli
Cup:Napoli

Netherlands
League :Feyenoord
Cup:Roosendaal

Portugal
League :Benfica
Cup:U. Leiria

Spain
League :Recreativo Huelva
Cup:Getafe

Argentina
League :Boca Juniors
Cup:Boca Juniors

Brazil
League :Gama
Cup:América-RN

Paraguay
League :Fernando de la Mora
Cup:Libertad

Uruguay
League :Danubio
Cup:Cerro Largo

 

April 30, 2009 11:14

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

The first 2 league rounds tend to have a good attendance, after that the league position is taken in consideration. For the national cups, the first rounds tend to have poor attendance, it gets better as you approach the final.

 

April 30, 2009 11:04

678 posts(s)

 

I think he meens me Nicky :)……It’s not in the “rat pack” best intrest to help out teams other then french ones :D.
.
You did amaze me for playing 4-3-3 in your return game vs me in CL. I didn’t quite understand that. You knew based on your home possesion of 51% that you had to do something for the away game otherwise you would be outplayed, but you suprised me some what with your 4-3-3. I didn’t think that was tthe right choice if somehow you wanted to increase your possesion and get some more control on the game.
.
But Philipp, I have 1 point to make. I think it was said on “prediction topic” aswell by DaMaGo. Your squad is pure awesomeness, but you are not pressured to make many tactical changes in germany. With your squad you can have everyone on play possition and still win! Doesn’t really matter what you do tactically. In other countries there is more competition. Managers have to adapt more in order to do well. This makes them learn more about the game and tactics. What you need to do is get some better managers to germany in order to increase the avarage level of teams :P

 

April 30, 2009 10:47

609 posts(s)

 

(of the french team managers) <—- thx for the compliment, i guess? ;)

 

April 30, 2009 07:24

17 posts(s)

 

Real Madrid vs Ejido att:39,000 full for 2nd div game
Real vs Celta Vigo (1st Div team) Att: 14,000? for Copa Del Rey

unrealistic, fan should be more attracted for a game against a far superior team no???
Or maybe they knew we would lose the game :0( comon!!

 

April 28, 2009 13:08

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

That’s exactly my suggestion, change the wage paid by the loaning team only on loan renewal.

 

April 28, 2009 13:07

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

We have this enhancement planned for a long time now. I’ve just raised its priority to critical so we can work on it sooner.
Cheers!

 

April 28, 2009 10:53

803 posts(s)

 

I see Parag’s point, the wage paid by the loaning team should only change when the loan is renewed. If the loaning team think it is too high simple do not renewal the loan… If this is possible to be done I think it would be the best solution…

Regards

 

April 28, 2009 10:45

387 posts(s)

 

it should be avoided (by the system) that teams from the same country play each other in the qualification round (for the group stage).
Thats not fair regarding the country ranking points. In FT play all 4 german teams each other …

 

April 28, 2009 10:42

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

Well, we have two different points of view here, keep the same wage, or keep the same wage percentage considering the new wage. I’d like to keep the renewal simple, not allowing the negotiation of new terms so it has to be one of these two options. Both makes sense to me, but I think I prefer the second (percentage of new wage). Anyone else?

 

April 28, 2009 04:33

651 posts(s)

 

i am not sure we agree here. Loaning team was willing to agree to pay the percentage on the wage specified during the contract.
If any changes have to be made then, that should be done during the Loan renewal period…

 

April 28, 2009 00:30

4,296 posts(s)

Administator

 

It is working the way it is supposed to work, but I agree with you Filipe, we should change it.

Cheers!