Recent Posts
18,554 posts(s) found
I lowered transferprices of Hortiguela, Marques, Lahaye and Léger again. So hurry and choose the right player for your team because you can do only 1 transfer with my team per season.
Hortiguela: experienced midfielder, good for team just below the top. (612 pts)
Lahaye: 94 passing midfielder (614 pts)
Marques: attacker who scores his goals every season (617 pts)
Léger: 25 y.o. DM with 91 tackling and 88 passing – still improving
i assume players get rated mainly based on their primary duty. In this case, he is a defender who only made 3 tackles out of 19 attempts, including ten fouls. Despite the scoring, he had a pretty shitty display.
Then again, a 0 rating is absurd.
Just had a friendly with a weird result. I won 1 0 but the player who scored the goal had a rating of 0.0.
Check it out: http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/1019182
Regards,
Jorge
well, then this is a wish for a feature! ;)
/bk
no worries, gabriel. i guess everyone can live with this state of play. i was just surprised, but i am aware that this game can not reflect every inch of RL. at least not on this stage of development, and manpower ;)
Liverpool selling it’s veterans
Gandara 626 pts 97 shooting
Maikez 641 pts 96 shooting
Corcelli 634 pts 100 pass
Lemos 630 pts 99 tackle
Urban 636 pts 88-89-89 tackle/pass/shoot
Viniet 624 pts
All prices have been lowered, still negotiable
Let’s not forget this is just another cheating prevention feature, that’s why it considers the hard coded formula instead of matches played and team success ;-)
Ok. Lets play with youths
“A bug means malfunction of a designed and implemented feature/function”
If you have on the one hand a player, that plays 6 out of 36 matches (~16%), and on the other hand at the same a team that leads the league table and reaches CL QF without a problem (without the players help), the board’s statement “This player is too important to the squad to be fired.” is a bug to me. Sorry.
.
Maybe not a bug of the hard coded players value formula, but a bug by the obvious numbers (playtime, matches, his contibution to the success).
.
Normally i wouldn’t have had him fired due his achievements for the club, but as there is no mentorship yet or the like, he has to move for a young gun.
A bug means malfunction of a designed and implemented feature/function, ie something is not working the way it is supposed to, a defect even.
Also, who would want to fire a person who said he will quit work?
I am guessing that you want to kick him and open a space for a replacement, but the lack of functions to make a swift change doesn’t mean this is a bug.
In any normal job, you (the boss) would be prepared to look for a replacement, bring him(or her) in and have the guy leaving handover his knowledge to the replacement.
This is football of course, you shouldn’t have to kick this guy to let some younger player know that he is to fill the retiring player’s shoes next season. Perhaps a new function to put the retiring player mentor more the younger guy and depending on his personality and skill, could aid the younger player to develop better during the last season of a retiring (older) player. But that is a different story.. :)
/bk
hmm, ok, then is this was one of (the) few less materialistic 17yro talents on this planet – choosing 1,5m over a 4m $/year offer, just to play first team …. tststs, this guy has character!
Dirk is right, the only factor besides wage is first team opportunity. I don’t remember the numbers but for keepers it is possible that if he would be the best keeper in a team vs. the third or worse keeper in another he accepts a wage around half what the best team offered.
Wow, his value is already $338,116,830. Knowing he has only a starting value of $164 277 every player is a potential star :)
The clue is he played almost 400 matches and played all league matches from his 17 birthday. So does somebody want to loan my youth goalie Chavez. He has a higher staring value AND he is Argentinian. :-D lol
Check http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/fantasy-football-injuries/
Arsenal has nine injured players now…
Is it normal in real life soccer so many injuries as in ruby soccer?
Lets get my Champs League history:
I have played 6 matches and have 4 players injuried.
My 5 latests matches in Primeira Divison:
I had more 4 players injuried.
So, in 11 matches I had 8 injuried players.
You can say that I have old player, but they don´t have 80 years old to get so many problems.
@Filipe: true ;) but maybe in 10 years this kid will play first team …
@Dirk: then the best teams do not stand a chance to small teams with weaker first teams … btw: my bid was muuch higher than the one he agreed on.
.
maybe Gabriel/Danilo can confirm on the decision making logic …
You still got that young keeper having the best keeper ever, that kid must be crazy if he thinks he can play first team :D
Transferprices are lowered.
Players on free transfer choose the team where they have the best chance to play in 1st team. Maybe the position on the field (L, C or R) of the player is also important but I’m not sure. They will only reconsider your bid when it is much higher than the other team. I don’t know how much higher your bid should be.
Have there been any changes to the (free agent) players decision making logic lately? Isn’t money/wage the only criteria anymore?
This guy just passed on an amount of extra cash and decided to go for a “small” salary at Sevilla …
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/157806 (FT)
sorry, Berhan, I still consider this as a “bug” …
But if Gabriel wouldn’t have fired him manually, I’d be have been fine with this instance as well. I do not want to have any privilege.
.
Regarding your interest of 200m, I just recognized this happened to me, too, – but only 75m are missing, Gabriel could you please go ahead! ;)
hahaha, come on..
Gabriel, the bank accidentally forgot to return my interest of 200M, can you put in the money manually for me please?
What is the point of this guys?
Philipp, shame on you! ;)
/bk
Many thanks, Gabriel. According to my formula he was not 2nd best ;-) Anyway, a manager should be able to release a guy (right away) who announces his will to retire at the end of a season.
There is no bug here, the board considers him your second best, not 4th best attacker. We know you’re not cheating so I’ll fire him for you ;-)
You have to think about your country! If teams from the same country don’t face each other both have a chance to win and score points for their country ranking ;-)
I know, you were unlucky, the same country problem is more critical in South America. But I hope this will change soon when we have 8 groups instead of 4!
cancelled negotiation (thanks for the advice), but the board still rejects my request …
Maybe its because you are in negotiations with him…why the hell you negotiate a contract if you want to fire him lol…my guess is you want some squad space….try canceling his nego and fire him!!
where is the bug ? he have a estimated value more than 20 M …
I wanna fire a 38yro striker, but the board rejects my will to release this guy (“This player is too important to the squad to be fired.”).
.
He’s useless to me, by value the 4th best striker in my squad. Only 1 player listed for sale, 1 loaned.
.
Gabriel/Danilo, can you please fire him … thanks!
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/75391 (FT)
ummm i face Real Sporting de Gijón in the CL 1/4 finals…we were in the same group!…..the format is messed up i think worse than teams matching up from same country…hope you guys can figure out a better solution :)