It is joke, seriously!!!
Score 2-0 for Hertha
Hertha gets a red card
score goes 2-1 for Hertha
Hertha gets a second red
Score 3-1 for Hertha
Auxerre gets a red card card
4-1 for Hertha
Hertha substitutes his goalie with a 70 skilled keeper
end result 7-1 for Hertha
IT’S A COMPLETE JOKE!!!!
You guys have to take care of this immediately.
-With 2 players less on the field the team manages to score. It’s Sci-Fi
-With 2 men advantage, the team gets a red card. It’s SCI-FI
-And Hertha manages to score 3 more goals despite being one man down. Ridiculous!!! It shouldn’t matter that Auxerre put a 70 keeping goalie after the 55, minute. Auxerre should have won this game blindfolded.
I’m sorry, but the CL final has simply taken all the responsibility out of this game.
Such a joke!!!
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/76034
Mesma situacao, logo penso que mo podem despedir tambem
Don’t know if it has been suggested before, but shouldn’t the losers of the Champions League qualification round qualify for the Europa League? Not only because it’s the case in real life, but also because it’s strange that a number three of a league can get more European games (even if they lose all their European Games) than the champion…
This great player: http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/87896
had his contracted renewed. I dont have more official games and he is retiring.
So, just waste money and space.
(FT) America has Young and Old players for sale, great prices, Players with great skills and bright futures.
Belchior Franco (18 YO)
M C
Pas – 79
Spe – 75
Dri – 76
Ctr – 76
Hea – 75
-———————————————————————————————————————————————-
Leonardo Teixeira (24 YO)
D C
Tac – 89
Spe – 96
Dri – 91
Ctr – 93
-————————————————————————————————————————————————
Other Players for sale as well, if you dont like the price just let me know what you think and I am sure we can work out something in between.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/83073
closed
Your fault!! you should give your players a proper warm up :)
Just 31 seconds of game play:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_replay/1049743
I think the division the team is doesn’t matter for the player’s decision, but in RS Germany has a better ranking league than England. The player’s value for the 1st team decision counts all skills so thats probably why he went to the German team.
It happen the same to me this tick, I offered a 15k wage for this player (http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/161851) and he went to Lille for a 6k wage. The thing is Lille has a similar number of strikers as my team just they have 3 strikers better than any of mine… Players should not only consider the number of players better than them but also how much better they are… That player would have much more chances to play first team in my team than he has in Lille…
ok here is the scenario.
Player up for sale at say 20 mil
2 teams bid at the same price – one is German Bund and other is English Prem
English Prem puts in a wage higher than the German team
If he joins prem then he will be the highest skilled striker. first team
If he joins German team then he will be 4th highest skilled striker.
who does he join….yes the German team!
why? lol
Great striker for sale!
Florentino Barraza – A (RC) – 26 yo – 635 overall pts
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/126384
Be quick en do your bids! Negotiations are possible if your bids are fair.
edit:
Peter Vogel – M (L) – 33 yo – 94 passing
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/95642
I bought him for a new tactic with wingers but it didn’t work very good. He doesn’t fit in my tactics anymore. So he can give assists for another team.
Looks like I missed a Tigre striker for my dream 11.
M.Motta © – Ita – Tigre – overall 657
This brings the number of Tigre players in my dream 11 to a total of 7 (and 9 if you count Lago and Costa who also played for Tigre).
Hello Luc Blomme :)….
Loyal people indeed. Althought there are different “big clubs” now then when you left. Tigre for example is THE GIANT of the moment and Gijon and Liverpool in europe could be considered “The big clubs” there. Although Hertha never really left :)…our boy Philip is still around with the big boy’s :)
im amazed still the same names about!
closed
What a shame! Trying to fool the system! I won’t tell you whether or not it works :-D
Anyway, I feel this is not completely balanced but it is good the hear Dhimitri had some success by paying outrageous wages to young talents (that’s one of our goals). Other factors are yet to be considered in the player’s decision, the first team opportunity was just the first one included.
I will go with Sly and don’t reveal things anymore…but you guys already got the general idea ;-)
Personally I think gabriel shouldn’t clear anything up. Some things are best remained a secret. It makes the game slightly more unpredictable. It was one of the great features of Managersim back in the day. Nobody actually knew 100% how youth worked. In there a player could start growing because he joined a big club.
Filipe is right, a youth in academy simply improves 2x faster than out of academy (again Gabriel needs to confirm this), but the overall growth pts is set from his ‘birth’ so in the long run it doesn’t impact the player’s growth.
Players like those at Tigre or Palacio % Craggs are all extremes, rarities in the above 140 average pts growth benchmark. Ironically, Palacio is released from Tigre’s academy :D
One more thing.
Since season 31, Tigre has made only 19 buys between FT and FA. Of those 12 have become some sort of superstar (including LAgos and Costa). One is 26 and might still grow, so the jury is still on him at this point. And 6 have been resold without much success of growth (not including Lagos and Costa).
Now, that’s a 67% success in picking not the guy who makes it, but the guy who shakes it.
That is truly amazing. Kudos to him
27k over 80k is indeed extreme.
Sometimes though you could overcome an one year 80k bid with a 3 year 30k bid :)
Here are some of my winning bids in the last 3 season
1 × 60k
2 × 50k
6 × 30k (some of which on multiple years contract, 2 or 3)
PS: one other trick the i believe works (Gabriel can confirm this if true), I do have plenty of MA’s and one MD. So if i want to buy a mid, i switch all the above to A’s or D’s o have as less mids in line up as possible. And I have actually been buying lots of young mids in the last 3 seasons: 8 of them to be exact
I think even if a player dos not develop all he could in the youth academy he still can develop that later , but now you said that I’m not sure… We need Gabriel to clear all again :D
good to hear, Dhimitri, but how “more” worked for you? I offered most times like 10-15k and they decide for a 5k salary. The extreme was my 80k offer for the defender mentioned above, who prefered a 27k contract …
I think that most players have the potential to become a topplayer when they play all league games since their “birth”. Most of us let them play friendlies what give them less improvement points and won’t give them their total improvement in youth academy (where they improve more then afterwards if I’m not wrong).
IMO if you get a team in a competition with already good youths, get all your players from your own youth academy and let them play every league match you will get a pretty good team after a couple of seasons.
So these english players come from English teams that were not managed by a top manager. So they had the chance to improve maximal. This would also explain there low starting value. Jones even has a starting value of 97000 which is extremely low.
The only thing I can’t fit in is the 140 points improvement. Coleman has an overall score of 675 which make 435 at his “birth”. Would this only give a staring value of 116000?
it’s also striking IMO that four of those players actually come from England, considering that England, at least since the “birth” of these players has not been ranked higher than 6th or 7th
I had the same problem as you Philip when the rule was first implemented. I basically lost in any biding out there for a youth even though my offers were considerably higher. So i decided to raise the stakes even higher (raise the salary offer) and it has been quite satisfactory in achieving the players i wanted.
It does create a bit of a financial burden, but in the long run it does justify itself to pay high wages (relatively high) for young talents.
The way i see it, as long as it’s financially viable, a big club should pay more both to get the best grown player and to secure its financial future by securing the best future talents.
Still only recently i lost a bid to a young D even though my bid was 13k/year higher, but in a way i expected it to happen and completely share the rule here, because I already had 9 Defenders in my team, all better.
Still do not favor the new logic. Since you changed the system, I haven’t been able to acquire a single young player (from free transfer) if a minor club was bidding aswell. This is IMO as unbalanced as deciding on a wage offered basis. 16-18 yro should not decide depending only on their chances on first team, they are young and need qualified training etc.
In real life the majority of extraordinary teen talents favor to go a big club to improve rather then moving to Aserbaidchan or a Turkish 2nd div for playing in a first team instantly.
This decision making now in RS is unbalanced as well, in favor of minor clubs, and only minor clubs/squads.
.
How do other “big clubs” feel about the situaton since the changes were implemented? Has anyone acquired a player against a minor yet?
You probably don’t know, but Alessandro Figueira is in fact Arsene Wenger, he just want us to think we have a chance :D
Don’t know how he does it but I sure would like to, most of that players have a low starting value even for the season they start their career…
I should have called it “Tigre’s team” :D It must be a talent to create such a team. Can’t be luck anymore.
Btw. Virginio Costa has increased to 668 overal. Haven’t checked the other players anymore.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/130767
CLOSEST OFFER TO THE LISTED PRICE WINS THE PLAYER