Recent Posts by Philipp Leibeck
375 posts(s) found
No, Gabriel. I guess Alban tried to say that he has some young players for sale with great stats ;)
So no change on the improvement logic needed … it’s still hard enough to have get great youth
1. no, LC loses zero points in C (aswell in L, LC, RC) just in R (he gets “-3”)
2. points that will reduced from each skill (shoo, pass, tack, etc.); e.g. players skills “88-57-70” will be in a match “85-54-67” with a 3 point penalty
- Excellent Attacker for Sale *
Drop in your offers, in some cases prices are negotiable …
Just Scoring machines ! (1.Bundesliga goals/matches)
LEFT – CENTER – RIGHT
Pessoa (106/248) – Soveral (18/36) – Lusa (40/105)
Iran Pessoa A L
..28 years
..Shooting..83 <—-
…Dribble…89 <——
…Speed…..83 <—
…Control…85 <—-
Daniel Soveral AD C
..21 years
..Shooting..84 <—-
…Dribble…79 <—
…Speed…..75 <—
…Control…77 <—
Cruz Lusa A R
..26 years
..Shooting..88 <——
…Dribble…79 <—
…Speed…..80 <—
…Control…82 <—-
Thanks, Paulada.
Anyway i would suggest to make an investment to the physio more attractive with better protection against injuries. Isn’t unrealistic …
Does the level of the physio department effect just the healing process? Or does a higher level prevent from getting injured?
does every player has 39 times an improvement or are some predicted to have less?
would be very kind, thx :)
is it a big deal to change the criteria for the ranking in league tables? Status quo is, when teams have the same number of points the number of wins is the 2nd ranking decider. That’s not common, so why don’t change it to goal difference or direct-matchup?
I remember you said it’s the brazilian system, but i had look to the current standings in Serie A & and there’s no such rule active. Or am i wrong?
obviously i had agreed (or others have agreed) on 2 friendlies at turn 20 (fastticker). so i had the same line-up at:
20 Arsenal 1×0 Hertha BSC Berlin Lost Friendly
20 Leixões 0×4 Hertha BSC Berlin Won Friendly
regarding the rule not allowing to buy a player your team sold (years ago) before.
i would suggest to delete this rule or to assign a time limitation to this rule. e.g. after 2 years it’s aloud to buy him back.
or if you sold/released a player as a youth (not finally reached his improvement limits), you’re able to buy him back someday.
@Gabriel:
that’s interesting. so every youth player can reach the 100 in each skill (or just the main skill?) – theoretically. a player starting with 59 in shooting has the same chance to recah 100 like a player starting with e.g. 73 in shooting ?
@ smithers & thorpedo:
the highest player level in Berlin has been 90 (1x) so far (12 seasons) – 1x 88 and currently 1 player 86 & improving.
would have been fair to adjust/re-calculate the points for the seasons before the change was implemented… :/
@ Gabriel:
what’s the maximum a player can improve (in each skill), 20, 25 ??
@ smithers & thorpedo:
do you mean the highest level at the start of a career or the highest skill level you achieved with german/italian players after all their improvement?
i’m absolutely pro “stars”. They should be given not just to players with great stats, but also with qualities like
- ~10 years in the club
- team captain/ important for team building
- show biz qualities/ “beckham”
- etc.
So in the end merchandise & sponsorship should depend on a certain level on the amount of stars in the team.
FOR SALE:
Marco José Bernardo
Age: 28
Position: MA
Side: R
Tackle: 61
Passing: 82
Shooting: 75
Speed: 66
Dribble: 79
Control: 79
Aggressiveness: 51
Price: 2,45 M
FOR SALE:
Douglas Vilela
Age: 22
Position: MD
Side: L
Tackle: 80
Passing: 81
Shooting: 73
Speed: 73
Dribble: 71
Control: 72
Aggressiveness: 11
fast ticker > Champions League > 1st round > Hannover 96 x VfL Wolfsburg …
both german teams. Thought this instance isn’t possible anymore (in 1st rounds) ???
I was surprised myself that cpu teams are still able/allowed to spend big cash on players. Anyway, that price is not so far away from what i have expected a RL manager is willing to pay (not many GK of that class around in FT, and young). I had some offers before, those were close …
But in general i agree, that cpu teams should act with reserve.
a minor suggestion (as long as there is no “newspaper” added):
when a manager gets fired, all other manager should get a notice (e.g. via ingame mail) that the team is free for new manager proposals … So no one misses the chance to get the vacant manager spot (when you make it a 3-turn minimum deadline).
suggestion 2:
i would like to see the improvement in financial, team skills and/or other non-competion related managing business as a vital component for the evaluation of the manager. Those factors should be taken in consideration and calculation as well, somehow.
for more transparency: if there is a rating system/number like you described, why don’t you show this to the manager. I mean in exact numbers. e.g.“Current satis-factor on turn 109: 33”.
With a chart/diagram for the last 144 turns you see if you’re team is in a negative/positive trend. and the manager is aware that the firing is coming closer to him if he’s not improving.
For SALE:
John Lovelock
Age: 27
Club: Hertha BSC Berlin
Position: M
Side: C
Tackle: 74
Passing: 78
Shooting: 76
Speed: 70
Dribble: 83
Control: 94
Aggressiveness: 50
Price: reasonable
but to understand you completely: what was the benefit you planned for a manager using “coaching” staff ?
first i read the announcement then i upgraded the coaching. but i assumed that the coaching improves the youths without matches & accelates those who play friendlies aswell. that made sense.
i don’t get your point/approach described above, Gabriel …
a cpu team (Sochaux) in fast ticker resells a player just 10 turns after they have bought him …
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/35331
For SALE:
Dylan Alix
Age: 26
Club: Hertha BSC Berlin
Position: DA
Side: C
Tackle: 80
Passing: 57
Shooting: 70
Speed: 80
Dribble: 81
Control: 90
Aggressiveness: 44
Price: 2,4 M !!!
so a RC only gets penalty when playing on position “L” and a LC when playing on “R”, right? How many points?
done & working. thanks!
I updated yesterday to Fox3. Now the drag & drop in formations isn’t possible anymore …