Final Cup
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/785156
Average grade from my team: 7.1 / away team: 6.6
1 × 1 (P.K. 1 × 2)
4-3-3 formação 4-5-1
49% posse de bola 51%
24 chutes 5
22 chutes a gol 4
89% passes certos 89%
73% roubadas efetivas 58%
5 escanteios 0
6 impedimentos 6
5 faltas 7
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/766823
Why my 3 strikers w/ 100 shot skill each (playing home!) can´t win a game with 20 shots on target agains a not so good goalkeeper?
I already have talked with Gabriel some seasons ago. I just want to share a little math:
Lets do it with 100, 500 and 1000 chairs:
Chairs – Cost
100: $0.5M
500: $2.4M
1000: $4.55M
Cost per new chair
100: $5k
500: $4.8k
1000: $4.55k
My team had played 28 official games in home last season. Lets suppose full house all games, so:
How long it will take to pay my investment?
100 chairs → need 500 home games, so: 500/28 = almost 18 seasons
500 chairs = 17 seasons
1000 chairs = 16 seasons
Is it worth? What is your opinion?
Note: 16 seasons = 864 turns = 384 days in FT (more than 1 year!) Just to have your $4.55M back.
Are my players AFRAID playing HOME?
I had 9 kicks from strikers 100shot and 90+ control
My 99 goalkeaper coudn´t hold 3 of just 9 shots.
1 × 3
4-3-3 formação 4-3-3
51% posse de bola 49%
23 chutes 10
18 chutes a gol 9
78% passes certos 84%
79% roubadas efetivas 68%
4 escanteios 0
5 impedimentos 11
5 faltas 4
Maybe an option to set “Pretend new youth”: G,D,M,A
If you have high scouting you can have more chance to have your option.
Another one
1 × 2
4-3-3 formation 4-4-2
55% possession 45%
34 shots 7
30 shots on target 7
96% accurrate passes 91%
51% effective tackles 37%
8 corners 0
3 offsides 5
8 fouls 8
You have to press enter after put a new name
In spain if you go to final you will have 4 officials games in sequence. It is too much!
A better option should be start Champs League a bit later. In CL there is too much space from semi-final to final and to the match agains Libertadores.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/724784
2×2
Ball Possession: 38% x 62%
Tackle: 44% x 68%
Shoots: 11 × 30
you will need java plugin for firefox
M – 23 years old.
100 header
95 dribble
93 pass
92 speed
Average skills: 89
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/100013
Again and again. But now my striker is 100 shooting and 100 control
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/724697 (27 min)
Just admins can change this. Normally they don´t do it
Ok if admins or gms take a look first
How a player like this one:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/83342
Has this estimated price: $8,967,870 ?
Just administrators (Danilo and Gabriel) can ban players or cancel negotiations
Admir,
normally if a team have a lot of shots it is using long shot and have more players at zones A, M+1, M+0 and D+1
If you hardly have 10 shoots it is because other team should have a very solid defence and middlefilder.
About your second questions: since 2 months ago when they have changed how match engine works all managers are making experiments about the best tatic, because the old ones are not working so good anymore.
Now middle have more importance. Before strikers use to be very strong. Sometimes players from zone M+1, M+0 have more shots than strikers
More 1 time:
Semi-final National Cup:
My Team X Away Team (2 games)
Shoots:
54 × 18
Goals:
2 × 2
My 3 best strikers shoot skills:
Givanildo Monteiro 100
Oscar Franco 100
Luca Spaltini 100
His 3 best strikers:
Salvatore Vidal Del Ojo 94
David Mina 85
Emilio Franchetti 84
My goalkeeper skills:
Adolfo Berrugoso 99
His goalkeeper:
Fernando Frota 92
Is something wrong?
And I loose 16%!!! from my directors board aprove
Like we say in Brazil:
soccer is a little surprises box
Now it is ok. Post from Rui Antunes was showing in news feed.
This match is totally awkward:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/699952
My team: 60% ball possession, 30 shoots
His team: 5 shots
Result: he won for 2v0!!!!
Have you read my post from Aug 5, 2009 5:46am – Update from version 0.0.5 to 0.1.0 ?
Have you installed greasemonkey properly? I´m running without problems with firefox 3.6
(en) I didnt understand. Say in english and in your default language.
(pt-br) Não entendi nada. Fale em inglês e em outra língua também.
96 in average!!!! o.0 Amazing
This team is 5 officials matches without loose and beating great teams (like my one damit!). After 6 games without win, what happened? Have you found a great formation?
After you have changed -1, 0 and +1 logic, it is been common, at least at my team, players from position D +1 been more present near oponnets goal than striker at position A-1.
For me defender -1, should stay just in defence and rarelly at middlefield
Defenders +1 should be more common at middlefield but very rarelly in A +0 or A +1
Summarizing:
Position / Acting positions
D-1 / ALL D, M-1, M0
D0 / ALL D, ALL M
D+1 / ALL D, ALL M and A-1
M-1 / ALL D, ALL M
M0 / D0, D+1, ALL M, A-1, A0
M+1 / D+1, ALL M, ALL A
A-1 / D+1, ALL M, ALL A
A-0 / ALL M, ALL A
A+1 / M0, M+1, ALL A
Should be interesting to change this. Like:
- If a player is loaned you can´t put him on transfer list
or
- Before u put to loan you have an option in contract: brake or not if player is transfered
or
- Loan contract receive an auto terminate in 12 or 18 turns.
strikers:
Monteiro 100 shot, 100 head, 92 dribble
Spaltini 100 shot, 94 dribbel, 96 control
Gouveia 95 tackle, 93 shot, 96 speedy
Defenders: all with 97+ tackle
Middle: very high tackle, pass and dribble
Goalkeeper: 99 goal, 100 head, 98 control, 89 speedy (his average: 94)
And playing home.
Ok to loose for 0×1, 0×2 or 1×2, but 0×4??? insane.
Great players, great defence, great middlefield, playing home:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/658314