Enhance distance to goal calculation on match simulation. Instead of measuring the distance to the center of the goal we now measure the distance to the closest point of the goal, considering its whole size. It should make LC/RC attackers shoot a little bit more.
Match strategies are not applied partially anymore. If you configure a position change and a substitution in the same strategy, the position change is not performed if the substitution can’t be made (when the player is not available).
Manager and team ranking points are now earned based on opponent quality. In other words, beating a strong oppoent is worth more points than beating weak one. As a result the best ranked teams/managers will probably lose some points even on victories until the new scores are normalized.
You were not lucky enough Gabriel. :)
wow, it can totally change my attackers performance ! =)
Should be, I’ll try it later today.
Ahha, is it easy to change the distance to goal calculation ? =)
No changes to the attendance logic…if you’re talking about national cup attendance it’s normal that it’s not full on early stages…on league you are also not in a good position right now ;)
I have an idea to improve shots from left or right, the problem is the distance is measured to the goal center, so central attackers are always closer to the goal. I believe we have more shots cause I’ve fixed a bug in the passing logic a few days ago. If you check the % of successful passes you’ll see it’s much higher :)
It looks like the stadiums don’t get filled all the time, because of weak opponents or why else ?
I also think we have even more shots on goal now. From both sides. 50 shots on goal and more…we have no need for midfield
Certainly not enough ! It also looks that you can score only from Center, shots from Left or Right (LC and RC) don’t get into the net…
@ the cl/uefa etc…Like you can say block from own league, i would like to see that we can choose to loan players out to teams that play in other cups. Which result in more xp!
@Vaughn: what exactly do you mean about getting ueaf/cl in the loan option? Is it a clause saying the player must play matches on these competitions? Regarding putting the player back on loan list before loan ends it is interesting but pretty complex to do with the current rules…of course we could work it out ;)
They’re still tiring guys, maybe not enough :P
Another questionable result! 2nd vs 3rd in EPL, medium tick.
What happened to opposition keeper tiring with shots on Goal???????
1 × 2
3-4-3 formation 4-4-2
51% possession 49%
32 shots 13
24 shots on target 11
94% accurrate passes 94%
52% effective tackles 45%
4 corners 1
0 offsides 0
12 fouls
Vaughan, You have win! Look at our result, very much fustrating.
Auxerre
Manager: Charles Cimetier
2 × 0
4-4-2 formation 3-4-3
47% possession 53%
5 shots 19
4 shots on target 15
89% accurrate passes 91%
54% effective tackles 60%
2 corners 2
5 offsides 5
12 fouls 8
is it me or are the amount of shot the same before the enchancement and the score is still low/weird? I had this game;
.
Juventus
.
G Paolo Marini 7.4
D Floriano Sarasola 5.8
D Roberto Iavarone 7.8
D Carlos Murta Player_substitution_entered 4.0
D Sandro Illario Player_substitution_left 7.6
M Luciano Alves 10.0
M * Léandro Torralba 10.0
M Euclides Alcântara 10.0
M Pinto Saraniti 10.0
A Adílson Sardinha 9.1
A Manuel Martín Player_goal 10.0
A Ricardo João Paulo 9.6
.
1 × 0
.
3-4-3 formation 3-5-2
52% possession 48%
37 shots 5
35 shots on target 5
95% accurrate passes 87%
69% effective tackles 51%
10 corners 0
3 offsides 0
6 fouls 16
.
Empoli
.
G Luis Conrad 9.5
D Dionísio Branco 5.7
D Bennet Weise 6.0
D João Tó Figueira Player_yellow_card 8.4
M Diego Sousa Player_substitution_left 9.7
M Ferdinando Cristofari 8.4
M Demétrio Feijó 3.9
M Reno Leone 6.4
M Antonio Atencio 6.3
A Luís Costa Pinto Player_substitution_entered 5.9
A Leonardo Macrì 4.1
A Christopher Risley 7.6
.
His keeper might be good, but 3 pounding attackers on his ass with 1 100 shooter deserve more goals? Ofc i’m happy with just a win ;)
Hey,
i thought i somewhere read something about getting uefa/cl in the loan option as a suggestion but can’t find it anymore. Anyone have thought about this? I would like to have this option.
.
And 2nd. Maybe it’s an idea to put a loaned out player back on the loan list before his contract with the old team ends. Say like 20 ticks (when u didn’t accept te renewal) so he can get loaned out right away again when he returns.
.
Nicky
the age is 27 I think! The name I don’t know, I’m too lazy to look! if u wanna buy him just look at my team ^^
can we please say the name AND age to if you post :) thanks.
excelent gk sale at danubio!
Keeper: 88
Pass: 70
shoot: 47
speed: 91
Drible: 84
Control: 94
header: 80
Brazilian international for sale!
Tomás Pedroso
27 years
Position: M / Side: L
.
Tackle: 89
Passing: 94
Shooting: 87
.
Speed: 90
Dribble: 79
Control: 86
Header: 80
Super cheap!
Demóstenes Furtado 30 years old
transfer price: $460,976
Attributes
Position: MA
Side: C
Keeping: 39
Tackle: 66
Passing: 84
Shooting: 63
Speed: 84
Dribble: 73
Control: 79
Header: 80
Aggressiveness: 99
Stamina: 100
I have hope!
Dot: But it’s easier on your team since brazil has the best youths ^^
My board expectations are way too high as well in my opinion. In my case I know the reason, I have some players with excellent secondaries but lacking on main skills. Besides that I have more than one excellent keeper while most teams have only way, so the board evaluates my team quality above the average. Maybe it’s your case.
When you fill one expectation you don’t earn extra points, it’s kinda like you did your job, as expected, you probably earned some points from the victories you had until you reached the semi-finals. My expectation was to fight for the title last season and I ended up in 8th place and even though I reached the finals in the National Cup and Libertadores I lost both, which cost me lots of points cause, according to the team quality formula, my team was much better than my opponent.
Good luck for us both!
I understand what you’re saying, Humberto, but I belive a few good teams in a small country can make the difference as seasons goes buy and slowly increase the country’s position in the country ranking. Of course it’s harder for South American countries while we have only 4, but it’s still possible :)
i’m managing valenciennes in mediumticker and my boards expectations are way to high (champions league and cup semis)and even though i have filled out one of them by reaching the cup semi-finals I still have ‘’you are doing terrible’’ written. I have a good team but my team is not that good to make it to the champions league, and i’m doing a lot better this year than last year but for some reason my boards expectation went up from last season and i finished around 14th last year
Well guys… I have an example for you all:
Me.
.
I picked up Santo André in Season 13. It was a second division team in Brazil with medium/bad players. After two seasons I reached the main division and I’m there until now. And recently I’m fighting for all titles, and eventually, winning some.
.
I think that is up only to the managers qualities how well their teams are developed. And, IMHO, the big teams weren’t big all the time. They just grew up… little by little :D
.
So, for the new managers: Be patient, guys. :D
you need to play 35min atleast to gain exp…so the awnser is yes. If u score after like 60min and your sub = ahead +1, after 55min then it means from 55min till 90min.